1. Additional effect of erenumab for patients with chronic migraine treated with onabotulinumtoxin A-real-world data from a preliminary cohort study.
- Author
-
Koelsche T, Nikolov P, Koska V, Ingwersen J, Jansen R, Arat E, Meuth SG, Albrecht P, and Lee JI
- Abstract
Background: This preliminary retrospective cohort study investigates the potential additive prophylactic effect of erenumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, in combination with ongoing onabotulinumtoxin A (onaBoNT-A) treatment in patients suffering from chronic migraine., Methods: The study included 218 patients and investigated the effects of adding erenumab to the existing treatment regimen. The primary outcome was the MIDAS (Migraine Disability Assessment) score assessed 3 months after the introduction of erenumab., Results: The results indicated a significant improvement of the MIDAS score, suggesting a reduction in migraine-related disability following the addition of erenumab to onaBoNT-A. In the inter group comparison, dual therapy showed a significantly greater reduction of the MIDAS when compared to a switch from onaBoNT-A to erenumab monotherapy, but not compared to initiation of onaBoNT-A monotherapy. It is hypothesized that the observed additive effects are due to the independent modes of action of erenumab and onabotulinumtoxin A., Conclusion: This study suggests that the combination of erenumab with onaBoNT-A may offer an improved approach for the treatment of chronic migraine in selected patients. However, the results highlight the need for prospective, controlled studies to validate these findings and determine the optimal combination of treatments tailored to the individual patient., Competing Interests: TK has received travel grants from Merck, Abbvie, Ipsen, and Merz, all outside the submitted work. VK has received travel grants from Abbvie, Ipsen and Merz, all outside the submitted work. SM received honoraria for lecturing and travel expenses for attending meetings and has received financial research support from Bayer, Biogen Idec, Sanofi-Aventis, Bayer Schering, Merck Serono, Novo Nordisk, Genzyme, MSD, and Teva.PA reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Novartis, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Biogen, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Merz, personal fees and non-financial support from Teva, personal fees and non-financial support from Ipsen, from Allergan, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Celgene, personal fees from Janssen Cilag, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Roche, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Merck, grants and personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from Sandoz, outside the submitted work. J-IL is Review Editor for Frontiers in Neurology and has received honoraria for speaking/consultation from Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Allergan, Abbvie, Ipsen, Novartis, Teva, Lilly, Pfizer as well as travel grants from Allergan, Abbvie, Ipsen, Merz, Bayer, Novartis, all outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Koelsche, Nikolov, Koska, Ingwersen, Jansen, Arat, Meuth, Albrecht and Lee.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF