1. Survey of Laboratory Stewardship Governance at US Academic Medical Centers.
- Author
-
Eby CS, Al-Hammadi N, Dodds K, Sunkavalli D, and Gronowski AM
- Subjects
- Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Leadership, Laboratories, Clinical organization & administration, Academic Medical Centers organization & administration, Academic Medical Centers statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Background: Efforts to appropriately utilize laboratory tests have been underway for several decades. However, limited information is available regarding the status of laboratory stewardship at academic medical centers. Prior to initiating a laboratory stewardship committee, a study was initiated to gain insights from peer institutions., Methods: An online REDCap survey was created and emailed to US pathology department leaders at 94 academic medical centers., Results: Response rate was 40%. Sixty-eight percent (n = 26) of respondents indicated that they have a laboratory stewardship committee. There was variability among academic medical institutions regarding governance, committee structure and responsibilities, and assessment of laboratory stewardship committee performance. There was consensus for inclusion of: hospital administration and clinical leadership; informatics (IT) support, and a multidisciplinary clinical team combined with laboratory medicine expertise. Of the 32% (n = 12) without a committee, 4 started one but found it unsustainable, and 6 were unsuccessful at starting a program. Respondents without a current laboratory stewardship program cited lack of leadership support, insufficient management and IT resources, and unclear vision and goals as major factors. Fifty-eight percent of those without a laboratory stewardship committee predicted their hospital would establish one within the next 5 years., Conclusions: Survey results provide insights into the status of laboratory stewardship efforts at peer institutions. Awareness of the structural and leadership components critical to successful and sustained initiatives will improve the quality and value of clinical laboratory services., (© Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine 2025. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF