Search

Study Design: Retrospective Cohort., Objective: Investigate the disparities between octogenarians and non-octogenarians undergoing cervical spine surgery regarding perioperative, and postoperative outcomes., Summary of Background Data: As the population ages, the demand for elective cervical spine surgery among older, more active adults increases. However, concerns remain regarding the optimal management of older patients undergoing cervical surgery, given the potential complexities associated with advanced age, comorbidities, and physiological decline. While the safety and efficacy of cervical spine surgery in younger cohorts have been extensively studied, there is a paucity of literature specifically addressing outcomes in octogenarians., Methods: Octogenarians undergoing elective cervical spine surgery were propensity matched 3:1 to patients <80 years old by baseline neck and arm pain, surgical approach, and total instrumented levels. Primary outcomes of interest were postoperative complications, unexpected 90-day hospital readmissions and 12-month reoperation. Secondary outcomes were 12-month patient satisfaction and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at 3 and 12 months, including EuroQol-5D, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association, neck disability index, and visual analog scale for neck and arm pain., Results: There were 29 octogenarians and 87 nonoctogenarians identified. The mean age in each cohort was 82.4±2.2 vs. 59.1±11.1 years, respectively. There was no difference in postoperative complications (10.3% vs. 6.9%, P=0.548), 90-day readmission (10.3% vs. 6.9%, P=0.548), and 12-month reoperation (3.4% vs. 2.3%, P=0.736) between octogenarians and non-octogenarians. Similarly, octogenarians and nonoctogenarians experienced comparable 12-month patient satisfaction (65.2% vs. 55.3%, P=0.393), improvement in 3- and 12- month PROMs and MCID achievement., Conclusion: Postoperative complications, readmission, reoperation rate, patient satisfaction, and PROMs did not significantly differ between octogenarians and non-octogenarians undergoing cervical spine surgery. These findings suggest that age alone should not be a determining factor in surgical decision-making for elective cervical spine procedures, as octogenarians can achieve comparable outcomes to their younger counterparts., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: Dr. Abtahi receives institutional research support from Stryker Spine. Dr. Gardocki is a consultant and teaching surgeon for Joimax, a consultant for Arthrex, a teaching surgeon and consultant with royalties for Integrity Implants, and a consultant with royalties for Spineology. Dr. Stephens is a teaching consultant for Globus and receives institutional research support from Globus and Stryker Spine. Dr. Zuckerman reports being an unaffiliated neurotrauma consultant for the National Football League. No other perceived conflict of interest by any of the listed authors., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study., Objective: To assess the impact of smoking on outcomes following elective cervical laminoplasty for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM)., Summary of Background Data: The detrimental effect of cigarette smoking on cervical spinal fusion surgery outcomes is well documented. However, the impact of smoking on outcomes following nonfusion cervical spine procedures is unknown. One commonly utilized nonfusion technique for cervical decompression is laminoplasty., Methods: Adult smokers or nonsmokers who underwent primary elective laminoplasty for DCM were included. The propensity score (PS) was constructed for being a current smoker based on covariates. Only patients contained in the PS overlapped region were included in the analysis set. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at baseline and 12 months postoperation included Visual Analog Scale (VAS) neck and arm pain, neck disability index (NDI)%, EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), and modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) scores. Other outcomes included perioperative complications, 3-month readmissions/reoperations, and patient satisfaction. Wilcoxon and Pearson tests were used to compare outcomes between smokers and nonsmokers., Results: The study included 132 patients: 30 were smokers (22.7%) and 102 were nonsmokers (77.3%). No significant differences were found at baseline between groups in demographics or medical history. Smokers had significantly worse baseline VAS neck pain (5.7±3.2 vs. 4.4±3.04, P=0.028) and arm pain (5.7±3.5 vs. 4.3±3.2, P=0.045) scores, but all other baseline PROs were not statistically different between groups. No differences were found between smokers and nonsmokers in any 12-month PRO, or in rates of perioperative complications, 3-month readmissions, or 3-month reoperations. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, smoking had no significant impact on any outcome of interest., Conclusion: Clinical and PROs following elective laminoplasty for DCM are not significantly different between smokers and nonsmokers. Laminoplasty should be considered a good surgical option in smokers presenting with DCM., Competing Interests: A.M.A. received institutional research support from Stryker Spine. R.J.G. is a consultant and teaching surgeon for Joimax, a consultant for Arthrex, a teaching surgeon and consultant with royalties for Integrity Implants, and a consultant with royalties for Spineology. J.S.P. is a consultant for 3Spine and Steamboat Orthopedic and Spine Institute. B.F.S. is a consultant for Globus and receives institutional research funding from Globus and Stryker. S.L.Z. reports being an unaffiliated neurotrauma consultant for the National Football League. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study., Objective: To identify factors predictive of returning to work within 90 days of laminoplasty for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM)., Background: DCM is a debilitating condition resulting from spinal canal stenosis and spinal cord compression. One surgical option for cord decompression is cervical laminoplasty. Factors influencing return to work (RTW) postsurgery are unknown., Methods: This study included adult patients previously employed, undergoing primary elective laminoplasty for DCM, and with documented RTW status. Variables included demographic information, medical history, illness characteristics, and baseline patient-reported outcomes. The primary outcome of interest was RTW status at 90 days. Statistical analyses were conducted to identify predictors., Results: Forty-six patients (67.6%) returned to work within 90 days, whereas 22 (32.3%) either RTW between 90 and 365 days (n = 3) or did not RTW within 365 days (n = 19). Significantly more patients who RTW within 90 days worked full-time (90.9% vs 64.3%, P = 0.030). Patients who RTW within 90 days had significantly lower preoperative Neck Disability Index scores (23.7 ± 17.5 vs 35.6 ± 14.3, P = 0.008) and higher preoperative modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scores (13.7 ± 2.5 vs 12.2 ± 2.7, P = 0.018) compared with those who did not RTW. No differences were found in other baseline patient-reported outcomes. Patients who RTW within 90 days had significantly lower postoperative 3-month neck pain (2.0 ± 2.1 vs 3.8 ± 2.6, P = 0.007), 3-month arm pain (1.3 ± 1.9 vs 3.6 ± 2.8, P < 0.001), 12-month neck pain (1.4 ± 1.6 vs 3.1 ± 2.4, P = 0.019) and 12-month arm pain (1.1 ± 1.8 vs 2.4 ± 2.4, P = 0.048) compared with those who did not RTW within 90 days. Higher preoperative modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scores were significantly associated with truncated time to RTW (HR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.01-1.29, P = 0.034)., Conclusion: Patients with better preoperative neck and arm pain and functional scores were more likely to RTW within 90 days postlaminoplasty. Preoperative functional status plays an important role in assessing RTW postlaminoplasty. This information is valuable for preoperative patient counseling., Competing Interests: A.M.A. received an institutional research support from Stryker Spine. R.J.G. is a consultant and teaching surgeon for Joimax, a consultant for Arthrex, a teaching surgeon and consultant with royalties for Integrity Implants, and a consultant with royalties for Spineology. J.S.P. is a consultant for 3Spine and Steamboat Orthopedic and Spine Institute. B.F.S. is a consultant for Globus and receives institutional research funding from Globus and Stryker. S.L.Z. reports being an unaffiliated neurotrauma consultant for the National Football League. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: Optimal iliac screw position in relation to the sciatic notch remains unknown. In 12 cadavers undergoing S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screw placement, we tested the pullout strength of screws placed in proximity to the sciatic notch (≤5 mm) vs farther away from the sciatic notch (>5 mm)., Methods: A biomechanical, cadaver-based study was performed on 12 cadavers undergoing bilateral S2AI screw insertion. The position of the S2AI screw regarding the sciatic notch was dichotomized as ≤5 mm from the sciatic notch on the right side and >5 mm on the left side, confirmed using c-arm fluoroscopy. The primary outcome was the pullout strength of the screw (N). Secondary outcomes were stiffness (N/mm), yield force (N), and work to failure (N mm). Ischial tuberosity was embedded into polymethyl methacrylate and secured to a custom 3-axis vise grip mounted to a 14.5-kN load cell. Pullout testing was performed at 5 mm/min. Force and displacement data were collected at 100 Hz and evaluated using MATLAB. The Mann-Whitney test was performed., Results: Of 24 S2AI screws, 3 screws could not be tested because of cement-bone interface failure. A positive though nonsignificant trend of screw pullout strength was found for screws close to the notch compared with those farther from the notch (861.8 ± 340.7 vs 778.7 ± 350.8 N, P = .859). Similarly, screws close to the notch demonstrated a higher trend of stiffness (149.4 ± 145.4 vs 111.34 ± 128.2 N/mm, P = .320) and force to yield (806.9 ± 352.0 vs 618.6 ± 342.9 N, P = .455). Conversely, screws farther from the notch had a higher but similarly nonsignificant area under the force-displacement curve (10 867.0 ± 9565.0 vs 14 196.6 ± 9578.3 N mm, P = .455), which might be due to excess sheer/translation force that could not be reliably quantified., Conclusion: Although placing S2AI screws ≤5 mm of the sciatic notch provided stronger fixation in 3 of 4 biomechanical testing categories, these results were not statistically significant. Therefore, placing S2AI screws ≤5 mm of the sciatic notch did not provide stronger fixation., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Systematic review and Meta-analysis., Objective: Analyze and summarize literature evaluating the role of C7, T1, and T2 lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) selection in posterior cervical fusion (PCF) and if this affects the progression of mechanical failure and revision surgery., Summary of Background Data: Literature evaluating mechanical failure and adjacent segment disease in the setting of PCF at or nearby the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) remains limited with studies reporting conflicting results., Materials and Methods: Two reviewers conducted a detailed systematic review using EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar on June 28, 2021, for primary research articles comparing revision and complication rates for posterior fusions ending in the lower cervical spine (C7) and upper thoracic spine (T1-T2). The initial systematic database yielded 391 studies, of which 10 met all inclusion criteria. Random effects meta-analyses compared revision and mechanical failure rates between patients with an LIV above the CTJ and patients with an LIV below the CTJ., Results: Data from 10 studies (total sample=2001, LIV above CTJ=1046, and LIV below CTJ=955) were meta-analyzed. No differences were found between the 2 cohorts for all-cause revision [odds ratio (OR)=0.75, 95% CI=0.42-1.34, P <0.0001] and construct-specific revision (OR=0.62, 95% CI=0.25-1.53, P <0.0001). The odds of total mechanical failure in the LIV below CTJ cohort compared with the LIV above CTJ cohort were significantly lower (OR=0.38, 95% CI=0.18-0.81, P <0.0001)., Conclusion: The results show patients with PCFs ending below the CTJ have a lower risk of undergoing total mechanical failure compared with fusions ending above the CTJ. This is important information for both physicians and patients to consider when planning for operative treatment., Level of Evidence: Level I., Competing Interests: B.F.S. is a consultant and receives honarium from Depuy Synthes. In addition, he is a principle investigator for a project sponsored by Nuvasive Inc. A.M.A. is currently serving as principal investigator for a study sponsored by Stryker Corporation. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data., Objective: To examine the combined influence of preoperative sleep disturbance and depression on 12-month patient-reported outcomes after lumbar spine surgery (LSS)., Summary of Background Data: Psychological and behavioral factors are considered major risk factors for poor outcomes after LSS. However, there is a need to explore the combined effects of preoperative factors such as sleep disturbance and depression. Understanding the influence of sleep disturbance and depression can inform evidence-based preoperative assessment and shared-decision making of preoperative and postoperative treatment., Methods: Data from 700 patients undergoing LSS were analyzed. Preoperative sleep disturbance and depression were assessed with PROMIS subscales. Established thresholds defined patients with moderate/severe symptoms. Outcomes for disability (Oswestry Disability Index) and back and leg pain (Numeric Rating Scales) were assessed preoperatively and at 12 months. Separate multivariable linear regressions examined the influence of each factor on 12-month outcomes with and without accounting for the other and in combination as a 4-level variable: (1) moderate/severe sleep disturbance alone, (2) moderate/severe depression alone, (3) both moderate/severe sleep disturbance and depression, (4) no moderate/severe sleep disturbance or depression., Results: Preoperative sleep disturbance and depression were associated with 12-month disability and pain ( P <0.05). After accounting for depression, preoperative sleep disturbance remained associated with disability, while preoperative depression adjusting for sleep disturbance remained associated with all outcomes ( P <0.05). Patients reporting both moderate/severe sleep disturbance and moderate/severe depression had 12.6 points higher disability and 1.5 points higher back and leg pain compared with patients without moderate/severe sleep disturbance or depression., Conclusions: The combination of sleep disturbance and depression impacts postoperative outcomes considerably. The high-risk group of patients with moderate/severe sleep disturbance and depression could benefit from targeted treatment strategies., Level of Evidence: Level II., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cervical radiculopathy is a spine ailment frequently requiring surgical decompression via anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior foraminotomy/discectomy. While endoscopic posterior foraminotomy/discectomy is gaining popularity, its financial impact remains understudied despite equivalent randomized long-term outcomes to ACDF. In a cohort of patients undergoing ACDF vs endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy/discectomy, we sought to compare the total cost of the surgical episode while confirming an equivalent safety profile and perioperative outcomes., Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy undergoing ACDF or endoscopic cervical foraminotomy between 2018 and 2023 was undertaken. Primary outcomes included the total cost of care for the initial surgical episode (not charges or reimbursement). Perioperative variables and neurological recovery were recorded. Multivariable analysis tested age, body mass index, race, gender, insurance type, operative time, and length of stay., Results: A total of 38 ACDF and 17 endoscopic foraminotomy/discectomy operations were performed. All patients underwent single-level surgery except for 2 two-level endoscopic decompressions. No differences were found in baseline characteristics and symptom length except for younger age (46.8 ± 9.4 vs 57.6 ± 10.3, P = 0.002) and more smokers (18.4% vs 11.8%, P = 0.043) in the ACDF group. Actual hospital costs for the episode of surgical care were markedly higher in the ACDF cohort (mean ±95% CI; $27,782 ± $2011 vs $10,103 ± $720, P < 0.001) driven by the ACDF approach (β = $17,723, P < 0.001) on multivariable analysis. On sensitivity analysis, ACDF was never cost-efficient compared with endoscopic foraminotomy, and endoscopic failure rates of 64% were required for break-even cost. ACDF was associated with significantly longer operative time (167.7 ± 22.0 vs 142.7 ± 27.4 minutes, P < 0.001) and length of stay (1.1 ± 0.5 vs 0.1 ± 0.2 days, P < 0.001). No significant difference was found regarding 90-day neurological improvement, readmission, reoperation, or complications., Conclusion: Compared with patients treated with a single-level ACDF for unilateral cervical radiculopathy, endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy/discectomy can achieve a similar safety profile, pain relief, and neurological recovery at considerably less cost. These findings may help patients and surgeons revisit offering the posterior cervical foraminotomy/discectomy utilizing endoscopic techniques., Clinical Relevance: Endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy/discectomy offers comparable safety, pain relief, and neurological recovery to traditional methods but at a significantly lower cost., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests : Dr. Gardocki is a consultant and teaching surgeon for Joimax, a consultant for Arthrex, a teaching surgeon and consultant with royalties for Integrity Implants, and a consultant with royalties for Spineology. Dr. Zuckerman reports being an unaffiliated neurotrauma consultant for the National Football League and consultant for Medtronic. Dr. Stephens is a consultant for Nuvasive and Carbofix and receives institutional research support from Nuvasive and Stryker Spine. Dr. Abtahi received institutional research support from Stryker Spine. No other perceived conflict of interest by any of the listed authors., (This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2024 ISASS. To see more or order reprints or permissions, see http://ijssurgery.com.)

Background and Objectives: Open thoracic diskectomy often requires significant bone resection and fusion, whereas an endoscopic thoracic diskectomy offers a less invasive alternative. Therefore, we sought to compare one-level open vs endoscopic thoracic diskectomy regarding (1) perioperative outcomes, (2) neurological recovery, and (3) total cost., Methods: A single-center, retrospective, cohort study using prospectively collected data of patients undergoing one-level thoracic diskectomy was undertaken from 2018 to 2023. The primary exposure variable was open vs endoscopic. The primary outcome was perioperative outcomes and neurological recovery. Secondary outcomes were total cost of care. Multivariable regression analysis controlled for age, body mass index, sex, symptom onset, disk characteristics, operative time, and length of stay., Results: Of 29 patients undergoing thoracic diskectomy, 17 were open and 12 were endoscopic. Preoperative demographics, symptoms, and radiographic findings were comparable between the cohorts. Perioperatively, open surgery had significantly higher mean length of stay (4.9 ± 1.5 vs 0.0 ± 0.0 days, P < .001), median (IQR) longer operative time (342.8 [68.4] vs 141.5 [36] minutes, P < .001), and more blood loss (350 [390] vs 6.5 [20] mL; P < .001). 16 (94%) open patients required fusion vs 0 endoscopic (P < .001). Postoperative opioid use (P = .119), readmission (P = .665), reoperation (P = .553), and rate of neurological improvement (P > .999) were similar between the 2 groups. Financially, open surgical median costs were 7x higher than endoscopic ($59 792 [$16 118] vs $8128 [$1848]; P < .001), driven by length of stay (β = $2261/night, P < .001), open surgery (β = $24 106, P < .001), and number of pedicle screws (β = $1829/screw, P = .002) on multivariable analysis. On sensitivity analysis, open surgery was never cost-efficient against endoscopic surgery and excess endoscopic revision rates of 86% above open revision rates were required for break-even costs between the surgical approaches., Conclusion: Endoscopic thoracic diskectomy was associated with decreased length of stay, operative time, blood loss, and total cost compared with the open approach, with similar neurological outcomes. These findings may help patients and surgeons seek endoscopic approach as a less morbid and less costly alternative., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.)

Background: In patients undergoing spine surgery for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), we sought to: (1) describe patterns of postoperative targeted systemic therapy and radiotherapy (RT), (2) compare perioperative outcomes among those treated with targeted systemic therapy to those without, and (3) evaluate the impact of targeted systemic therapy and/or RT on overall survival (OS) and local recurrence (LR)., Methods: A single-institution, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic RCC from 2010 to 2021 was undertaken. Treatment groups were RT alone, targeted systemic therapy alone, dual therapy consisting of RT and targeted systemic therapy, and neither therapy. Multivariable Cox regression controlled for age, race, sex, insurance, and preoperative targeted systemic therapy., Results: Forty-nine patients underwent spine surgery for RCC. Postoperatively, 4 patients (8%) received RT alone, 19 (38.8%) targeted systemic therapy alone, 12 (24.5%) dual therapy, and 13 (28.6%) neither. All groups were similar in demographics, preoperative Karnofsky Performance Score ( P = 0.372), tumor size ( P = 0.413), readmissions ( P = 0.884), complications ( P = 0.272), Karnofsky Performance Score ( P = 0.466), and Modified McCormick Scale ( P = 0.980) at last follow-up. Higher 1-year survival was found in dual therapy (83.3%) compared with other therapies. OS was significantly longer in patients with dual therapy compared with other therapies (log-rank; P = 0.010). Multivariate Cox regression (HR = 0.08, 95% CI = 0.02-0.31, P < 0.001) showed longer OS in dual therapy compared with other therapies. Seven patients (14.3%) experienced LR, and a similar time to LR was found between groups (log-rank; P = 0.190)., Conclusion: In patients undergoing metastatic spine surgery for RCC, postoperative dual therapy demonstrated significantly higher 1-year survival and OS compared with other therapies., Clinical Relevance: Multidisciplinary management of metastatic RCC is necessary to ensure timely implementation of targeted systemic therapy and RT to improve outcomes., (This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2024 ISASS. To see more or order reprints or permissions, see http://ijssurgery.com.)

Background: We sought to determine which aspect of the upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV)-tilt angle or screw angle-was more strongly associated with: (1) proximal junctional kyphosis/failure (PJK/F), (2) other mechanical complications and reoperations, and (3) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)., Methods: A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was undertaken for patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery from 2011 to 2017. Only patients with UIV at T7 or below were included. The primary exposure variables were UIV tilt angle (the angle of the UIV inferior endplate and the horizontal) and UIV screw angle (the angle of the UIV screws and superior endplate). Multivariable logistic regression included age, body mass index, osteopenia/osteoporosis, postoperative sagittal vertical axis, postoperative pelvic-incidence lumbar lordosis mismatch, UIV tilt angle , and UIV screw angle., Results: One hundred and seventeen patients underwent adult spinal deformity surgery with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. A total of 41 patients (35.0%) had PJK and 26 (22.2%) had PJF. (1) UIV tilt angle: 96 (82.1%) had lordotic UIV tilt angles, 6 (5.1%) were neutral, and 15 (12.8%) were kyphotic. (2) UIV screw angle: 38 (32.5%) had cranially directed screws, 4 (3.4%) were neutral, and 75 (64.1%) were caudally directed. Both lordotic-angled UIV endplate (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.01-1.12, and P = 0.020) and cranially directed screws (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.07-1.33, and P < 0.001) were associated with higher odds of PJK, with a more pronounced effect of UIV screw angle compared with UIV tilt angle (Wald test, 9.40 vs 4.42). Similar results were found for PJF. Neither parameter was associated with other mechanical complications, reoperations, or patient-reported outcome measures., Conclusions: UIV screw angle was more strongly associated with development of PJK/F compared with tilt angle. Overall, these modifiable parameters are directly under the surgeon's control and can mitigate the development of PJK/F., Clinical Relevance: Surgeons may consider selecting a UIV with a neutral or kyphotically directed UIV tilt angle when performing ASD surgery with a UIV in the lower thoracic or lumbar region, as well as use UIV screw angles that are caudally directed, for the purprose of decreasing the risk of developing PJK/F., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests : The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2024 ISASS. To see more or order reprints or permissions, see http://ijssurgery.com.)

Objective: In patients undergoing metastatic spine surgery, we sought to 1) report time to postoperative radiation therapy (RT), 2) describe the predictive factors of time to postoperative RT, and 3) determine if earlier postoperative RT is associated with improved local recurrence (LR) and overall survival (OS)., Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was undertaken of all patients undergoing spine surgery for extradural metastatic disease and receiving RT within 3 months postoperatively between January 2010 and January 2021. Time to postoperative RT was dichotomized at <1 month versus 1-3 months. The primary outcomes were LR, OS, and 1-year survival. Secondary outcomes were wound complication, Karnofsky Performance Status, and modified McCormick Scale (MMS) score. Regression analyses controlled for age, body mass index, tumor size, preoperative RT, preoperative/postoperative chemotherapy, and type of RT., Results: Of 76 patients undergoing spinal metastasis surgery and receiving postoperative RT within 3 months, 34 (44.7%) received RT within 1 month and 42 (55.2%) within 1-3 months. Patients with larger tumor size (β = -3.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6.59 to -0.57; P = 0.021) or new neurologic deficits (β = -16.21; 95% CI, -32.21 to -0.210; P = 0.047) had a shorter time to RT. No significant association was found between time to RT and LR or OS on multivariable logistic/Cox regression. However, patients who received RT between 1 and 3 months had a lower odds of 1-year survival compared with those receiving RT within 1 month (odds ratio, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.74; P = 0.022). Receiving RT within 1 month versus 1-3 months was not associated with wound complications (7.1% vs. 2.9%; P = 0.556) (odds ratio, 4.40; 95% CI, 0.40-118.0; P = 0.266) or Karnofsky Performance Status/modified McCormick Scale score., Conclusions: Spine surgeons, oncologists, and radiation oncologists should make every effort to start RT within 1 month to improve 1-year survival after metastatic spine tumor surgery., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: Obtaining timely postoperative radiotherapy (RT) following separation surgery is critical to avoid local recurrence of disease yet can be a challenge due to scheduling conflicts, insurance denials, and travel arrangements. In patients undergoing metastatic spine surgery for spinal cord compression, the authors sought to: 1) report the rate of postoperative RT, 2) describe reasons for patients not receiving postoperative RT, and 3) investigate factors that may predict whether a patient receives postoperative RT., Methods: A single-center retrospective case series was undertaken of all patients who underwent metastatic spine surgery for extradural disease between January 2010 and January 2021. Inclusion criteria were patients with intermediate or radioresistant tumors with evidence of spinal cord compression who underwent surgery. The primary outcome was the occurrence of RT within 3 months following surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed controlling for age, BMI, race, total number of decompressed levels, tumor size, other organ metastasis, and preoperative RT or chemotherapy to predict patients receiving postoperative RT., Results: Of 239 patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic disease, 113 (47.3%) received postoperative RT while 126 (52.7%) did not. In the postoperative RT group, 24 (21.2%) received stereotactic body radiation therapy while 89 (78.8%) received conventional external-beam radiation therapy. The most common reasons for patients not receiving postoperative RT included death or transfer to hospice (31.0%), RT not being recommended by radiation oncology (30.2%), and loss to follow-up (23.8%). On critical review with the radiation oncology department, the authors estimated that 101 of 126 (80.2%) patients who did not receive postoperative RT were potential candidates for postoperative RT. Patients who received postoperative RT had more documented inpatient (48.7% vs 32.5%, p < 0.001) and outpatient (100.0% vs 65.1%, p < 0.001) radiation oncology consultations than those who did not. Additionally, patients who received postoperative RT had a higher rate of postoperative chemotherapy (53.1% vs 25.4%, p < 0.001), while patients who did not receive postoperative RT had a higher rate of preoperative RT (7.1% vs 31.0%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis confirmed that patients who received preoperative RT had lower odds of undergoing postoperative RT (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.06-0.34; p < 0.001), and patients who underwent postoperative chemotherapy had higher odds of undergoing postoperative RT (OR 3.83, 95% CI 2.05-7.17; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: In the current study reflecting real-world care of patients with metastatic spine disease after undergoing separation surgery, 47% of patients did not receive postoperative RT, and 80% of those patients were potential candidates for postoperative RT. Radiation oncology consultation and postoperative chemotherapy were significantly associated with receiving postoperative RT, whereas preoperative RT was significantly associated with not receiving postoperative RT. The lack of timely postoperative RT highlights a potential gap in metastatic spine tumor care and underscores the necessity for prompt radiation oncology consultation and effective planning.

Study Design: This is a retrospective cohort study., Objective: In patients undergoing elective posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion (PCLF) with a minimum of 5-year follow-up, we sought to compare reoperation rates between patients with an upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) of C2 versus C3/4., Summary of Background Data: The long-term outcomes of choosing between C2 versus C3/4 as the UIV in PCLF remain unclear., Methods: A single-institution, retrospective cohort study from a prospective registry was conducted of patients undergoing elective, degenerative PCLF from December 2010 to June 2018. The primary exposure was UIV of C2 versus C3/4. The primary outcome was reoperation. Multivariable logistic regression controlled for age, smoking, diabetes, and fusion to the thoracic spine., Results: Of the 68 patients who underwent PCLF with 5-year follow-up, 27(39.7%) had a UIV of C2, and 41(60.3%) had a UIV of either C3/4. Groups had similar duration of symptoms (P=0.743), comorbidities (P>0.999), and rates of instrumentation to the thoracic spine (70.4% vs. 53.7%, P=0.210). The C2 group had significantly longer operative time (231.8±65.9 vs. 181.6±44.1 mins, P<0.001) and more fused segments (5.9±1.8 vs. 4.2±0.9, P<0.001). Reoperation rate was lower in the C2 group compared with C3/4 (7.4% vs. 19.5%), though this did not reach statistical significance (P=0.294). Multivariable logistic regression showed increased odds of reoperation for the C3/4 group compared with the C2 group (OR=3.29, 95%CI=0.59-18.11, P=0.170), though statistical significance was not reached. Similarly, the C2 group had a lower rate of instrumentation failure (7.4% vs. 12.2%, P=0.694) and adjacent segment disease/disk herniation (0% vs. 7.3%, P=0.271), though neither trend attained statistical significance., Conclusions: Patients with a UIV of C2 had less than half the number of reoperations and less adjacent segment disease, though neither trend was statistically significant. Despite a lack of statistical significance, whether a clinically meaningful difference exists between UIV of C2 versus C3/4 should be validated in larger samples with long-term follow-up., Level of Evidence: Level-3., Competing Interests: S.L.Z. reports being an unaffiliated neurotrauma consultant for the National Football League. B.F.S. is a consultant for Nuvasive and Carbofix and receives institutional research support from Nuvasive and Stryker Spine. A.M.A. receives institutional research support from Stryker Spine. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The impact of radiation on wound healing after metastatic spine surgery remains an active area of research. In patients undergoing metastatic spine surgery, we sought to (1) assess the relationship between preoperative and/or postoperative radiation on wound complications, and (2) evaluate the relationship between the timing of postoperative radiation and wound complications., Methods: A single-center, retrospective, cohort study of patients undergoing metastatic spine surgery was conducted from 2010 to 2021. The primary exposure variable was the use/timing of radiation. Radiation included both external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Patients were trichotomized into the following groups: (1) preoperative radiation only, (2) postoperative radiation only, and (3) no radiation. The primary outcome variable was wound complications, which was defined as dehiscence requiring reoperation, infection requiring antibiotics, or infection requiring surgical debridement. Multivariable logistic/linear regression controlled for age, tumor size, primary organ of origin, and the presence of other organ metastases., Results: A total of 207 patients underwent surgery for extradural spinal metastasis. Participants were divided into three groups: preoperative RT only (N = 29), postoperative RT only (N = 91), and no RT (N = 178). Patients who received postoperative RT only and no RT were significantly older than patients who received preoperative RT only ( p = 0.009) and were less likely to be white ( p < 0.001). No other significant differences were found in basic demographics, tumor characteristics, or intraoperative variables. Wound-related complications occurred in two (6.9%) patients with preoperative RT only, four patients (4.4%) in postoperative RT only, and 11 (6.2%) patients with no RT, with no significant difference among the three groups ( p = 0.802). No significant difference was found in wound-related complications, reoperation, and time to wound complications between patients with preoperative RT only and no RT, and between postoperative RT only and no RT ( p > 0.05). Among the postoperative-RT-only group, no difference in wound complications was seen between those receiving SBRT (5.6%) and EBRT (4.1%) ( p > 0.999). However, patients who received preoperative RT only had a longer time to wound complications in comparison to those who received postoperative RT only (43.5 ± 6.3 vs. 19.7 ± 3.8, p = 0.004). Regarding timing of postoperative RT, the mean (SD) time to RT was 28.7 ± 10.0 days, with a median of 28.7 (21-38) days. No significant difference was found in time to postoperative RT between patients with and without wound complications (32.9 ± 12.3 vs. 29.0 ± 9.7 days, p = 0.391)., Conclusion: In patients undergoing metastatic spine surgery, a history of previous RT or postoperative RT did not significantly affect wound complications. However, those with previous RT prior to surgery had a longer time to wound complications than patients undergoing postoperative RT only. Moreover, timing of RT had no impact on wound complications, indicating that earlier radiation may be safely employed to optimize tumor control without fear of compromising wound healing.

Introduction: Approximately 20% of patients with metastatic spine disease develop symptomatic spinal cord compression, and these patients can present urgently to the emergency department (ED) or, in a more organized fashion, to a clinic. In a cohort of patients undergoing metastatic spine surgery, we sought to (1) determine the rate of ED presentation, (2) identify preoperative and perioperative risk factors associated with ED presentation, and (3) evaluate whether ED vs. clinic presentation impacts long-term outcomes., Methods: A single-institution, multi-surgeon, retrospective cohort study was undertaken of patients undergoing metastatic spinal tumor surgery between 02/2010 and 01/2021. The primary exposure variable was presentation setting, dichotomized to the ED vs. clinic. The primary outcomes were postoperative functional status, measured with the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and McCormick Scale (MMS), local recurrence (LR), and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included complications and readmissions., Results: A total of 311 patients underwent metastatic spine surgery (51.7% ED vs. 48.3% clinic). Those presenting to the ED had higher rates of smoking (21.7% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.02), were more likely to have 2+ comorbidities (47.2% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.011), and were more likely to have public insurance (43.5% vs. 32.0%, p = 0.043). Preoperative KPS was lower in ED patients ( p < 0.001), while the Bilsky score was higher ( p = 0.049). ED patients had higher rates of oligometastatic disease ( p = 0.049), higher total decompressed levels ( p = 0.041), and higher rates of costotransversectomy ( p = 0.031) compared to clinic patients. Length of stay was significantly longer for ED patients (7.7 ± 6.1 vs. 6.1 ± 5.8 days, p = 0.020), and they were less likely to be discharged home (52.2% vs. 69.3%, p = 0.025). ED presentation was significantly associated with shorter overall survival (HR =1.53 95% CI = 1.13-2.08, p = 0.006)., Conclusions: Of patients undergoing metastatic spine disease, approximately half presented through the ED vs. clinic. ED patients had higher rates of smoking, public insurance, and higher Bilsky score. ED patients also underwent more extensive surgery, had longer LOS, were less likely discharged home, and most importantly, had a shorter overall survival. These results suggest that initial presentation for patients undergoing surgery for metastatic spine disease significantly impacts outcomes, and signs/symptoms of metastatic spine disease should be recognized as soon as possible to prevent ED presentation.

Objective: After lumbar spine surgery, postoperative drain removal often delays discharge. Whether inpatient drain removal reduces the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) or hematoma remains controversial. Therefore, in patients undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery, the authors sought to determine the impact of inpatient versus outpatient drain removal on the following variables: 1) length of hospital stay (LOS), and 2) postoperative complications., Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study in which the authors used prospectively collected data of patients undergoing primary, elective, 1- or 2-level lumbar spine decompression and/or fusion was undertaken between 2016 and 2022. Patients with intraoperative or postoperative CSF leaks were excluded. The primary exposure variable was inpatient versus outpatient drain removal. The primary outcome was LOS, and secondary outcomes were postoperative complications, including 90-day postoperative SSI or hematoma. Multivariable logistic and linear regression were performed, controlling for age, body mass index, instrumentation, number of levels, antibiotics at discharge, and surgeons involved., Results: Of 483 patients included, 325 (67.3%) had inpatient drain removal and 158 (32.7%) had outpatient drain removal. Patients with outpatient drain removal were significantly younger (58.6 ± 12.4 vs 61.2 ± 13.2 years, p = 0.040); more likely to have 1-level surgery (75.9% vs 56.6%, p < 0.001); and less likely to receive instrumentation (50.6% vs 69.5%, p < 0.001). Postoperatively, patients with outpatient drain removal had a shorter LOS (0.7 ± 0.6 vs 2.3 ± 1.6 days, p < 0.001); were more likely to be discharged home (98.1% vs 92.3%, p = 0.015); were more likely to be discharged on antibiotics (76.6% vs 3.1%, p < 0.001); were less likely to be on opioids (32.3% vs 88.3%, p < 0.001); and were more likely to have Jackson-Pratt compared to Hemovac drains (96.2% vs 34.5%, p < 0.001). No difference was found in SSI (3.7% vs 3.8%, p > 0.999) or hematoma (0.9% vs 0.6%, p > 0.999), as well as reoperation or readmission due to SSI or hematoma. On multivariable regression, outpatient drain removal was significantly associated with shorter LOS (β = -1.15, 95% CI -1.56 to -0.73, p < 0.001). No association was found with SSI/hematoma (p > 0.05)., Conclusions: Outpatient drain removal after elective lumbar spine surgery was associated with a significantly decreased LOS without a significant increase in postoperative SSI or hematoma. Although the choice of drain removal and the LOS may be subject to surgeons' preference, these results may support the feasibility and safety of outpatient drain removal, and the potential cost savings resulting from shortened hospital stays. Drawbacks may exist regarding added burden to the patient and the surgeon's team to accommodate 1-week follow-up appointments for drain removal.

