Search

Introduction: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are effective for glycemic control, with many also demonstrating cardiovascular (CV) benefit, in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study aimed to find a consensus on the barriers and strategies for the optimal use of GLP-1 RAs in people with T2D and high CV risk or established cardiovascular disease (CVD) in Spain., Methods: A two-round Delphi survey (53 questions) was conducted among members of four national scientific societies in Spain, including physicians experienced in the management of people with T2D. The degree of consensus was evaluated with a 7-point Likert scale, establishing consensus when ≥ 70% of the panelists agreed (6-7) or disagreed (1-2)., Results: A total of 97 physicians participated in the first round (endocrinology: 34%, family and community medicine: 21%, internal medicine: 23%, and cardiology: 23%), and 96 in the second round. The main barriers identified were: therapeutic inertia and late use of GLP-1 RAs; lack of a comprehensive approach to CV risk; lack of knowledge on the usefulness of GLP-1 RAs in CVD prevention and treatment; and economic/administrative barriers. Strategies with a highest consensus included: the need to establish simple protocols that integrate awareness of CV risk monitoring; training professionals and patients; and the use of new technologies., Conclusion: Physicians identified clinical, healthcare, and economic/administrative barriers that limit the use of GLP-1 RAs in people with T2D and high CV risk or established CVD in Spain, highlighting the importance of integrating these therapies according to clinical practice guidelines., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in developed countries and entails high resources use and costs for health systems. The risk of suffering future cardiovascular (CV) events and the consequent resources use is higher in those patients who have already had a previous cardiovascular event. The objective of the study was to determine the average annual cost of patients with a new or recurrent atherosclerotic CV event during the 2 years after the event., Methodology: Retrospective observational study of electronic medical records of patients from the BIG-PAC® database (7 integrated health areas of 7 Autonomous Communities; n  = 1.8 million). Patients with a new or recurrent episode of ASCVD (angina, acute myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack, stroke, or peripheral arterial disease) between 1-Jan-2017 and 31-Dec-2018 were included. The resources use within two years of the diagnosis was estimated in order to estimate the average cost of patient follow-up., Results: A total of 26,976 patients with an ASCVD episode were identified during the recruitment period; Out of them, 6,798 had a recurrent event during the follow-up period and 2,414 died. The average costs per patient were €11,171 during the first year and €9,944 during the second year., Discussion: Patients with ASCVD represent a significant economic burden for the health system and for society. Despite the perception that drug costs in the follow-up of chronic patients imply a high percentage of the costs, these accounted for only one tenth of the total amount. Implementing preventive programs and increasing the control of cardiovascular risk factors may have a significant social and health impact by helping to reduce mortality and costs for the Spanish National Health System. The costs derived from pharmacological treatments were obtained from the NHS pricing nomenclator database (https://www.sanidad.gob.es/profesionales/nomenclator.do)., Competing Interests: NM, JMR and JP are employed by Novartis. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2024 Martínez López, Gómez Cerezo, Gámez, Egocheaga Cabello, Castellanos, Campuzano Ruiz, Barrios, Pallarés-Carratalá, Rodríguez, Morant Talamante, Parrondo and Mostaza.)

