Search

Background: Achieving competence in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) requires extensive training. Recognizing the potential of simulator-based education for safe and effective skill development, we aimed to assess whether initial training with the Boškoski-Costamagna ERCP Trainer (BCT) is beneficial compared with conventional training alone (i.e. predictive validity)., Methods: A prospective multicenter randomized trial involving 16 novice ERCP trainees, randomly assigned to intervention or control groups, was performed. Both underwent hands-on training, with the intervention group receiving additional simulation training during the first 3 months. Each trainee was required to complete a minimum of 60 ERCPs in up to 1 year. The TEESAT score evaluated rates of global overall competence (primary outcome), biliary cannulation, and adverse events (AEs; secondary outcomes). Mixed-effect logistic regression models assessed differences in between-group ERCP procedure competence and success. Learning curves were generated cumulatively over the training period., Results: 1106 ERCPs (562 simulator group; 544 control group) were included. Although no statistically significant difference in global overall competence was observed between the groups, possibly owing to data heterogeneity, simulation training demonstrated higher success for native biliary cannulation (52% vs. 42%; P <0.001) and faster median (interquartile range) biliary cannulation times (3 [6] vs. 5 [8] minutes; P <0.001). The simulator group also showed faster improvements in overall performance, native biliary cannulation, and sphincterotomy. No statistical difference was found in overall AEs between the groups., Conclusion: Early simulation training with the BCT improved technical competence in native biliary cannulation and accelerated overall ERCP learning. This approach has the potential to enhance ERCP training programs., Competing Interests: I. Boskoski received a research grant from ERBE Elektromedizin and consultancy fees from Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, Pentax Medical, Siemens, Endotools, Nitinotes, and lecture fees from Microtech; he holds patents USA No. US D740,361 S (Endoscopy Training Apparatus) Oct. 6, 2015 and No. 0001426680, Class A61B1814 (Stent for electrothermal treatment) Feb. 7, 2017, and has stock options from Myka Labs. T. Voiosu has received fees for lectures from Boston Scientific and an educational event from Cook Medical. G. Costamagna has received consultancy fees from Olympus, Waldner Group, and AlfaSigma, as well as speaker's and writer's fees from Malesci. J. Devière’s received institutional support for IRB-approved studies and consultancy fees to his institution from Olympus and Cook Medical, as well as stocks from Endotools Therapeutics. M. Arvanitakis's has received consultancy fees from Olympus and honoraria from Pentax to her institution. J. van Hooft has received lecture fees from Cook Medical, Boston Scientific, Falk, and Fujifilm, and a consultancy fee from Olympus. G. Vanbiervliet has received lecture fees from Norgine, Tillots, Ambu, Fujifilm, and Pentax, and a consultancy fee from Boston Scientific. P. Fockens has provided consultancy for Cook Endoscopy and Olympus. R.P. Voermans received a research grant form Boston Scientific and Prion Medical, and his institution received consultancy fees from Boston Scientific and Cook Medical. J.-M. Gonzalez has received consultancy fees from Fujifilm and Boston Scientific. J.W. Poley has provided consultancy for MediGlobe GmbH, and Pentax Medical. M. Bruno has received consultancy fees from Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, Pentax, and AMBU, support for industry- and investigator-initiated studies from Boston Scientific and Cook Medical, and support for investigator-initiated studies from Pentax Medical, Mylan, AMBU, and ChiRoStim. P.J.F. de Jonge has received consultancy and lecture fees from Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, and Fujifilm. S.T. de Campos, M. Salmon, A. Langers, C. Gomercic, A. Lemmers, M. Barthet, W. Laleman, I. Tarantino, R. de Ridder, and JM Conchillo declare that they have no conflict of interests., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy (EUS-GJ) is an alternative to duodenal stenting and surgical GJ (SGGJ) in malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO). European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines restricted EUS-GJ for MGOO only, because of misdeployment. The aim was to evaluate its outcomes focusing on benign indications., Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted from 2016 to 2023 in a tertiary center. Patients included had malignant or benign GOO indicated for EUS-GJ. Techniques were the direct approach until August 2021, and the wire endoscopic simplified technique (WEST) afterwards. The main objective was to compare outcomes in benign vs. MGOO. Secondary end-points were technical success, adverse events rates, and describing the evolution of techniques and indications., Results: In all, 87 patients were included, 46 men, mean age 66 ± 16.2 years. Indications were malignant in 60.1% and benign in 39.1%. The EUS-GJ technique was direct in 33 patients (37.9%) and WEST in 54 (62.1%). No difference was found in terms of technical, clinical, or adverse events rates. The initial technical success rate was 88.5%. The final technical and clinical success rates were 96.6% and 94.25%, respectively. In the last year, benign exceeded malignant indications (70.4% vs. 29.6%, P < 0.05). Seven misdeployments occurred, six being addressed with the rescue technique. The misdeployment rate was significantly decreased using the WEST approach compared to the direct one: 3.7% vs. 18% (P < 0.05). The severe postoperative adverse events rate was 2.3%., Conclusion: This study demonstrated similar outcomes of EUS-GJ between benign and MGOO, with a decreasing misdeployment rate (<4%) applying WEST. This represents an additional step towards recommending EUS-GJ in benign indications., (© 2024 The Author(s). Digestive Endoscopy published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.)

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Background: Complete digestive disunion due to anastomotic necrosis is considered a contraindication to endoscopic repair. However, recent publications have suggested that endoscopic treatment by insertion of a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) is possible. The report of this patient series aims to demonstrate the use of endoscopic management in selected cases with complete digestive disunion., Methods: Seven consecutive patients with complete and circumferential upper gastrointestinal anastomotic disunion were treated at two European tertiary care centers between 2009 and 2021 by endoscopic insertion of an SEMS. Treatment was performed with a therapeutic gastroscope under general anesthesia, carbon dioxide insufflation, and fluoroscopic guidance, after surgical or percutaneous drainage., Results: All patients were successfully treated by endoscopic insertion of fully or partially covered SEMS left in place for a median of 8 weeks, with a median of 3 endoscopic sessions. Digestive neo-epithelialization was associated with a restored circumferential gut lumen in all cases. The rate of stent migration was 23% and three patients (43%) experienced symptomatic strictures, which were successfully treated by endoscopic dilation., Conclusion: Complete digestive rupture could be successfully treated by endoscopy in selected cases, adding proof-of-concept data regarding guided tissue regeneration alongside SEMS placement., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a minimally invasive therapy for patients with gastric outlet obstruction without the risks of surgical bypass and the limited long-term efficacy of enteral self-expanding metal stent placement. However, due to its novelty, there is a lack of significant data comparing long-term outcomes of patients with EUS-GE, based on the underlying disease. In this study, we compare outcomes of EUS-GE on benign versus malignant indications., Methods: Consecutive patients from 12 international, tertiary care centers who underwent EUS-GE over 3 years were extracted in a retrospective registry. Demographic characteristics, procedure-related information and follow-up data was collected. Primary outcome was the rate of adverse events associated with EUS-GE and the comparison of the rate of adverse events in benign versus malignant diseases. Secondary outcomes included technical and clinical success as well as hospitalization admission., Results: A total of 103 patients were included: 72 malignant and 31 benign. The characteristics of the patients undergoing EUS-GE is shown in Table 1. The mean age of the cohort was 68 years and 58 years for malignant and benign etiology. Gender distribution was 57% and 39% being females in malignant and benign etiology group, respectively. Clinical success, technical success, average procedure time, and hospital length of stay were similar in both groups. Patients with benign underlying etiology had significantly higher number of surgically altered midgut anatomy ( P =0.0379)., Conclusion: EUS-GE is equally efficient regardless of the underlying etiology (malignant vs. benign), and the adverse events both groups were comparable., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is mainly due to advanced malignant disease. GOO can be treated by surgical gastroenterostomy (SGE), endoscopic enteral stenting (EES), or endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) to improve the quality of life., Methods: Between 2009 and 2022, patients undergoing SGE or EUS-GE for GOO were included at three centers. Technical and clinical success rates, post-procedure adverse events (AEs), length of hospital stay (LOS), 30-day all-cause mortality, and recurrence of GOO were retrospectively analyzed and compared between SGE and EUS-GE. Predictive factors for technical and clinical failure after SGE and EUS-GE were identified., Results: Of the 97 patients included, 56 (57.7%) had an EUS-GE and 41 (42.3%) had an SGE for GOO, with 62 (63.9%) GOO due to malignancy and 35 (36.1%) to benign disease. The median follow-up time was 13,4 months (range 1 days-106 months), with no difference between the two groups (p = 0.962). Technical (p = 0.133) and clinical (p = 0.229) success rates, severe morbidity (p = 0.708), 30-day all-cause mortality (p = 0.277) and GOO recurrence (p = 1) were similar. EUS-GE had shorter median procedure duration (p < 0.001), lower post-procedure ileus rate (p < 0.001), and shorter median LOS (p < 0.001) than SGE. In univariate analysis, no risk factors for technical or clinical failure in SGE were identified and abdominal pain reported before the procedure was a risk factor for technical failure in the EUS-GE group. No risk factor for clinical failure was identified for EUS-GE. In the subgroup of GOO due to benign disease, SGE was associated with better technical success (p = 0.035) with no difference in clinical success rate compared to EUS-GE (p = 1)., Conclusion: EUS-GE provides similar long-lasting symptom relief as SGE for GOO whether for benign or malignant disease. SGE may still be indicated in centers with limited experience with EUS-GE or may be reserved for patients in whom endoscopic technique fails., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

