1. Clinical RNA sequencing clarifies variants of uncertain significance identified by prior testing.
- Author
-
Marquez J, Cech JN, Paschal CR, Dingmann B, Scott AI, Thies JM, Mills MR, Albert CM, Beck AE, Beckman E, Bonkowski ES, Earl DL, Lam CT, Mefford HC, Merritt JL 2nd, Nelson Z, Ohlsen TJ, Taylor MR, Perlman SJ, Rudzinski ER, Sikes MC, Waligorski N, Wenger TL, Adam MP, Mirzaa GM, Bennett JT, Glass IA, Sternen DL, and Miller DE
- Abstract
Purpose: Sequencing-based genetic testing often identifies variants of uncertain significance (VUS) or fails to detect pathogenic variants altogether. We evaluated the utility of RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to clarify VUS or identify missing variants in a clinical setting., Methods: Over a 2-year period, genetics providers at a single institution referred 26 cases for clinical RNA-seq. Cases had either no candidate variant identified by prior testing or a VUS suspected to impact splicing or expression. A committee reviewed each submission to ensure it met study criteria., Results: Among 26 cases, 8 could not be sequenced because of poor expression in an accessible tissue, 2 did not meet inclusion criteria, 3 were solved prior to collection, and 4 families declined participation or did not complete sample collection. For the 9 cases sequenced, the clinical laboratory reported two positive, four negative, and three "indeterminate." For all three indeterminate cases, original RNA-seq data was manually evaluated and deemed explanatory., Conclusion: Clinical RNA-seq can clarify VUS, especially splice variants, but laboratory-specific interpretation guidelines may lead to indeterminate results. Identifying individuals likely to benefit from RNA-seq and providing appropriate counseling poses unique challenges., Competing Interests: DEM holds stock options in MyOme, is on a scientific advisory board at Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT), is engaged in a research agreement with ONT, and has received travel support from ONT.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF