Search

Background: COVID-19 has overwhelmed health services globally. Oral antiviral therapies are licensed worldwide, but indications and efficacy rates vary. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral favipiravir in patients hospitalised with COVID-19., Methods: We conducted a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial of oral favipiravir in adult patients who were newly admitted to hospital with proven or suspected COVID-19 across five sites in the UK (n=2), Brazil (n=2) and Mexico (n=1). Using a permuted block design, eligible and consenting participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral favipiravir (1800 mg twice daily for 1 day; 800 mg twice daily for 9 days) plus standard care, or standard care alone. All caregivers and patients were aware of allocation and those analysing data were aware of the treatment groups. The prespecified primary outcome was the time from randomisation to recovery, censored at 28 days, which was assessed using an intention-to-treat approach. Post-hoc analyses were used to assess the efficacy of favipiravir in patients aged younger than 60 years, and in patients aged 60 years and older. The trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04373733., Findings: Between May 5, 2020 and May 26, 2021, we assessed 503 patients for eligibility, of whom 499 were randomly assigned to favipiravir and standard care (n=251) or standard care alone (n=248). There was no significant difference between those who received favipiravir and standard care, relative to those who received standard care alone in time to recovery in the overall study population (hazard ratio [HR] 1·06 [95% CI 0·89-1·27]; n=499; p=0·52). Post-hoc analyses showed a faster rate of recovery in patients younger than 60 years who received favipiravir and standard care versus those who had standard care alone (HR 1·35 [1·06-1·72]; n=247; p=0·01). 36 serious adverse events were observed in 27 (11%) of 251 patients administered favipiravir and standard care, and 33 events were observed in 27 (11%) of 248 patients receiving standard care alone, with infectious, respiratory, and cardiovascular events being the most numerous. There was no significant between-group difference in serious adverse events per patient (p=0·87)., Interpretation: Favipiravir does not improve clinical outcomes in all patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19, however, patients younger than 60 years might have a beneficial clinical response. The indiscriminate use of favipiravir globally should be cautioned, and further high-quality studies of antiviral agents, and their potential treatment combinations, are warranted in COVID-19., Funding: LifeArc and CW+., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Treatment options for severe asthma are limited, particularly in those patients who do not meet criteria for biologicals. Targeted lung denervation (TLD) is the bronchoscopic ablation of the peribronchial vagal nerve trunks to reduce cholinergic stimulation of airway smooth muscle and submucosal glands. This report describes the experience of the first 2 asthma patients treated with TLD worldwide. The participants were 54 and 51 years of age, and both had severe asthma (GINA 5) (FEV1: 53% and 113% of predicted; AQLQ scores: 5.3 and 4.4). Both participants were treated with TLD in a single day-case procedure under general anaesthesia. Lung function, health status, and adverse event data were collected at baseline and 12 months after TLD. No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported up to 12 months. Cough symptoms improved in both participants, and 1 participant reported a marked reduction in rescue medication use at 6 months. There were no significant changes in spirometry, lung volumes, or health status. In conclusion, TLD was performed safely in both participants, but more evidence is needed to clarify safety and efficacy of TLD in severe asthma. Therefore, further investigation of the treatment in severe asthma patients would be useful., (© 2021 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: No currently approved intervention counteracts airway metaplasia and mucus hypersecretion of chronic bronchitis in COPD. However, metered cryospray (MCS) delivering liquid nitrogen to the tracheobronchial airways ablates abnormal epithelium and facilitates healthy mucosal regeneration. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of MCS in chronic bronchitis., Methods: Patients with a forced expiratory volume in 1 s of 30-80% predicted who were taking optimal medication were recruited. Primary outcomes were feasibility (completion of treatments), efficacy (3-month change in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)) and safety (incidence of adverse events). Secondary outcomes were lung function, exercise capacity and additional patient-reported outcomes., Results: 35 patients, 19 male/16 female, aged 47-76 years, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease grade I (n=3), II (n=10) and III (n=22), underwent staggered liquid nitrogen treatments to the tracheobronchial tree. 34 patients completed three treatments, each lasting 34.3±12.1 min, separated by 4-6 weeks; one withdrew after the first treatment. ∼1800 doses of MCS were delivered. Clinically meaningful improvements in patient-reported outcomes were observed at 3 months: change in SGRQ -6.4 (95% CI -11.4 to -1.3; p=0.01), COPD Assessment Test (CAT) -3.8 (95% CI -6.4 to -1.3; p<0.01) and Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) 21.6 (95% CI 7.3 to 35.9; p<0.01). Changes in CAT were durable to 6 months (-3.4, 95% CI -5.9 to -0.9; p=0.01); changes in SGRQ and LCQ were durable to 9 months (-6.9, 95% CI -13.0 to -0.9; p=0.03 and 13.4, 95% CI 2.1 to 24.6; p=0.02, respectively. At 12 months, 14 serious adverse events were recorded in 11 (31.4%) subjects; six (43%) moderate and eight (57%) severe. Nine were respiratory-related: six exacerbations of COPD, two pneumonias and one case of increased coughing; all recovered without sequelae. None were serious device- or procedure-related adverse events., Conclusion: MCS is safe, feasible and associated with clinically meaningful improvements in multidimensional patient-reported outcomes., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: J.L. Garner has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T. Shaipanich has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.E. Hartman has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C.M. Orton has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Caneja has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: K. Klooster has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Thornton has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D.D. Sin has received honoraria for speaking engagements from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim, and funding for research projects from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim and Merck. Conflict of interest: D.J. Slebos reports grants and non-financial support from, and was PI for and advisor to CSA Medical, USA, during the conduct of the study; grants and non-financial support from, and was PI for and advisor to PulmonX, USA, Nuvaira, USA and PneumRx/BTG, USA, and was PI for and advisor to FreeFlowMedical, USA, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: P.L Shah was reimbursed by CSA Medical for travel expenses incurred during the training with the medical device and trial protocol development; the hospital was reimbursed for all clinical trial related costs, and reports personal fees from CSA Medical, Boston Scientific, Broncus, Creo Medical, Nuvaira, Olympus, Medtronic and PneumRX/BTG as consultant on scientific advisory board; and sponsorship to Imperial College for a bronchoscopy course from ERBE, Cook medical, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Broncus, Pulmonx, Olympus and PneumRX/BTG, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©ERS 2020.)

