Search

Background: As online teaching gains prevalence in higher education, traditional face-to-face methods are encountering limitations in meeting the demands of medical ethics, the availability of experimental resources, and essential experimental conditions. Consequently, under the guidance of the BOPPPS (bridge-in, objective, preassessment, participatory learning, postassessment, summary) teaching model, the application of virtual simulation platform has become a new trend. The purpose of this study is to explore the effect of BOPPPS combined with virtual simulation experimental teaching on students' scores and the evaluation of students' participation, performance and teachers' self-efficacy in preventive medicine experiment., Methods: Students from Class 1 and Class 2 of 2019 preventive medicine major in Binzhou Medical University were selected as the research objects. The experimental group (class 2) (n = 51) received the teaching mode combined with BOPPPS and virtual simulation platform, while the control group (class 1) (n = 49) received the traditional experimental teaching method. After class, the experimental report scores, virtual simulation scores, students' engagement scale (SES), Biggs questionnaires, and teachers' sense of self-efficacy (TSES) questionnaires were analyzed., Results: The experimental report results demonstrated a significant increase in the total score of the experimental group and the scores of each of the four individual experiments compared to the control group (P < 0.05). To investigate the impact of the new teaching model on students' learning attitudes and patterns, as well as to evaluate teachers' self-efficacy, a questionnaire survey was administered following the course. The SES results showed that students in the experimental group had high performance scores on the two dimensions of learning methods and learning emotions (t = 2.476, t = 2.177; P = 0.015, P = 0.032). Furthermore, in the Biggs questionnaire, the total deep learning score of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group (t = 2.553, P = 0.012), and the deep learning motivation score of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group (t = 2.598, P = 0.011). The TSES questionnaire shows that most teachers think it is easier to manage students and the classroom and easier to implement teaching strategies under this mode., Conclusions: The combination of BOPPPS and the virtual simulation platform effectively enhances the experimental environment for students, thereby improving their academic performance, engagement and learning approach in preventive medicine laboratory courses., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the BOPPPS model (bridge-in, learning objective, pre-test, participatory learning, post-test, and summary) in otolaryngology education for five-year undergraduate students., Methods: A non-randomized controlled trial was conducted with 167 five-year undergraduate students from Anhui Medical University, who were allocated to an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group received instruction using the BOPPPS model, while the control group underwent traditional teaching methods. The evaluation of the teaching effectiveness was performed through an anonymous questionnaire based on the course evaluation questionnaire. Students' perspectives and self-evaluations were quantified using a five-point Likert scale. Furthermore, students' comprehension of the course content was measured through a comprehensive final examination at the end of the semester., Results: Students in the experimental group reported significantly higher scores in various competencies compared to the control group: planning work (4.27 ± 0.676 vs. 4.03 ± 0.581, P < 0.05), problem-solving skills (4.31 ± 0.624 vs. 4.03 ± 0.559, P < 0.01), teamwork abilities (4.19 ± 0.704 vs. 3.87 ± 0.758, P < 0.05), and analytical skills (4.31 ± 0.719 vs. 4.05 ± 0.622, P < 0.05). They also reported higher motivation for learning (4.48 ± 0.618 vs. 4.09 ± 0.582, P < 0.01). Additionally, students in the experimental group felt more confident tackling unfamiliar problems (4.21 ± 0.743 vs. 3.95 ± 0.636, P < 0.05), had a clearer understanding of teachers' expectations (4.31 ± 0.552 vs. 4.08 ± 0.555, P < 0.05), and perceived more effort from teachers to understand their difficulties (4.42 ± 0.577 vs. 4.13 ± 0.59, P < 0.01). They emphasized comprehension over memorization (3.65 ± 1.176 vs. 3.18 ± 1.065, P < 0.05) and received more helpful feedback (4.40 ± 0.574 vs. 4.08 ± 0.585, P < 0.01). Lecturers were rated better at explaining concepts (4.42 ± 0.539 vs. 4.08 ± 0.619, P < 0.01) and making subjects interesting (4.50 ± 0.546 vs. 4.08 ± 0.632, P < 0.01). Overall, the experimental group expressed higher course satisfaction (4.56 ± 0.542 vs. 4.34 ± 0.641, P < 0.05). In terms of examination performance, the experimental group scored higher on the final examination (87.7 ± 6.7 vs. 84.0 ± 7.7, P < 0.01) and in noun-interpretation (27.0 ± 1.6 vs. 26.1 ± 2.4, P < 0.01)., Conclusion: The BOPPPS model emerged as an effective and innovative teaching method, particularly in enhancing students' competencies in otolaryngology education. Based on the findings of this study, educators and institutions were encouraged to consider incorporating the BOPPPS model into their curricula to enhance the learning experiences and outcomes of students., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Teaching ward rounds are the main teaching method used to develop clinical skills in standardized nursing training. However, the existing methods lack of cultivation of comprehensive ability and humanistic care for nurses, cannot meet the requirements of standardized training for nurses. BOPPPS (bridge-in, objective, pre-assessment, participatory Learning, post-assessment, and summary) is a student-centered teaching model that has been proven to enhance classroom teaching effectiveness. Therefore, the BOPPPS model was applied and its effectiveness in standardized nursing training was evaluated., Methods: In total, 260 nursing students were randomly allocated to two groups: the experimental group used the BOPPPS model and the control group used the traditional teaching model. This study used a mixed quantitative and qualitative research method to evaluate the effectiveness of the BOPPPS model., Results: The quantitative results were as follows: no significant difference in baseline scores was observed between the two groups before training. After training, the theory and practical scores in the experimental group were significantly higher than that of the control group. Similarly, students in the experimental group presented higher comprehensive ability scores than their counterparts. The students in the experimental group also exhibited higher satisfaction compared to the control group, while there was no difference in teacher satisfaction scores between the two groups ( p  = 0.323). Qualitative data showed that the vast majority of nurses and teachers agreed on the value of BOPPPS training., Conclusion: Compared to traditional teaching methods, the BOPPPS model was more effective in standardized nursing training. We recommend applying the BOPPPS model to nursing training., Competing Interests: The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Shen.)

Background: Expanding new nurse training and education is a priority for nursing educators as well as a critical initiative to stabilize the nursing workforce. Given that there is currently no standardized program for the training of new nurses in China, we investigated the effectiveness of the bridge-in, objective, pre-assessment, participatory learning, post-assessment, and summary model combined with case-based learning ((BOPPPS-CBL) for the standardized training of new nurses., Methods: The mixed method approach with explanatory sequential (quantitative-qualitative) method was used. A questionnaire was used to compare the impact of the BOPPPS-CBL model and the Traditional Learning Model (TLM) on the core competencies of 185 new nurses for two years of standardized training. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0. Focus group interviews were used with four groups of new nurses and perceptions of BOPPPS-CBL training were recorded. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically., Results: According to the quantitative data, more new nurses agreed that the BOPPPS-CBL model stimulated their learning and improved their core nursing competencies than the TLM. The BOPPPS-CBL group outperformed the TLM group on theoretical knowledge tests. Qualitative data revealed that 87.5% of new nurses agreed on the value of BOPPPS-CBL training, and three themes were extracted: (1) role promotion; (2) formation of new thinking to solve clinical problems; and (3) suggestions for improvement., Conclusion: BOPPPS-CBL training had a significant impact on improving new nurses' core competencies and promoting the transition of new nurses to clinical practice nurses in China. The study recommends BOPPPS-CBL training as an effective teaching model for the standardized training and education of new nurses., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background/aim: Interpreting an electrocardiogram (ECG) is a vital skill for nurses in cardiology. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the bridge-in, objective, preassessment, participatory learning, post-assessment, and summary (BOPPPS) model, when combined with case-based learning (CBL), in enhancing nursing students' ECG interpretation capabilities., Materials & Methods: Nursing students were randomly divided into two groups: one utilizing the BOPPPS model combined with CBL (BOPPPS-CBL), and the other employing a traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) model. All participants underwent training and completed pre- and post-course quizzes., Results: The BOPPPS-CBL model significantly improved nursing students' abilities in ECG interpretation compared to the traditional LBL model group. The BOPPPS-CBL model proved to be a comprehensive and effective method for enhancing students' attitudes towards teaching and learning., Discussion: Our study demonstrated for the first time that the BOPPPS-CBL model is an innovative and effective method for promoting nurses' accuracy in ECG interpretation. It highlights the potential of this approach as a superior alternative to traditional learning methods., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: BOPPPS (bridge-in, learning objective, pretest, participatory learning, posttest, and summary) is a student-centered modular teaching model that improves classroom teaching effectiveness. This study's primary aim was to explore whether the BOPPPS model has advantages over traditional instructional approaches in teaching lung cancer courses to clinical medical interns., Methods: A total of 88 students majoring in clinical medicine of Shandong First Medical University and Shandong University, who had clinical practice in thoracic surgery from January 2018 to December 2019, were divided into two groups, receiving the same lung cancer teaching content. The experimental group (n = 44) utilized the BOPPPS model, while the control group (n = 44) used the traditional instructional approach. A questionnaire was used to attain the students' satisfaction and self-evaluation of the course, and a post-study examination was used to assess end-of-course performance., Results: The experimental group's