This joint ASGE-ESGE guideline provides an evidence-based summary and recommendations regarding the role of endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) in the management of obesity. The document was developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. It evaluates the efficacy and safety of EBMT devices and procedures that currently have CE mark or FDA-clearance/approval, or that had been approved within five years of document development. The guideline suggests the use of EBMTs plus lifestyle modification in patients with a BMI of ≥ 30 kg/m 2 , or with a BMI of 27.0-29.9 kg/m 2 with at least 1 obesity-related comorbidity. Furthermore, it suggests the utilization of intragastric balloons and devices for endoscopic gastric remodeling (EGR) in conjunction with lifestyle modification for this patient population., Competing Interests: Disclosure The following authors disclosed financial relationships: P. Jirapinyo: Consultant for Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific Corporation, Erbe, and Spatz Medical; advisory board for Apollo Endosurgery; research support from Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific Corporation, GI Dynamics, Fractyl, and USGI Medical. A. Hadefi: Research support from Endo Tools Therapeutics. C. C. Thompson: Consultant for Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific Corporation, Medtronic, Endoquest Robotics, Fractyl, FujiFilm, GI Dynamics, EnVision Endoscopy, Olympus/Spiration, Softac, USGI Medical, Xenter, Enterasense Ltd, and Lumendi; research support from Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific Corporation, Endoquest Robotics, Erbe, Fractyl, FujiFilm, GI Dynamics, Olympus/Spiration, USGI Medical, and Lumendi; advisory board for Fractyl and USGI Medical; founder of Bariendo, BlueFlame Healthcare Venture Fund, ELLES, EnVision Endoscopy, GI Windows, Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Endoscopy Inc, and Enterasense Ltd, and GI Windows; board member for Bariendo, ELLES, EnVision Endoscopy, GI Windows, and Enterasense Ltd; ownership in Bariendo, ELLES, EnVision Endoscopy, GI Windows, Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Endoscopy Inc, Softac, Xenter, and Enterasense Ltd; partner in BlueFlame Healthcare Venture Fund; president of the Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Endoscopy Inc; Scientific Advisory Board for Xenter. R. Pannala: Research support from Fractyl Labs; general payments from Boston Scientific Corporation; consultant for HCL Technologies; advisory board for Nestle Healthsciences and Bluestar Genomics. S. K. Goelder: Travel compensation from Apollo Endosurgery. V. Kushnir: Consultant for BSCI, Noah Medical, Steres, and ConMed. M. Barthet: Consultant for Boston Scientific Corporation, Endotools, and Taewoong. C. M. Apovian: Advisory board for Altimmune, Inc, CinFina Pharma, Inc, Cowen and Company, LLC, Currax Pharmaceuticals, LLC, EPG Communication Holdings Ltd, Form Health, Inc, Gelesis, Srl, L-Nutra, Inc, NeuroBo Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Novo Nordisk, Inc, OptumRx, Inc, Pain Script Corporation, Palatin Technologies, Inc, Pursuit By You, ReShape Lifesciences Inc, Riverview School, and Xeno Biosciences; research support from the National Institutes of Health, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, and GI Dynamics, Inc. I. Boskoski: Consultant for Boston Scientific Corporation (Apollo Endosurgery), Nitinotes, and EndoTools. C. G. Chapman: Consultant for Boston Scientific Corporation, Olympus, Steris, and Apollo Endosurgery; speaker for Apollo Endosurgery. V. Kumbhari: Consultant for Boston Scientific Corporation. J. Esker: Consultant for Pendulum Therapeutics. A. D. Pryor: Speaker for Gore, Medtronic, and Stryker. R. Maselli: Consultant for Apollo Endosurgery. A. R. Schulman: Consultant for Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific Corporation, Olympus, and MicroTech; research support from GI Dynamics and Fractyl. N. Thosani: Consultant for Boston Scientific Corporation, Ambu, and Pentax America; royalties from UpToDate; ownership in ROSEAId. V. Huberty: Shareholder in, board member for, and research support from EndoTools Therapeutics. S. Sullivan: Consultant for Allurion Technologies, Biolinq, BariaTek, Pentax, Fractyl, and Endo Tools Therapeutics; research support from Allurion Technologies, ReShape Medical/Obalon Therapeutics, and Rebiotix; stock ownership in Biolinq. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc on behalf of American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and by Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart on behalf of European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This joint ASGE-ESGE guideline provides an evidence-based summary and recommendations regarding the role of endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) in the management of obesity. The document was developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. It evaluates the efficacy and safety of EBMT devices and procedures that currently have CE mark or FDA-clearance/approval, or that had been approved within five years of document development. The guideline suggests the use of EBMTs plus lifestyle modification in patients with a BMI of ≥30 kg/m 2 , or with a BMI of 27.0-29.9 kg/m 2 with at least 1 obesity-related comorbidity. Furthermore, it suggests the utilization of intragastric balloons and devices for endoscopic gastric remodeling (EGR) in conjunction with lifestyle modification for this patient population., Competing Interests: The following authors disclosed financial relationships: P. Jirapinyo: Consultant for Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific Corporation, Erbe, and Spatz Medical; advisory board for Apollo Endosurgery; research support from Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific Corporation, GI Dynamics, Fractyl, and USGI Medical. A. Hadefi: Research support from Endo Tools Therapeutics. C. C. Thompson: Consultant for Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific Corporation, Medtronic, Endoquest Robotics, Fractyl, FujiFilm, GI Dynamics, EnVision Endoscopy, Olympus/Spiration, Softac, USGI Medical, Xenter, Enterasense Ltd, and Lumendi; research support from Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific Corporation, Endoquest Robotics, Erbe, Fractyl, FujiFilm, GI Dynamics, Olympus/Spiration, USGI Medical, and Lumendi; advisory board for Fractyl and USGI Medical; founder of Bariendo, BlueFlame Healthcare Venture Fund, ELLES, EnVision Endoscopy, GI Windows, Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Endoscopy Inc, and Enterasense Ltd, and GI Windows; board member for Bariendo, ELLES, EnVision Endoscopy, GI Windows, and Enterasense Ltd; ownership in Bariendo, ELLES, EnVision Endoscopy, GI Windows, Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Endoscopy Inc, Softac, Xenter, and Enterasense Ltd; partner in BlueFlame Healthcare Venture Fund; president of the Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Endoscopy Inc; Scientific Advisory Board for Xenter. R. Pannala: Research support from Fractyl Labs; general payments from Boston Scientific Corporation; consultant for HCL Technologies; advisory board for Nestle Healthsciences and Bluestar Genomics. S. K. Goelder: Travel compensation from Apollo Endosurgery. V. Kushnir: Consultant for BSCI, Noah Medical, Steres, and ConMed. M. Barthet: Consultant for Boston Scientific Corporation, Endotools, and Taewoong. C. M. Apovian: Advisory board for Altimmune, Inc, CinFina Pharma, Inc, Cowen and Company, LLC, Currax Pharmaceuticals, LLC, EPG Communication Holdings Ltd, Form Health, Inc, Gelesis, Srl, L-Nutra, Inc, NeuroBo Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Novo Nordisk, Inc, OptumRx, Inc, Pain Script Corporation, Palatin Technologies, Inc, Pursuit By You, ReShape Lifesciences Inc, Riverview School, and Xeno Biosciences; research support from the National Institutes of Health, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, and GI Dynamics, Inc. I. Boskoski: Consultant for Boston Scientific Corporation (Apollo Endosurgery), Nitinotes, and EndoTools. C. G. Chapman: Consultant for Boston Scientific Corporation, Olympus, Steris, and Apollo Endosurgery; speaker for Apollo Endosurgery. V. Kumbhari: Consultant for Boston Scientific Corporation. J. Esker: Consultant for Pendulum Therapeutics. A. D. Pryor: Speaker for Gore, Medtronic, and Stryker. R. Maselli: Consultant for Apollo Endosurgery. A. R. Schulman: Consultant for Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific Corporation, Olympus, and MicroTech; research support from GI Dynamics and Fractyl. N. Thosani: Consultant for Boston Scientific Corporation, Ambu, and Pentax America; royalties from UpToDate; ownership in ROSEAId. V. Huberty: Shareholder in, board member for, and research support from EndoTools Therapeutics. S. Sullivan: Consultant for Allurion Technologies, Biolinq, BariaTek, Pentax, Fractyl, and Endo Tools Therapeutics; research support from Allurion Technologies, ReShape Medical/Obalon Therapeutics, and Rebiotix; stock ownership in Biolinq. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships.The following authors disclosed financial relationships: P. Jirapinyo: Consultant for Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific Corporation, Erbe, and Spatz Medical; advisory board for Apollo Endosurgery; research support from Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific Corporation, GI Dynamics, Fractyl, and USGI Medical. A. Hadefi: Research support from Endo Tools Therapeutics. C. C. Thompson: Consultant for Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific Corporation, Medtronic, Endoquest Robotics, Fractyl, FujiFilm, GI Dynamics, EnVision Endoscopy, Olympus/Spiration, Softac, USGI Medical, Xenter, Enterasense Ltd, and Lumendi; research support from Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific Corporation, Endoquest Robotics, Erbe, Fractyl, FujiFilm, GI Dynamics, Olympus/Spiration, USGI Medical, and Lumendi; advisory board for Fractyl and USGI Medical; founder of Bariendo, BlueFlame Healthcare Venture Fund, ELLES, EnVision Endoscopy, GI Windows, Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Endoscopy Inc, and Enterasense Ltd, and GI Windows; board member for Bariendo, ELLES, EnVision Endoscopy, GI Windows, and Enterasense Ltd; ownership in Bariendo, ELLES, EnVision Endoscopy, GI Windows, Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Endoscopy Inc, Softac, Xenter, and Enterasense Ltd; partner in BlueFlame Healthcare Venture Fund; president of the Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Endoscopy Inc; Scientific Advisory Board for Xenter. R. Pannala: Research support from Fractyl Labs; general payments from Boston Scientific Corporation; consultant for HCL Technologies; advisory board for Nestle Healthsciences and Bluestar Genomics. S. K. Goelder: Travel compensation from Apollo Endosurgery. V. Kushnir: Consultant for BSCI, Noah Medical, Steres, and ConMed. M. Barthet: Consultant for Boston Scientific Corporation, Endotools, and Taewoong. C. M. Apovian: Advisory board for Altimmune, Inc, CinFina Pharma, Inc, Cowen and Company, LLC, Currax Pharmaceuticals, LLC, EPG Communication Holdings Ltd, Form Health, Inc, Gelesis, Srl, L-Nutra, Inc, NeuroBo Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Novo Nordisk, Inc, OptumRx, Inc, Pain Script Corporation, Palatin Technologies, Inc, Pursuit By You, ReShape Lifesciences Inc, Riverview School, and Xeno Biosciences; research support from the National Institutes of Health, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, and GI Dynamics, Inc. I. Boskoski: Consultant for Boston Scientific Corporation (Apollo Endosurgery), Nitinotes, and EndoTools. C. G. Chapman: Consultant for Boston Scientific Corporation, Olympus, Steris, and Apollo Endosurgery; speaker for Apollo Endosurgery. V. Kumbhari: Consultant for Boston Scientific Corporation. J. Esker: Consultant for Pendulum Therapeutics. A. D. Pryor: Speaker for Gore, Medtronic, and Stryker. R. Maselli: Consultant for Apollo Endosurgery. A. R. Schulman: Consultant for Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific Corporation, Olympus, and MicroTech; research support from GI Dynamics and Fractyl. N. Thosani: Consultant for Boston Scientific Corporation, Ambu, and Pentax America; royalties from UpToDate; ownership in ROSEAId. V. Huberty: Shareholder in, board member for, and research support from EndoTools Therapeutics. S. Sullivan: Consultant for Allurion Technologies, Biolinq, BariaTek, Pentax, Fractyl, and Endo Tools Therapeutics; research support from Allurion Technologies, ReShape Medical/Obalon Therapeutics, and Rebiotix; stock ownership in Biolinq. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships., (American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc on behalf of American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and by Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart on behalf of European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The prevalence of esophageal motor disorders (EMD) in PPI-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is substantial. However, limited data exist on their impact on the efficacy of endoscopic treatments like anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS). This study aimed to evaluate the influence of EMD on ARMS efficacy in patients with PPI-refractory GERD., Method: This single-center retrospective study enrolled patients with refractory GERD treated with ARMS-b (anti-reflux mucosectomy band-ligation). High-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) was conducted before the procedure to identify EMD presence. The primary endpoint was treatment efficacy, defined as >50% improvement in GERD-HRQL score at 1 year. Secondary endpoints included PPI intake, symptom control, ARMS complications, and overall patient satisfaction at 12 months., Results: The study included 65 patients, with 41 (63.1%) showing EMD on HREM. Treatment efficacy was achieved by 33.8% (22) of patients, with 8 without EMD, 11 having isolated LES hypotonia, and 3 with both LES hypotonia and esophageal body motor disorder. No significant differences were observed between patients with and without EMD regarding the primary endpoint, PPI use, symptom control, or complications. Dysphagia developed in 52.3% (34) within 6 months, leading to esophageal dilatation in 15.3% (10). Two patients experienced acute hemorrhage, and one had perforation., Conclusion: The presence of esophageal motor disorders does not seem to impact ARMS response, suggesting the technique's consideration in this population. Larger studies are essential for confirming these results and exploring treatment response and post-operative predictors.