Background: Lung volume reduction surgery is a proven treatment for emphysematous patients with hyperinflation, but the precarious health of candidates has prompted development of less invasive approaches. Bronchoscopic implanted endobronchial coils, shape-memory nitinol filaments, shrink emphysematous lung tissue to restore elastic recoil and to tether airways to maintain patency. Studies have demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and improvements in lung function, exercise capacity, and quality of life out to 3 years. Volume reduction is key. However, data for longer-term survival are limited., Objective: The aim of this study was to establish the 5-year overall and transplant-free survivals of subjects whose procedure in the first randomized controlled trial, RESET, achieved clinically meaningful reduction in residual volume (RV)., Methods: Patients and their primary care doctors were contacted to confirm vital status and history of additional interventions. Death certificates were acquired via the General Registry Office. Survival time was calculated for responders achieving a reduction of ≥10% in RV compared to non-responders., Results: 39 patients completed the planned bilateral sequential treatments. Six patients received unilateral implants. At 5 years, 22 patients had died. The overall survivals at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years were 88.9, 88.9, 77.8, 64.4 and 50.6%, respectively. Two patients underwent lung transplantation at 52 and 59 months and were alive at 5 years. The transplant-free (TF) survivals at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years were 88.9, 88.9, 77.8, 64.4 and 46.7%, respectively. Volume reduction responders (n = 18) at 3 months had a 5-year TF survival of 66.7% compared to 36.4% for non-responders (n = 22; p = 0.07). Higher baseline inspiratory capacity (HR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.73; p = 0.02) and partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.86; p < 0.01) values were predictive of survival for the entire cohort and were not influenced by age., Conclusions: Endobronchial coil implantation appears to confer a 5-year survival advantage for those who achieved a 10% reduction in RV at 3 months. Ongoing trials are designed to clarify the mechanisms of action of coils and to refine patient selection., (© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

The current standard therapy for patients with giant bullae is surgical bullectomy; however, high operative risk and comorbidities preclude surgical procedures in many patients. Autologous blood instilled directly into bullae can induce an inflammatory reaction, leading to scarring, fibrosis, and ultimately volume loss. We have treated 5 patients with this minimally invasive approach as day-case procedures using moderate sedation. Three of the 5 patients had shrinkage of the bullae, leading to large and clinically meaningful improvements in lung function, exercise capacity, and quality of life 3 months after treatment., (Copyright © 2013 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Evidence suggests that oxidative stress is a unifying feature underlying the toxic actions of particulate matter (PM). We have investigated whether individual plasma antioxidant concentrations (uric acid and vitamins C, A, and E) and 10 antioxidant genes modify the response to PM with respect to hospital admissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma., Methods: Using a bidirectional, hospital-based, case-crossover study, 209 patients admitted for asthma or COPD to the Chelsea and Westminster Hospital (London), with 234 admissions, were recruited between May 2008 and July 2010. PM10 levels in the area of Kensington and Chelsea at the time of admission were compared with the levels 14 days before and 14 days after the event. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of PM10 at several temporal lags, while controlling for confounders., Results: An increase in asthma/COPD admission rate was related to a 10 μg/m increase in PM10, with the highest effect noted 0-3 days before the exacerbation (for lag 0-3, odds ratio = 1.35 [95% confidence interval = 1.04-1.76]). Serum vitamin C modified the effect of PM10 on asthma/COPD exacerbations. A similar (although weaker) influence was observed for low levels of uric acid and vitamin E, whereas vitamin A showed no effect modification. GSTP1 (rs1695), SOD2 (rs4880), and Nrf2 (rs1806649) were associated with a trend toward an increased risk of hospital admissions during periods of high PM10 levels., Conclusions: Our study suggests that the concentration of antioxidants in patients' serum modifies the short-term effects of PM10 on asthma and COPD exacerbations.

National surveys have revealed significant differences in patient outcomes following admission to hospital with acute exacerbation of COPD which are likely to be due to variations in care. We developed a care bundle, comprising a short list of evidence-based practices to be implemented prior to discharge for all patients admitted with this condition, based on a review of national guidelines and other relevant literature, expert opinion and patient consultation. Implementation was then piloted using action research methodologies with patient input. Actively involving staff was vital to ensure that the changes introduced were understood and the process followed. Implementation of a care bundle has the potential to produce a dramatic improvement in compliance with optimum health care practice.