Study Design: A retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data., Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate preoperative differences in racial and socioeconomic factors in patients undergoing laminoplasty (LP) versus laminectomy and fusion (LF) for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM)., Summary of Background Data: DCM is prevalent in the United States, requiring surgical intervention to prevent neurological degeneration. While LF is utilized more frequently, LP is an emerging alternative. Previous studies have demonstrated similar neurological outcomes for both procedures. However, treatment selection is primarily at the discretion of the surgeon and may be influenced by social determinants of health that impact surgical outcomes., Materials and Methods: The Quality Outcome Database (QOD), a national spine registry, was queried for adult patients who underwent either LP or LF for the management of DCM. Covariates associated with socioeconomic status, pain and disability, and demographic and medical history were collected. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess patient factors associated with undergoing LP versus LF., Results: Of 1673 DCM patients, 157 (9.4%) underwent LP and 1516 (90.6%) underwent LF. A significantly greater proportion of LP patients had private insurance (P<0.001), a greater than high school level education (P<0.001), were employed (P<0.001), and underwent primary surgery (P<0.001). LP patients reported significantly lower baseline neck/arm pain and Neck Disability Index (P<0.001). In the multivariate regression model, lower baseline neck pain [odds ratio (OR)=0.915, P=0.001], identifying as non-Caucasian (OR=2.082, P<0.032), being employed (OR=1.592, P=0.023), and having a greater than high school level education (OR=1.845, P<0.001) were associated with undergoing LP rather than LF., Conclusions: In DCM patients undergoing surgery, factors associated with patients undergoing LP versus LF included lower baseline neck pain, non-Caucasian race, higher education, and employment. While symptomatology may influence the decision to choose LP over LF, there may also be socioeconomic factors at play. The trend of more educated and employed patients undergoing LP warrants further investigation., Competing Interests: B.F.S. receives institutional research support from Nuvasive and has previously received institutional support from Stryker Spine. A.M.A. receives institutional research support from Stryker Spine. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: While the natural history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and adult idiopathic scoliosis (AdIS) is well documented in the literature, the impact of age on postoperative outcomes remains an active area of research. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare patients undergoing surgery for AIS and AdIS with respect to: (1) postoperative Cobb correction, (2) perioperative variables, and (3) postoperative complications., Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in accordance with preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines., Inclusion Criteria: studies published between 2002 and 2022, retrospective, and comparing AIS vs. AdIS patients undergoing deformity surgery. The primary outcome was postoperative Cobb correction. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, total instrumented levels, length of stay (LOS), and postoperative complications. Random-effects models were performed according to the method of DerSimonian and Laird., Results: Of 190 identified articles, 14 fit the inclusion criteria. A total of 1788 patients were included, 1275(71.3%) with AIS, and 513(28.7%) with AdIS. There was a significant age difference between AIS and AdIS (15.3 vs. 36.7 years, mean difference (MD) = 21.3 years, 95%CI = 14.3-28.4,p < 0.001). Mean postoperative Cobb percentage correction was reported in 5 articles and was significantly higher in AIS (68.4%) vs. AdIS (61.4%) (MD = -7.2, 95%CI = -11.6,-2.7,p = 0.001). EBL was not significantly different between AIS and AdIS (695.6 mL vs 817.7 mL,p = 0.204). Furthermore, no difference was found in operative time (MD = 37.9 min,95%CI = -10.7;86.6,p = 0.127), total instrumented level (MD = 0.88,95%CI = -0.7,2.4,p = 0.273), and LOS (MD = 0.5, 95%CI = -0.2;1.2, p = 0.188). Four articles reported postoperative complications in AIS vs AdIS, with no difference in neurological deficit, instrumentation-related complications, and medical complications., Conclusion: AIS patients had better radiographic correction compared to AdIS. Though no difference was found in perioperative outcomes and complications, these findings emphasize the importance of counseling patients regarding the optimal timing of surgical correction., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: In patients undergoing surgery for primary bone tumors of the spine, we sought to compare Bilsky score 0-1 versus 2-3 in: 1) preoperative presentation, 2) perioperative variables, and 3) long-term outcomes., Methods: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was undertaken of patients undergoing surgery for extradural, primary bone tumors of the spine between January 2010 and January 2021. The primary exposure variable was Bilsky score, dichotomized as 0-1 versus 2-3. Survival analysis was performed to assess local recurrence (LR) and overall survival (OS)., Results: Of 38 patients undergoing resection of primary spinal tumors, 19 (50.0%) patients presented with Bilsky 0-1 and 19 (50.0%) Bilsky 2-3 grades. The most common diagnosis was chondrosarcoma (33.3%), followed by chordoma (16.7%). There were 15 (62.5%) malignant tumors. Preoperatively, there was no significant difference in demographics, Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) (P > 0.999), or motor deficit (P > 0.999). Perioperatively, no difference was found in operative time (P = 0.954), blood loss (P = 0.416), length of stay (P = 0.641), neurologic deficit (P > 0.999), or discharge disposition (P = 0.256). No difference was found in Enneking resection status (69.2% vs. 54.5%, P = 0.675). Long-term, no differences were found regarding reoperation (P = 0.327), neurologic deficit (P > 0.999), postoperative KPS (P = 0.605) and modified McCormick Scale (MMS) (P = 0.870). No difference was observed in KPS (P = 0.418) and MMS (P = 0.870) at last follow-up. However, patients with Bilsky 2-3 had shorter time to LR (1715.0 vs. 513.0 ± 633.4 days, log-rank; P = 0.002) and shorter OS (2025.0 ± 1165.3 vs. 794.0 ± 952.6 days, log-rank; P = 0.002)., Conclusions: Bilsky 2-3 lesions were associated with shorter time to LR and shorter OS. Patients harboring primary spinal tumors with higher grade Bilsky score appear to be at a higher risk for worse outcomes., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Context: Unplanned readmissions following lumbar spine surgery have immense clinical and financial implications. However, little is known regarding the impact of unplanned readmissions on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following lumbar spine surgery., Purpose: To evaluate the impact of unplanned readmissions, including specific readmission reasons, on patient reported outcomes 12 months after lumbar spine surgery., Study Design/setting: A retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data was conducted using patients included in the lumbar module of the Quality and Outcomes Database (QOD), a national, multicenter spine registry., Patient Sample: A total of 33,447 patients who underwent elective lumbar spine surgery for degenerative diseases were included. Mean age was 59.8 (SD=14.04), 53.6% were male, 89.5% were white, 45.9% were employed, and 47.5% had private insurance., Outcome Measures: Unplanned 90-day readmissions and 12-month patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including numeric rating scale (NRS) scores for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) scores, and North American Spine Society (NASS) patient-satisfaction scores., Methods: The lumbar module of the QOD was queried for adults undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery for degenerative disease. Unplanned 90-day readmissions were classified into 4 groups: medical, surgical, pain-only, and no readmissions. Medical and surgical readmissions were further categorized into primary reason for readmission. 12-month PROs assessing patient back and leg pain (NRS), disability (ODI), quality of life (EQ-5D), and patient satisfaction were collected. Multivariable models predicting 12-month PROs were built controlling for covariates., Results: A total of 31,430 patients (94%) had no unplanned readmission while 2,017 patients (6%) had an unplanned readmission within 90 days following lumbar surgery. Patients with readmissions had significantly worse 12-month PROs compared with those with no unplanned readmissions in covariate-adjusted models. Using Wald-df as a measure of predictor importance, surgical readmissions were associated with the worst 12-month outcomes, followed by pain-only, then medical readmissions. In separate covariate adjusted models, we found that readmissions for pain, SSI/wound dehiscence, and revisions were among the most important predictors of worse outcomes at 12-months., Conclusions: Unplanned 90-day readmissions were associated with worse pain, disability, quality of life, and greater dissatisfaction at 12-months, with surgical readmissions having the greatest impact, followed by pain-only readmissions, then medical readmissions. Readmissions for pain, SSI/wound dehiscence, and revisions were the most important predictors of worse outcomes. These results may help providers better understand the factors that impact outcomes following lumbar spine surgery and promote improved patient counseling and perioperative management., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: In a cohort of employed patients undergoing elective cervical spine surgery with an uncomplicated postoperative course, the authors sought to determine the demographic, functional, and occupational characteristics associated with return to work (RTW) following surgery., Methods: A retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data was undertaken of patients undergoing elective cervical spine surgery for degenerative disease in the Quality Outcomes Database. Study inclusion criteria were: 1) employed prior to surgery and planned to RTW, 2) no unplanned readmissions, 3) achieved 30% improvement on the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and 4) were satisfied with the surgical outcome at 3 or 12 months postoperatively. A multivariable Cox regression model was built using demographic, functional, operative, and occupational characteristic to predict time to RTW., Results: Of 5110 included patients, 4788 (93.7%) returned to work within 12 months, with a median time of 35 (IQR 19-60) days. Patients who did RTW were significantly younger (51.3 ± 9.4 vs 55.8 ± 9.6 years, p < 0.001), more often underwent an anterior approach (85.8% vs 80.7%, p = 0.009), were significantly more privately insured (82.1% vs 64.0%, p < 0.001), and were less likely to have workers' disability insurance (6.7% vs 14.6%, p < 0.001) compared with patients who did not RTW. On multivariable Cox regression, demographic factors associated with a longer RTW were older age (hazard ratio [HR] 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-1.00, p < 0.001) and Black race (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62-0.81, p < 0.001). Male sex was associated with a shorter RTW time (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.11-1.26, p < 0.001). Regarding baseline functional status, worse preoperative NDI (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-0.99, p < 0.001) was associated with a longer RTW, whereas the absence of myelopathy was associated with a shorter RTW (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.09-1.25, p < 0.001). Having a sedentary (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.65-1.99, p < 0.001), light-intensity (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.45-1.76, p < 0.001), and medium-intensity (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.22, p = 0.037) occupation was associated with a shorter RTW time compared with a heavy-intensity occupation at any time point. Heavy-intensity occupations were independently the strongest predictor of longer RTW. Similar predictors of shorter RTW were found in a subanalysis of occupation intensity and among operative approaches used., Conclusions: Among patients undergoing elective degenerative cervical spine surgery who had favorable surgical outcomes and planned to RTW before surgery, 94% had a successful RTW. Age was the strongest predictor of lower odds of RTW. Regarding time to RTW, having a sedentary, light-intensity, or medium-intensity occupation was associated with a shorter RTW time compared with a heavy-intensity occupation. These findings highlight the importance of considering the demographic and occupational characteristics when predicting postoperative RTW in patients with satisfactory surgical outcomes.

Introduction: After adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, patients often require postoperative rehabilitation at an inpatient rehabilitation (IPR) center or a skilled nursing facility (SNF). However, home discharge is often preferred by patients and hsas been shown to decrease costs. In a cohort of patients undergoing ASD surgery, we sought to (1) report the incidence of discharge to home, (2) determine the factors significantly associated with discharge to home in the form of a simple scoring system, and (3) evaluate the impact of discharge disposition on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methods: A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was undertaken for patients undergoing ASD surgery from 2009 to 2021. Inclusion criteria were ≥ 5-level fusion, sagittal/coronal deformity, and at least 2-year follow-up. Exposure variables included preoperative, perioperative, and radiographic data. The primary outcome was discharge status (dichotomized as home vs. IPR/SNF). Secondary outcomes included PROMs, such as the numeric rating scales (NRSs) for back and leg pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EQ-5D. A subanalysis comparing IPR to SNF discharge was conducted. Univariate analysis was performed. Results: Of 221 patients undergoing ASD surgery with a mean age of 63.6 ± 17.6, 112 (50.6%) were discharged home, 71 (32.2%) were discharged to an IPR center, and 38 (17.2%) were discharged to an SNF. Patients discharged home were significantly younger (55.7 ± 20.1 vs. 71.8 ± 9.1, p < 0.001), had lower rate of 2+ comorbidities (38.4% vs. 45.0%, p = 0.001), and had less hypertension (57.1% vs. 75.2%, p = 0.005). Perioperatively, patients who were discharged home had significantly fewer levels instrumented (10.0 ± 3.0 vs. 11.0 ± 3.4 levels, p = 0.030), shorter operative times (381.4 ± 139.9 vs. 461.6 ± 149.8 mins, p < 0.001), less blood loss (1101.0 ± 977.8 vs. 1739.7 ± 1332.9 mL, p < 0.001), and shorter length of stay (5.4 ± 2.8 vs. 9.3 ± 13.9 days, p < 0.001). Radiographically, preoperative SVA (9.1 ± 6.5 vs. 5.2 ± 6.8 cm, p < 0.001), PT (27.5 ± 11.1° vs. 23.4 ± 10.8°, p = 0.031), and T1PA (28.9 ± 12.7° vs. 21.6 ± 13.6°, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in patients who were discharged to an IPR center/SNF. Additionally, the operating surgeon also significantly influenced the disposition status ( p < 0.001). A scoring system of the listed factors was proposed and was validated using univariate logistic regression (OR = 1.55, 95%CI = 1.34-1.78, p < 0.001) and ROC analysis, which revealed a cutoff value of > 6 points as a predictor of non-home discharge (AUC = 0.75, 95%CI = 0.68-0.80, p < 0.001, sensitivity = 63.3%, specificity = 74.1%). The factors in the scoring system were age > 56, comorbidities ≥ 2, hypertension, TIL ≥ 10, operative time > 357 mins, EBL > 1200 mL, preop SVA > 6.6 cm, preop PT > 33.6°, and preop T1PA > 15°. When comparing IPR ( n = 71) vs. SNF ( n = 38), patients discharged to an SNF were significantly older (74.4 ± 8.6 vs. 70.4 ± 9.1, p = 0.029) and were more likely to be female (89.5% vs. 70.4%, p = 0.024). Conclusions: Approximately 50% of patients were discharged home after ASD surgery. A simple scoring system based on age > 56, comorbidities ≥ 2, hypertension, total instrumented levels ≥ 10, operative time > 357 mins, EBL > 1200 mL, preop SVA > 6.6 cm, preop PT > 33.6°, and preop T1PA > 15° was proposed to predict non-home discharge. These findings may help guide postoperative expectations and resource allocation after ASD surgery.