Background and Aims: Gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) is the criterion standard for the diagnosis of gastroparesis. However, data are lacking regarding the prognostic value of preoperative intragastric meal distribution during GES in patients undergoing gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) for gastroparesis. This study investigated the association of GES morphologic parameters and the long-term clinical success of G-POEM., Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent G-POEM for refractory gastroparesis in a tertiary center with preoperative GES data. Intragastric meal distribution was measured using the proximal to distal count ratio (PDCR) at 0, 1, 2 and 4 hours, and the retention index was calculated. Clinical success was defined as a decrease of at least 50% in the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index total score after G-POEM., Results: In total, 77 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 40.14 months. Clinical success was observed in 54.55% of patients. The retention index was not associated with clinical success. Only PDCR at 0 hours (PDCR0) was associated with clinical success. In univariate analysis, the median PDCR0 was 6.0 (interquartile range, 5.59) in patients with clinical success and 4.29 (interquartile range, 4.51) in patients with clinical failure (P = .019). In multivariate analysis, PDCR0 >5.25 was associated with clinical success (odds ratio, 4.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.55-12.26; P = .00524)., Conclusions: This study suggests that in patients with gastroparesis, a high PDCR0 value (suggestive for a preferential fundic meal distribution) during preoperative GES is associated with long-term clinical response to G-POEM., Competing Interests: Disclosure All authors disclosed no financial relationships., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) is a promising technique for treating refractory gastroparesis. We present the first double-blind randomized study comparing the clinical efficacy of G-POEM versus pyloric botulinum toxin injection (BTI)., Methods: This randomized study, conducted in two expert centers, enrolled patients with refractory gastroparesis, medically managed for >6 months and confirmed by gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES), into two groups, G-POEM versus BTI, with follow-up of 1 year. The primary end point was the 3-month clinical efficacy, defined as a >1-point decrease in the mean Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) score. Secondary end points were: 1-year efficacy, GES evolution, adverse events, and quality of life., Results: 40 patients (22 women; mean age 48.1 [SD 17.4]), with mean symptom duration of 5.8 (SD 5.7) years, were randomized. Etiologies included idiopathic (n=18), diabetes (n=11), postoperative (n=6), and mixed (n=4). G-POEM showed a higher 3-month clinical success than BTI (65% vs. 40%, respectively; P =0.10), along with non-significantly higher 1-year clinical success (60% vs. 40%, respectively) on intention-to-treat analysis. The GCSI decreased in both groups at 3 months and 1 year. Only three minor adverse events occurred in the G-POEM group. The GES improvement rate was 72% in the G-POEM group versus 50% in the BTI group (non-significant)., Conclusion: G-POEM seems to have a higher clinically relevant success rate than BTI, but this was not statistically demonstrated. This study confirms the interest in treatments targeting the pylorus, either mechanically or chemically, for managing refractory gastroparesis., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background/aims: The evaluation of visceral hypersensitivity and gastric accommodation in patients with gastroparesis (GP) is difficult. CT-scan gastric volumetry allows to test the distension of different regions of the stomach. We aimed to study gastric volumes and patient's sensitivity to gastric distension between in patients with GP compared to patients with GERD., Method: Retrospective study including patients who had CT-scan volumetry for GP or GERD. Two CT-scan series were made after gastric distension: left lateral decubitus 30° (LLD30) for antrum and right lateral decubitus (RLD) for body. Pain and discomfort were assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS). Gastric volumes were measured for LLD30 and RLD., Results: 13 patients (7 GP and 6 GERD) were included. Mean age was 35.6+/-7.3 years. Median gastric volume in the RLD was lower in GP vs GERD (927+/-208 ml vs. 1115+/-163 ml; p  = 0.046) while it was similar for LLD30 (1053+/-228 ml vs. 1054+/-193 ml; p  = 0.603). GP patients had significantly more pain and discomfort during the procedure: pain VAS for GP was 6[0-9] versus 0[0-2] for GERD, p  = 0.004, discomfort VAS for GP was 7[4-10] versus 4[0-5] for GERD, p  = 0.007. 66.7% of GERD patients felt no pain vs. 14.3% in GP, p  = 0.053., Conclusion: This pilot study suggests that GP could be associated with a reduced gastric volume compared to GERD in RLD after gaseous distension. In contrast, patient self-assessment of pain related to gastric distension was greater int GP patients. A lack of fundus accommodation and visceral hypersensitivity could explain some mechanisms in the genesis of GP symptoms.

Background and study aims Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) may lead to symptomatic mid-gastric twist in 0.1% to 4% of cases. Endoscopic balloon dilatation often fails, requiring a switch to Roux-en-Y bypass. Submucosal endoscopic treatment is expanding, so we propose a new technique of fibrosis incision after tunnelization, called medio-gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (MG-POEM). Patients and methods Four patients aged 41 to 70 years underwent MG-POEM in 2020 for symptomatic post-LSG medio-gastric twist. The aim was to describe the technique, and document the efficacy, using the Gastric Outlet Obstruction Scoring System (GOOSS) score and a quality-of-life scale (QOLS). The procedures consisted of a POEM with myotomy and fibrosis incision. Results Median preoperative GOOSS and QOLS were 1/3 ([0-3] and 1.75/10 [0-10], respectively. All procedures were technically successful. One patient had immediate postoperative complications, which were treated conservatively. The median follow-up was 18 months. All patients had improved quality of life and food intake, with median postoperative GOOSS and QOLS of 3/3 and 6,5/10 [6-8], respectively. Two patients required additional pneumatic dilatation for scarring strictures. Follow-up endoscopies and esophagograms showed that the twist had disappeared. Conclusions MG-POEM shows promise for safe and effective management of post-LSG mid-gastric twist, despite requiring a high level of endoscopic skill to perform submucosal tunneling., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest JM Gonzalez and M Barthet are consultants for Boston Scientific, Pentax Medical and Fuijifilm., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Competing Interests: M. Barthet and J. M. Gonzalez are consultants for Boston Scientific.

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) appears to be effective and safe in gastric outlet obstruction (GOO); however, the EUS-GE procedure is not standardized, with the use of assisted or direct methods still debated. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of EUS-GE techniques focusing on an assisted with orointestinal drain wireless endoscopic simplified technique (WEST) and the nonassisted direct technique over a guidewire (DTOG)., Method: This was a multicenter European retrospective study involving four tertiary centers. Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-GE for GOO between August 2017 and May 2022 were included. The primary aim was to compare the technical success and adverse event (AE) rates of the different EUS-GE techniques. Clinical success was also analyzed., Results: 71 patients (mean [SD] age 66.2 10 years; 42.3 % men; 80.3 % malignant etiology) were included. Technical success was higher in the WEST group (95.1 % vs. 73.3 %; estimate of relative risk from odds ratio (eRR) 3.2, 95 %CI 0.94-10.9; P  = 0.01). The rate of AEs was lower in the WEST group (14.6 % vs. 46.7 %; eRR 2.3, 95 %CI 1.2-4.5; P  = 0.007). Clinical success was comparable between the two groups at 1 month (97.5 % vs. 89.3 %). The median follow-up was 5 months (range 1-57)., Conclusion: The WEST resulted in a higher technical success rate with fewer AEs, with clinical success comparable with the DTOG. Therefore, the WEST (with an orointestinal drain) should be preferred when performing EUS-GE., Competing Interests: L. Monino is a consultant for Prion Medical and Braun Medical and has received speaker’s fees from Olympus Belgium and Olympus Europe. E. Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles and J.-M. Gonzalez are consultants for Boston Scientific. P. H. Deprez is a consultant for Boston Scientific and Olympus Europe. T. G. Moreels has received speaker’s fees from Olympus Belgium and Olympus Europe. M. Barthet is a consultant for Boston Scientific.C. Snauwaert, H. Alric, M. Gasmi, S. Ouazzani, H. Benosman, G. Rahmi, and C. Cellier declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: The use of laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) to treat refractory GERD may induce refractory dysphagia (5%-10%). The management is complex, and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) including valve incision is a new therapeutic option., Methods: This retrospective study involved patients with postfundoplication refractory dysphagia treated by POEM associated with complete wrap incision. Patients were evaluated with Eckardt and dysphagia scores. Study objectives were to evaluate clinical and technical outcomes, adverse events, and GERD recurrence., Results: Twenty-six patients, with a mean age of 57.3 ± 15.6 years, were included. Mean follow-up was 25.3 ± 17.6 months. The technical and clinical success rates were 96% and 84.6%, respectively. Among failures, 1 patient underwent Lewis-Santy, 2 required dilations, and 1 was lost to follow-up. Three late recurrences occurred and were endoscopically managed. Five patients (19%) had GERD recurrence that was mainly improved by proton pump inhibitors., Conclusions: POEM with fundoplication is a serious therapeutic option for managing persistent dysphagia after LF, with a low risk of GERD recurrence., Competing Interests: Disclosure The following authors disclosed financial relationships: J-M. Gonzalez: Consultant for Boston Scientific and Fujifilm. M. Barthet: Consultant for Boston Scientific. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships., (Copyright © 2023 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Natural orifice transluminal endoscopy surgery (NOTES) gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA) with duodenal exclusion (DE) could be used as a less invasive alternative to surgical gastric bypass. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of both methods for bariatric purpose., Methods: This was a prospective, experimental and comparative study on 27 obese living pigs, comparing 4 groups: GJA alone (group 1, G1), GJA + DE (group 2, G2), surgical gastric bypass (group 3, G3), control group (group 4, G4). GJA was endoscopically performed, using NOTES technic and LAMS, while DE was performed surgically for limb length selection. Animals were followed for 3 months. Primary outcome included technical success and weight change, while secondary endpoints included the rate of perioperative mortality and morbidity, histological anastomosis analysis and biological analysis., Results: Technical success was 100% in each intervention group. No death related to endoscopic procedures occurred in the endoscopic groups, while early mortality (< 1 month) was 57,1% in the surgical group, all due to anastomotic dehiscence. At 3 months, compared to baseline, mean weight change was + 3,1% in G1 (p = 0,46); -14,9% in G2 (p = 0,17); +5,6% in G3 (p = 0,38) and + 25% in G4 (p = 0,029). Histopathological analysis of endoscopic GJA showed complete fusion of different layers without leak or abscess., Conclusions: Endoscopic GJA with DE provides the efficacy of bypass on weight control in an animal model. Next steps consist of the development of devices to perform exclusively endoscopically limb length selection and DE., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background and Aims: EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) has been described as a potentially curative option for solid and cystic pancreatic neoplasms. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of pancreatic EUS-RFA in a large study population., Methods: A retrospective study retrieving all consecutive patients who underwent pancreatic EUS-RFA during 2019 and 2020 in France was conducted. Indication, procedural characteristics, early and late adverse events (AEs), and clinical outcomes were recorded. Risk factors for AEs and factors related to complete tumor ablation were assessed on univariate and multivariate analyses., Results: One hundred patients (54% men, 64.8 ± 17.6 years old) affected by 104 neoplasms were included. Sixty-four neoplasms were neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), 23 were metastases, and 10 were intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms with mural nodules. No procedure-related mortality was observed, and 22 AEs were reported. Proximity of pancreatic neoplasms (≤1 mm) to the main pancreatic duct was the only independent risk factor for AEs (odds ratio [OR), 4.10; 95% confidence interval [CI), 1.02-15.22; P = .04). Fifty-nine patients (60.2%) achieved a complete tumor response, 31 (31.6%) a partial response, and 9 (9.2%) achieved no response. On multivariate analysis, NENs (OR, 7.95; 95% CI, 1.66-51.79; P < .001) and neoplasm size <20 mm (OR, 5.26; 95% CI, 2.17-14.29; P < .001) were independently related to complete tumor ablation., Conclusions: The results of this large study confirm an overall acceptable safety profile for pancreatic EUS-RFA. Close proximity (≤1 mm) to the main pancreatic duct represents an independent risk factor for AEs. Good clinical outcomes in terms of tumor ablation were observed, especially for small NENs., (Copyright © 2023 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a very effective treatment for achalasia. However, training remains non-standardized. We evaluated a training curriculum, including ex vivo cases, followed by patients' cases under expert supervision. The objective was to establish a learning curve of POEM., Materials and Methods: Four operators having completed advanced endoscopy fellowship were involved. They had already observed > 30 cases performed by experts. They performed 30 POEMs standardized (tunnel and myotomy lengths) procedures on ex vivo porcine model. Procedural times, number/volume of injections, mucosal and serous perforations, and myotomy length were collected. The learning curve was assessed using dissection speed (DS) and a dedicated performance score (PS), including learning rate (LR) and learning plateau (LP)., Results: The operators completed all cases within 4 months (median of 3.5 cases/week). The mean procedural time was 43.3 min ± 14.4. Mean myotomy length was 70.0 mm ± 15.6 mm. Dissection speed averaged 1.78 mm/min ± 0.78. Using DS and PS as parameter, the LR was reached after 12.2 cases (DS = 2.0 mm/min) and 10.4 cases, respectively. When comparing the LP and the plateau phase, the DS was slower (1.3 ± 0.5 mm/min versus 2.1 ± 0.54 mm/min, p < 0.005) and perforations were decreased: 0.35 ± 0.82 in LP vs. 0.16 ± 0.44 in PP. Following this training, all operators performed 10 supervised cases and are competent in POEM., Conclusion: The association of observed cases and supervised ex vivo model training is effective for starting POEM on patients. The learning curve is 12 cases to reach a plateau., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background and Aims: No recommendation regarding antibiotic prophylaxis and preparation modalities are available for patients with esophageal motor disorders who benefit from Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM). The aim of our study was to evaluate their impact on the POEM's safety., Patients and Methods: This study was a comparative and multicentric retrospective analysis of a database prospectively collected. Patients over 18 years old with esophageal motor disorders confirmed by prior manometry, who underwent POEM were included. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of adverse events, as classified by Cotton, based on whether or not antibiotic prophylaxis was administered., Results: A total of 226 patients (median age 52.9 ± 19.12 years [18-105], 116 women [51.3%]) were included. The indication for POEM was mainly type 2 achalasia ( n  = 135, 60.3%). Antibiotic prophylaxis was administered to 170 patients (75.2%) during 3.93 ± 3.46 days [1-21]. The overall adverse events rate was 9.3% ( n  = 21). Antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with the occurrence of adverse events ( p  = .003), but had no impact on their severity ( p  = .238). Antibiotic prophylaxis didn't influence the effectiveness of POEM (1 [0-4] vs 1 [0-9], p  = .231). The use of a liquid diet in the 48 h prior to the procedure was significantly associated with a lower adverse events rate (3.1% vs 6.19%, p  = .0002)., Conclusion: The antibiotic prophylaxis during POEM does not prevent adverse events, had no impact on their severity and the efficacy of the procedure. A liquid diet before the procedure should be systematically proposed.

This study assessed a new natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) bariatric endoscopic procedure in obese adult pigs. This 14-week prospective study compared 6 adult male Yucatan test pigs with baseline mean age 1.5 years to 2 control pigs. The test pigs received a fully endoscopic NOTES-based duodenal-jejunal bypass including measurement of the bypassed limb and creation of a gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA) using a gastrojejunal lumen-apposing metal stent (GJ-LAMS) at Week 0, placement of a duodenal exclusion device (DED) at Week 2, and endoscopic examinations at Weeks 6 and 10. At Week 14, the pigs were sacrificed for necropsy. All endoscopic procedures were technically successful. By Week 14, the controls had gained a mean 1.1 ± 2.1 kg (+ 1.6%) while the intervention animals lost a mean 6.8 ± 3.9 kg (- 10.5%) since baseline. GJ-LAMS migrations occurred in 3 pigs, two of which also had DED migration and/or partial dislocation. Two other pigs died, one with aberrant splenic vein positioning near the GJA and the other from an unknown cause. An endoscopic bariatric bypass procedure with controlled bypass length was technically successful in all the cases and led to weight loss in test animals. Safety concerns must be further addressed., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Working from vague client instructions, how do audio producers collaborate to diagnose what specifically is wrong with a piece of music, where the problem is and what to do about it? This paper presents a design ethnography that uncovers some of the ways in which two music producers co-ordinate their understanding of complex representations of pieces of music while working together in a studio. Our analysis shows that audio producers constantly make judgements based on audio and visual evidence while working with complex digital tools, which can lead to ambiguity in assessments of issues. We show how multimodal conduct guides the process of work and that complex media objects are integrated as elements of interaction by the music producers. The findings provide an understanding how people currently collaborate when producing audio, to support the design of better tools and systems for collaborative audio production in the future., Competing Interests: Conflict of InterestsThe authors declared that they have no conflict of interest., (© The Author(s) 2022.)

Background and Objectives: Over the last two decades, EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) has emerged as a therapeutic alternative for patients with biliary obstruction and failed ERCP. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) as the gold standard is associated with relevant morbidity and need for re-intervention. The aim of our work was to evaluate in a phase II study the safety and efficacy profile of EUS-HGS. A PTBD arm was considered a control group., Patients and Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, noncomparative phase II study in three French tertiary centers involving patients with benign or malignant obstructive jaundice after failure of ERCP. Patients were randomized to either PTBD or EUS-HGS., Results: Fifty-six patients (mean age 64 years) have been included between 2011 and 2015. Twenty-one underwent PTBD and thirty-five were drained using EUS-HGS. An interim analysis after the inclusion of 41 patients revealed an unexpected high 30-day morbidity rate for PTBD (13 out of 21 patients), justifying to stop randomization and inclusion in this control arm in 2013. The primary objective was reached with 10 out of the 35 EUS-HGS patients (28.6%) having observed complications (90%-level bilateral exact binomial confidence interval [CI] [16.4%-43.6%], left-sided exact binomial test to the objectified 50% unacceptable rate P = 0.0083). Both methods achieved comparable technical success rate (TSR) and clinical success rate (CSR) (TSR: PTBD 100% vs. EUS-HGS 94.3%, P = 0.28; CSR: PTBD 66.7% vs. EUS-HGS 80%, P = 0.35). Long-term follow-up showed EUS-HGS patients being at lower risk for re-intervention (relative risk = 0.47, 95% CI [0.27-0.83])., Conclusion: In cases of ERCP failure, EUS-HGS is a valuable alternative for biliary drainage with a high TSR and CSR. PTBD is associated with an unacceptable 30-day morbidity rate, whereas EUS-HGS seems to have a decent safety profile, suggesting that it may be the treatment of choice in appropriately selected patients., Competing Interests: None

Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided digestive anastomosis (EUS-A) is a new alternative under evaluation in patients presenting with afferent limb syndrome (ALS) after Whipple surgery. The aim of the present study is to analyze the safety and effectiveness of EUS-A in ALS., Methods: This is an observational multicenter study. All patients ≥18 years old with previous Whipple surgery presenting with ALS who underwent an EUS-A using a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) between 2015 and 2021 were included. The primary outcome was clinical success, defined as resolution of the ALS or ALS-related cholangitis. Furthermore, technical success, adverse event rate, and mortality were evaluated., Results: Forty-five patients (mean age: 65.5 ± 10.2 years; 44.4% male) were included. The most common underlying disease was pancreatic cancer (68.9%). EUS-A was performed at a median of 6 weeks after local tumor recurrence. The most common approach used was the direct/freehand technique (66.7%). Technical success was achieved in 95.6%, with no differences between large (≥15 mm) and small LAMS (97.4% vs. 100%, P = 0.664). Clinical success was retained in 91.1% of patients. A complementary treatment by dilation of the stent followed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography through the LAMS was performed in three cases (6.7%). There were six recurrent episodes of cholangitis (14.6%) and two procedure-related adverse events (4.4%) after a median follow-up of 4 months. Twenty-six patients (57.8%) died during the follow-up due to disease progression., Conclusion: EUS-A is a safe and effective technique in the treatment of malignant ALS, achieving high clinical success with an acceptable recurrence rate., (© 2022 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.)

Background: Gastric per oral endoscopic esophageal myotomy (G-POEM) is a promising procedure to treat refractory gastroparesis. The safety profile of G-POEM is an important topic because gastroparesis is a functional pathology, with a procedure whose effectiveness is between 50 and 65% depending on the studies., Objectives: We present this retrospective multicenter study, with the aim of establishing a safety profile, focusing on serious adverse events (AEs)., Design: This was a multicenter observational cohort study conducted in five French expert centers., Methods: All patients who underwent G-POEM for refractory gastroparesis between 2015 and 2021 were included for analysis. AEs were classified into per endoscopic, early postoperative, and late postoperative, up to 1 month. Their severity was assessed using Dindo-Clavien and American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy classification. The primary objective was to evaluate the rate of G-POEM severe AEs. Secondary objectives were to document other postoperative AEs, and to identify predictive factors., Results: In all, 217 patients were included: 81 men and 136 women, mean age 52 ± 17 years. The average procedural time was 44 ± 14 min (12-78). The average hospital stay was 3.7 ± 2.3 days. The AEs rate classified as Clavien-Dindo ⩾3 was 0.4% (one delayed bleeding requiring blood transfusion and endoscopic management). There were no deaths or patients admitted to intensive care unit. The rates of mucosotomy and capnoperitoneum were 3.7 and 1.8%, respectively, without clinical consequences. Most patients (81.5%) did not experience any AE. Three cases of dumping syndrome occurred, quickly managed by dietary measures., Conclusion: Our study confirms the safety of G-POEM with less than 0.5% of serious AEs, medically managed. This outcome makes this a procedure to have a good benefit-risk ratio., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest., (© The Author(s), 2022.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Laurent MONINO is a consultant for Prion Medical and Braun Medical and received speaker's fees from Olympus Belgium and Olympus Europe. Marc BARTHET is consultant for Boston Scientific.

Background and Aims: Limited data exist concerning the long-term efficiency of gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) as a treatment of refractory gastroparesis. This study evaluated the 3-year results of G-POEM in patients with refractory gastroparesis., Methods: This was a prospective multicenter study of all G-POEM operations performed in 2 expert French centers for 46 patients with refractory gastroparesis with at least 3 years of follow-up., Results: Clinical success was 65.2% at 36 months. There was significant improvement in symptom severity. Median Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index decreased from 3.33 to 1.80 (P < .0001), with improvement in all subscales. We created a predictive score concerning G-POEM success (G-POEM predictive score) to which points were assigned as follows: nausea subscale <2: predictive of success, 1 point; satiety subscale >4: predictive of success, 1 point; bloating subscale >3.5: predictive of success, 1 point; percentage of gastric retention at 4 hours on scintigraphy >50%: 1 point. A threshold of 2 was identified by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis with an area under the curve of .825 that predicted clinical success with a sensitivity of 93.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], .77-.99), specificity of 56.3% (95% CI, .33-.77), positive predictive value of 80% (95% CI, .67-.93), negative predictive value of 81.8% (95% CI, .59-1.00), and accuracy of 80.4% (95% CI, .69-.92). Patients with a score ≥2 were significantly more likely to be responders at 3 years than were patients with a score <2 (80% and 18%, respectively; P = .0004)., Conclusions: The clinical success of G-POEM for refractory gastroparesis was 65.2% at 36 months. Our predictive score offers an easy tool that needs to be confirmed in other studies., (Copyright © 2022 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Bariatric endoscopic procedures are emerging as alternatives to bariatric surgical procedures. This study aimed to assess if a natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) bariatric procedure could be converted to a surgical duodenal-jejunal bypass (DJB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG)., Materials and Methods: This 12-week prospective study compared 4 test pigs to 3 control (no procedures) pigs aged 3 months at baseline. The test pigs received a fully endoscopic NOTES-based bypass including measurement of the bypassed limb and creation of a gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA) using gastrojejunal lumen-apposing metal stents (GJ-LAMS) at Week 0, placement of a duodenal exclusion device (DED) at Week 2, and randomization to DJB or SG surgery at Week 8 with subsequent 4-week follow-up. At Week 12, the pigs were sacrificed and necropsy was performed., Results: Endoscopic procedures were technically successful. One pig did not receive a DED due to early GJ-LAMS migration leading to premature closure of the GJA. At Week 8, all 4 pigs were doing well, and the remaining 3 GJ-LAMS and 3 DEDs were uneventfully endoscopically removed. Two one-anastomosis DJB were performed, and 2 SG were performed, closing in one case the site of the previous GJA. The surgical procedures were technically feasible and uneventful during follow-up. Necropsy assessments showed no local or peritoneal inflammation or abscess and no leakage or fistula., Conclusion: An endoscopic bariatric bypass can be transitioned to a one-anastomosis duodenal-jejunal bypass or sleeve gastrectomy, without complications., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Bckground and Objectives: EUS-guided cystogastrostomy is a well-established advanced endoscopic technique with a steep-learning curve which necessitates an ex-vivo simulator that would allow for adequate training. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of the model in allowing training for EUS-guided cystogastrostomy using lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS)., Subjects and Methods: The model was created by ROEYA Training Center, Egypt, using native porcine tissue to create fluid collections simulating both cystic and solid lesions. It was designed and tested in advance while the hydrogel was added on-site. The simulator was evaluated prospectively in five training sessions involving 17 international experts. The task was to successfully deploy the LAMS to drain the created cyst. After using the simulator, the experts were asked to fill a questionnaire to assess their experience. The primary endpoint was overall satisfaction with the model as a training tool., Results: All of the experts were satisfied with the model as a tool to train endoscopists for the technique. 76.5% (n = 11) of the experts thought the model to be moderately realistic. Proper visualization was reported by 94.1% of the experts. All experts believed the lesions to be either slightly like or very similar to real lesions. The model was graded "easy" in difficulty by 11 of the experts., Conclusions: In all parameters assessed, the experts thought the model to be a useful tool for future training. This preliminary study suggests that the aforementioned simulator can be used to train endoscopists on using LAMS in a risk-free environment., Competing Interests: None

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) is a benign non-tumoral disorder of the major papilla. It occurs mainly after cholecystectomy but can also occur before surgery. Biliary pain and biliary colic are the most frequent symptoms although recurrent pancreatic pain or pancreatitis can also be presenting symptoms. In about half of the cases, there is a fibrotic stricture of the sphincter of Oddi, probably secondary to the passage of biliary stones, while in the remaining half, the syndrome is due to ampullary motility disorders. The diagnosis of SOD first requires exclusion of choledocholithiasis or ampullary tumor, by means of ERCP, endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging. Findings on biliary manometry will establish the diagnosis, but this technique is performed less and less often because its high risk of inducing pancreatitis discourages its use as a diagnostic procedure. Biliary scintigraphy offers a risk-free alternative albeit with lower sensitivity. Medical treatment relies on the administration of trimebutine and nitroglycerine when pain occurs. Their efficacy is moderate. Sometimes patients are referred for endoscopic sphincterotomy. Endoscopic treatment should be performed only for patients with biliary pain associated with hepatic function disorders and/or bile duct dilatation. Practicians and patients should be aware that endoscopic sphincterotomy in this clinical setting is associated with a high risk of pancreatitis and its efficacy is limited in patients with pain but without laboratory anomalies or dilatation of the biliary duct (type III Milwaukee classification). Patients with Milwaukee classification type III disorders have mostly functional complaints or psychosocial disabilities and require only medical management., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

1:  ESGE recommends a prolonged course of a prophylactic broad-spectrum antibiotic in patients with ascites who are undergoing therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) procedures.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 2:  ESGE recommends placement of partially or fully covered self-expandable metal stents during EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy for biliary drainage in malignant disease.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 3:  ESGE recommends EUS-guided pancreatic duct (PD) drainage should only be performed in high volume expert centers, owing to the complexity of this technique and the high risk of adverse events.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 4:  ESGE recommends a stepwise approach to EUS-guided PD drainage in patients with favorable anatomy, starting with rendezvous-assisted endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (RV-ERP), followed by antegrade or transmural drainage only when RV-ERP fails or is not feasible.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 5:  ESGE suggests performing transduodenal EUS-guided gallbladder drainage with a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS), rather than using the transgastric route, as this may reduce the risk of stent dysfunction.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 6:  ESGE recommends using saline instillation for small-bowel distension during EUS-guided gastroenterostomy.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 7:  ESGE recommends the use of saline instillation with a 19G needle and an electrocautery-enhanced LAMS for EUS-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (EDGE) procedures.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 8:  ESGE recommends the use of either 15- or 20-mm LAMSs for EDGE, with a preference for 20-mm LAMSs when considering a same-session ERCP.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence., Competing Interests: M. Barthet has received a research grant from Boston Scientific (2015 to present). K.F. Binmoeller has received fees for training and education from Boston Scientific (2015 to present). M. Bronswijk has consultancy agreements with Prion Medical and Taewoong Medical (both ongoing). M.A. Khashab receives consultancy fees from BSCI, Medtronic, Olympus, Pentax, GI Supply, and Apollo (all ongoing). A. Larghi has received consultancy fees from Boston Scientific and Pentax Medical, and educational fees from Taewoong Medical; he receives research support from Medtronic. R. Law receives consultancy fees from Medtronic (2020 to present) and Conmed (2021). M. Perez-Miranda receives consultancy fees from Lumendi and Olympus (both 2020 to present) and consultancy and speaker's fees from Boston Scientific (2021). S. van der Merwe has received consultancy fees from Boston Scientific and Cook Endoscopy (both 2012 to present); he was the Boston Chair in Interventional Endoscopy (2018 to 2021) and is the Cook Chair in Portal Hypertension (2021). J.E. van Hooft has received lecture fees from Medtronics (2014, 2015, and 2019), Cook Medical (2019), and Abbivie (2021), and consultancy fees from Boston Scientific (2014 to 2017) and Olympus (2021); her department received research support from Abbott (2014 to 2017) and Cook Medical (2014 to 2019). P.G. Arcidiacono, A. Badaoui, S. Everett, T. Hucl, R. Kunda, S. Lakhtakia, M. Rimbas, and R.L.J. van Wanrooij declare that they have no conflict of interest., (European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved.)

Considerable progress has been made in therapeutic endoscopy over recent years and new techniques now offer access to a new space, the submucosal space, thus paving the way for new therapeutic perspectives, in particular, for functional endoscopy. The first of these applications, POEM (Per-oral endoscopic myotomy), has become, since the beginning of the 2010's, an endoscopic alternative to Heller myotomy for the treatment of achalasia. The results of this technique have been fully documented, and the technique has replaced pneumatic dilatation and become the standard treatment for this indication with equivalent effectiveness compared to traditional surgery, but with less morbidity. Indeed, the overall efficacy is around 90%, results are stable over time, and severe morbidity is less than 1%. Later, other motility disorders, such as spastic disorders, have been treated, certainly with less impressive outcomes than for achalasia, but still, of interest. This approach has also been applied to post-fundoplication motility disorders, whose de novo prevalence can be as high as 20%, and for which management is complex; this represents another new non-surgical perspective. The POEM procedure for this indication, in addition to myotomy, allows performance of a partial incision of the wrap with substantial symptomatic relief. In conclusion, the technique seems to have a bright future as it is progressively applied to more and more motility disorders., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Introduction: In patients with benign and refractory esophageal strictures (BES), repeating initial dilations in short intervals could be recommended, but little data are available to validate this strategy. Our aim was to evaluate long-term results of a scheduled program of repeated and sustained esophageal dilations in patients with refractory strictures., Methods: Patients with BES requiring five or more dilations were retrospectively included and divided in two groups for analysis: a SCHEDULED group (SDG) where patients were systematically rescheduled for the 5 first dilations; ON-DEMAND group (ODG) where patients were dilated only in case of recurrence of the dysphagia. Comparison between SDG and ODG was done with a 1:1 matching analysis and etiology of stricture. Clinical success was defined as the absence of dysphagia for more than a year., Results: 39 patients with refractory BES were included with post-operative stenosis in 51.2% and post-caustic injury 28.2%; 10 were in SDG and 29 in ODG. In overall analysis (39 patients), the follow-up was 64.4 ± 32 months, success rate was 79.5% and duration of treatment was 27.3 ± 20 months, and mean number of dilations was 11.7 per patient. The need for dilations decreased significantly after 18 months of treatment with an average of 0.56 dilations per semester. Self-expandable metallic stent insertion was associated with an increased rate of complications (5.9% vs 59.1% p = 0.001). In matched analysis (10 ODG vs 10 SDG patients), the duration of treatment was lower in SDG (18.8 vs 41.4 months, p = 0,032) with a higher probability of remission (survival analysis, Log-rank: p = 0,019) and the success rate did not differ between ODG and SDG patients (80% vs 90%; NS)., Conclusion: Overall, long-term esophageal dilations resulted in a 79.5% success rate and the need for further dilatations decreased significantly in both groups after 18-month follow-up. A scheduled dilation program was associated with a higher probability of final success and lower treatment duration., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.)

1: ESGE recommends the use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) over percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in malignant distal biliary obstruction when local expertise is available.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 2: ESGE suggests EUS-BD with hepaticogastrostomy only for malignant inoperable hilar biliary obstruction with a dilated left hepatic duct when inadequately drained by ERCP and/or PTBD in high volume expert centers.Weak recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 3: ESGE recommends that EUS-guided pancreatic duct (PD) drainage should only be considered in symptomatic patients with an obstructed PD when retrograde endoscopic intervention fails or is not possible.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 4: ESGE recommends rendezvous EUS techniques over transmural PD drainage in patients with favorable anatomy owing to its lower rate of adverse events.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 5: ESGE recommends that, in patients at high surgical risk, EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (GBD) should be favored over percutaneous gallbladder drainage where both techniques are available, owing to the lower rates of adverse events and need for re-interventions in EUS-GBD.Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 6: ESGE recommends EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE), in an expert setting, for malignant gastric outlet obstruction, as an alternative to enteral stenting or surgery.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 7: ESGE recommends that EUS-GE may be considered in the management of afferent loop syndrome, especially in the setting of malignancy or in poor surgical candidates. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 8: ESGE suggests that endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE) can be offered, in expert centers, to patients with a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass following multidisciplinary decision-making, with the aim of overcoming the invasiveness of laparoscopy-assisted ERCP and the limitations of enteroscopy-assisted ERCP.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence., Competing Interests: M. Barthet has received a research grant from Boston Scientific (2015 to present). K.F. Binmoeller has received fees for training and education from Boston Scientific (2015 to present). M. Bronswijk has received consultancy fees from Prion Medical and Taewoong Medical (both 2021). M.A. Khashab receives consultancy fees from BSCI, Medtronic, Olympus, Pentax, GI Supply, and Apollo (all ongoing). A. Larghi has received consultancy fees from Boston Scientific and Pentax Medical, and educational fees from Taewoong Medical; he receives research support from Medtronic. R. Law receives consultancy fees from Medtronic (2020 to present) and Conmed (2021). M. Perez-Miranda receives consultancy fees from Lumendi and Olympus (both 2020 to present) and consultancy and speaker's fees from Boston Scientific (2021). S. van der Merwe has received consultancy fees from Boston Scientific and Cook Endoscopy (both 2012 to present); he was the Boston Chair in Interventional Endoscopy (2018 to 2021) and is the Cook Chair in Portal Hypertension (2021). J.E. van Hooft has received lecture fees from Medtronics (2014, 2015, and 2019), Cook Medical (2019), and Abbivie (2021), and consultancy fees from Boston Scientific (2014 to 2017) and Olympus (2021); her department received research support from Abbott (2014 to 2017) and Cook Medical (2014 to 2019). P.G. Arcidiacono, A. Badaoui, S. Everett, T. Hucl, R. Kunda, S. Lakhtakia, M. Rimbas, and R.L.J. van Wanrooij declare that they have no conflict of interest., (European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved.)

We conducted a pilot study of a potential endoscopic alternative to bariatric surgery. We developed a Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) gastric bypass with controlled bypass limb length using four new devices including a dedicated lumen-apposing metal stent (GJ-LAMS) and pyloric duodenal exclusion device (DED). We evaluated procedural technical success, weight change from baseline, and adverse events in growing Landrace/Large-White pigs through 38 weeks after GJ-LAMS placement. Six pigs (age 2.5 months, mean baseline weight 26.1 ± 2.7 kg) had initial GJ-LAMS placement with controlled bypass limb length, followed by DED placement at 2 weeks. Technical success was 100%. GJ-LAMS migrated in 3 of 6, and DED migrated in 3 of 5 surviving pigs after mucosal abrasion. One pig died by Day 94. At 38 weeks, necropsy showed 100-240 cm limb length except for one at 760 cm. Weight gain was significantly lower in the pigs that underwent endoscopic bypass procedures compared to expected weight for age. This first survival study of a fully endoscopic controlled bypass length gastrojejunostomy with duodenal exclusion in a growing porcine model showed high technical success but significant adverse events. Future studies will include procedural and device optimizations and comparison to a control group., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Pelvic collections may occur after surgery or in medical diseases. EUS transmural (TM) treatment has been shown as highly effective and safe, becoming an alternative to surgery or radiology. We aimed to assess the results of EUS management of pelvic collections., Methods: Retrospective, single-center observational study conducted between 2004 and 2018. Patients with symptomatic collections treated by EUS-TM approach were enrolled. The procedures were performed with a therapeutic EUS-scope, following two possible options: puncture-aspiration-injection of antibiotics PAIA (group 1) or EUS-drainage by plastic double pigtail stents (DPS) with an ano-cavitary drain (ACD) or lumen-apposing metal Stent (LAMS) (group 2). The main objective was to assess the clinical effectiveness based on symptoms and collection resolution., Results: Seventy-three patients were included. Mean age was 42.5 years [12-87]. 30 patients in group 1 (41%) underwent PAIA and 43 in group 2 (59%) underwent DPS ± ACD in 41 patients (95%) and LAMS in 2. The collection was postoperative in 58%. The mean size was 48.9 mm [8-120], 33 +/- 17 mm in group 1, compared to 67 ± 21 mm in group 2 ( p  < .0001). All the procedures were technically successful. Overall clinical success was 96% (93% in group 1 (28/30), 98% (42/43) in group 2). Failures occurred in 2 post sigmoiditis abscesses and 1 ileo-colic Crohn's disease. No adverse event was reported. During the median follow-up of 7.5 years [4.4-8.9], no patient had recurrence., Conclusions: EUS-TM with either PAIA or drainage depending on the collection size is confirmed to be highly effective and safe.

