Search

Background: In the phase 2 EMPOWER-CSCC-1 study (NCT02760498), cemiplimab demonstrated antitumor activity against metastatic (mCSCC) and locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (laCSCC)., Objectives: To report final analysis of weight-based cemiplimab in mCSCC and laCSCC (Groups 1 and 2), fixed-dose cemiplimab in mCSCC (Group 3), and primary analysis of fixed-dose cemiplimab in mCSCC/laCSCC (Group 6)., Methods: Patients received cemiplimab (3 mg/kg intravenously [IV] every 2 weeks [Groups 1 and 2]) or cemiplimab (350 mg IV [Groups 3 and 6]) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS) are presented per protocol, according to post-hoc sensitivity analyses that only include the period of protocol-mandated imaging assessments., Results: At 42.5 months, ORR for Groups 1-3 (n=193) was 47.2%, estimated 12-month DOR was 88.3%, and median PFS was 26.0 months. At 8.7 months, ORR for Group 6 (n=165 patients) was 44.8%; median DOR and median PFS were not reached. Serious treatment-emergent adverse event rates (grade ≥3) were Groups 1-3: 31.1% and Group 6: 34.5%., Limitations: Non-randomized study, non-survival primary endpoint., Conclusion: EMPOWER-CSCC-1 provides the largest prospective data on long-term efficacy and safety for anti-programmed cell death-1 therapy in advanced CSCC., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) are chronic malignant diseases that typically necessitate diverse strategies to achieve remission. Systemic interferon (IFN)-α (subtypes 2a and 2b) has been used to treat MF/SS since 1984; however, its production was recently stopped. The recombinant pegylated (PEG) form of IFN-α-2a remains the only alternative IFN treatment, although it has not been approved for use in MF/SS., Objectives: To assess the effectiveness and safety of PEG-IFN-α-2a in monotherapy and in combination with other treatments using time to next treatment (TTNT) as a measure of clinical therapeutic benefit in a real-world setting., Methods: We conducted an international, multicentre retrospective study of patients with MF and SS (of any stage) treated with PEG-IFN-α-2a from July 2012 to February 2022. Patients were included across 11 centres in 10 countries. The primary endpoints were to determine the TTNT of PEG-IFN-α-2a and adverse events (AEs) in MF/SS., Results: In total, 105 patients were included [mean (SD) age 61 (13.1) years]; 42 (40.0%) had stage IA-IIA and 63 (60.0%) had stage IIB-IVB disease. PEG-IFN-α-2a was combined with other therapies in 67 (63.8%) patients, most commonly with extracorporeal photopheresis (36%) and bexarotene (22%). Patients with stage I-IIA disease achieved an overall response rate (ORR) of 57%; the ORR in those with stage IIB-IVB disease was 51%. Combination treatment resulted in a median TTNT of 10.4 months (range 0.6-50.7) vs. 7.0 months (range 0.7-52.4) for those who received monotherapy (P < 0.01). Overall, the mean (SD) TTNT was 9.2 (10.6) months and the ORR was 53.3% (n = 56). A complete response was seen in 13% of patients and a partial response in 40%. AEs were described in 68.6% (n = 72) of patients. Flu-like symptoms (n = 28; 26.7%), lymphopenia (n = 24; 22.9%) and elevated liver function (n = 10; 9.5%) were the most frequently reported. Grade 3-4 AEs were reported in 23 (21.9%) patients, mostly related to myelosuppression., Conclusions: PEG-IFN-α-2a for MF/SS resulted in an ORR of 53.3% and a mean (SD) TTNT of 9.2 (10.6) months. Combination regimens were superior to monotherapy and doses of 180 µg PEG-IFN-α-2a weekly were related to a higher ORR., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest E.H. has received honoraria for consulting and/or lectures from Helsinn, Takeda, Vidac, Recordati and Rafa; and support for travel/meeting participation from Rafa. C.J. has received honoraria for consulting and/or lectures and support for travel/meeting participation from Takeda, Kyowa Kirin and Recordati. J.N. has received honoraria for consulting and/or lectures from Kyowa Kirin, Takeda, Recordati/Helsinn and Mallinckrodt/Therakos; and research funding from Kyowa Kirin. P.Q. has received honoraria for consulting and/or lectures from Takeda, Kyowa Kirin, Recordati/Helsinn, Mallinckrodt and 4SC. J.C.-M. has received honoraria for lectures from Takeda and Janssen. P.O. has received honoraria for lectures from Kyowa, Helsinn, Recordati, Mallinkrodt and 4SC; and support for travel/meeting participation from Kyowa, Almirall and LEO Pharma., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Mycosis fungoides (MF) has usually an indolent course. However, some patients develop a more aggressive disease and few prognostic parameters have been identified. Isolated cases of pustular MF (pMF) suggest an unfavourable prognosis., Objectives: We aim to describe the clinico-pathological characteristics and prognostic value of pMF., Methods: We retrospectively collected data of all cases of MF with histological pustules diagnosed from 2009 to 2020. The outcomes and clinico-pathological characteristics of pMF at diagnosis (pMFD) were compared to those of a cohort of non-pustular MF (NpMF)., Results: 33 pMF (including 22 pMFD) and 86 NpMF cases were included. The median age at diagnosis of pMF was 61 years [IQR=50-75]. The median follow-up of pMFD was 32 months [IQR=14-49]. Clinically, 33% of pMF had pustules. Large-cell transformation (LCT) occurred in 17 cases. pMFD were at a significantly more advanced-stage and more showed LCT at diagnosis than NpMF (50% vs 7%, p<0.001 and 23% vs 0%, p<0.001, respectively). In multivariate Cox analysis, the presence of histological pustule at diagnostic was associated with shorter OS in all patients (HR=13.90, CI95%[2.43-79]; p=0.003), and in early-stage patients (HR=11.09, CI95%[1.56-78.82]; p=0.02). In multivariate Fine and Gray model analysis, pMFD was associated with a higher cumulative incidence of LCT (SHR=13.90, CI95% [2.43-79]; p=0.003) in all patients. Median OS after the occurrence of histological pustules during follow-up of all pMF patients was 37 months, with a five-year OS of 25% (CI95% [0.06-0.5])., Conclusion: pMF often follows an aggressive course, with a high risk of LCT and shorter survival, even for early-stage patients. Histological pustules at diagnostic of MF might represent an independent poor prognostic factor, to be confirmed by further studies. Because pustules are not always clinically identified, histological pustules should be mentioned in pathology reports of MF and prompt discussion of a closer follow-up., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: New highly effective drugs for moderate-to-severe cutaneous psoriasis are regularly marketed, and the hierarchy of treatments thus requires frequent review., Objectives: A Delphi method was used to enable a structured expert consensus on the use of systemic treatments and phototherapy among adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis., Methods: The Delphi method consists in achieving a convergence of opinions among a panel of experts using several rounds of questionnaires with controlled feedback between rounds. A two-part Delphi questionnaire was administered online to French psoriasis experts. In the first part, 180 items related to the prescription of systemic treatments and phototherapy for adult patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were grouped into 21 sections covering different lines of treatment and different forms of cutaneous psoriasis. The experts voted on each proposal using an ordinal 7-point Likert scale. The second part comprised 11 open-ended questions about special indications for each therapeutic class. These were converted into 101 questions for subsequent rounds. Consensus was deemed to have been reached if more than 80% of the experts agreed with a given proposal., Results: Three rounds of questionnaires were sequentially sent to 35 participants between November 2021 and March 2022. Thirty-three (94%) completed all three rounds. For plaque psoriasis, only methotrexate was recommended by the experts as first-line systemic treatment (89% of votes). Cyclosporin was advocated in pustular and erythrodermic psoriasis, and acitretin was suggested for hyperkeratotic and palmoplantar psoriasis. In the event of failure of or intolerance to non-biological systemic treatments, guselkumab, risankizumab, ixekizumab or secukinumab were recommended by more than 80% of the experts. Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) inhibitors remain useful for patients with cardiovascular risk factors. Special indications were provided for each therapeutic class (methotrexate/narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy, psoralen/ultraviolet A phototherapy, cyclosporin, acitretin, apremilast, TNF inhibitors, interleukin (IL)-12/23 inhibitors, IL-17(R)A inhibitors, and IL-23 inhibitors)., Conclusions: This expert consensus statement indicate that newly available IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors may be favored over TNF and IL-12/23 inhibitors as first-line biologics. The Centre of Evidence of the French Society of Dermatology has drawn up a decision-making algorithm to guide clinicians in the therapeutic management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) present clinicians with the challenge of managing immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can range from mild to severe due to immune system activation 1 . While guidelines recommend discontinuing ICIs for grade 3 partial and all grade 4 irAEs, there is growing interest in rechallenging patients based on oncological outcomes, particularly for cardiovascular and neurological irAEs where data remains scarce 1,2 . We retrospectively evaluated the safety of ICI rechallenge following grade 3-4 irAEs, specifically focusing on cardiovascular and neurological events, in patients discussed at our multidisciplinary immunotoxicity assessment board between 2019 and 2021. Fifteen patients were included, with a median time to severe irAE onset of 49 days. Among them, five patients experienced neurological adverse events (NAEs): aseptic meningitis (3), inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy (1), and ophthalmoplegia (1), while one patient presented with myocarditis. Of the 15 patients retreated with ICIs after initial severe irAEs, 11 (73%) remained free of subsequent irAEs, two (13%) experienced recurrence of the initial irAE, and two (13%) developed new irAEs distinct from the initial event. The median time to event recurrence was 69 days, occurring no earlier than the initial severe irAE. In the subset analysis focusing on severe cardiovascular and neurological irAEs, rechallenge with ICIs was generally well tolerated. However, one patient treated with anti-PD1 experienced a relapse of grade 2 aseptic meningitis. Overall, our findings suggest that rechallenging with ICIs after severe irAEs, including those affecting the cardiovascular and neurological systems, may be safe, particularly after irAE regression and corticosteroid withdrawal., Competing Interests: EG: congress fees and investigator for BMS and MSD. RV: speakers’ bureau for BMS. SM-P: consultant on boards for BMS. AP-L: congress fees for BMS. CDu: Clinical investigation in trials, congress fees and member of boards for BMS, MSD. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Eldani, Kostine, Faure, Lazaro, Rigothier, Hiriart, Teulières, Poullenot, Haissaguerre, Zysman, Veillon, Vergnenegre, Issa, Domblides, Mary-Prey, Beylot-Barry, Pham-Ledard, Dutriaux, Sole, Duval and Gerard.)

Background: Sézary syndrome is an extremely rare and fatal cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Mogamulizumab, an anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody, has recently been associated with increased progression-free survival in a randomized clinical trial in CTCL. We aimed to evaluate OS and prognostic factors in Sézary syndrome, including treatment with mogamulizumab, in a real-life setting., Methods: Data from patients with Sézary (ISCL/EORTC stage IV) and pre-Sézary (stage IIIB) syndrome diagnosed from 2000 to 2020 were obtained from 24 centers in Europe. Age, disease stage, plasma lactate dehydrogenases levels, blood eosinophilia at diagnosis, large-cell transformation and treatment received were analyzed in a multivariable Cox proportional hazard ratio model. This study has been registered in ClinicalTrials (SURPASSe01 study: NCT05206045)., Findings: Three hundred and thirty-nine patients were included (58% men, median age at diagnosis of 70 years, Q1-Q3, 61-79): 33 pre-Sézary (9.7% of 339), 296 Sézary syndrome (87.3%), of whom 10 (2.9%) had large-cell transformation. One hundred and ten patients received mogamulizumab. Median follow-up was 58 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 53-68). OS was 46.5% (95% CI, 40.6%-53.3%) at 5 years. Multivariable analysis showed that age ≥ 80 versus <50 (HR: 4.9, 95% CI, 2.1-11.2, p = 0.001), and large-cell transformation (HR: 2.8, 95% CI, 1.6-5.1, p = 0.001) were independent and significant factors associated with reduced OS. Mogamulizumab treatment was significantly associated with decreased mortality (HR: 0.34, 95% CI, 0.15-0.80, p = 0.013)., Interpretation: Treatment with mogamulizumab was significantly and independently associated with decreased mortality in Sézary syndrome., Funding: French Society of Dermatology, Swiss National Science Foundation (IZLIZ3&#95;200253/1) and SKINTEGRITY.CH collaborative research program., Competing Interests: AdM declares nonfinancial support from Kyowa Kirin and Recordati Rare Diseases; fees from Takeda, Almirall and Recordati Rare Diseases, and research funding, outside the scope of this study, from Kyowa Kirin, Innate Pharma, Almirall and Takeda. MB declares consultant fees from Innate Pharma, Kyowa Kirin, Takeda, BMS, Sanofi, Quantum Genomics, and research funding from Kyowa Kirin and Takeda, outside the scope of this study. SM declares consultant fees outside the scope of this study, from Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Novartis and Biocartis, and has received research funding from BMS, Novartis and Roche. NF declares having received nonfinancial support from Kyowa Kirin. PS received a research grant from Pierre Fabre, fees unrelated to this manuscript from Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Merck-Serono, Pfizer, Roche-Genentech, Pierre Fabre, and Novartis; received nonfinancial support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Roche-Genentech, Pierre Fabre, and Novartis outside of the scope of this study. MBB declares consultant fees from Kyowa Kirin, Takeda and Recordati and research funding from Kyowa Kirin and Almirall outside the scope of this study. HMT declares consultant fees outside from the scope of this study from Innate Pharma, and has received research funding, outside the scope of this study, from Kyowa Kirin. SIHO consultant fees outside the scope of this study from Takeda and Recordati. GD declares consultant fees outside of the scope of this study from Kyowa Kirin and Recordati. EG declares consultant fees and/or grant support from Mallinckrodt, Helsinn, Takeda, Novartis and Kyowa Kirin unrelated to this work. FG declares consultant fees from Recordati and Kyowa Kirin, outside from the scope of this study. GQ declares consultant fees from Takeda, Recordati and Kyowa Kirin, outside the scope of this study. CM declares nonfinancial support from MSD, Pfizer, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, Leo Pharma, Sanofi Aventis, Jannsen Cilag outside of the scope of this study. SB declares having received nonfinancial support from Kyowa Kirin and Recordati. MBag declares consulting fees from Kyowa Kirin, Takeda, Recordati. HB declares consultant fees from Kyowa Kirin. EH declares consultant fees outside the scope of this study from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, Sanofi, Jannsen Cilag, Blueprint Medicines, AbbVie and nonfinancial support from Kyowa Kirin, MSD, UCB Pharma, Novartis, Almirall, Pierre Fabre. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Appendix S2 (see Supporting Information).

Background: Cutaneous adnexal carcinomas are a heterogeneous group of rare neoplasms. Surgical excision is the first-line treatment in localized stage. The use and effectiveness of radiotherapy have not been thoroughly evaluated in these neoplasms., Objectives: The present work analyses prognostic factors on outcomes in skin adnexal carcinomas, based on data from the CARADERM (CAncers RAres DERMatologiques) database., Methods: Data were collected retrospectively including demographic data, tumour types and therapeutic characteristics of all patients included in the CARADERM database, with at least one informative follow-up visit. Analyses were performed on three populations: patients with complete resection of the primary tumour (ADJ/primary population), patients achieving complete remission after complete resection of a recurrent tumour (ADJ/recurrent population) and patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic tumours (ADV/MET population). Overall and recurrence/progression-free survivals at 3-year were analysed using Cox regression models., Results: Radiotherapy did not affect overall survival (OS) in the ADJ/primary population. Adjusted recurrence-free survival (RFS) was significantly lower in the radiotherapy group in ADJ/primary group. Older patients had significantly poorer OS and RFS. Tumour size and immunosuppression were significantly associated with poorer RFS only. Radiotherapy had no effect on OS and RFS in the ADJ/recurrent population. Age was the only factor associated with a poorer OS. Radiotherapy was significantly associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) in age-sex adjusted analysis in the ADV/MET population, without effect on OS., Conclusions: Our study shows that age, tumour size and immunosuppression are significantly associated with survival in localized adnexal carcinomas. Radiotherapy may improve PFS in the ADV/MET population but not in localized and recurrent carcinomas after complete excision., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Background: French guidelines recommend stopping biologic treatment of psoriasis between 3 and 24 weeks before conception in accordance with the relevant Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-life practice of dermatologists in the management of pregnant women with psoriasis previously treated with biologic agents. We wished to assess the level of practitioner adherence to the relevant SmPCs., Material and Methods: We conducted a study in collaboration with GRPso and Resopso. A computerized questionnaire was completed by the practitioners. We performed descriptive statistics and studied the profile of the practitioners, their level of confidence with continuation of biological agents during pregnancy, and their reported practices on the use of biological agents in pregnancy. Statistical analyses were performed using XLSTAT. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant., Results: A total of 63 dermatologists (women: 71%; mean age 43.8 years) participated in this study, the majority of whom were hospital-based (87%). Recommendations were followed by 36.5% of practitioners, while 44% reported discontinuing biologic agents on diagnosis of pregnancy, and 20.5% reported using these agents during pregnancy. Among dermatologists with more than ten years of experience, 19% reported following the SmPC. Among dermatologists with a patient base >200 (patients treated with biologic agents for psoriasis), 19% reported following the SmPC compared to 54% of practitioners with less than 50 patients. The mean age of dermatologists following the SmPC was 41 years vs. 47 years for those not following the SmPC., Discussion: The majority of practitioners do not follow recommendations on discontinuation of biologic agents before the planning of pregnancy by patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Primary cutaneous lymphomas (PCLs) are a heterogeneous group of lymphoproliferative disorders caused by the accumulation of neoplastic T or B lymphocytes in the skin. Sézary syndrome (SS) is an aggressive and rare form of cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL) characterized by an erythroderma and the presence of atypical cerebriform T cells named Sézary cells in skin and blood. Most of the available treatments for SS are not curative, which means there is an urgent need for the development of novel efficient therapies. Recently, targeting cancer metabolism has emerged as a promising strategy for cancer therapy. This is due to the accumulating evidence that metabolic reprogramming highly contributes to tumor progression. Genes play a pivotal role in regulating metabolic processes, and alterations in these genes can disrupt the delicate balance of metabolic pathways, potentially contributing to cancer development. In this review, we discuss the importance of targeting energy metabolism in tumors and the currently available data on the metabolism of Sézary cells, paving the way for potential new therapeutic approaches aiming to improve clinical outcomes for patients suffering from SS.

