Search

Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a life-threatening interstitial lung disease (ILD). Characterizing health outcomes of IPF patients is challenging due to disease rarity., Objective: This study aimed to identify the burden of disease in patients newly diagnosed with IPF., Methods: Patients with ≥1 claim with an IPF diagnosis were identified from a United States healthcare insurer's database (2000-2013). Patients with other known causes of ILD or aged <40 years were excluded. Subgroups were compared based on the 2011 change in International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) definition of IPF and occurrence of IPF testing. The prevalence and incidence of preselected health conditions of clinical interest were estimated., Results: Median age of newly diagnosed patients (n = 7,298) was 62 years (54.0% male). Restricting to patients with IPF diagnostic testing did not substantially affect cohort characteristics, nor did ICD-9 IPF coding change. Mean follow-up was 1.7 years; 16.8% of patients died; and a substantial proportion of patients were censored due to end of health plan enrollment (50.7%) and other causes of ILD (19.6%). The incidence of pulmonary hypertension, lung cancer, and claims-based algorithm proxy for acute respiratory worsening of unknown cause was 22.5, 17.6, and 12.6 per 1,000 person-years, respectively., Conclusions: Patients with IPF had a high disease burden with a variety of health outcomes observed, including a high rate of mortality. Database censoring due to changes in enrollment or other ILD diagnoses limited follow-up. Altering cohort entry definitions, including IPF testing or ICD-9 IPF coding change, had little impact on cohort baseline characteristics., (© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: there is a lack of scientific data regarding speed of action of antimanic treatments, a relevant issue in clinical practice., Objective: to assess differences in the speed of onset of antimanic efficacy between haloperidol (as most studied first-generation antipsychotic) and second-generation antipsychotics., Experimental Procedures: meta-analysis of double-blind randomized clinical trials in acute mania, comparing treatment with haloperidol and with second-generation antipsychotics. Search was conducted in MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases (last search: September 2011). Differences in mania scale score reduction at week 1 were assessed., Results: 8 randomized clinical trials fulfilled inclusion criteria and 1 of them was excluded due to low methodological quality. 2037 Manic patients had been treated with antipsychotics in the 7 trials. Haloperidol was found to be significantly more efficacious in the reduction of the mania scale score at week 1. The effect size was small, the Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) being 0.17, with a 95% Confidence Interval ranging from 0.01 to 0.32. Haloperidol was significantly more efficacious than olanzapine (SMD: 0.40 [0.21, 0.59]) and ziprasidone (0.39 [0.18, 0.61]). A non-significant trend towards superiority of haloperidol was found over aripiprazole (SMD: 0.13 [-0.02, 0.19]). There were no significant differences between haloperidol and quetiapine (0.17 [-0.11, 0.44]), and haloperidol and risperidone (SMD: -0.10 [0.30, 0.09])., Conclusions: haloperidol shows a faster onset of antimanic action than second-generation antipsychotics. This difference may be related to D2 affinity. Haloperidol may be considered a treatment option in severely ill manic patients who require urgent relief of symptoms., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. and ECNP. All rights reserved.)

Background: Treatment of acute mania with second-generation antipsychotics has been claimed to involve a lower risk of switch to depression than haloperidol. However, clinical guidelines clearly state that this is not a proven fact., Methods: Meta-analysis of double-blind randomized controlled trials in acute mania, comparing rates of switch to depression with atypical antipsychotics and with haloperidol. Search was conducted in MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases (last search: September 2011)., Results: 8 randomized clinical trials fulfilled inclusion criteria. 2 of them were excluded because of low methodological quality or lack of data. 5 second-generation antipsychotics (aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone) were compared to haloperidol. In the mixed effects model the Risk Ratio for depressive switch was 0.71 (0.52, 0.96) favouring atypical antipsychotics. In the random effects model the difference did not reach statistical significance. In the heterogeneity analysis, exclusion of an outlying aripiprazole trial yielded a Risk Ratio of 0.58 (0.42, 0.82) with a non-significant heterogeneity test. Although no atypical antipsychotic was individually significantly superior to haloperidol, a trend could be seen favouring olanzapine (RR=0.56 [0.29, 1.08]), quetiapine (RR=0.36 [0.10, 1.33]), and ziprasidone (RR=0.51 [0.22, 1.18])., Limitations: All trials were industry supported, with some variability in dosage of haloperidol. Switch to depression was not the primary outcome of the trials. Heterogeneity could be explained as a lack of class-effect for atypicals., Conclusions: Treating acute mania with atypicals is associated to 42% less risk of switch to depression than with haloperidol. Nevertheless, caution should be taken when considering this a class effect, as only olanzapine, quetiapine, and ziprasidone may show a better profile., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Amisulpride is a selective D(2)-D(3) antagonist that has been reported to be effective in the treatment of schizophrenia and major depressive disorder. However, no prospective study to date has assessed the effectiveness and tolerability of this compound in mania., Method: Twenty DSM-IV-defined acutely ill manic bipolar patients with a Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score of 20 or more entered this open, prospective, 6-week study. Assessments included the YMRS, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Clinical Global Impressions Scale for Bipolar Disorder, Modified (CGI-BP-M), and the systematic report of adverse events. Amisulpride was added to other medications, but other antipsychotics were not allowed., Results: Fourteen patients (70%) completed the study. Using last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) analyses, amisulpride produced significant improvements on the YMRS (p = .0001), the HAM-D (p < .0141), and the overall (p = .0003), mania (p = .0001), and depression (p = .0268) subscales of the CGI-BP-M. The most common side effect was sedation (N = 5, 25%), but there were also some extrapyramidal symptoms, galactorrhea, insomnia, and agitation. The mean amisulpride dose was 680 mg/day (LOCF) and 786 mg/day in completers., Conclusions: This first prospective study on amisulpride in the treatment of mania suggests that, despite the limitations of the open, observational design and small sample size, amisulpride may be effective and reasonably safe in the treatment of bipolar mania. D(2) and D(3) antagonism may be involved in the mechanisms of the therapeutic response to antipsychotics in mania.