Background and Objectives: Although risk factors for unplanned readmission after cervical spine surgery have been widely reported, less is known about how readmission itself affects patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Using the Quality Outcomes Database registry of patients undergoing elective cervical spine surgery, we sought to (1) determine the impact of unplanned readmission on PROMs and (2) compare the effect of specific readmission reasons on PROMs., Methods: An observational study was performed using a multi-institution, retrospective registry for patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. The occurrence of 90-day unplanned readmission classified into medical, surgical, pain only, and no readmissions was the exposure variable. Outcome variables included 12-month PROMs of Neck Disability Index (NDI), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-neck/arm pain, EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), and patient dissatisfaction. Multivariable models predicting each PROM were built using readmission reasons controlling for demographics, clinical characteristics, and preoperative PROMs., Results: Data from 13 355 patients undergoing elective cervical spine surgery (82% anterior approach and 18% posterior approach) were analyzed. Unplanned readmission within 90 days of surgery occurred in 3.8% patients, including medical (1.6%), surgical (1.8%), and pain (0.3%). Besides medical reasons, wound infection/dehiscence was the most common reason for unplanned readmission for the total cohort (0.5%), dysphagia in the anterior approach (0.6%), and wound infection/dehiscence in the posterior approach (1.5%). Based on multivariable regression, surgical readmission was significantly associated with worse 12-month NDI, NRS-neck pain, NRS-arm pain, EQ-5D, and higher odds of dissatisfaction. Pain readmissions were associated with worse 12-month NDI and NRS-neck pain scores, and worse dissatisfaction. For specific readmission reasons, pain, surgical site infection/wound dehiscence, hematoma/seroma, revision surgery, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism were significantly associated with worsened 12-month PROMs., Conclusion: In patients undergoing elective cervical spine surgery, 90-day unplanned surgical and pain readmissions were associated with worse 12-month PROMs compared with patients with medical readmissions and no readmissions., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Retrospective analysis on prospectively collected data., Objectives: To compare posterior lumbar fusions with versus without an interbody in: (1) Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at 1 year and (2) postoperative complications, readmission, and reoperations., Summary of Background Data: Elective lumbar fusion is commonly used to treat various lumbar pathologies. Two common approaches for open posterior lumbar fusion include posterolateral fusion (PLF) alone without an interbody and with an interbody through techniques, like transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Whether fusion with or without an interbody leads to better outcomes remains an area of active research., Patients and Methods: The Lumbar Module of the Quality Outcomes Database was queried for adults undergoing elective primary posterior lumbar fusion with or without an interbody. Covariates included demographic variables, comorbidities, primary spine diagnosis, operative variables, and baseline PROs, including Oswestry Disability Index, North American Spine Society satisfaction index, numeric rating scale-back/leg pain, and Euroqol 5-dimension. Outcomes included complications, reoperations, readmissions, return to work/activities, and PROs. Propensity score matching and linear regression modeling were used to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated to assess the impact of interbody use on patient outcomes., Results: After propensity matching, there were 1044 patients with interbody and 215 patients undergoing PLF. The average treatment effect on the treated analysis showed that having an interbody or not had no significant impact on any outcome of interest, including 30-day complications and reoperations, 3-month readmissions, 12-month return to work, and 12-month PROs., Conclusion: There were no discernible differences in outcomes between patients undergoing PLF alone versus with an interbody in elective posterior lumbar fusion. These results add to the growing body of evidence that posterior lumbar fusions with and without an interbody seem to have similar outcomes up to 1 year postoperatively when treating degenerative lumbar spine conditions., Competing Interests: J.S.P reports a past contract with NeuroPoint Alliance Inc. as well as consulting fees from Steamboat Orthopedic Spine Institute and 3Spine. R.G. is a teaching surgeon and consultant for Joimax, teaching and consulting surgeon with royalties from Integrity Implants, a consultant for Arthrex, and a consultant for Nuvasive. S.L.Z. reports being an unaffiliated neurotrauma consultant for the National Football League. B.F.S. reports educational consulting for Medical Device Business Services and a grant from Stryker Spine (R1160501). The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has proven to be a clinically efficient and cost-effective method for treating patients with degenerative cervical spine conditions. New intervertebral implant products are being developed to improve fusion and stability while decreasing complications. This study assesses the effectiveness of Tritanium C (Tri-C) Anterior Cervical Cage (Stryker) in the treatment of degenerative disk disease (DDD) of the cervical spine compared with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages., Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using data prospectively collected from two institutions. Patients who underwent ACDFs for DDD using either the Tri-C cage or PEEK cage were identified. The patients' demographics, comorbidities, operative variables, and baseline patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected. PROs included the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and numeric rating scale (NRS) for neck and arm pain. The primary outcomes included 3- and 12-month PROs as well as the rates of 90-day readmission, 90-day reoperation, and perioperative complication. The radiographic outcomes included rates of subsidence, cage movement, and successful fusion within 12 months. Multivariate linear regression models were run to identify variables predictive of 12-month PROs., Results: A total of 275 patients who underwent ACDF were included in this study and were divided into two groups: PEEK (n=213) and Tri-C (n=62). Both groups showed improvement in neck and arm pain and NDI postoperatively. When Tri-C and PEEK were compared, no significant differences were observed in the 3- or 12-month changes in neck or arm pain or NDI. Furthermore, there were no differences in the rates of 90-day readmission, 90-day reoperation, and perioperative complication. Regression analysis revealed that Tri-C vs. PEEK was not a significant predictor of any outcome., Conclusions: Our results indicate that the use of porous titanium Tri-C cage during ACDFs is an effective method for managing cervical DDD in terms of PROs, perioperative morbidity, and radiologic parameters. No significant difference was observed in any clinical outcome between patients undergoing ACDF using the Tri-C cage and those in whom the PEEK cage was used., Level of Evidence: III., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: Dr. Stephens reports receiving institutional research support from Nuvasive. Dr. Abtahi reports receiving other institutional research support from Stryker Spine. Dr. Zuckerman reports being an unaffiliated neurotrauma consultant for the National Football League (NFL). There are no perceived conflicts of interest by any of the other listed authors., (Copyright © 2024 The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.)

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data., Objective: To determine the effectiveness of intraoperative tranexamic acid (TXA) in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) on postoperative blood loss., Summary of Background Data: TXA has been proven to be a safe and effective agent in reducing blood loss after cervical surgery; however, its efficacy when used intraoperatively for ACDF surgeries had yet to be researched. Currently, there are few studies examining the effects of intraoperative TXA in cervical spinal fusion, and none specifically examining TXA use in ACDF., Methods: A tertiary medical center's prospectively collected spine registry was queried between 1/1/18 and 12/1/21 for all patients who underwent elective ACDF surgery and received a drain postoperatively. Patients were separated into 2 groups; those who had received intraoperative TXA and those who did not. Baseline demographic and operative variables were collected from the registry. The primary outcome was postoperative blood loss over a 24-hour period. Secondary outcomes included total drain output, intraoperative estimated blood loss, operative duration, drain duration, changes in preoperative to postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, and rate of transfusions, complications, revisions, and reoperations. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed., Results: Two hundred eighty-six patients were included. One hundred ninety patients underwent ACDF and did not receive intraoperative TXA, whereas 96 patients underwent ACDF and did receive TXA. There were no differences in any demographic or baseline variables. Multivariate analysis showed intraoperative TXA was associated with shorter drain duration (β=-5.74, 95% CI: -10.9 to -0.53, P =0.031) and reduction in 24-hour drain output (β=-12.2, 95% CI: -19.4 to -4.89, P =0.001) and total drain output (β=-14.0, 95% CI: -22.9 to -5.05, P =0.002)., Conclusions: TXA use during ACDF procedures leads to a decrease in perioperative blood loss and faster drain removal. TXA is an effective and safe agent for reducing perioperative blood loss in ACDF surgery., Level of Evidence: III., Competing Interests: S.L.Z. reports being an unaffiliated neurotrauma consultant for the National Football League. B.F.S. reports being a consultant for NuVasive, Carbofix, and Depuy-Synthes, and has received institutional research support from Stryker Spine and NuVasive. A.M.A. reports receiving research support from Stryker Spine. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Whether a combined anterior-posterior (AP) approach offers additional benefits over the posterior-only (P) approach in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery remains unknown. In a cohort of patients undergoing ASD surgery, we compared the combined AP vs. the P-only approach in: (1) preoperative/perioperative variables, (2) radiographic measurements, and (3) postoperative outcomes. Methods: A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was performed for patients undergoing ASD surgery from 2009 to 2021. Inclusion criteria were ≥5-level fusion, sagittal/coronal deformity, and 2-year follow-up. The primary exposure was the operative approach: a combined AP approach or P alone. Postoperative outcomes included mechanical complications, reoperation, and minimal clinically important difference (MCID), defined as 30% of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Multivariable linear regression was controlled for age, BMI, and previous fusion. Results: Among 238 patients undergoing ASD surgery, 34 (14.3%) patients underwent the AP approach and 204 (85.7%) underwent the P-only approach. The AP group consisted mostly of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) at L5/S1 (73.5%) and/or L4/L5 (38.0%). Preoperatively, the AP group had more previous fusions (64.7% vs. 28.9%, p < 0.001), higher pelvic tilt (PT) (29.6 ± 11.6° vs. 24.6 ± 11.4°, p = 0.037), higher T1 pelvic angle (T1PA) (31.8 ± 12.7° vs. 24.0 ± 13.9°, p = 0.003), less L1-S1 lordosis (-14.7 ± 28.4° vs. -24.3 ± 33.4°, p < 0.039), less L4-S1 lordosis (-25.4 ± 14.7° vs. 31.6 ± 15.5°, p = 0.042), and higher sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (102.6 ± 51.9 vs. 66.4 ± 71.2 mm, p = 0.005). Perioperatively, the AP approach had longer operative time (553.9 ± 177.4 vs. 397.4 ± 129.0 min, p < 0.001), more interbodies placed (100% vs. 17.6%, p < 0.001), and longer length of stay (8.4 ± 10.7 vs. 7.0 ± 9.6 days, p = 0.026). Radiographically, the AP group had more improvement in T1PA (13.4 ± 8.7° vs. 9.5 ± 8.6°, p = 0.005), L1-S1 lordosis (-14.3 ± 25.6° vs. -3.2 ± 20.2°, p < 0.001), L4-S1 lordosis (-4.7 ± 16.4° vs. 3.2 ± 13.7°, p = 0.008), and SVA (65.3 ± 44.8 vs. 44.8 ± 47.7 mm, p = 0.007). These outcomes remained statistically significant in the multivariable analysis controlling for age, BMI, and previous fusion. Postoperatively, no significant differences were found in mechanical complications, reoperations, or MCID of PROMs. Conclusions: Preoperatively, patients undergoing the combined anterior-posterior approach had higher PT, T1PA, and SVA and lower L1-S1 and L4-S1 lordosis than the posterior-only approach. Despite increased operative time and length of stay, the anterior-posterior approach provided greater sagittal correction without any difference in mechanical complications or PROMs.