Objectives: A single-use duodenoscope (SUD) has been recently developed to overcome issues with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related cross-infections. The aim was to evaluate SUD safety and performance in a prospective multi-centre study., Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing ERCP in six French centers were prospectively enrolled. All procedures were performed with the SUD; in case of ERCP failure, operators switched to a reusable duodenoscope. Study outcomes were the successful completion of the procedure with SUD, safety and operators' satisfaction based on a VAS 0-10 and on 22 qualitative items. The study protocol was approved by French authorities and registered (ID-RCB: 2020-A00346-33). External companies collected the database and performed statistical analysis., Results: Sixty patients (34 females, median age 65.5 years old) were enrolled. Main indications were bile duct stones (41.7%) and malignant biliary obstruction (26.7%). Most ERCP were considered ASGE grade 2 (58.3%) or 3 (35.0%). Fifty-seven (95.0%) procedures were completed using the SUD. Failures were unrelated to SUD (one duodenal stricture, one ampullary infiltration, and one tight biliary stricture) and could not be completed with reusable duodenoscopes. Median operators' satisfaction was 9 (7-9). Qualitative assessments were considered clinically satisfactory in a median of 100% of items and comparable to a reusable duodenoscope in 97.9% of items. Three patients (5%) reported an adverse event. None was SUD-related., Conclusions: The use of a SUD allows ERCP to be performed with an optimal successful rate. Our data show that SUD could be used for several ERCP indications and levels of complexity., (© 2021 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.)

Background: Endoscopic internal drainage (EID) with double-pigtail stents or low negative-pressure endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) are treatment options for leakage after upper gastrointestinal oncologic surgery. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of these techniques., Methods: Between 2016 and 2019, patients treated with EID in five centers in France and with EVT in Göttingen, Germany were included and retrospectively analyzed using univariate analysis. Pigtail stents were changed every 4 weeks; EVT was repeated every 3-4 days until leak closure., Results: 35 EID and 27 EVT patients were included, with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) leak size of 0.75 cm (0.5-1.5). Overall treatment success was 100 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 90 %-100 %) for EID vs. 85.2 % (95 %CI 66.3 %-95.8 %) for EVT ( P  = 0.03). The median (IQR) number of endoscopic procedures was 2 (2-3) vs. 3 (2-6.5; P  = 0.003) and the median (IQR) treatment duration was 42 days (28-60) vs. 17 days (7.5-28; P  < 0.001), for EID vs. EVT, respectively., Conclusion: EID and EVT provide high closure rates for upper gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks. EVT provides a shorter treatment duration, at the cost of a higher number of procedures., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Stent misdeployment (SM) has hindered the dissemination of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) for gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) management. We aimed to provide a classification system for SM during EUS-GE and study clinical outcomes and management accordingly., Methods: This is a retrospective study involving 16 tertiary care centers (8 in the United States, 8 in Europe) from March 2015 to December 2020. Patients who developed SM during EUS-GE for GOO were included. We propose classifying SM into 4 types. The primary outcome was rate and severity of SM (per American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy lexicon), whereas secondary outcomes were clinical outcomes and management of dislodgement according to the SM classification type, in addition to salvage management of GOO after SM., Results: From 467 EUS-GEs performed for GOO during the study period, SM occurred in 46 patients (9.85%). Most SMs (73.2%) occurred during the first 13 EUS-GE cases by the performing operators. SM was graded as mild (n = 28, 60.9%), moderate (n = 11, 23.9%), severe (n = 6, 13.0%), or fatal (n = 1, 2.2%), with 5 patients (10.9%) requiring surgical intervention. Type I SM was the most common (n = 29, 63.1%), followed by type II (n = 14, 30.4%), type IV (n = 2, 4.3%), and type III (n = 1, 2.2%). Type I SM was more frequently rated as mild compared with type II SM (75.9% vs 42.9%, P = .04) despite an equivalent rate of surgical repair (10.3% vs 7.1%, P = .7). Overall, 4 patients (8.7%) required an intensive care unit stay (median, 2.5 days). The median length of stay was 4 days after SM., Conclusions: Although SM is not infrequent during EUS-GE, most are type I, mild/moderate in severity, and can be managed endoscopically with a surgical intervention rate of approximately 11%., (Copyright © 2022 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and study aims  Ischemic colitis (IC) is potentially lethal. Clinical and biology information and results of computed tomography (CT) scan and/or colonoscopy are used to assess its severity. However, decision-making about therapy remains a challenge. Patients and methods  This was a retrospective, single-center study between 2006 and 2015. Patients with severe IC who underwent endoscopic evaluation were included. The aims were to determine outcomes depending on endoscopic findings and assess the role of endoscopy in the management. Results  A total of 71 patients were included (men = 48 (68%), mean age = 71 ± 13 years). There was hemodynamic instability in 29 patients (41 %) and severity signs on CT scan in 18 (38 %). Twenty-nine patients (41 %) underwent surgery and 24 (34 %) died. The endoscopic grades were: 15 grade 1 (21 %), 32 grade 2 (45 %), and 24 grade 3 (34%). Regarding patients with grade 3 IC, 55 % had hemodynamic instability, 58 % had severity signs on CT scan, 68 % underwent surgery, and 55 % died. The decision to perform surgery was based on hemodynamic status in 62 % of cases, CT scan data in 14 %, endoscopic findings in 10 %, and other in 14 %. Colectomy was more frequent in patients with grade 3 IC ( P  < 0.05). A mismatch between mucosal aspect (necrosis) and serous (normal) was observed in 13 patients (46 %). Risk factors for colectomy in univariate analysis were aortic aneurysm surgery, hemodynamic instability, no colic enhancement on CT scan, and endoscopic grade 3. Risk factors for mortality in multivariate analysis were hemodynamic instability, colectomy, and Charlson score > 5 ( P  < 0.05). Conclusions  This study suggests a low impact of endoscopy on surgical decision making. Hemodynamic instability was the first indication for colectomy. A discrepancy between endoscopic mucosal (necrosis) and surgical serous (normal) aspects was frequently noted., Competing Interests: Competing interests The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

The genus Fusarium contains many fungal species known to be pathogenic to animals and plants alike. One species complex within this genus, the Fusarium solani species complex (FSSC), is of particular concern due to its high numbers of pathogenic members. FSSC members are known to contribute significantly to plant, human and other animal fungal disease. One member of the FSSC, Fusarium keratoplasticum, is of particular ecological concern and has been implicated in low hatching success of endangered sea turtle eggs, as well as contribute to human and other animal Fusarium pathogenesis. Species-specific primers for molecular identification of F. keratoplasticum currently do not exist to our knowledge, making rapid identification, tracking and quantitation of this pathogenic fungus difficult. The objective of this study was to develop primers specific to F. keratoplasticum that could be applied to DNA from isolated cultures as well as total (mixed) DNA from environmental samples. RPB2 sequence from 109 Fusarium isolates was aligned and analysed to determine nucleotide polymorphisms specific to F. keratoplasticum useful for primer design. A set of primers were generated and found to be effective for identification of F. keratoplasticum from total DNA extracted from sand surrounding sea turtle nesting sites., (© 2021 The Society for Applied Microbiology.)

Background and Aims: Consensus regarding an optimal algorithm for endoscopic treatment of papillary adenomas has not been established. We aimed to assess the existing degree of consensus among international experts and develop further concordance by means of a Delphi process., Methods: Fifty-two international experts in the field of endoscopic papillectomy were invited to participate. Data were collected between August and December 2019 using an online survey platform. Three rounds were conducted. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement., Results: Sixteen experts (31%) completed the full process, and consensus was achieved on 47 of the final 79 statements (59%). Diagnostic workup should include at least an upper endoscopy using a duodenoscope (100%) and biopsy sampling (94%). There should be selected use of additional abdominal imaging (75%-81%). Patients with (suspected) papillary malignancy or over 1 cm intraductal extension should be referred for surgical resection (76%). To prevent pancreatitis, rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs should be administered before resection (82%) and a pancreatic stent should be placed (100%). A biliary stent is indicated in case of ongoing bleeding from the papillary region (76%) or concerns for a (micro)perforation after resection (88%). Follow-up should be started 3 to 6 months after initial papillectomy and repeated every 6 to 12 months for at least 5 years (75%)., Conclusions: This is the first step in developing an international consensus-based algorithm for endoscopic management of papillary adenomas. Surprisingly, in many areas consensus could not be achieved. These aspects should be the focus of future studies., (Copyright © 2021 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: After lung transplantation (LT), gastroparesis is frequent, occurring in 25-63% of cases and leading to pulmonary infections. In refractory disease, classical management has demonstrated limited efficacy. Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) is a recently developed safe and effective procedure that has been performed here on five patients with severe post-LT gastroparesis., Methods: In all patients, the diagnosis was confirmed by disturbed gastric emptying scintigraphy and GCSI calculation showing severe disease. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopies confirmed the absence of organic lesions. All patients were informed about the procedure and signed informed consent forms. The procedure consisted of performing an endoscopic pyloromyotomy under general anesthesia., Results: The patients were between 35 and 64 years of age. Four had chronic disease, starting approximately 1 year following LT, and one had acute, severe gastroparesis requiring intubation in the intensive care unit. All patients underwent G-POEM after failure of medical treatment, without any complications. Three of the patients with chronic disease improved; they resumed a normal diet and gained weight. The patient with acute disease was discharged within a few days following the procedure and resumed oral intake., Conclusion: G-POEM is promising for managing post-LT refractory gastroparesis and should be further evaluated., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)