Aging is the decline of physiological capabilities required for life maintenance and reproduction over time. The human immune cells, including T-cells lymphocytes, undergo dramatic aging-related changes, including those related to telomeres and telomerase. It was demonstrated that telomeres and telomerase play crucial roles in T-cell differentiation, aging, and diseases, including a well-documented link between short telomeres and telomerase activation demonstrated in several T-cells malignancies. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review of the literature regarding T-cells' telomeres and telomerase in health and age related-diseases., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.)

Purpose: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common cancer in white-skinned populations. There is little information on the epidemiology of cSCC, and even less on advanced cases (acSCC). Therefore, we analyzed acSCC patients to describe their characteristics, management, and outcomes over time., Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted over a period of 5 years, including all patients who started systemic therapy for acSCC. The patient characteristics, cSCC management, response to therapy, and survival were recorded. Patients were stratified into equal chronological periods (periods 1 and 2). A subgroup analysis was performed to compare patients who received immunotherapy (group 1) with those who did not (group 2)., Results: The study included 127 patients, and patient numbers increased by an average of 19.7% per year. Most patients were male (88/127), elderly (mean 81.6 years), with comorbidities, and 27.6% were immunocompromised. The median overall survival (OS) was higher in period 2 (20 months) than in period 1 (10 months) (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.62 [0.39; 0.98], p = 0.04). The risk of progression increased with age and immunosuppression. Of the 64 patients who received second-line therapy, 38 had immunotherapy (group 1) and 26 received other therapies (group 2). Immunotherapy reduced mortality and progression by 71% (p = 0.004) and 67% (p = 0.002), respectively., Conclusions: Patients with acSCC are usually very frail and elderly. OS increased over time, with a twofold improvement between periods 1 and 2, whereas progression-free survival (PFS) did not increase. Access to immunotherapy reduced mortality in a majority of patients in period 2. Immunosuppression and advanced age were associated with lower PFS., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Cemiplimab (Libtayo ® ), a human monoclonal immunoglobulin G4 antibody to the programmed cell death-1 receptor, is approved for the treatment of patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC), who are not candidates for curative surgery or curative radiation, using an every-3-weeks (Q3W) dosing interval. Pharmacokinetic modeling indicated that C trough of extended intravenous dosing of 600 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) would be comparable to the approved intravenous dosage of 350 mg Q3W. We examined the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety of cemiplimab dosed Q4W., Methods: In this open-label, phase II trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02760498), the cohort of patients ≥18 years old with advanced CSCC received cemiplimab 600 mg intravenously Q4W for up to 48 weeks. Tumor measurements were recorded every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate by independent central review., Results: Sixty-three patients with advanced CSCC were treated with cemiplimab. The median duration of follow-up was 22.4 months (range: 1.0-39.8). An objective response was observed in 39 patients (62%; 95% CI: 48.8% to 73.9%), with 22% of patients (n = 14) achieving complete response and 40% (n = 25) achieving partial response. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were diarrhea, pruritus, and fatigue., Conclusions: Extended dosing of cemiplimab 600 mg intravenously Q4W exhibited substantial antitumor activity, rapid and durable responses, and an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced CSCC. These results confirm that cemiplimab is a highly active therapy for advanced CSCC. Additional data would help ascertain the benefit-risk profile for the 600 mg intravenous dosing regimen compared with the approved regimen., Competing Interests: Competing interests: DR reports institutional research grants and funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Kura Oncology, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, ALX Oncology, Decibel Therapeutics and Roche; and uncompensated scientific committee and advisory board membership from GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc and Sanofi. BGMH reports consulting or advisory roles at AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer and Roche; and institutional research funding from Amgen. NB-S declares no conflict of interest. DS reports institutional patients’ fees from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc; advisory board, speaker honoraria and patients’ fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novarti and Pierre Fabre; steering committee honoraria from 4SC, Bristol-Myers Squibb, InflaRx, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Nektar and Novartis; advisory board fees from Daiichi Sanyo, OncoSec Medical, Pfizer and Replimune; advisory board and patients’ fees from Philogen and Sun Pharma; and research funding to their institution from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Novartis. SB reports an advisory board role or speaker bureau for Sanofi, Ipsen, Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Merck Sharp & Dohme Australia; and virtual meeting sponsorship from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Merck Sharp & Dohme Australia. ST reports speaker honoraria and advisory board fees from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pierre Fabre and Sun Pharma. FM reports travel support, speaker’s fees or advisor’s honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche and Sanofi; and research funding from Novartis and Roche. TE reports consulting or advisory roles at Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi Genzyme; speaker’s bureau roles at Merck Sharp & Dohme and Roche; and research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Novartis. VCE reports advisory board honoraria from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Pharmamar; and speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca and Merck Sharp & Dohme. BS reports advisory board membership for Bristol-Myers Squibb Australia and Merck Sharp & Dohme. MBB reports serving as a speaker without honoraria for Sanofi. SD reports advisory board honoraria and travel expenses from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, PFO Global and Sun Pharma. BD reports consultancy for Sanofi. MRM reports honoraria and travel expenses from Genentech, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Sanofi and Sun Pharma; and institutional research funding from Genentech, Eli Lilly, Novartis and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. AH reports institutional grants, speaker’s honoraria and consultancy fees from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Provectus and Roche; institutional grants and consultancy fees from EMD Serono, Philogen and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc; and consultancy fees from OncoSec Medical. CDS reports steering committee membership for Castle Biosciences; steering committee membership and consultancy for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc; consultancy for Sanofi; research funding from Castle Biosciences, Genentech, Merck, Novartis and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc; and serving as a chair for the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. AML reports uncompensated advisory board participation from Merck Sharp & Dohme and Bristol-Myers Squibb with travel and accommodation expenses; and uncompensated consultancy for Eisai. S-YY, APaccaly, APapachristos, J-HN, EO, FS, JB and IL are employees of and shareholders in Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. MGF is an employee of, has patents pending with, and is a shareholder of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. AG reports personal fees and nonfinancial support (advisory board and travel support) from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Sun Pharma; personal fees (advisory board) from Eisai, Merck KGaA and Pfizer; non-financial support (travel) from Astellas; and clinical trial unit support from PPD Australia., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Importance: The Ritux 3 trial demonstrated the short-term efficacy and safety of first-line treatment with rituximab compared with a standard corticosteroid regimen in pemphigus. No data on the long-term follow-up of patients who received rituximab as first line are available., Objective: To assess the long-term efficacy and safety of the Ritux 3 treatment regimen., Design, Setting, and Participants: This 7-year follow-up study of the Ritux 3 trial included patients with pemphigus from 25 dermatology departments in France from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2015., Exposure: Patients were initially randomized in the rituximab plus prednisone group or prednisone-alone group., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the 5- and 7-year disease-free survival (DFS) without corticosteroids, assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves. Secondary outcomes were occurrence of relapse, occurrence of severe adverse events (SAEs), and evolution of antidesmoglein (Dsg) antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay values to predict long-term relapse., Results: Of the 90 patients in the Ritux 3 trial, 83 were evaluated at the end of follow-up study visit (44 in the rituximab plus prednisone group; 39 in the prednisone-alone group) with a median (IQR) follow-up of 87.3 (79.1-97.5) months. Forty-three patients (93%) from the rituximab plus prednisone and 17 patients (39%) from the prednisone-alone group had achieved complete remission without corticosteroids at any time during the follow-up. Patients from the rituximab group had much longer 5- and 7-year DFS without corticosteroids than patients from the prednisone-alone group (76.7% and 72.1% vs 35.3% and 35.3%, respectively; P < .001), and had about half the relapses (42.2% vs 83.7%; P < .001). Patients who received rituximab as second-line treatment had shorter DFS than patients treated as first line (P = .007). Fewer SAEs were reported in the rituximab plus prednisone group compared with the prednisone-alone group, 31 vs 58 respectively, corresponding to 0.67 and 1.32 SAEs per patient, respectively (P = .003). The combination of anti-Dsg1 values of 20 or more IU/mL and/or anti-Dsg3 values of 48 or more IU/mL yielded 0.83 positive predictive value and 0.94 negative predictive value to predict long-term relapse., Conclusions and Relevance: In this secondary analysis of the Ritux 3 trail, first-line treatment of patients with pemphigus with the Ritux 3 regimen was associated with long-term sustained complete remission without corticosteroid therapy without any additional maintenance infusion of rituximab.

Purpose: While several studies reported the influence of co-medications on immune checkpoint therapy and chemotherapy, it remains poorly studied with targeted therapy. Targeted therapies inhibiting BRAF and MEK had significantly improved management of advanced melanoma with BRAFV600 mutation over the last decade, we aimed to investigate the possible influence of co-mediations on the efficacy and toxicity of these targeted therapies (TT)., Methods: We conducted an observational study identifying patients with advanced melanoma treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors between 2013 and 2020 in the Bordeaux University Hospital. Co-medications given within 1 month before until 3 months after the initiation of targeted therapy were recorded and classified by their mechanism or by their metabolism. Survival data were analyzed with univariable and multivariable cox regression and the combined effect of multiple factors was evaluated using a factor analysis of mixed data (FAMD). The impact of co-medications on toxicity related to TT was also assessed., Results: A total of 192 patients were included. Although several co-medications were associated with significantly shorter overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS), PPIs was the only co-medication with a significant impact in multivariable analysis considering all co-medications and specific prognostic factors. Co-medications did not influence the risk, type, or timing of TT-related toxicity. Additional FAMD revealed the impact of each factor on the oncological outcomes. In a subgroup of patients, residual plasma TT concentration was available and did not differ between PPIs users and non-users., Conclusion: Co-medications, especially PPIs, must be carefully assessed at the time of TT initiation., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: SP: congress fees and consultant on boards for Novartis et Pierre Fabre Oncology. CD: congress fees and consultant for BMS, MSD. Sanofi, Pierre Fabre, sun pharma, Novartis. EG: congress fees and investigator for Novartis and Pierre Fabre Dermatology., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Another course of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is often considered in patients with cancer progression and previous immune-related adverse events, including inflammatory arthritis (ICI-IA), but there are limited data regarding safety of ICI rechallenge in this setting. We aimed to assess the rate and clinical features associated with ICI-IA flare/recurrence on ICI rechallenge., Methods: We conducted a multicentre observational study including cancer patients with ICI-IA who started a second course of ICI more than 3 months after ICI discontinuation in four French university hospitals. Primary outcome was the frequency of ICI flare/recurrence after ICI rechallenge., Results: Twenty-three patients were included. At the time of ICI rechallenge, 18 patients reported no symptoms of ICI-IA (78%) and 5 had grade 1 (22%), 11 patients (48%) were not receiving any ICI-IA treatment, 11 (48%) were still on prednisone, 2 (9%) were on conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and 1 (4%) on anti-IL-6. ICI-IA flare/recurrence occurred in 12 patients (52%) with a median time of 1 month after ICI rechallenge. ICI-IA phenotype, disease activity and ICI-IA treatment at the time of ICI rechallenge did not differ according to ICI-IA flare/recurrence status., Conclusion: In this first observational study of ICI-IA patients rechallenged with ICI, about half of the patients experienced ICI-IA flare/recurrence with a similar phenotype but occurring earlier than the initial ICI-IA, warranting close monitoring during the first month of retreatment. Risk of flare did not differ according to baseline immunosuppressive treatment at the time of rechallenge., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AL and TB: No conflict of interest. GM: Research support: Abbvie, BMS, Gilead, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Roche Chugai, Sanofi; consulting fees: Abbvie, UCB, BMS, Lilly, Gilead, Novartis, Janssen; education: Abbvie, BMS, Gilead, Lilly, Novartis, Roche Chugai. AT: Consulting fees: Galapagos; speaker: Brystol-Myers Squibb; support for attending congress: Sanofi, Abbvie. SB: Co conflict of interest. SP, CD: Congress fees and investigator in clinical trials: BMS and MSD. EG: Congress fees and investigator for BMS and MSD. AP-L and MB-B: No conflict of interest. MZ: Grants from AVAD and grants from FRM. RV: Consulting fees and speaker fees: Roche; registration reimbursement: Pfizer and AstraZeneka; speaker and registration reimbursement: BMS and MSD. AD: Consulting or Advisory Role: Merck, MSD, BMS, Merus; travel, accommodations, expenses: BMS, Merck. MG-G: Consulting or Advisory Role: Astra Zeneca, Merck, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, Roche; travel, accommodations, expenses: MSD, Janssen. BS: no conflict of interest. FL: Congress fees, consulting fees, and sub investigator in trials: Astra Zeneca, BMS, MSD, Roche, Pfizer. ML, CR and M-ET: No conflict of interest. TS: Clinical research: AbbVie, Abivax, Biogen, Pfizer, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Sandoz; advisory Boards: AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi; education: AbbVie, Biogen, BMS, Galapagos, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer, Viatris; help for research: Pfizer, Lilly, Abbvie, Biogen. MK: No conflict of interest., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Little is known about phototype and the response to systemic treatment in psoriasis., Objectives: To assess the characteristics of psoriasis, the therapeutic choice and its efficacy according to phototype., Methods: We included patients from the PsoBioTeq cohort initiating a first biologic. Patients were classified according to their phototype. The evaluation included disease characteristics, choice of the initial biologic and therapeutic response at 12 months based on 90% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0/1., Results: Of the 1400 patients included, 423 (30.2%), 904 (64.6%) and 73 (5.2%) were in the phototype I-II, III-IV and V-VI groups, respectively. The V-VI group had a higher initial DLQI, and more frequently initiated ustekinumab. Patients in the V-VI group maintained the initial biologic prescribed as did the other phototype groups, even though the proportion of patients reaching PASI 90 and DLQI 0/1 at 12 months was lower in this group than the other groups., Conclusions: Patient phototype seems associated with quality of life and choice of the initial biologic in psoriasis. The phototype V-VI group less frequently switched treatments than did the other groups when the response was not efficient., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest F.T. is Head of the Clinical Research Unit at Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital and the Centre de Pharmacoepidemiologie (Cephepi) (Pharmacoepidemiology Centre) of the Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris (Paris Hospitals); she has received research funding, grants and fees for consultancy activities from a large number of pharmaceutical companies that have contributed to employee salaries (but no personal remuneration for F.T.). M.V. has undertaken activities as a paid consultant, advisor or speaker for AbbVie, Arrow, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galderma, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Lilly, medac, MSD, Novartis and Pfizer. M.B.-B. offers a consultancy service and is an investigator for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Lilly, MSD, Novartis and Pfizer. N.B. has been an investigator for Novartis and Pfizer; she is a consultant for Janssen and has received speaker remuneration from Janssen. P.J. is a consultant for GSK, Lilly, Principia Biopharma, Roche and Sanofi Aventis. D.J. is a consultant for AbbVie, Biogen, Celgene, Fresenius Kabi, Janssen, Lilly, medac, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. E.M. is a consultant for AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis and Pfizer; she has also been an investigator for AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, LEO Pharma, Novartis and Pfizer; and has received speaker remuneration from AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis and Pfizer. C.P. has been an investigator and consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Novartis and Pfizer. M.-A.R. is a consultant for AbbVie, BMS, Galderma, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and Pierre Fabre. H.B. has undertaken activities as a paid consultant, advisor or speaker for AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Baxalta, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceuticals and UCB; he has also received grant funding from Pfizer. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine cutaneous tumor with high metastatic potential. In rare cases, it can be associated with paraneoplastic syndromes (PNS), which result from an antitumor immunity against antigens produced by the tumor itself. Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (LEMS) is a neurological autoimmune PNS characterized by an impairment of the neuromuscular junction, leading to proximal muscle weakness and fatigability. Although the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is a breakthrough in the management of many cancers, onset or worsen of immune diseases has been described. Thereby, in patients with previous neurological PNS like LEMS, the ICI therapy for cancer may aggravate neurological symptoms and lead to irreversible impairment. We report here 2 cases of patients with metastatic MCC associated with a LEMS at the diagnosis. Both successfully received ICI therapies (anti-PDL1 avelumab and anti-PD1 pembrolizumab) without worsening of LEMS and any major immune-related adverse effects. Their neurological condition improved and disappeared concomitantly with the efficacy of immunotherapy, and we did not observe relapse of both MCC and LEMS after treatment discontinuation. Finally, we performed a complete review of the literature, which confirmed that ICI treatment could be discussed for patients with paraneoplastic LEMS, and emphasized the need for multidisciplinary management., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Lentigo maligna (LM) is a melanocytic proliferation occurring on photo-exposed skin that may progress to LM melanoma. Surgery is recommended as first-line treatment. Excision margins of 5-10 mm remain, without international consensus. Several studies have shown that imiquimod, an immunomodulator, induces LM regression. This study investigated the effect of imiquimod versus placebo in neoadjuvant settings., Patients and Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized, multicentre, phase III clinical study. Patients were randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to receive imiquimod or placebo for 4 weeks, followed by LM excision 4 weeks after the last application of imiquimod or placebo. The primary endpoint was extra-lesional excision, with a 5 mm margin from the residual pigmentation after imiquimod or vehicle. Secondary endpoints included the gain on the surface removed between the two groups; number of revision surgeries to obtain extra-lesional excisions; relapse-free time; and number of complete remissions after treatment., Results: A total of 283 patients participated in this study; 247 patients, 121 patients in the placebo group and 126 in the imiquimod group, accounted for the modified ITT population. The first extralesional extirpation was performed in 116 (92%) imiquimod patients and in 102 (84%) placebo patients; the difference was not significant (p = 0.0743). Regarding the surface of LM, imiquimod reduced the LM surface (4.6-3.1 cm 2 ) significantly (p < 0.001) more compared to the placebo (3.9-4.1 cm 2 )., Conclusion: Imiquimod reduces the lentigo maligna surface after 1 month of treatment, without a higher risk of intralesional excision and with a positive aesthetic outcome., (© 2023 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Background: Efficacy and safety of mogamulizumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against C-C chemokine receptor 4, were demonstrated in a previous multinational clinical trial conducted in patients with previously treated cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL): Sézary syndrome (SS) or Mycosis Fungoides (MF)., Objectives: The real-world French OMEGA study aimed to describe effectiveness and tolerability of mogamulizumab in adult patients with CTCL, overall and according to the disease (SS or MF)., Methods: In this retrospective study, patients treated with mogamulizumab for SS or MF were included from 14 French expert centres. The overall response rate (ORR) under treatment was described (primary criterion), as well as treatment use and safety data., Results: The 122 analysed patients (69 SS, 53 MF) were aged 66.6 ± 12.1 years at mogamulizumab initiation, and their median disease duration was 2.5 years (IQR: 1.3-5.6). Prior to treatment start, they received a median of three systemic CTCL therapies (2-5). Overall, 77.8% of patients suffered from advanced disease (Stage IIB-IVB), with frequent blood (B1/B2) involvement (67.5%). Over the treatment period (median: 4.6 months, 2.1-7.2), 96.7% of patients received all the planned mogamulizumab infusions. Among the 109 patients evaluable for effectiveness, ORR was 58.7% (95% CI [48.9-68.1]) overall, 69.5% [56.1-80.8] in SS and 46.0% [31.8-60.7] in MF. Compartmental response in the blood was observed in 81.8% [69.1-90.9] of SS patients. Skin responses were observed in 57.0% [47.0-66.5] of patients overall, 66.7% [52.9-78.6] in SS and 46.0% [31.8-60.7] in MF. The most common serious adverse drug reactions were rash (8.1% of patients) and infusion-related reactions (2.4%) which led to treatment discontinuation in 7.3% and 0.8% of patients, respectively. One patient with SS died from mogamulizumab-related tumour lysis syndrome., Conclusions: This large French study confirmed the effectiveness and tolerability of mogamulizumab in SS and MF patients in routine medical practice., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Trichoblastic carcinoma is a rare malignant cutaneous adnexal tumor with a risk of local invasion and distant metastasis. As of today, there is no consensus for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic trichoblastic carcinoma. "AcSé Nivolumab" is a multi-center Phase II basket clinical trial (NCT03012581) evaluating the safety and efficacy of nivolumab in several cohorts of rare, advanced cancers. Here we report the results of nivolumab in patients with trichoblastic carcinoma. Of the eleven patients enrolled in the study, five patients had been previously treated by sonic hedgehog inhibitors. The primary endpoint 12-week objective response rate was 9.1% (N = 1/11) with 1 partial response. Six patients who progressed under previous lines of treatment showed stable disease at 12 weeks, reflecting a good control of the disease with nivolumab. Furthermore, 54.5% of the patients (N = 6/11) had their disease under control at 6 months. The 1-year overall survival was 80%, and the median progression-free survival was 8.4 months (95%CI, 5.7 to NA). With 2 responders (2 complete responses), the best response rate to nivolumab at any time was 18.2% (95%CI, 2.3-51.8%). No new safety signals were identified, and adverse events observed herein were previously described and well known with nivolumab monotherapy. These results are promising, suggesting that nivolumab might be an option for patients with advanced trichoblastic carcinomas. Further studies on larger cohorts are necessary to confirm these results and define the role of nivolumab in the treatment of trichoblastic carcinomas., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Advanced-stage cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) are rare, usually refractory, and fatal diseases. Case series have suggested that allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) might improve the prognosis of advanced-stage CTCLs. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of allogeneic HSCT compared with non-HSCT therapy on the outcome of individuals with advanced-stage CTCLs., Methods: In this prospective, multicentre, matched controlled trial, conducted at 30 hospitals, participants with advanced CTCLs were allocated treatment: if they had an available compatible related donor they were assigned to allogeneic HSCT, or if not they were allocated to non-allogeneic HSCT therapy. Key inclusion criteria were participants aged 18-70 years, with advanced stage mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome, and at least one poor prognostic criteria. Participants were excluded if they were not in complete or partial remission of the disease. Propensity score 1:1 matching with replacement (ie, that each participant treated with HSCT was matched to the participant with the closest propensity score treated with non-HSCT therapy, even if they had already been matched) was used to handle confounding factors, with the balance of covariate distribution between HSCT and non-HSCT groups assessed using standardised mean differences. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the matched intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02520908), and is currently active but not recruiting., Findings: From June 1, 2016, to March 3, 2022, total of 99 participants were enrolled at 17 centres in France. Participants with a sibling or matched unrelated donor were assigned to allogeneic HSCT (HSCT group, n=55 [56%]) and participants without a donor were assigned to non-allogeneic HSCT treatment (non-HSCT group, n=44 [44%]). The median follow-up among survivors was 12·6 months (IQR 11·0-35·2). In the HSCT group, 51 participants (93%) were 1:1 matched to participants from the non-HSCT group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the HSCT group (9·0 months [95% CI 6·6-30·5]) than in the non-HSCT group (3·0 months [2·0-6·3]), with a hazard ratio of 0·38 (95% CI 0·21-0·69; p<0·0001). In the per-protocol population, 40 participants (78%) in the HSCT group had 101 serious events and 29 participants (67%) in the non-HSCT group had 70 serious adverse events. The most common serious adverse event other than graft-versus-host disease in both groups was infections, occurring in 30 participants (59%) in the HSCT group and in 19 participants (44%) in the non-HSCT group., Interpretation: Allogeneic HSCT was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival in participants with advanced-stage CTCLs. These results indicate that allogeneic HSCT treatment should be made available to individuals with high-risk, advanced-stage mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome who achieve pre-transplant disease remission., Funding: French Ministry of Health, National Cancer Institute, Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique en Cancérologie., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests AdM reports research funding from Innate, Almirall, and Kyowa Kirin; travel expenses from Kyowa Kirin, Recordati Rare Diseases and Orphan Europe, and Janssen-Cilag; and fees from Takeda. MB-B reports consultancy at Kyowa Kirin and Recordati; and research funding from Celgene and Roche. SD reports institutional grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and Merck Sharp & Dohme. SI-H-O reports consultancy for Takeda and Recordati. CO reports honoraria from Novartis. JA reports honoraria from Roche and Janssen. OD reports consultancy from Bristol Myers Squibb, Kyowa Kirin, Merck, Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Recordati Rare Diseases, Sanofi, and Sun Pharma; honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Kyowa Kirin, LeoPharma, Merck, Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Recordati Rare Diseases, Sanofi, and Sun Pharma; registration to meetings from Bristol Myers Squibb, Kyowa Kirin, LeoPharma, Merck, Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, and Pierre Fabre; grants from Pierre Fabre; research funding from Kyowa Kirin, Novartis, and Pierre Fabre; and travel expenses from Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, LeoPharma, Merck, Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, and Sanofi. SBa reports consultancy at Amgen and Blueprint Medicines; and honoraria from Novartis, Leo Laboratories, and AbbVie. EW-H reports consultancy at Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, BluePrint, Sun Pharma, AbbVie, and Sanofi; research funding from AbbVie; and honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, AbbVie, Sanofi, and Pierre Fabre. FA reports consultancy at AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen-Cilag, Leo, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, and Union Chimique Belge; honoraria from AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen-Cilag, Leo, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, and Union Chimique Belge; and research funding from Galderma, Janssen, and Pfizer. RH reports honoraria from Kite and Gilead, Novartis, Incyte, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Takeda, and Roche; and consultancy at Kite and Gilead, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb and Celgene, ADC Therapeutics, Incyte, and Miltenyi. AP-L reports honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis; and travel accommodation and meeting participation from Kyowa Kirin, Recordati, Novartis, and Bristol Myers Squibb. DM reports honoraria from Novartis, Incyte, CSL Behring, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. J-DB reports being on a speaker or advisory board member for Boehringer-Ingelheim, Janssen, Novartis, Union Chimique Belge, Leo, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Almirall. FG reports consultancy at Recordati Rare Disease, Kyowa Kirin, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Merck Sharp & Dohme. HM-T reports consultancy at Innate; and research funding from Kyowa Kirin. SMo reports honoraria from Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche and Biocartis; and research funding from Novartis and Bristol Myers Squibb. MBat reports consultancy at Bristol Myers Squibb and Quantum Genomics; honoraria from Innate, Kyowa Kirin, Takeda, Meccellis Biotech, Cerba Research, and Sanofi; research funding from Kyowa Kirin; and grants from Takeda. ED reports grants from Pfizer and Mallinckrodt; and consultancy at Swedish Orphan Biovitrum. ML reports honoraria from Novartis, Pfizer, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Sandoz, Novartis, Sanofi, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum, Gilead, and Bristol Myers Squibb. AP reports consultancy and honoraria from Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Sun Pharma. AH reports consultancy at Novartis, Astellas, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Pfizer; and honoraria from Novartis, Astellas, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Pfizer. YLC reports consultancy at Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Pierre Fabre Oncologie; and honoraria from Novartis, Leo, AbbVie, Pfizer, and Pierre Fabre Oncologie. EF reports participation in advisory board at Gilead, GSK, and Sanofi; speakers bureau from Novartis and Alexion; honoraria from Novartis; and travel grants from Gilead, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis. GS reports consultancy at Novartis and Alexion Pharmaceuticals; honoraria from Novartis, Incyte, and Alexion Pharmaceuticals; and research funding from Alexion Pharmaceuticals. RPdL reports consultancy at Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Apellis Pharmaceuticals, and Swedish Orphan Biovitrum; honoraria from Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Apellis Pharmaceuticals, and Swedish Orphan Biovitrum; research funding from Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen, and Alexion Pharmaceuticals; and grants from Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Novartis, and Pfizer. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The nature of the COVID-19 pandemic led to concerns among patients and physicians about the potential impact of immunosuppressive treatments for chronic diseases such as psoriasis on the risk of severe COVID-19., Objectives: To describe treatment modifications and determine the incidence of COVID-19 infection among psoriasis patients during the first wave of the pandemic, and identify the factors associated with these events., Methods: Data from PSOBIOTEQ cohort relating to the first COVID-19 wave in France (March to June, 2020), as well as a patient-centred COVID-19 questionnaire, were used to evaluate the impact of lockdown on changes (discontinuations, delays or reductions) in systemic therapies, and to determine the incidence of COVID-19 cases among these patients. Logistic regression models were used to assess associated factors., Results: Among the 1751 respondents (89.3%), 282 patients (16.9%) changed their systemic treatment for psoriasis, with 46.0% of these changes being initiated by the patients themselves. Patients were more likely to experience psoriasis flare-ups during the first wave if they changed their treatment during this period (58.7% vs 14.4%; P < 0.0001). Changes to systemic therapies were less frequent among patients with cardiovascular diseases (P < 0.001), and those aged ≥ 65 years (P = 0.02). Overall, 45 patients (2.9%) reported having COVID-19, and eight (17.8%) required hospitalization. Risk factors for COVID-19 infection were close contact with a positive case (P < 0.001) and living in a region with a high incidence of COVID-19 (P < 0.001). Factors associated with a lower risk of COVID-19 were avoiding seeing a physician (P = 0.002), systematically wearing a mask during outings (P = 0.011) and being a current smoker (P = 0.046)., Conclusions: Discontinuation of systemic psoriasis treatments during the first COVID-19 wave (16.9%) - mainly decided by patients themselves (46.0%) - was associated with a higher incidence of disease flares (58.7% vs 14.4%). This observation and factors associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 highlight the need to maintain and adapt patient-physician communication during health crises according to patient profiles, with the aim of avoiding unnecessary treatment discontinuations and ensuring that patients are informed about the risk of infection and the importance of complying with hygiene rules., Competing Interests: Disclosure of interest HA, YD, ES, and OC have no conflicts of interest to disclose. EM is a consultant and has received speaker remunerations from Novartis, AbbVie, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Celgene, Amgen, and Janssen-Cilag. MAR is a consultant for Pfizer, LEO Pharma, Janssen, Galderma, AbbVie, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Merck and BMS. MV has undertaken activities as a paid consultant, adviser or speaker for Janssen, AbbVie, MSD, Pfizer, LEO Pharma, Medac, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis and Arrow. MBB offers a consultancy service and is an investigator for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Lilly, MSD, Novartis and Pfizer. AD has undertaken activities as a paid consultant for Sanofi-Aventis, outside of the submitted work. NB has been an investigator for Pfizer and Novartis. She is currently a consultant for Janssen and has received speaker remuneration from Janssen. PJ is a consultant for Roche, GSK, Lilly, Principia Biopharma, and Sanofi-Aventis. DJ is a consultant for AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Fresenius-Kabi, Janssen-Cilag, LEO Pharma, Lilly, MEDAC, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB. HB has undertaken activities as a paid consultant, adviser or speaker for AbbVie, Almirall, Anaptysbio, Amgen, Aristea Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Xion Pharmaceuticals. He has also received grant funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, LEO Pharma and Pfizer. CP has been an investigator and consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer and Sanofi. FT is head of the Pharmaco-Epidemiology Centre (Cephépi) of the Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris and of the Clinical Research Unit of Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, both of which structures have received unrestricted research funding and grants for the research projects handled and fees for consultant activities from a large number of pharmaceutical companies that have contributed indiscriminately to the salaries of its employees. Florence Tubach is not employed by these structures and has not received any personal remuneration from these companies., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

