Search

Extracorporeal CO 2 removal is a highly promising support therapy for patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure but whose clinical implementation and patient benefit is hampered by high cost and highly specialized expertise required for safe use. Current approaches target removal of the gaseous CO 2 dissolved in blood which limits their ease of clinical use as high blood flow rates are required to achieve physiologically significant CO 2 clearance. Here, a novel hybrid approach in which a zero-bicarbonate dialysis is used to target removal of bicarbonate ion coupled to a gas exchange device to clear dissolved CO 2 , achieves highly efficiently total CO 2 capture while maintaining systemic acid-base balance. In a porcine model of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure, a CO 2 -reduction of 61.4 ± 14.4 mL/min was achieved at a blood flow rate of 248 mL/min using pediatric-scale priming volumes. The dialyzer accounted for 81% of total CO 2 capture with an efficiency of 33% with a minimal pH change across the entire circuit. This study demonstrates the feasibility of a novel hybrid CO 2 capture approach capable of achieving physiologically significant CO 2 removal at ultralow blood flow rates with low priming volumes while leveraging widely available dialysis platforms to enable clinical adoption.

This study was aimed to evaluate the effects on some inflammatory markers of two dialytic treatments [bicarbonate dialysis (BHD) and hemodiafiltration (HDF)] in patients with severe chronic kidney disease. We evaluated: blood glucose, homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance index, homocistein (Hcs), high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), fibrinogen, lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], metalloproteinases-2, and -9 (MMP-2 and MMP-9), and soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE). Considering the all sample, we observed a decrease of sRAGE with BHD, but not with HDF. Fibrinogen, MMP-2, and -9, Hs-CRP decreased after HDF, but not after BHD. In diabetics, blood glucose decreased after HDF dialysis, but not after BHD. Soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products obtained with HDF were higher compared to BHD. Fibrinogen, MMP-2, MMP-9, Hcs, Hs-CRP decreased, and ADN increased after HDF, these changes did not happen after BHD. Furthermore, sRAGE, and ADN were higher, and MMP-2 lower after HDF. In euglycemic patients, instead, MMP-2, MMP-9, and Hs-CRP decreased, and ADN increased with HDF, but not with BHD. We can conclude that hemodiafiltration seems to greater reduce inflammatory markers, and it could be more suitable for people with type 2 diabetes. Registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01049152., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

As the name reveals, acetate-free biofiltration (AFB) is featured by lack of acetate and this would seem to allow better hemodynamic stability. However, AFB also has a unique characteristic of carbon dioxide (CO2 )-free dialysate, whereas all other modern dialysis techniques imply an overload of CO2 from dialysate to the patient. This notwithstanding the role of CO2 in tolerance to dialysis treatment, both AFB and all other dialysis techniques seem not investigated in due depth. Specifically, the amount of CO2 coming back to the patient's bloodstream during AFB and bicarbonate dialysis (BD) is unknown. We measured partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2 ) in blood samples withdrawn from the venous line of the extracorporeal circuit during BD and subsequently during AFB in 22 stable chronic hemodialysis outpatients. The amount of CO2 coming back to the patient's bloodstream is higher in BD (59.1 ± 4.0 mmol/L) than in AFB (42.8 ± 4.5 mmol/L, P < 0.0001). Such difference exceeds 30%. Moreover, shifting from BD to AFB shows, notably for each patient, the reduction of pCO2 toward physiological values. BD implies CO2 overload from dialysate, whereas AFB does not. Further studies are required to evaluate if AFB would be the most appropriate dialysis technique in patients affected by chronic, but especially acute, lung diseases., (Copyright © 2015 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Aim: To evaluate the effects on glycemic excursions during bicarbonate dialysis (BHD) compared to hemodiafiltration (HDF) in type 2 diabetic or not diabetic patients affected by end-stage renal disease (ESRD)., Material and Methods: Thirty-six patients (20 affected by type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 16 not diabetic patients) were evaluated and underwent BHD dialysis, followed by HDF dialysis two days later. All patients underwent also glucose continuous monitoring system, using iPro Continuous Glucose Monitor System (Medtronic MiniMed) starting just before the BHD, and ending five days later, two days after the HDF dialysis. Glycemic control was estimated as the mean blood glucose (MBG), the area under the glucose curve above 70mg/dl (AUC>70) or 180mg/dl (AUC>180), and the percentage of time above 70mg/dl (t>70) or 180mg/dl (t>180). Intraday glycemic variability was assessed as the standard deviation (SD), M value, and the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE). Day-to-day glycemic variability was assessed as the mean of daily difference (MODD), that is the mean of the absolute difference among glucose values taken on 2 consecutive days at the same time., Results: glycemic control was better with HDF: MBG, and AUC>180 were lower during HDF compared do BHD. We also observed a significant decrease of glycemic excursions during HDF dialysis: SD, M value, and the MAGE value were lower with HDF. The MODD value was significantly changed in BHD group, while no differences were recorded during HDF., Conclusion: HDF seems to greater reduce glycemic excursions during the treatment compared to BHD., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)