1. "There's no us vs. them, it's just us": a creative approach to centring lived experience within the AVATAR2 trial.
- Author
-
Owrid O, Richardson L, Allan S, Grant A, Gogan S, Hamilton N, Yanga F, Sirey N, Syrett S, Garety P, Craig T, Clancy M, Pinfold V, Miller L, Ward T, and Edwards C
- Subjects
- Humans, Hallucinations psychology, Hallucinations therapy, Patient Participation methods, Patient Participation psychology, Community Participation psychology, Community Participation methods, Creativity
- Abstract
This article describes a Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) led creative workshop space held within a clinical trial of a talking therapy for distressing voices (AVATAR2). PPI adds significant value to clinical research and ensures the work is meaningful to patients and their supporters. However, known issues include tokenism, a common power imbalance between PPI colleagues and researchers and a lack of opportunity for PPI to shape the research. PPI has played a key role at all stages of the AVATAR2 trial, including design, recruitment of staff and participants, data collection, analysis, and dissemination. An active and creative group of people was established, with over 30 members flexibly involved across all four sites. PPI group members were from diverse backgrounds, with lived experience of mental health conditions and recovery, and including carers. During this work, PPI colleagues identified that they would value a creative space which would help to promote the study but extend beyond an exclusive focus on trial deliverables. A regular creative workshop was established to support PPI colleagues in their creative work, including material such as poetry, blogs, art and podcasts. PPI colleagues and trial staff have cowritten a reflective piece to share their experiences on the impact of the creative workshops, organised into four themes. We found the workshops to be a powerful tool for forging relationships among trial staff and PPI colleagues, while also fostering personal development. We reflected on how the workshops built up the confidence of attendees and supported demanding trial activities such as public speaking. Finally, we discussed the impact of the workshops on wider trial culture, by upholding the values of the team and challenging the status quo., Competing Interests: Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate The work outlined here was carried out as part of the PPI programme in the trial, and not as ethically approved research. As all contributors are authors no ethical approval was necessary. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF