Search

Guanine-rich nucleic acid sequences can exert sequence and/or structure specific activities to influence biological and pathobiological cellular processes. As such, it has been reported that different G-rich oligonucleotides (both DNA and RNA) can have cytotoxic as well as cytoprotective effects to the cells. However, the mechanisms of such a biological outcome are unclear. In this report, we report that G-rich DNA oligonucleotides (ODNs) that can form four stranded secondary structures called G-quadruplexes (G4s) can have topology-dependent biological outcome. Using different biochemical, biophysical, and cellular approaches, we demonstrate that only the parallel topology G4-forming ODNs can repress eukaryotic translation by directly interacting with eukaryotic translation initiation protein 1 (EIF4G1), while the antiparallel topology G4s do not have inhibitory effect on mRNA translation To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to directly connect the G4 topological differences with differential functional biological impacts. Our study provides the foundation for the rational design of G-rich oligonucleotides for a desired therapeutic outcome.

Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are the key adaptor molecules aiding protein synthesis. Hundreds of tRNA genes are found in the human genome but the biological significance of this genetic excess is still enigmatic. The tRNA repertoires are variable between tissues and cells as well as during development. Such variations can only be partially explained by the correlation to the physiological needs in protein production, e.g. by changes in the expression of tRNA isoacceptor sets (tRNAs charged with the same amino acid but bearing different anticodons). However, changes in the expression levels of individual isodecoders (tRNAs with the same anticodon) are less understood. Besides canonical functions in mRNA translation, tRNAs are implicated in non-canonical functions unrelated to protein synthesis. tRNAs are rich source of small non-protein coding RNAs called tRNA-derived RNAs (tDRs), which include tRNA-derived stress-induced RNAs (tiRNAs) formed in response to stress. Here, we show that tiRNAs derived from isodecoders different in a single nucleotide can also differ in their activities. Specifically, we show that isodecoder sets for tRNA His-GTG , tRNA Gly-GCC and tRNA Cys-GCA are cleaved by ribonucleases to yield 5'-tiRNAs showing differential activity towards mRNA reporter translation. Our data propose a model where cleavage repurposes specific tRNA isodecoders for non-canonical functions., Significance Statement: The human genome encodes hundreds of transfer RNA (tRNA) genes to decode 61 codons. The basis for such genetic redundancy is unclear but the increase in the number of tRNA genes goes in concert with the complexity of an organism. While changes in the expression of isoacceptor tRNA pools can reflect adaptation to demanding protein synthesis needs and/or codon usage, the variations in the expression of the individual tRNA isodecoders are documented but poorly understood. Such expression variations are hypothesized to contribute to non-canonical tRNA functions, yet physiological relevance remains ambiguous. We report here that specific tRNA isodecoders can be functionally repurposed through cleavage that produces tRNA-derived RNAs (tDRs). The repurposing employs nucleotide variations in isodecoders leading to the production of distinct sets of tDRs with variable bioactivities.

Cellular stress is an intrinsic part of cell physiology that underlines cell survival or death. The ability of mammalian cells to regulate global protein synthesis (aka translational control) represents a critical, yet underappreciated, layer of regulation during the stress response. Various cellular stress response pathways monitor conditions of cell growth and subsequently reshape the cellular translatome to optimize translational outputs. On the molecular level, such translational reprogramming involves an intricate network of interactions between translation machinery, RNA-binding proteins, mRNAs, and non-protein coding RNAs. In this review, we will discuss molecular mechanisms, signaling pathways, and targets of translational control that contribute to cellular adaptation to stress and to cell survival or death., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflict of interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