Aim: To reach a multidisciplinary consensus on managing patients with type 2 diabetes among specialists in family medicine, cardiology, endocrinology, internal medicine, and nephrology., Methods: A two-round Delphi study was conducted using a questionnaire with 68 positive/negative statements distributed in four thematic blocks on diabetes management: early diagnosis and prediabetes, referral criteria, treatment and comorbidities, and clinical management. The expert panel was composed of 105 physicians from different specialties (family medicine, cardiology, endocrinology, internal medicine, and nephrology) with experience in managing patients with diabetes and who were members of a diabetes-related society., Results: Response rates for the first and second rounds were 86.7 and 75.2%, respectively. After both rounds, a consensus was reached on 52 (76.5%) items. The recommendations with the highest degree of consensus (median = 10, IQR = 0.00) were related to anti-smoking education, cardiovascular risk factor target control, and diabetic kidney disease. There were significant differences between family physicians and other specialties for some items., Conclusions: This study provides a set of recommendations for diabetes management agreed upon by specialists from different healthcare settings., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction and Objective: The cardiovascular prevention strategy by autonomous communities can be variable since the competences in health are transferred. The objective of the study was to determine the degree of dyslipidaemia control and the lipid-lowering pharmacological therapy used in patients at high/very high cardiovascular risk (CVR) by autonomous communities., Methods: Observational, cross-sectional, descriptive study based on a consensus methodology. Information on the clinical practice of 145 health areas belonging to 17 Spanish autonomous communities was collected through face-to-face meetings and questionnaires administered to the 435 participating physicians. Furthermore, aggregate non-identifiable data were compiled from 10 consecutive dyslipidaemic patients that each participant had recently visited., Results: Of the 4010 patients collected, 649 (16%) had high and 2458 (61%) very high CVR. The distribution of the 3107 high/very high CVR patients was balanced across regions, but there were inter-regional differences (P<.0001) in the achievement of target LDL-C <70 and <55mg/dL, respectively. High-intensity statins in monotherapy or in combination with ezetimibe and/or PCSK9 inhibitors were used in 44, 21 and 4% of high CVR patients, while in those at very high CVR it rose to 38, 45 and 6%, respectively. The use of these lipid-lowering therapies at national level was significantly different between regions (P=.0079)., Conclusions: Even though the distribution of patients at high/very high CVR was similar between autonomous communities, inter-territorial differences were identified in the degree of achievement of LDL cholesterol therapeutic goal and use of lipid-lowering therapy., (Copyright © 2023 Sociedad Española de Arteriosclerosis. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) continue to be the main cause of death in our country. Adequate control of lipid metabolism disorders is a key challenge in cardiovascular prevention that is far from being achieved in real clinical practice. There is a great heterogeneity in the reports of lipid metabolism from Spanish clinical laboratories, which may contribute to its poor control. For this reason, a working group of the main scientific societies involved in the care of patients at vascular risk, has prepared this document with a consensus proposal on the determination of the basic lipid profile in cardiovascular prevention, recommendations for its realization and unification of criteria to incorporate the lipid control goals appropriate to the vascular risk of the patients in the laboratory reports., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) continue to be the main cause of death in our country. Adequate control of lipid metabolism disorders is a key challenge in cardiovascular prevention that is far from being achieved in real clinical practice. There is a great heterogeneity in the reports of lipid metabolism from Spanish clinical laboratories, which may contribute to its poor control. For this reason, a working group of the main scientific societies involved in the care of patients at vascular risk, has prepared this document with a consensus proposal on the determination of the basic lipid profile in cardiovascular prevention, recommendations for its realization and unification of criteria to incorporate the lipid control goals appropriate to the vascular risk of the patients in the laboratory reports., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U.)

Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is one of the main public health care problems worldwide. It is associated with a marked increased risk of developing atherosclerotic vascular disease, heart failure, chronic kidney disease and death. It is essential to act during the early phases of the disease, through the intensification of lifestyle changes and the prescription of those drugs that have been shown to reduce these complications, with the aim not only of achieving an adequate metabolic control, but also a comprehensive vascular risk control. In this consensus document, developed by the different specialists that treat these patients (endocrinologists, primary care physicians, internists, nephrologists and cardiologists), a more appropriate approach in the management of patients with T2DM or its complications is provided. A particular focus is given to the global control of cardiovascular risk factors, the inclusion of weight within the therapeutic objectives, the education of patients, the deprescription of those drugs without cardiovascular benefit, and the inclusion of GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors as cardiovascular protective drugs, at the same level as statins, acetylsalicylic acid, or renin angiotensin system inhibitors.

Background and Aims: We aimed to understand the impact of physicians' perception about LDL-cholesterol (LDLc) control on the management of patients with dyslipidemia in Spain., Methods: We performed a cross-sectional and multicenter study, in which 435 healthcare professionals participated in face-to-face meetings, collecting qualitative and quantitative information related to hypercholesterolemia management. Additionally, aggregated anonymized data of the last 10 patients with hypercholesterolemia attended by each physician were collected., Results: A total of 4,010 patients (8%, 13%, 16% and 61% with low, moderate, high, and very high cardiovascular [CV] risk) were included. Physicians' perception was that 62% of their patients attained LDLc goals (66%, 63%, 61% and 56%, for low, moderate, high and very high CV risk, respectively). However, when looking into the data only 31% (vs 62% p<0.01) of patients attained the LDLc goals (47%, 36%, 22% and 25%, respectively). Overall, 33% of patients were taking high intensity statins, 32% statin/ezetimibe, 21% low/moderate intensity statins and 4% PCSK9 inhibitors. These numbers were 38%, 45%, 8% and 6% for very high risk patients and 44%, 21%, 21% and 4% for high CV risk patients. In 32% of patients, a change in lipid lowering therapy was performed after the visit, mainly combining statins/ezetimibe (55%)., Conclusions: In Spain, most patients with dyslipidemia do not achieve the recommended LDLc goals because of an insufficient intensification of lipid lowering therapy. On the one hand, this is in part due to physicians misperception on preventive LDLc control and the need for repeated advice to patient, and, on the other, to the lack of patient adherence., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:Juan Cosin-Sales: has received conference fees from Almirall, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, MSD, Novartis, Organon, Rovi and Sanofi; has participated in advisory services for Almirall, Amgen, MSD and Sanofi; and has received research grants from Amgen, Ferrer, MSD and Sanofi. Raquel Campuzano: has received conference fees from Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, Mylan, MSD, Organon, Sanofi, Servier and Novartis; has participated in advisory services for Novartis, Amgen, Sanofi and Servier; and has received collaborations to scientific or research projects from Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, Organon, Servier and Novartis. José Luis Díaz: has received fees for presentations, advisory services or scientific collaborations from Amgen, Bayer, Boëringher, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Mylan, Novartis, Novo-Nordisk, Pfizer, Rovi, Rubió, Sanofi, Daiichi-Sankyo and Servier. Carlos Escobar: has received fees for conferences/advisory services from: Almirall, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Esteve, Ferrer, MSD, Novartis, Organon, Rovi, Sanofi, Servier and Viatris. María Rosa Fernández: has received fees for conferences from Amgen, Sanofi, Ferrer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Organon and Rovi; has participated in advisory services for Novartis, Amgen, Sanofi and Amarin. Juan José Gómez-Doblas: has received fees for conferences from Amgen, Sanofi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Organon and MSD; has participated in advisory services for Amgen, Sanofi and Amarin; and has received collaborations to scientific or research projects from Amgen, Sanofi, Ferrer and Daiichi-Sankyo. José María Mostaza: has participated in advisory services and/or conferences, or has carried out projects for Pfizer, Amarin, Ferrer, Sanofi, Amgen, Alter, Servier, Novartis and Daiichi-Sankyo. Juan Pedro-Botet: has received fees for conferences from Amarin, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Esteve, MSD, Sanofi and Viatris; and has participated in advisory services for Amarin, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Esteve, Ferrer, Sanofi and Viatris. Núria Plana: has received fees for conferences from Amgen, Sanofi, Daiichi-Sankyo Mylan and Alexion. Pedro Valdivielso: has received fees for conferences from Amgen, Sanofi, Ferrer, Amarin, Akcea, Sobi, MSD, Novartis and Daiichi-Sankyo; has participated in advisory services for Daiichi-Sankyo, Amgen, Sanofi, Akcea and Amarin; and has received research grants from Ferrer and Akcea., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Our aim was to assess the degree of acceptance of the European Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) on heart failure (HF) among Spanish physicians according to sex. This was a cross-sectional study, employing Google Forms, conducted by a group of HF experts from the Region of Madrid (Spain), between November 2021 and February 2022, among specialists and residents of Cardiology, Internal Medicine, and Primary Care from Spain., Recent Findings: A total of 387 physicians-173 women (44.7%)-from 128 different centers completed the survey. Compared to men, women were significantly younger (38.2 ± 9.1 years vs. 40.6 ± 11.2 years; p = 0.024) and had fewer years of clinical practice (12.1 ± 8.1 years vs. 14.5 ± 10.7 years; p = 0.014). Briefly, women and men had a positive opinion of the guidelines and thought that implementing quadruple therapy is feasible in less than 8 weeks. Women followed more frequently than men the new paradigm of "4 pillars at lowest doses" and considered more frequently the establishment of quadruple therapy before implanting a cardiac device. Although they agreed about "low blood pressure" as the major limitation for achieving quadruple therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, there were discrepancies on the second most frequent barrier, and women were more proactive when initiating SGLT2 inhibitors. In a large survey including nearly 400 doctors from all over Spain to provide real-world opinion on 2021 ESC HF Guidelines and experience with SGLT2 inhibitors, women follow more frequently the new paradigm of "4 pillars at lowest doses", consider more frequently the establishment of quadruple therapy before implanting a cardiac device, and were more proactive when initiating SGLT2 inhibitors. Further studies confirming an association of sex with a better compliance of HF guidelines are needed., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) continue to be the main cause of death in our country. Adequate control of lipid metabolism disorders is a key challenge in cardiovascular prevention that is far from being achieved in real clinical practice. There is a great heterogeneity in the reports of lipid metabolism from Spanish clinical laboratories, which may contribute to its poor control. For this reason, a working group of the main scientific societies involved in the care of patients at vascular risk, has prepared this document with a consensus proposal on the determination of the basic lipid profile in cardiovascular prevention, recommendations for its realization and unification of criteria to incorporate the lipid control goals appropriate to the vascular risk of the patients in the laboratory reports., (Copyright © 2023. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U.)

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide affecting both sexes equally. However, in comparison to men, in women, it often is underrecognized and undertreated in both primary and secondary prevention settings. It is clear, that in the healthy population, there are profound differences both anatomically and biochemically between women and men, and this may impact how both groups present when they become ill. Moreover, some diseases affect more frequently women than men such as myocardial ischemia or infarction without obstructive coronary disease, Takotsubo syndrome, some atrial arrhythmias, or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Therefore, diagnostic and therapeutic strategies that have been established largely on the basis of clinical studies with a predominantly male population must be adapted before being applied to women. There is a paucity of data regarding cardiovascular disease in women. It is inadequate to only perform a subgroup analysis evaluating a specific treatment or invasive technique when women constitute fifty percent of the population. In this regard, this may affect the time of clinical diagnosis and severity assessments of some valvulopathies. In this review, we will focus on the differences in the diagnosis, management, and outcomes for women with the most frequent cardiovascular pathologies including coronary artery disease, arrhythmia, heart failure, and valvopathies. In addition, we will describe diseases that exclusively affect women that are related to pregnancy, and some of them are life-threatening. Although the lack of research on women plays a role in the poorer outcomes in women, especially in ischemic heart disease, some techniques such as transcatheter aortic valve implantation and transcatheter edge-to-edge therapy seem to have better outcomes in women.

The environment is a strong determinant of cardiovascular health. Environmental cardiology studies the contribution of environmental exposures with the aim of minimizing the harmful influences of pollution and promoting cardiovascular health through specific preventive or therapeutic strategies. The present review focuses on particulate matter and metals, which are the pollutants with the strongest level of scientific evidence, and includes possible interventions. Legislation, mitigation and control of pollutants in air, water and food, as well as environmental policies for heart-healthy spaces, are key measures for cardiovascular health. Individual strategies include the chelation of divalent metals such as lead and cadmium, metals that can only be removed from the body via chelation. The TACT (Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy, NCT00044213) clinical trial demonstrated cardiovascular benefit in patients with a previous myocardial infarction, especially in those with diabetes. Currently, the TACT2 trial (NCT02733185) is replicating the TACT results in people with diabetes. Data from the United States and Argentina have also shown the potential usefulness of chelation in severe peripheral arterial disease. More research and action in environmental cardiology could substantially help to improve the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease., Competing Interests: CONFLICTO DE INTERESES Ningún autor tiene conflictos de intereses con el presente trabajo.

The environment is a strong determinant of cardiovascular health. Environmental cardiology studies the contribution of environmental exposures with the aim of minimizing the harmful influences of pollution and promoting cardiovascular health through specific preventive or therapeutic strategies. The present review focuses on particulate matter and metals, which are the pollutants with the strongest level of scientific evidence, and includes possible interventions. Legislation, mitigation and control of pollutants in air, water and food, as well as environmental policies for heart-healthy spaces, are key measures for cardiovascular health. Individual strategies include the chelation of divalent metals such as lead and cadmium, metals that can only be removed from the body via chelation. The TACT (Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy, NCT00044213) clinical trial demonstrated cardiovascular benefit in patients with a previous myocardial infarction, especially in those with diabetes. Currently, the TACT2 trial (NCT02733185) is replicating the TACT results in people with diabetes. Data from the United States and Argentina have also shown the potential usefulness of chelation in severe peripheral arterial disease. More research and action in environmental cardiology could substantially help to improve the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease., (Copyright © 2022 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Introduction and Objectives: The treatment of dyslipidemia exhibits wide variability in clinical practice and important limitations that make lipid-lowering goals more difficult to attain. Getting to know the management of these patients in clinical practice is key to understand the existing barriers and to define actions that contribute to achieving the therapeutic goals from the most recent Clinical Practice Guidelines., Methods: Observatory where the information gathered is based on routine clinical practice and the experience from the healthcare professionals involved in the treatment of dyslipidemia in Spain. The information is collected by health area through: (i) face-to-face meeting with three different medical specialties and (ii) quantitative information related to hypercholesterolemia patients' management (ad-hoc questionnaire). Information includes patients' profiles, assistance burden, guidelines and protocols used, goal attainment, limitations and opportunities in clinical practice., Results: 145 health areas are planned to be included, with the participation of up to 435 healthcare professionals from the 17 Autonomous Regions of Spain. Information collection will result in aggregated data from over four thousand patients., Conclusions: This observatory aims to understand how hypercholesterolemia is being treated in routine clinical practice in Spain. Even though the preliminary results show important improvement areas in the treatment of dyslipidemias, mechanisms to drive a change towards health outcomes optimization are also identified., (Copyright © 2022 Sociedad Española de Arteriosclerosis. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) and dyslipidemia are associated to a higher risk of cardiovascular events, mortality, use of healthcare resources and costs. In Spain, the evidence about the administration of lipid-lowering treatments in clinical practice, and their clinical effectiveness in patients with ASCVD and hypercholesterolemia and patients with FH is scarce. Therefore, a multidisciplinary working group of cardiologists, family physicians, internal medicine specialists and neurologists was gathered for the Reality study. The aim of this study is to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and concomitant medication of patients with ASCVD and hypercholesterolemia and of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). The use of healthcare resources and costs associated to the management of these diseases after their diagnosis were also considered., Methods: This is an observational and retrospective study, based on the BIG-PAC ® database, which includes the electronic medical registries (EMRs) of 1.8 million people from 7 Autonomous Communities in Spain (including public primary care centers and hospitals). The study includes patients who had a new or recurrent episode of ASCVD during the recruitment period (from 01/01/2017 to 31/12/2018). The index date will be defined as the date of the ASCVD event, and the follow-up period will be 24 months. According to their first diagnosis in the database, patients will be classified as ASCVD (5 groups: stable/unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and peripheral arterial disease) or FH., Discussion: This study aims to analyze the treatment patterns and use of healthcare resources of ASCVD and FH in Spain. The prevalence of these disorders will also be estimated. Due to the high morbidity and mortality associated with these diseases, it is expected that our study will provide useful information for healthcare systems and decision makers to improve the management of these disabling diseases., Competing Interests: This study is a Research collaboration between Atrys Health SA and Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Author VB has received consultancy and lecturing/speaker bureau fees from Almirall, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, MSD/Organon, Sanofi, Servier and Mylan/Viatris. Author MC has received consultancy fees for consulting services and as a speaker from Ferrer, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, BMS-Pfizer, Böehringer-Ingelheim, Astra Zeneca, Alexion, Novartis and Lundbeck. Author RC has received lecture fees from Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, Mylan, MSD, Organon, Sanofi, Servier and Novartis. She has participated in consultancies for Novartis, Amgen, Sanofi and Servier. She has also received collaborations to scientific or research projects from Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, Organon, Servier and Novartis. Author JG declares to have received honoraria for oral presentations and advisory boards, and research grants from Almirall, Novartis, Amgen, Sanofi, and Daiichi. Author IE declares to have received fees for consulting services from Novartis, Servier, and Boehringer-Ingelheim, and to have received fees for services as a speaker from Novartis, Vifor, and Boehringer-Ingelheim. Author JMG declares to have received fees for consulting services from Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Almirall, Sanofi, and Böehringer-Ingelheim, and to have received fees for services as a speaker from Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Almirall, Sanofi, Amgen, Organon, Viatris, Rovi and Menarini. Author JM has received fees for consulting services from Pfizer, Amaryn, Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Servier, Sanofi, and Amgen, and has received fees for services as a speaker from Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Servier, Sanofi, Amgen, Viatris, and Alter. Author VP-C has received fees for consulting and speaker bureau from Almirall, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, Sanofi, Almirall, Rovi, Menarini, Organon. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Barrios, Castellanos, Campuzano Ruiz, Gómez Cerezo, Egocheaga Cabello, Gámez, Martínez López, Mostaza, Morant Talamante, Parrondo, Sicras Navarro, Pérez Román, Sicras-Mainar and Pallarés-Carratalá.)

Purpose: To carry out a systematic review about the information about the application of of virtual reality and videogames in cardiac rehabilitation., Methods: A systematic review was conducted. Jadad scale was applied to evaluate the methodological quality of the articles included and the degree of evidence and the level of recommendation were determined through the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine. PRISMA guidelines statement for systematic reviews were followed., Results: The total number of articles included in the present review was 10, with heterogeneity in the study populations, cardiac rehabilitation phases, technology used and protocols. Most of the studies showed an increase in heart rate, less pain, a greater ability to walk, higher energy levels, an increase in physical activity and improvements of motivation and adherence. The methodological quality of the studies was between acceptable and poor., Conclusions: The use of virtual reality and videogames could be considered as complementary tools of physical training in patients with cardiovascular diseases in the different phases of cardiac rehabilitation. However, it is also necessary to carry out studies with adequate methodological quality to determine the ideal technological systems, target populations and clearly protocols to study their effects in the short, medium and long-term assessments.Implications for rehabilitationThe use of virtual reality and videogames could be considered as complementary tools for physical training in patients with cardiovascular diseases.Interactive virtual reality using exergames may promote heart rate, fatigue perception, physical activity and reduce pain in patients with cardiovascular diseases.Virtual reality and videogames enhance motivation and adherence in cardiac rehabilitation programs.

(1) Background: The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of a virtual reality (VR) program, as a complementary tool to a conventional cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program in phase II of patients with ischemic heart disease compared to a conventional treatment group. (2) Methods: A single blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted. The patients were randomized to a control group (CG) or an experimental group (EG). The EG carried out a training based on VR of aerobic exercise using the XBOX ONE console and Kinect sensor. Ergometry, metabolic equivalents (METS), Functional Independence Measure, 6-min walk test (6MWT), the Short Form Health Survey-36 Questionnaire (SF-36), the Beck Depression Inventory-II, and the degree of satisfaction and adherence to treatment were used as outcome measures. (3) Results: Our results showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups. Statistical analysis within group for the EG showed statistically significant changes in the variables HR final ergometry, ergometry minutes, % ergometry, METS, final HR 6MWT, 6MWT distance, 6MWT number of laps, and for the SF-36 and Beck Depression Inventory-II. (4) Conclusion: A VR-based video game program, as an adjunct tool to a CR program, showed improvements in ergometry, METS, resistance to fatigue and health-related quality of life with excellent adherence and satisfaction perceived by patients with ischemic heart disease in phase II.

Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common finding among patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and contributes to develop right ventricular systolic dysfunction (RVSD)., Aims: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of Flowers and Horan electrocardiographic criteria to detect significant right ventricular pressure overload., Methods: 123 patients were prospectively included. We used the Flowers and Horan (FH) ECG criteria to define RV enlargement (score >10). Echocardiographic measurements were performed blinded to the electrocardiographic results., Results: Severe PH was found in 51.5%. Seventeen patients (16.5%) had a FH score >10 points. This was associated to RVSD (RR 2.66; 1.51-4.67 CI 95%, p=0.002), with 90.5% specificity and 34.4% sensitivity and to severe PH (RR 1.70; 1.16-2.50 CI 95%, p=0.028) with 91.9% specificity and 27.5% sensitivity., Conclusions: The ECG is a useful tool to classify HFpEF patients with echocardiographic signs of right ventricular pressure overload, in the absence of RBBB., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction and Objectives: Calculation of the effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) is regarded as the most accurate way of assessing the severity of mitral regurgitation (MR), but the technique's complexity limits its use. Our objective was to modify and validate a previously published semiquantitative method of assessment based on measurement of the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) in order to adapt it to recent recommendations from American and European cardiology societies., Methods: In the PISA method, maximum regurgitant flow (MRF) is a function of the radius and aliasing velocity (AV). Using this relationship, it is possible to construct a nomogram formed by lines of different MRF value, which can be easily derived by looking for radius values on the graph and observing where they cross with AV values. The MR severity limits on the nomogram were set to reflect the different severity grades and limits recommended for use with ERO measurements by American and European cardiology societies., Results: We studied 76 patients with MR using Doppler echocardiography. There was an excellent correlation between MRF and ERO (r=0.98, P< .001). Estimates of MR severity made using the new nomogram were in good agreement with those derived from the ERO: for a scale with three severity grades, kappa was 0.951 and the standard error was 0.11; for four grades, kappa was 0.969 and the standard error, 0.11., Conclusions: Estimates of MR severity derived semiquantitatively from MRF using the nomogram proposed here were in excellent agreement with quantitative estimates obtained using the ERO, and the method was faster and easier to use.