BRAF V600 wild-type advanced melanomas quickly reach a therapeutic dead-end, after immunotherapy failure. Even if preclinical studies have suggested sensitivity to MEK inhibitors such as trametinib in NRAS, NF1 or GNA mutated melanoma, therapeutic options are limited for these patients. We present a retrospective monocentric study of 22 patients with advanced melanoma treated by trametinib after immunotherapy resistance. Melanomas harboured NRAS (20), NF1 (1) or GNA 11 (1) mutations. For most of them (18), anti-PD1 was associated with trametinib. A disease-control was reported in 36% of patients (8/22), with six stable diseases and two partial responses according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Median progression-free survival was 2 months (1-14) and median overall survival was 6.5 months (2-24). In patients with progressive disease (14/22), dissociated radiologic responses and clinical benefits such as pain reduction were seen in five patients. High blood level of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) seemed associated with trametinib failure, without significance ( P  = 0.06). Adverse events (grade 1-3) occurred in 91% of patients during the first weeks of treatment, mainly papulo-pustular rashes (77%), leg oedemas (36%), asthenia (18%) and diarrhoea (14%). This real-life study showed that trametinib may benefit some metastatic melanoma that progressed after chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Objective disease control (partial response or stable disease) using RECIST criteria was observed in 36% of patients. Because of frequent side-effects which can alter the quality of life and the short response duration, this off-label option has to be discussed with the patient. Studies with combination therapy with trametinib to improve relapse-free survival and lower side-effects are ongoing., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Folliculitis decalvans is a chronic inflammatory skin disease leading to scarring alopecia. Management of this disabling disease is difficult and no treatment is currently approved. Current knowledge regarding the pathogenesis of folliculitis decalvans suggests the benefit of using anti-tumour necrosis factor-α. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of anti-tumour necrosis factor-α for management of folliculitis decalvans. A single-centre retrospective pilot study included patients with refractory folliculitis decalvans treated by tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors. An Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score was designed and validated to assess the efficacy of the therapy. Response to treatment was considered good to excellent when an IGA ≤ 2 was obtained at month 12. Eleven patients were included, with a mean time from diagnosis of folliculitis decalvans to the introduction of infliximab (n = 9) or adalimumab (n = 2) of 8.55 ± 1.26 years. Nine patients had failed on at least 2 lines of systemic therapies before starting anti-tumour necrosis factor-α. The median IGA score at baseline was 3. At the end of follow-up, 5 patients were considered responders. Overall, the safety profile of anti-tumour necrosis factor-α was good. The results suggest that the clinical benefit of anti-tumour necrosis factor-α is obtained after at least 6 months of treatment. However, further prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

As a major cancer hallmark, there is a sustained interest in understanding the telomerase contribution to carcinogenesis in order to therapeutically target this enzyme. This is particularly relevant in primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL), a malignancy showing telomerase dysregulation with few investigative data available. In CTCL, we examined the mechanisms involved in telomerase transcriptional activation and activity regulation. We analyzed 94 CTCL patients from a Franco-Portuguese cohort, as well as 8 cell lines, in comparison to 101 healthy controls. Our results showed that not only polymorphisms (SNPs) located at the promoter of human telomerase reverse transcriptase ( hTERT) gene (rs2735940 and rs2853672) but also an SNP located within the coding region (rs2853676) could influence CTCL occurrence. Furthermore, our results sustained that the post-transcriptional regulation of hTERT contributes to CTCL lymphomagenesis. Indeed, CTCL cells present a different pattern of hTERT spliced transcripts distribution from the controls, mostly marked by an increase in the hTERT β+ variants proportion. This increase seems to be associated with CTCL development and progression. Through hTERT splicing transcriptome modulation with shRNAs, we observed that the decrease in the α-β+ transcript induced a decrease in the cell proliferation and tumorigenic capacities of T-MF cells in vitro. Taken together, our data highlight the major role of post-transcriptional mechanisms regulating telomerase non canonical functions in CTCL and suggest a new potential role for the α-β+ hTERT transcript variant.

Primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg-type (PCDLBCL-LT) is an aggressive cutaneous lymphoma. Bone involvement is rare and poorly described. We present five cases of PCDLBCL-LT with bone localization. In four cases, the bone involvement was diagnosed during the initial staging with positron emission tomography (PET) or computed tomography (CT) scan, and in the fifth case after tibial fracture during treatment with rituximab (RTX) and polychemotherapy (PCT). PCDLBCL-LT can be asymptomatic and involve bone sites distant from cutaneous lesions. None had other extracutaneous involvement. In our series, all patients received RTX-PCT as first-line chemotherapy and all had early relapses or progression. Second-line treatments had poor efficacy. Our series shows that bone involvement seems to be associated with poor prognosis in PCDLBCL-LT. Bone localization is not diagnosed with initial thoracic-abdominal-pelvic CT when asymptomatic and affecting the limbs only. If there is a suspicion of PCDLBCL-LT, patients should undergo systematic investigation with alternative imaging techniques, including PET, both at baseline and if there is any concern during follow-up., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) are rare types of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, which present in skin. Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) are subtypes which make up two-thirds of all CTCL cases. The phase 3 MAVORIC study (NCT01728805) compared mogamulizumab to vorinostat in MF and SS patients, with post hoc data showing a trend for higher efficacy in mogamulizumab-treated patients as baseline blood tumour burden increases., Objectives: The aim of this study was to use updated post hoc analyses in order to examine the efficacy of mogamulizumab and vorinostat in MF patients when stratified by baseline blood involvement and to determine what factors affect time-to-global and time-to-skin response to inform clinical follow-up., Methods: Post hoc analyses were carried out using data from MAVORIC. Overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) data were used to assess efficacy in patients with MF. Time-to-global response (TTR) was examined by disease subtype, by blood involvement in MF patients, and time-to-skin response was examined by blood involvement in MF patients., Results: Numerically superior results were seen for ORR, PFS and TTNT in mogamulizumab-treated patients with MF compared with vorinostat, with a trend for outcomes improving with increasing baseline blood class. Statistically significant results for mogamulizumab compared with vorinostat were seen for MF B1 pts for PFS (8.43 vs. 2.83 months, p = 0.003) and TTNT (11.9 vs. 3.13 months, p = 0.002), and for MF B2 pts for ORR (46.2 vs. 9.1 months, p = 0.033)., Conclusions: In mogamulizumab-treated MF patients, ORR and PFS were seen to improve with increasing blood involvement, which led to improved TTNT. TTR was more predictable for mogamulizumab-treated MF patients with blood involvement, and skin response may take longer than previously reported in some patients., (© 2022 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: M.B.-B. is a consultant for AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, Novartis, Medac and UCB. N.B. is a consultant for Novartis, Celgene, MSD, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer and AbbVie. P.J. is a consultant for AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly and Novartis. D.J. is a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Fresenius-Kabi, Janssen-Cilag, LEO, Lilly, Pfizer, MEDAC, Novartis and UCB. E.M. is a consultant for AbbVie, LEO Pharma, Celgene, Pfizer, Janssen-Cilag and Novartis. C.P. is a consultant for AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Boerhinger, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi and UCB. M.-A.R. is a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Nordic, Novartis, Pfizer and Medac. H.B. is a consultant for AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Biocad, Boerhinger, Celgene, Dermavant, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Eli Lilly, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharmaceuticals and UCB. H.A. is a consultant for AbbVie, Novartis, Janssen-Cilag, Almirall, Leo and Lilly.

Primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphoma, leg-type (PCLBCL-LT) is the most aggressive primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma (PCBCL). Tumor microenvironment has a crucial role in tumor development, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) can be targeted by immunotherapies. We characterized TILs in 20 PCBCLs to identify the tumor microenvironment features associated with clinical outcomes. We developed a seven‒multiplex immunofluorescence panel using Opal staining and image analysis using HALO software. In PCLBCL-LT, TILs were sparsely intermingled within tumor infiltrate in contrast to those in indolent PCBCL where TILs were scattered around tumor nodule edges with variable tumor infiltration. In PCLBCL-LT, TILs were composed of CD8 and CD4, whereas CD4 was predominant in indolent PCBCL. Proliferative TILs (CD3+Ki-67+ cells) were more abundant in PCLBCL-LT (P = 0.0036) than in indolent PCBCL. In PCLBCL-LT, proliferative TILs' abundance tended to be associated with better progression-free survival. These data were confirmed in a second independent cohort of 23 cases showing that proliferative TILs were more abundant in PCLBCL-LT (P = 0.0205) and that in PCLBCL-LT, high CD3+Ki-67+ cell density was associated with better progression-free survival (P = 0.002). These distinct TILs composition and distribution among PCBCL suggest that proliferative T lymphocytes represent a good prognostic factor in PCLBCL-LT and that stimulating their functions may represent a therapeutic approach., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Our objective was to describe the clinical, histological characteristics, and disease outcome of a cohort of mycosis fungoides (MF) diagnosed during childhood including disease status at adulthood., Methods: This is a retrospective multicentre survey of patients aged under 18 years at diagnosis with histologically confirmed MF. Patients' clinical and histological characteristics, treatments, and disease outcome (for patients followed for more than 12 months) were analysed., Results: Forty-six patients were included (median age at diagnosis: 11 years; M:F sex ratio: 3:1) with 39 (85%) followed for at least 12 months. Thirty-nine patients (85%) had stage I MF. Hypopigmented patches were observed in 48% and folliculotropism in 43% patients. Immunophenotype of the skin infiltrate was predominantly CD8+ in 17% of patients. Initial management included a wait-and-see strategy in 6/39 (15%), skin-directed treatment in 27 (69%), and systemic treatment in 6 (15%) patients, respectively, with partial or complete clinical response (PR or CR) observed in 28 patients (72%). 14/39 patients (36%) relapsed after initial response. After a median follow-up period of 54 months, disease status at last news was PR or CR in 31/39 (79%), stable disease in 6 (15%), and progression in 2 (5%) patients. Histological transformation was observed in 3/39 (8%). Of the 15 patients followed until adulthood, 13 (87%) had persistent MF., Discussion: This survey confirms the high frequency of hypopigmented and folliculotropic lesions and of CD8+ immunophenotype compared to adult MF patients. The long-term course is usually indolent but transformation may occur sometimes long after disease onset and the disease may persist during adulthood., (© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Lentigo maligna (LM) can develop into lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM) with risk of metastatic dissemination. LMM may be underestimated on the basis of the initial biopsy. The invasion may affect both the therapeutic options and the prognosis., Objectives: To identify the clinical features associated with invasive forms of LM and factors associated with its recurrence., Methods: A retrospective, single-centre study of consecutive LM and LMM histologically confirmed and treated by surgery between 2009 and 2014., Results: In total, 175 patients with LM/LMM were surgically treated in our establishment. In men, lesions were more likely to be in the "peripheral zone" (41.8%), while in women they were seen more often in the "central zone" (P=0.001). In multivariate analysis, only the peripheral zone was found to be associated with a risk of invasion (P=0.008). The rate of recurrence was 9% and lesions were more likely to be primary LMM (P=0.0006) excised with clear margins., Conclusion: The treatment of choice in LM with non-clear margins must be re-excision, especially for lesions situated in the peripheral zone. Close follow-up is recommended due to risk of recurrence, even in the case of clear margins., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Primary cutaneous peripheral T-cell lymphomas with a T-follicular helper phenotype (pcTFH-PTCL) are poorly characterized, and often compared to, but not corresponding with, mycosis fungoides (MF), Sézary syndrome, primary cutaneous CD4 + lymphoproliferative disorder, and skin manifestations of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphomas (AITL)., Objectives: We describe the clinicopathological features of pcTFH-PTCL in this original series of 23 patients, and also characterize these cases molecularly., Methods: Clinical and histopathological data of the selected patients were reviewed. Patient biopsy samples were also analysed by targeted next-generation sequencing., Results: All patients (15 men, eight women; median age 66 years) presented with skin lesions, without systemic disease. Most were stage T3b, with nodular (n = 16), papular (n = 6) or plaque (atypical for MF, n = 1) lesions. Three (13%) developed systemic disease and died of lymphoma. Nine (39%) patients received more than one line of chemotherapy. Histologically, the lymphomas were CD4 + T-cell proliferations, usually dense and located in the deep dermis (n = 14, 61%), with the expression of at least two TFH markers (CD10, CXCL13, PD1, ICOS, BCL6), including three markers in 16 cases (70%). They were associated with a variable proportion of B cells. Eight patients were diagnosed with an associated B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD) on biopsy, including Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 3), EBV + LPD (n = 1) and monotypic plasma cell LPD (n = 4). Targeted sequencing showed four patients to have a mutated TET2-RHOAG17V association (as frequently seen in AITL) and another a TET2/DNMT3A/PLCG1/SETD2 mutational profile. The latter patient, one with a TET2-RHOA association, and one with no detected mutations, developed systemic disease and died. Five other patients showed isolated mutations in TET2 (n = 1), PLCG1 (n = 2), SETD2 (n = 1) or STAT5B (n = 1)., Conclusions: Patients with pcTFH-PTCL have pathological and genetic features that overlap with those of systemic lymphoma of TFH derivation. Clinically, most remained confined to the skin, with only three patients showing systemic spread and death. Whether pcTFH-PTCL should be integrated as a new subgroup of TFH lymphomas in future classifications is still a matter of debate. What is already known about this topic? There is a group of cutaneous lymphomas that express T-follicular helper (TFH) markers that do not appear to correspond to existing World Health Organization diagnostic entities. These include mycosis fungoides, Sézary syndrome, or primary cutaneous CD4 + small/medium-sized T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder or cutaneous extensions of systemic peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) with TFH phenotype. What does this study add? This is the first large original series of patients with a diagnosis of primary cutaneous PTCL with a TFH phenotype (pcTFH-PTCL) to be molecularly characterized. pcTFH-PTCL may be a standalone group of cutaneous lymphomas with clinicopathological and molecular characteristics that overlap with those of systemic TFH lymphomas, such as angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, and does not belong to known diagnostic groups of cutaneous lymphoma. This has an impact on the treatment and follow-up of patients; the clinical behaviour needs to be better clarified in further studies to tailor patient management., (© 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.)

Background: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common human malignancy. In most cases, BCC has slow progression and can be definitively cured by surgery or radiotherapy. However, in rare cases, it can become locally advanced or, even more rarely, metastatic. The alternative recommended treatments are Sonic Hedgehog pathway inhibitors; however, the response is often short-lived., Methods: This was a phase 2 basket study (NCT03012581) evaluating the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in a cohort of 32 advanced BCC patients, enrolled after failure of Sonic Hedgehog inhibitors, including 29 laBCC (91%) and 3 mBCC (9%)., Results: Compared to previously published studies, our population consisted of severe patients with a poor prognosis because they had already received multiple lines of treatment: all patients received previous Sonic Hedgehog inhibitors, 53% of patients already had chemotherapy and 75% radiotherapy. At 12 weeks, we reported 3.1% of complete responses, 18.8% of partial responses, and 43.8% of stable diseases. The best response rate to nivolumab reached 12.5% of complete responses (four patients), 18.8% of partial responses (three patients), and 43.8% of stable diseases (14 patients). Adverse events (AE) were mostly grade 2 or 3, slightly different to the adverse events observed in the treatment of metastatic melanoma (higher rate of diabetes, no thyroid dysfunction)., Conclusion: Nivolumab is a relevant therapeutic option for patients with advanced relapsing/refractory BCC., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Caroline Gaudy Marquestre has declared payment for lectures/presentations/writings from BMS and MSD, and support for attending meetings from MSD, BMS and Jansen. Aurelien Marabelle has declared support for the present manuscript from Unicancer and Gustave Roussy Institute, grants or contract from BMS, MSD and Sanofi, consulting fees from Sanofi, payment for lectures/presentations/writings from BMS and MSD, support for attending meetings from BMS and MSD, participation on Advisory Board with MSD, have leadership role in the board of the French Immune-Therapy for Cancer scholar society. Marie Beylot-Barry has declared payment for lectures/presentations/writings from Sun Pharma. Nicole Basset-Seguin has declared consulting fees from Regeneron/Sanofi and Sun Pharma, payments for lectures/presentations/writings from Regeneron/Sanofi and Sun Pharma, support for attending meetings from Regeneron/Sanofi and Sun Pharma, and have participated on Advisory Board for Regeneron/Sanofi and Sun Pharma. Philippe Saiag has declared consulting fees from BMS outside the topic of this study. Philippe Jamme has declared consulting fees from BMS, support for attending meetings from Pierre Fabre, and have participated on Advisory Board with Pierre Fabre, BMS and Novartis. Celeste Lebbe has declared support for the present manuscript from Amgen, BMS, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche and Sanofi; she have declared consulting fees from Amgen, BMS, MSD, Novartis and Roche; payments for lectures/presentations/writings from Amgen, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche; payment for expert testimony form Amgen, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Roche; support for attending meetings from BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi. Laurent Mortier has provided time for consulting and participation to scientific advisory boards of the following compagnies: Sun pharma, Novartis, Pierre Fabre and MSD, and have participated in congress with the same companies., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) such as Sézary syndrome or mycosis fungoides corresponds to an abnormal infiltration of T lymphocytes in the skin. CTCL cells have a heterogeneous phenotype and express cell adhesion molecules such as cutaneous lymphocyte antigen (CLA) supporting skin homing. The use of a mAb (HECA-452) against CLA significantly decreased transendothelial migration and survival of CTCL cells from patient samples and My-La cell line. The decrease of CLA expression by inhibition of its maturation enzyme, ST3 β-galactoside α-2,3-sialyltransferase 4, also impaired CTCL cell migration, proliferation, and survival. We confirmed in vivo that treatment with anti-CLA mAb decreased the tumorigenicity as well as dissemination of CTCL cells in different tissues compared with the control group. Our findings provide evidence of the involvement of CLA in CTCL cell migration and survival, supporting that CLA inhibition could represent an actionable therapy in patients with CTCL., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.