theoretical examination scores with the BOPPPS teaching model were significantly higher than those in the control group. Students preferred the BOPPPS model more than the traditional instructional approach in course satisfaction, student-teacher interaction, learning initiative, analytical ability, clinical thinking ability, and self-study ability (p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Compared with the traditional instructional approach. The BOPPPS model can better inspire clinical medical students' enthusiasm for thoracic surgery and enhance the students' comprehensive ability. In a word, the BOPPPS model has better teaching effectiveness in the clinical teaching practice of thoracic surgery, which is worthy of reference and popularization., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: To investigate the effect of the bridge-in, objective, preassessment, participatory learning, post assessment, and summary (BOPPPS) model combined with case-based learning (CBL) on ophthalmology teaching for five-year paediatric undergraduates., Methods: The effects of the BOPPPS model combined with CBL (BOPPPS-CBL) and traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) on ophthalmology teaching were compared among students in a five-year programme. The questionnaire surveys of the students were collected and statistically analysed after the class. The final examination scores, including on elementary knowledge and case analysis, in the two groups were analysed., Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the teachers and students in the baseline data. More students agreed that the BOPPPS-CBL model helped develop their problem-solving skills, analytical skills and motivation for learning better than the LBL model. There was no significant difference in learning pressure between the two groups. The final examination scores of the BOPPPS-CBL group were significantly higher than those of the LBL group. The overall course satisfaction of the BOPPPS-CBL group was obviously higher than that of the LBL group., Conclusions: The BOPPPS-CBL model is an effective ophthalmology teaching method for five-year paediatric undergraduates., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Although the teaching methods of the blended learning and BOPPPS (bridge-in, objective, preassessment, participatory learning, postassessment, and summary) model are proven to be successful and highly effective at improving the academic knowledge of the students, respectively, it is unclear whether blended learning combined with the BOPPPS model (BL-BOPPPS) could work well in an introduction course of health services management (HSM) for the health management students in China. The study investigated the perceptions and effects of implementing the BL-BOPPPS model on student learning outcomes in an introduction course of HSM. The intervention group consisted of 55 students introduced to the BL-BOPPPS model, while the control group consisted of 54 students who received a conventional lecture. After the end of course, the effectiveness of teaching was self-assessed with questionnaires by all students, and examination scores for the two groups were compared. The students' satisfaction levels of BL-BOPPPS teaching strategy were up to 81.8% in the intervention group. Compared with the control group, the intervention group showed significant elevation of perception scores of skills ( P = 0.001), initiative ( P = 0.002), self-control ( P = 0.008), self-efficacy ( P = 0.001), motivation ( P = 0.004), and the academic performance ( P = 0.001). The BL-BOPPPS model could stimulate the enthusiasm and interest of health students; boost students' skills, initiative, and motivation in learning; and improve the self-directed learning ability, academic performance, and teaching quality. The findings provide a basis of evidence for the promotion of the BL-BOPPPS model in various disciplines in Chinese colleges and universities.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of microteaching combined with the BOPPPS method (bridge-in, learning objective, pretest, participatory learning, posttest, and summary) on a dental materials course for predoctoral dental students. Participants were 105 fourth-year students in a dental school in China in 2016 and 2017. The control group consisted of 51 students who received conventional teaching, while the experimental group consisted of 54 students who received dental materials education from teachers using microteaching combined with the BOPPPS method. Teaching effectiveness was evaluated by all students after each class, and examination scores for the two groups were compared. The results showed that the evaluations of teacher performance in the experimental group were superior to those in the control group in two areas: effectiveness of communication and clear interpretation of abstract ideas and theories. The evaluation scores for teaching effectiveness were significantly better for the experimental group than for the control group (students were encouraged to participate in class discussion, instructor stimulated interest in the course subject, instructor encouraged students to think for themselves, students learned and understood the subject materials in the course). In addition, the experimental group had significantly higher examination scores than the control group. These results suggest that microteaching based on the BOPPPS model could stimulate the interest and enthusiasm of dental students, improve students' thinking ability, help teachers generate innovative teaching ideas, and improve teaching quality. The findings provide a scientific and rigorous theoretical basis for the promotion of this combined teaching model in various disciplines.