P-bodies are conserved mRNP complexes that are implicated in determining mRNA fate by affecting translation and mRNA decay. In this report, we identify RGG-motif containing translation repressor protein Sbp1 as a disassembly factor of P-bodies since disassembly of P-bodies is defective in Δsbp1. RGG-motif is necessary and sufficient to rescue the PB disassembly defect in Δsbp1. Binding studies using purified proteins revealed that Sbp1 physically interacts with Edc3 and Sbp1-Edc3 interaction competes with Edc3-Edc3 interaction. Purified Edc3 forms assemblies, promoted by the presence of RNA and NADH and the addition of purified Sbp1, but not the RGG-deletion mutant, leads to significantly decreased Edc3 assemblies. We further note that the aggregates of human EWSR1 protein, implicated in neurodegeneration, are more persistent in the absence of Sbp1 and overexpression of EWSR1 in Δsbp1 leads to a growth defect. Taken together, our observations suggest a role of Sbp1 in disassembly, which could apply to disease-relevant heterologous protein-aggregates., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background:  RNA binding proteins play crucial role in determining if a given mRNA will be translated, stored, or degraded. Sbp1 is an RGG-motif containing protein that is implicated in affecting mRNA decapping and translation. Sbp1 represses translation by binding eIF4G1 through its RGG-motif and activates decapping when overexpressed. In this report, we have assessed the genetic interaction of Sbp1 with decapping activators such as Dhh1, Pat1, and Scd6. We have further analyzed the importance of different domains and specific conserved residues of Sbp1 in its ability to cause over-expression mediated growth defect. Method:  Sequence alignment was performed to identify conserved aromatic residues to be mutated. Using site-directed mutagenesis several point mutations and domain deletions were created in Sbp1 expressed under a galactose-inducible promoter. The mutants were tested for their ability to cause growth defect upon over-expression. The ability of Sbp1 to affect over-expression mediated growth defect of other decapping activators was tested using growth assay. Live cell imaging was done to study localization of Sbp1 and its RRM-deletion mutants to RNA granules upon glucose starvation. Results:  Mutation of several aromatic residues in the RGG-motif and that of the phosphorylation sites in the RRM domain of Sbp1 did not affect the growth defect phenotype. Deletion of another eIF4G1-binding RGG-motif protein Scd6 does not affect the ability of Sbp1 to cause growth defect. Moreover, absence of Sbp1 did not affect the growth defect phenotypes observed upon overexpression of decapping activators Dhh1 and Pat1. Strikingly deletion of both the RRM domains (RRM1 and RRM2) and not the RNP motifs within them compromised the growth defect phenotype. Sbp1 mutant lacking both RRM1 and RRM2 was highly defective in localizing to RNA granules.   Conclusion:  This study identifies an important role of RRM domains independent of the RNP motif in Sbp1 function., Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed., (Copyright: © 2021 Bhatter N et al.)

Background: Mechanisms of mRNA fate decisions play an important role in determining if a given mRNA will be translated, stored or degraded upon arrival to cytoplasm. Sbp1 is an important RGG-motif containing protein that is implicated in affecting mRNA decapping and translation. Sbp1 represses translation by binding eIF4G1 through its RGG-motif and activates decapping when overexpressed. In this report we have assessed the genetic interaction of Sbp1 with  decapping activators such as Dhh1, Pat1 and Scd6.  We have further analyzed the importance of different domains and specific conserved residues of Sbp1 in translation repression activity. Method: Sequence alignment was performed to identify conserved aromatic residues to be mutated. Using site-directed mutagenesis several point mutations and domain deletions was created in Sbp1 expressed under a galactose-inducible promoter. The mutants were tested for their ability to cause growth defect upon over-expression. The ability of Sbp1 to affect over expression mediated growth defect of other decapping activators was tested using growth assay. Live cell imaging was done to study localization of Sbp1 and its RRM-deletion mutants to RNA granules upon glucose starvation. Results: Mutation of several aromatic residues in the RGG-motif and that of the phosphorylation sites in the RRM domain of Sbp1 did not affect the growth defect phenotype. Deletion of another eIF4G1-binding RGG-motif protein Scd6 does not affect the ability of Sbp1 to cause growth defect. Moreover, absence of Sbp1 did not affect the growth defect phenotypes observed upon overexpression of decapping activators Dhh1 and Pat1. Strikingly deletion of both the RRM domains (RRM1 and RRM2) and not the RNP motifs within them compromised the growth defect phenotype. Sbp1 mutant lacking both RRM1 and RRM2 was highly defective in localizing to RNA granules.   Conclusion: This study identifies an important role of RRM domains independent of RNP motif in Sbp1 repression activity., Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed., (Copyright: © 2020 Bhatter N et al.)

