Search

20-hydroxyvitamin D(2) [20(OH)D(2)] inhibits DNA synthesis in epidermal keratinocytes, melanocytes, and melanoma cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner. This inhibition is dependent on cell type, with keratinocytes and melanoma cells being more sensitive than normal melanocytes. The antiproliferative activity of 20(OH)D(2) is similar to that of 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) and of newly synthesized 1,20(OH)(2)D(2) but significantly higher than that of 25(OH)D(3). 20(OH)D(2) also displays tumorostatic effects. In keratinocytes 20(OH)D(2) inhibits expression of cyclins and stimulates involucrin expression. It also stimulates CYP24 expression, however, to a significantly lower degree than that by 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) or 25(OH)D(3). 20(OH)D(2) is a poor substrate for CYP27B1 with overall catalytic efficiency being 24- and 41-fold lower than for 25(OH)D(3) with the mouse and human enzymes, respectively. No conversion of 20(OH)D(2) to 1,20(OH)(2)D(2) was detected in intact HaCaT keratinocytes. 20(OH)D(2) also demonstrates anti-leukemic activity but with lower potency than 1,25(OH)(2)D(3). The phenotypic effects of 20(OH)D(2) are mediated through interaction with the vitamin D receptor (VDR) as documented by attenuation of cell proliferation after silencing of VDR, by enhancement of the inhibitory effect through stable overexpression of VDR and by the demonstration that 20(OH)D(2) induces time-dependent translocation of VDR from the cytoplasm to the nucleus at a comparable rate to that for 1,25(OH)(2)D(3). In vivo tests show that while 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) at doses as low as 0.8 μg/kg induces calcium deposits in the kidney and heart, 20(OH)D(2) is devoid of such activity even at doses as high as 4 μg/kg. Silencing of CY27B1 in human keratinocytes showed that 20(OH)D(2) does not require its transformation to 1,20(OH)(2)D(2) for its biological activity. Thus 20(OH)D(2) shows cell-type dependent antiproliferative and prodifferentiation activities through activation of VDR, while having no detectable toxic calcemic activity, and is a poor substrate for CYP27B1.

Chronic activation of Akt signaling in the endothelium recapitulates the salient features of a tumor vasculature and can be inhibited by rapamycin, an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin. This led to the hypothesis that the antitumor efficacy of rapamycin may be partially dependent on its ability to inhibit endothelial Akt signaling, making rapamycin an antiangiogenic agent and endothelial Akt pathway inhibitor. Dose-response studies with rapamycin showed that primary human endothelial cells and fibroblasts had a bimodal Akt response with effective reductions in phosphorylated Akt (pAkt) achieved at 10 ng/mL. In contrast, rapamycin increased pAkt levels in tumor cell lines. When tumor-bearing mice were treated with rapamycin doses comparable to those used clinically in transplant patients, we observed strong inhibition of mammary tumor growth. To test whether Akt activation in the endothelium was rate-limiting for this antitumor response, we engineered mouse mammary tumor virus-polyoma virus middle T antigen mice with endothelial cell-specific expression of constitutively activated Akt. We observed that the antitumor efficacy of rapamycin was reduced in the presence of elevated endothelial Akt activation. Just as we observed in MCF7 cells in vitro, rapamycin doses that were antiangiogenic resulted in increased pAkt levels in total mouse mammary tumor virus-polyoma virus middle T antigen tumor lysates, suggesting that tumor cells had an opposite Akt response following mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition compared with tumor endothelial cells. Together, these data support the hypothesis that endothelial Akt signaling in the tumor vasculature is an important target of the novel anticancer drug rapamycin.

We measured cervical spine movement during orotracheal intubation in 16 anesthetized patients without neck injury. Comparisons were made using straight and curved laryngoscope blades without stabilization, Philadelphia collar stabilization, and in-line stabilization by an assistant. There was cervical spine movement in all cases. There was no significant difference in movement without stabilization when comparing straight and curved laryngoscope blades (P = .8536). There was no significant decrease in movement when a Philadelphia collar was applied (P = 1.000). There was a significant decrease in movement when in-line stabilization was applied (P = 0.0056). Although none of the methods tested totally prevented cervical spine movement during orotracheal intubation, the least movement was obtained by the use of in-line stabilization by an assistant. The type of laryngoscope blade used or application of a Philadelphia collar did not reduce movement significantly.