1. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Benchmarking Uptake for a Regional Improvement Programme.
- Author
-
Taylor JC, Burke D, Iversen LH, Birch RJ, Finan PJ, Iles MM, Quirke P, and Morris EJA
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, England, Aged, Middle Aged, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures statistics & numerical data, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures methods, Elective Surgical Procedures statistics & numerical data, Elective Surgical Procedures methods, Quality Improvement, Robotic Surgical Procedures statistics & numerical data, Robotic Surgical Procedures methods, Benchmarking, Laparoscopy statistics & numerical data, Laparoscopy methods, Colorectal Neoplasms surgery, Colorectal Neoplasms pathology
- Abstract
Background: The uptake of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for patients with colorectal cancer has progressed at differing rates, both across countries, and within countries. This study aimed to investigate uptake for a regional colorectal cancer improvement programme in England., Method: We calculated the proportion of patients receiving elective laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery amongst those diagnosed with colorectal cancer over 3 time periods (2007-2011, 2012-2016 and 2017-2021) in hospitals participating in the Yorkshire Cancer Research Bowel Cancer Improvement Programme (YCR BCIP). These were benchmarked against national rates. Regression analysis and funnel plots were used to develop a data driven approach for analysing trends in the use of MIS at hospitals in the programme., Results: In England, resections performed by MIS increased from 34.9% to 72.9% for colon cancer and from 28.8% to 72.5% for rectal cancer. Robot-assisted surgery increased from 0.1% to 2.7% for colon cancer and from 0.2% to 7.9% for rectal cancer. Wide variation in the uptake of MIS was observed at a hospital level. Detailed analysis of the YCR BCIP region identified a decreasing number of surgical departments, since the start of the programme, as potential outliers for MIS when compared to the English national average., Conclusion: Wide variation in use of MIS for colorectal cancer exists within the English National Health Service and a data-driven approach can help identify outlying hospitals. Addressing some of the challenges behind the uptake of MIS, such as ensuring adequate provision of surgical training and equipment, could help increase its use., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF