Search

Background: In Europe, more than 15 million people live with heart failure (HF). It imposes an enormous social, organizational and economic burden. As a reaction to impending impact on healthcare provision, different country-specific structures for HF-care have been established. The aim of this report is to provide an overview and compare the HF-care approaches of Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands and the UK, and to open the possibility of learning from each other's experience., Methods: A mixed methods approach was implemented that included a literature analysis, interviews and questionnaires with HF-patients and caregivers, and expert interviews with representatives from healthcare, health service research and medical informatics., Results: The models of HF-care in all countries analyzed are based on the European Society of Cardiology guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of HF. Even though the HF-models differed in design and implementation in practice, key challenges were similar: (i) unequal distribution of care between urban and rural areas, (ii) long waiting times, (iii) unequal access to and provision of healthcare services, (iv) information and communication gaps and (v) inadequate implementation and financing of digital applications., Conclusion: Although promising approaches exist to structure and improve HF-care, across the four countries, implementation was reluctant to embrace novel methods. A lack of financial resources and insufficient digitalization making it difficult to adopt new concepts. Integration of HF-nurses seems to be an effective way of improving current models of HF-care. Digital solutions offer further opportunities to overcome communication and coordination gaps and to strengthen self-management skills., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.)

Background: Needs assessment tools can facilitate healthcare professionals in timely recognition of palliative care needs. Despite the increased attention for implementation of such tools, most studies provide little or no attention to the context of implementation. The aim of this study was to explore factors that contribute positively and negatively to timely screening of palliative care needs in advanced chronic heart failure., Methods: Qualitative study using individual interviews and focus groups with healthcare professionals. The data were analysed using a deductive approach. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to conceptualise the contextual factors., Results: Twenty nine healthcare professionals with different backgrounds and working in heart failure care in the Southern and Eastern parts of the Netherlands participated. Several factors were perceived to play a role, such as perception and knowledge about palliative care, awareness of palliative care needs in advanced chronic heart failure, perceived difficulty when and how to start palliative care, limited acceptance to treatment boundaries in cardiology, limited communication and collaboration between healthcare professionals, and need for education and increased attention for palliative care in advanced chronic heart failure guidelines., Conclusions: This study clarified critical factors targeting patients, healthcare professionals, organisations to implement a needs assessment tool for timely recognition of palliative care needs in the context of advanced chronic heart failure. A multifaceted implementation strategy is needed which has attention for education, patient empowerment, interdisciplinary collaboration, identification of local champions, chronic heart failure specific guidelines and culture., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: The education of patients with heart failure (HF) is an essential part of disease management. The perspectives of an increasing number of patients and a shortage of professionals force healthcare to explore new strategies in supporting patients to be better informed and more active., Methods: Three hundred and eighty-two patients with HF (age 71±SD 11.2 years) were randomly assigned to either a telemonitoring or a usual care group. Patients received four postal questionnaires to assess their levels of self-reported knowledge, self-care, self-efficacy and adherence. Generalized estimating equations analysis was performed to assess the effects of telemonitoring during the 1-year follow-up. Corrections for baseline were performed if needed., Results: Baseline differences between groups were found for self-care (p=0.001) and self-efficacy (p=0.024). Knowledge of patients in the telemonitoring group significantly improved with 0.9 point on a 15-points scale (p<0.001). Their self-care abilities improved with 1.5 point on a 10-item scale whereas no changes were found in patients receiving usual care (p<0.001). Self-efficacy of patients in the intervention group improved significantly after 6 months yet was not significantly different after 3 months and 1 year. For patients in the intervention group adherence improved for daily weighing (p<0.001) during the whole follow-up and for fluid intake (p=0.019) after 3 months and after 12 months (p=0.086). Adherence for activity recommendations improved (p=0.023) after 3 months and importance of medication adherence increased after 6 (p=0.012) and 12 months (p=0.037). No effects were found regarding appointments, diet, smoking and use of alcohol., Conclusions: Tailored telemonitoring was found to educate patients with HF and to improve their self-care abilities and sense of self-efficacy.

The increasing prevalence of chronic diseases, such as heart failure, presents a substantial challenge to healthcare systems. Telemonitoring is believed to be a useful instrument in the delivery of heart failure care. However, a widespread use of telemonitoring is currently failing for various reasons. This article provides an overview of the barriers for the implementation of telemonitoring in heart failure patients from the perspectives of its users: patients, healthcare professionals and healthcare organisations. In doing so, identified barriers are grouped according to the perceived attributes of innovation by Rogers. Recommendations are provided as to how research can improve the implementation of telemonitoring in heart failure.

We examined the incremental cost-effectiveness of telemonitoring (TM) versus usual care (UC) in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). In one university and two general hospitals, 382 patients were randomised to usual care or telemonitoring and followed for 1 year. Hospital-related and home costs were estimated, based on resource use multiplied by the appropriate unit prices. Effectiveness was expressed as QALYs gained. Information was gathered, using 3 monthly costs diaries and questionnaires. The mean age of the patients was 71 years (range 32-93), 59% were male and 64% lived with a partner. Health related quality of life improved by 0.07 points for the usual care and 0.1 points for the telemonitoring group, but the difference between groups was not significant. There were no significant differences in annual costs per patient between groups. At a threshold of €50,000 the probability of telemonitoring being cost-effective was 48%. The cost effectiveness analysis showed a high level of decision uncertainty, probably caused by the divergence between the participating institutions. It is therefore premature to draw an unambiguous conclusion regarding cost-effectiveness for the whole group.

Aims: Recent increases in heart failure tend to overload the healthcare system. Consequently, there is a need for innovative strategies to reduce heart failure hospitalizations., Methods and Results: A multicentre randomized controlled trial was carried out to test the hypothesis that telemonitoring reduces heart failure hospitalizations during 1 year follow-up. The mean age of the 382 participating patients was 71.5 (32-93) years; the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.38, and in 61% it was ≤0.45%. Mean time to first heart failure-related hospitalization was 161 days for the intervention group and 139 days for the usual-care group; hospitalizations occurred in 18 (9.1%) compared with 25 (13.5%) patients, with a total number of 24 and 43 hospitalizations, respectively [Kaplan-Meier P = 0.151, hazard ratio (HR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35-1.17]. Subgroup analysis of the primary endpoint showed benefits for three subgroups: duration of heart failure, having a pacemaker, and co-habiting. The combined endpoint of heart failure admission and all-cause mortality was similar for both groups (Kaplan-Meier P = 0.641, HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.69-1.83). No differences were found regarding secondary endpoints, except for the reduced number of face to face contacts with the heart failure nurse (Mann-Whitney P < 0.001). Mortality was 18 (9.1%) in the intervention group and 12 (6.5%) in the usual-care group (Mann-Whitney P = 0.34, Cox regression analysis P = 0.82)., Conclusion: No significant differences were found regarding the primary endpoint, possibly caused by a relative underpowering of the population combined with well-treated study groups. However, telemonitoring tends to reduce heart failure (re)admissions and significantly decreases contacts with specialized nurses. Further research with pre-specified groups, as found in the subgroup analysis, is needed., Trial Registration: NCT00502255.

Background: As the prevalence of heart failure (HF) rises sharply, the costs related to the care of these patients increases in parallel. Considering the already limited resources and manpower, in the future the demand for care may exceed the supply. Therefore, health care systems are encouraged to develop innovative strategies to deal with the burden of HF to improve the quality of care in order to medical outcomes and patients' quality of life. For that reason new management systems - such as telemonitoring - have to be explored., Objectives: This paper outlines the study protocol of a tailor-made telemonitoring program in ambulant patients with HF., Design and Methods: A prospective randomised controlled trial is carried out at 3 hospitals in the South-Limburg area in the Netherlands. Primary outcome measures are hospital admissions and cost-effectiveness. Secondary outcomes are effects on therapy compliance, level of disease specific knowledge and quality of life. Also determinants are studied of most and less benefited patients in the intervention group. POWER CALCULATION: It is estimated that 390 patients have to be included in the study, with 185 in each arm., Results: Inclusion started in September 2007 with a follow-up time of 12 months. First results are expected at the end of 2010., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The Chronic Disease Self-Management Programme (CDSMP)was recently evaluated among patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) in a randomized controlled trial (n = 317) with twelve months of follow-up after the start of the programme. That trial demonstrated short-term improvements in cardiac-specific quality of life. The current study assessed which of the patients participating in this trial benefited most from the CDSMP with respect to cardiac-specific quality of life., Methods: Subgroup analyses were conducted using mixed-effects linear regression models to assess the relationship between patient characteristics and the effects of the CDSMP on cardiac-specific quality of life., Results: In the short term, patients with better cognitive status benefited more from the CDSMP than their poorer functioning counterparts. In addition, lower educated patients benefited more from the CDSMP than their higher educated counterparts during total follow-up., Conclusion: Subgroup effects were found for cognitive status and educational level. Future research should be performed to validate current findings and further explore the conditions under which CHF patients may benefit more from the programme., Practice Implications: These results indicate that lower educated patients, in particular, should be encouraged to participate in the CDSMP. In addition, healthcare practitioners are recommended to take into account potential cognitive impairments of patients., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aim: This paper reports on of the effects of the Chronic Disease Self-Management Programme on psychosocial attributes, self-care behaviour and quality of life among congestive heart failure patients who experienced slight to marked limitation of physical activity., Background: Most self-management programmes for congestive heart failure patients emphasize the medical aspects of this chronic condition, without incorporating psychosocial aspects of self-management. The programme has been used with various patient groups, but its effectiveness with congestive heart failure patients when led by pairs of cardiac nurse specialists and peer leaders is unknown., Method: A randomized controlled trial with 12 months of follow-up from start of the programme was conducted with 317 patients. Control group patients (n = 131) received usual care, consisting of regular outpatient checkups. Intervention group patients (n = 186) received usual care and participated in the six-week self-management programme. The programme teaches patients medical, social and emotional self-management skills. Twenty-one classes were conducted in six hospitals in the Netherlands, and data were collected between August 2004 and January 2007., Results: Directly after the programme, statistically significant effects were found for cognitive symptom management (P < 0.001), self-care behaviour (P = 0.008) and cardiac-specific quality of life (P = 0.005). No effects were found at 6- and 12-month follow-up., Conclusion: Further research is necessary to study how long-term effectiveness of the programme with patients with congestive heart failure can be achieved, and how successful adaptations of the programme can be integrated into standard care.

Objective: This study assessed the feasibility of the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP) among patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). The program emphasizes patients' central role and responsibility in managing their illness., Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to the program, which was led by a cardiac nurse specialist and a CHF patient. Data on performance according to protocol, adherence, and opinion about the program were collected among 186 patients and 18 leaders., Results: Eighty percent of the group sessions were carried out largely according to protocol. Three fourths of the patients attended at least 4 of the 6 sessions. Female sex and lower New York Heart Association classification predicted good attendance., Conclusion: Directly after the program and at 12-month follow-up, approximately three fourths of the patients stated that they had benefited from the program. Recommendations mainly concerned spending more time on several program topics and specifying patient-selection criteria in more detail. The program was considered feasible.

Aims: The 'Chronic Disease Self-Management Programme' (CDSMP) emphasizes patients' responsibility for the day-to-day management of their condition(s) and has shown favourable effects on health behaviour and healthcare utilization among various groups of patients with chronic conditions. However, the effects of the CDSMP among congestive heart failure (CHF) patients are unknown. We therefore aimed to assess the effects of the CDSMP on health behaviour and healthcare utilization in patients with CHF., Methods and Results: This randomized, controlled trial with 12 months of follow-up included 317 CHF patients with a slight to marked limitation of physical activity. Control patients (n = 131) received usual care, consisting of regular checkups at an outpatient clinic. Intervention group patients (n = 186) received usual care and participated in a 6-week self-management group programme. Favourable effects on walking for exercise and other physical activities such as aerobic, stretching, and strength exercises, sports, and gardening were reported in the intervention group immediately after completion of the programme. The effect of the programme on other physical activities extended to 6 months of follow-up. No favourable effects were found for the other outcomes., Conclusion: The CDSMP significantly improved physical activity among CHF patients for up to 6 months after the end of the programme; however, it did not affect other health behaviour outcomes or healthcare utilization.