The fate of messenger RNA in cytoplasm plays a crucial role in various cellular processes. However, the mechanisms that decide whether mRNA will be translated, degraded or stored remain unclear. Single stranded nucleic acid binding protein (Sbp1), an Arginine-Glycine-Glycine (RGG-motif) protein, is known to promote transition of mRNA into a repressed state by binding eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G1 (eIF4G1) and to promote mRNA decapping, perhaps by modulation of Dcp1/2 activity. Sbp1 is known to be methylated on arginine residues in RGG-motif; however, the functional relevance of this modification in vivo remains unknown. Here, we report that Sbp1 is arginine-methylated in an hnRNP methyl transferase (Hmt1)-dependent manner and that methylation is enhanced upon glucose deprivation. Characterization of an arginine-methylation-defective (AMD) mutant provided evidence that methylation affects Sbp1 function in vivo. The AMD mutant is compromised in causing growth defect upon overexpression, and the mutant is defective in both localizing to and inducing granule formation. Importantly, the Sbp1-eIF4G1 interaction is compromised both for the AMD mutant and in the absence of Hmt1. Upon overexpression, wild-type Sbp1 increases localization of another RGG motif containing protein, Scd6 (suppressor of clathrin deficiency) to granules; however, this property of Sbp1 is compromised in the AMD mutant and in the absence of Hmt1, indicating that Sbp1 repression activity could involve other RGG-motif translation repressors. Additionally, the AMD mutant fails to increase localization of the decapping activator DEAD box helicase homolog to foci and fails to rescue the decapping defect of a dcp1-2Δski8 strain, highlighting the role of Sbp1 methylation in decapping. Taken together, these results suggest that arginine methylation modulates Sbp1 role in mRNA fate determination., (© 2019 The Authors. The FEBS Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Federation of European Biochemical Societies.)

Background: Mechanisms of mRNA fate decisions play an important role in determining if a given mRNA will be translated, stored or degraded upon arrival to cytoplasm. Sbp1 is an important RGG-motif containing protein that is implicated in mRNA fate decisions since it can affect mRNA decapping and translation. Sbp1 represses translation by binding eIF4G1 through its RGG-motif and activates decapping when overexpressed. In order to understand the amino acids important for translation repression activity of Sbp1 we performed mutational analysis of Sbp1 combined with assessing its genetic interaction with another RGG-motif protein Scd6. We created two classes of point mutations a) in aromatic residues of the RGG-motif and b) in residues reported to be phosphorylated. Method: Sequence alignment was performed to identify aromatic residues to be mutated based on conservation. Site-directed mutagenesis approach was used to create several point mutations in Sbp1 expressed under galactose-inducible promoter. The mutants were tested for their ability to cause growth defect upon overexpression. The ability of Sbp1 to affect repression activity of other decapping activators was tested using the same growth assay. Results: Mutation of several aromatic residues in the RGG-motif of Sbp1 led to a weak rescue phenotype. However the phospho-mimetic mutants of Sbp1 did not lead to any kind of growth defect rescue. Deletion of another eIF4G1-binding RGG-motif protein Scd6 does not affect ability of Sbp1 to cause growth defect. On the other hand absence of Sbp1 does not affect ability of Dhh1 and Pat1 to repress translation. Conclusion: Based on our growth assay analysis we conclude that mutated aromatic residues contribute marginally to repression activity of Sbp1 whereas phospho-mimetic mutants do not alter ability of Sbp1 to cause growth defect. Interestingly Scd6 does not affect ability of Sbp1 to repress translation, which in turn does not affect Dhh1 and Pat1., Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed., (Copyright: © 2018 Bhatter N et al.)