Objective: In patients undergoing cervical spine surgery for metastatic spine disease, we sought to 1) compare perioperative and oncologic outcomes among 3 different operative approaches, 2) report fusion rates, and 3) compare different types of anterior vertebral body replacement., Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing extradural cervical/cervicothoracic spine metastasis surgery between February 2010 and January 2021 was conducted. Operative approaches were anterior-alone, posterior-alone, or combined anterior-posterior, and the grafts/cages used in the anterior fusions were cortical allografts, static cages, or expandable cages. All cages were filled with autograft/allograft. Outcomes included perioperative/postoperative variables, along with fusion rates, functional status, local recurrence (LR), and overall survival (OS)., Results: Sixty-one patients underwent cervical spine surgery for metastatic disease, including 11 anterior (18.0%), 28 posterior (45.9%), and 22 combined (36.1%). New postoperative neurologic deficit was the highest in the anterior approach group (P = 0.038), and dysphagia was significantly higher in the combined approach group (P = 0.001). LR (P > 0.999), OS (P = 0.655), and time to both outcomes (log-rank test, OS, P = 0.051, LR, P = 0.187) were not significantly different. Of the 51 patients alive at 3 months, only 19 (37.2%) obtained imaging ≥3 months. Fusion was seen in 11/19 (57.8%) at a median of 8.3 months (interquartile range, 4.6-13.7). Among the anterior corpectomies, the following graft/cage was used: 6 allografts (54.5%), 4 static cages (36.3%), and 1 expandable cage (9.0%), with no difference found in outcomes among the 3 groups., Conclusions: The only discernible differences between operative approaches were that patients undergoing an anterior approach had higher rates of new postoperative neurologic deficit, and the combined approach group had higher rates of postoperative dysphagia., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Retrospective cohort., Objective: In a cohort of patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, we used artificial intelligence to compare three models of preoperatively predicting radiographic proximal junction kyphosis (PJK) using: (1) traditional demographics and radiographic measurements, (2) raw preoperative scoliosis radiographs, and (3) raw preoperative thoracic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)., Summary of Background Data: Despite many proposed risk factors, PJK following ASD surgery remains difficult to predict., Materials and Methods: A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was undertaken for patients undergoing ASD surgery from 2009 to 2021. PJK was defined as a sagittal Cobb angle of upper-instrumented vertebra (UIV) and UIV+2>10° and a postoperative change in UIV/UIV+2>10°. For model 1, a support vector machine was used to predict PJK within 2 years postoperatively using clinical and traditional sagittal/coronal radiographic variables and intended levels of instrumentation. Next, for model 2, a convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained on raw preoperative lateral and posterior-anterior scoliosis radiographs. Finally, for model 3, a CNN was trained on raw preoperative thoracic T1 MRIs., Results: A total of 191 patients underwent ASD surgery with at least 2-year follow-up and 89 (46.6%) developed radiographic PJK within 2 years. Model 1: Using clinical variables and traditional radiographic measurements, the model achieved a sensitivity: 57.2% and a specificity: 56.3%. Model 2: a CNN with raw scoliosis x-rays predicted PJK with a sensitivity: 68.2% and specificity: 58.3%. Model 3: a CNN with raw thoracic MRIs predicted PJK with average sensitivity: 73.1% and specificity: 79.5%. Finally, an attention map outlined the imaging features used by model 3 elucidated that soft tissue features predominated all true positive PJK predictions., Conclusions: The use of raw MRIs in an artificial intelligence model improved the accuracy of PJK prediction compared with raw scoliosis radiographs and traditional clinical/radiographic measurements. The improved predictive accuracy using MRI may indicate that PJK is best predicted by soft tissue degeneration and muscle atrophy., Competing Interests: B.F.S. receives institutional research support from Nuvasive and Stryker Spine. S.L.Z. reports being an unaffiliated neurotrauma consultant for the National Football League. A.M.A. receives institutional research support from Stryker Spine. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: Spinal cord compression caused by spinal tumors is measured using the epidural spinal cord compression scale, also known as the Bilsky score. Whether Bilsky score predicts short-/long-term outcomes remains unknown. The objectives were to determine the correlation of Bilsky score 0-1 vs 2-3 with regards to (1) preoperative presentation, (2) perioperative variables, and (3) long-term outcomes., Methods: A single-center, retrospective evaluation of a cohort of patients undergoing metastatic spine surgery was performed between 01/2010 and 01/2021. Multivariable logistic/linear/Cox regression were performed controlling for age, body mass index, race, total decompressed levels, tumor size, other organ metastases, and postoperative radiotherapy/chemotherapy., Results: Of 343 patients with extradural spinal metastasis, 92 (26.8%) were Bilsky 0-1 and 251 (73.2%) were Bilsky 2-3. Preoperatively, patients with Bilsky 2-3 lesions were older ( P = .008), presented more with sensory deficits ( P = .029), and had worse preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) ( P = .002). Perioperatively, Bilsky 2-3 patients had more decompressed levels ( P = .005) and transpedicular decompression ( P < .001), with similar operative time ( P = .071) and blood loss ( P = .502). Although not statistically significant, patients with Bilsky 2-3 had more intraoperative neuromonitoring changes ( P = .412). Although rates of complications ( P = .442) and neurological deficit ( P = .852) were similar between groups, patients with Bilsky 2-3 lesions had a longer length of stay ( P = .007) and were discharged home less frequently ( P < .001). No difference was found in 90-day readmissions ( P = .607) and reoperation ( P = .510) Long-term: LR ( P =.100) and time to LR (log-rank; P =0.532) were not significantly different between Bilsky 0-1 and Bilsky 2-3 lesions. However, patients with Bilsky 2-3 lesions had worse postoperative KPS ( P < .001), worse modified McCormick scale score ( P = .003), shorter overall survival (OS) (log-rank; P < .001), and worse survival at 1 year ( P = .012). Bilsky 2-3 lesions were associated with shorter OS on multivariable Cox regression (hazard ratio = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.27-2.49, P < .001), with no significant impact on time to LR (hazard ratio = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.37-1.44, P = .359)., Conclusion: Bilsky 2-3 lesions were associated with longer length of stay, more nonhome discharge, worse postoperative KPS/modified McCormick scale score, shorter OS, and reduced survival at 1 year. Higher-grade Bilsky score lesions appear to be at a higher risk for worse outcomes. Efforts should be made to identify metastatic spine patients before they reach the point of severe spinal cord compression.., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2023. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Retrospective review., Objective: The aim was to determine if preoperative spinal instability neoplastic scores (SINSs) and Tokuhashi prognostication scores differed in patients receiving surgical care before and during the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic., Summary of Background Data: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused delays in scheduling nonemergent surgeries. Delay in presentation and/or surgical treatment for oncology patients with metastatic spinal disease could result in progression of the disease, which can complicate surgical care and worsen patient outcomes., Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of electronic medical records between March 1, 2019 and March 1, 2021 at a tertiary medical center was performed to identify patients who underwent surgery for metastatic spine disease. Primary spinal tumors were excluded. Patients were separated into two groups base on their surgery date: before the COVID-19 pandemic (March 1, 2019-February 29, 2020) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 1, 2020-March 1, 2021). Primary outcomes included SINS and Tokuhashi scores. A variety of statistical tests were performed to compare the groups., Results: Fifty-two patients who underwent surgery before the COVID-19 pandemic were compared to 41 patients who underwent surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. There was a significant difference between the before and during groups with respect to SINS (9.31±2.39 vs . 11.00±2.74, P =0.002) and Tokuhashi scores (9.27±2.35 vs . 7.88±2.85, P =0.012). Linear regression demonstrated time of surgery (before or during COVID-19 restrictions) was a significant predictor of SINS (β=1.55, 95% CI: 0.42-2.62, P =0.005) and Tokuhashi scores (β=-1.41, 95% CI: -2.49 to -0.34, P =0.010)., Conclusions: Patients with metastatic spinal disease who underwent surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic had higher SINS, lower Tokuhashi scores and similar Skeletal Oncology Research Group scores compared to patients who underwent surgery before the pandemic. This suggests the pandemic has impacted the instability of disease at presentation in patients with spinal metastases, but has not impacted surgical prognosis, as there were no differences in Skeletal Oncology Research Group scores and the difference in Tokuhashi scores is most likely not clinically significant., Competing Interests: Dr. S.L.Z. reports being an unaffiliated neurotrauma consultant for the National Football League. Dr. B.F.S. reports educational consulting for Medical Device Business Services and a grant from Stryker Spine (R1160501). The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study., Objectives: In patients undergoing elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), we sought to determine the impact of screw length on: (1) radiographic pseudarthrosis, (2) pseudarthrosis requiring reoperation, and (3) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)., Methods: A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was undertaken from 2010-21. The primary independent variables were: screw length (mm), screw length divided by the anterior-posterior vertebral body diameter (VB%), and the presence of any screw with VB% < 75% vs all screws with VB% ≥ 75%. Multivariable logistic regression controlled for age, BMI, gender, smoking, American Society of Anesthesiology grade, number of levels fused, and whether a corpectomy was performed., Results: Of 406 patients undergoing ACDF, levels fused were: 1-level (39.4%), 2-level (42.9%), 3-level (16.7%), and 4-level (1.0%). Mean screw length was 14.3 ± 2.3 mm, and mean VB% was 74.4 ± 11.2. A total of 293 (72.1%) had at least one screw with VB% < 75%, 113 (27.8%) had all screws with VB% ≥ 75%, and 141 (34.7%) patients had radiographic pseudarthrosis at 1-year. Patients who had any screw with VB% < 75% had a higher rate of radiographic pseudarthrosis compared to those had all screws with VB% ≥ 75% (39.6% vs 22.1%, P < .001). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that a higher VB% (OR = .97, 95%CI = .95-.99, P = .035) and having all screws with VB% ≥ 75% (OR = .51, 95%CI = .27-.95, P = .037) significantly decreased the odds of pseudarthrosis at 1-year, with no difference in reoperation or PROMs (all P > .05)., Conclusion: Longer screws taking up ≥75% of the vertebral body protected against radiographic pseudarthrosis at 1-year. Maximizing screw length in ACDF is an easily modifiable factor directly under the surgeon's control that may mitigate the risk of pseudarthrosis., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Purpose: (1) Evaluate the associations between L1-pelvic angle (L1PA) and both sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and T1-pelvic angle (T1PA), and (2) assess the clinical impact of L1PA., Methods: A single-institution retrospective cohort study was undertaken for patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery from 2013 to 2017. Ideal L1PA was defined as (0.5xPelvic Incidence)-21. Pearson correlation was performed to compare L1PA, SVA, and T1PA. Univariate/multivariate regression was performed to assess the effect of L1PA on mechanical complications, controlling for age, BMI, and postoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI/LL). Due to the overlapping nature of patients with pseudarthrosis and rod fracture, these patients were analyzed together., Results: A total of 145 patients were included. Mean preoperative L1PA, SVA, and T1PA were 15.5 ± 8.9°, 90.7 ± 66.8 mm, and 27.1 ± 13.0°, respectively. Mean postoperative L1PA, SVA, and T1PA were 15.0 ± 8.9°, 66.7 ± 52.8 mm, and 22.3 ± 11.1°, respectively. Thirty-six (24.8%) patients achieved ideal L1PA. Though the correlation was modest, preoperative L1PA was linearly correlated with preoperative SVA (r 2  = 0.16, r = 0.40, 95%CI = 0.22-0.60, p < 0.001) and T1PA (r 2  = 0.41, r = 0.62, 95%CI = 0.46-0.76, p < 0.001). Postoperative L1PA was linearly correlated with postoperative SVA (r 2  = 0.12, r = 0.37, 95%CI = 0.18-0.56, p < 0.001) and T1PA (r 2  = 0.40, r = 0.62, 95%CI = 0.45-0.74, p < 0.001). Achieving ideal L1PA ± 5° was associated with a decreased risk of rod fracture/pseudarthrosis on univariate and multivariate regression (OR = 0.33, 95%CI = 0.12-0.86, p = 0.024). No association between achieving ideal L1PA and patient-reported outcomes was observed., Conclusion: L1PA was modestly correlated with SVA and T1PA, and achieving ideal L1PA was associated with lower rates of rod fracture/pseudarthrosis. Future studies are warranted to better define the clinical implications of achieving a normal L1PA., Level of Evidence: III., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: The natural history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has been well documented, but the impact of age at the time of surgical correction is relatively understudied. In this study, we matched patients undergoing surgical correction of adult idiopathic scoliosis (AdIS) with a cohort of AIS patients to compare: (1) coronal and sagittal radiographic correction, (2) operative variables, and (3) postoperative complications., Methods: A single-institution scoliosis registry was queried for patients undergoing idiopathic scoliosis surgery from 2000-2017., Inclusion Criteria: patients with idiopathic scoliosis, no previous spine surgery, and 2-year follow-up. AdIS patients were matched 1:2 with AIS patients based on Lenke classification and curve characteristics. Independent sample t-test and Chi-square test was used to analyze the data., Results: 31 adults underwent surgical correction of idiopathic scoliosis and were matched with 62 adolescents. Mean age of adults was 26.2 ± 11.05, mean BMI was 25.6 ± 6.0, and 22 (71.0%) were female. Mean age of adolescents was 14.2 ± 1.8, mean BMI was 22.7 ± 5.7, and 41(66.7%) were female. AdIS had significantly less postoperative major Cobb correction (63.9% vs 71.3%, p = 0.006) and final major Cobb correction (60.6% vs 67.9%, p = 0.025). AdIS also had significantly greater postoperative T1PA (11.8 vs 5.8, p = 0.002). AdIS had longer operative times (p = 0.003), higher amounts of pRBCs transfused (p = 0.005), longer LOS (p = 0.016), more ICU requirement (p = 0.013), higher overall complications (p < 0.001), higher rate of pseudarthrosis (p = 0.026), and more neurologic complications (p = 0.013)., Conclusion: Adult patients undergoing surgical correction of idiopathic scoliosis had significantly worse postoperative coronal and sagittal alignment when compared with adolescent patients. Adult patients also had higher rates of complications, longer operative times, and longer hospital stays., Level of Evidence: III., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.)

Study Design: Narrative review., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to provide a review of the current evidence on the impact of posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) performed before or after cervical disk replacement (CDR)., Summary of Background Data: The impact of PCF on outcomes in the setting of CDR is an evolving field, given the recent widespread adoption of CDR and the relative rarity of patients who have undergone both procedures., Methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed to determine current evidence regarding the indications, outcomes, and biomechanical effects of CDR and PCF when performed alone or in combination., Results: When radicular symptoms persist following PCF, a CDR can be safely performed to provide further decompression. Conversely, a PCF can be safely performed following CDR for these same indications. The biomechanical effects of these procedures in combination demonstrate maintained stability when the facetectomy is less than 50% of the facet joint. Studies demonstrate that stability is not significantly decreased by the presence, amount, or level of posterior foraminotomies in the setting of CDR., Conclusions: A PCF can be safely performed before or after cervical disk arthroplasty for recurrent radicular symptoms., Level of Evidence: Level V., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: In patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastasis, we sought to: (1) describe patterns of palliative care consultation, (2) evaluate the factors that trigger palliative care consultation, and (3) determine the association of palliative care consultation on longer-term outcomes., Methods: A single-center, retrospective, case-control study was conducted for patients undergoing spinal metastasis surgery from February 2010 to January 2021. The primary outcome was receiving a palliative care consultation, and the timing of consultation was divided into same hospital stay consultation, preoperative versus postoperative consultation, and early (

Objective: In patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, we sought to: (1) determine the relationship between dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)-measured bone mineral density (BMD), T-scores, and Hounsfield units (HU), and (2) compare the ability of DEXA-measured BMD, T-scores, and HU to predict mechanical complications and reoperations., Methods: A single-institution retrospective cohort study was undertaken for cases from 2013 to 2017., Inclusion Criteria: ≥5-level-fusion, sagittal/coronal deformity, and 2-year follow-up. Multivariable regression controlled for age, body mass index, receiving anabolic medications, and postoperative sagittal vertical axis and pelvic-incidence lumbar-lordosis mismatch. A subanalysis was performed for osteopenic patients (-1 < T-score < -2)., Results: Of 145 patients undergoing ASD surgery, 72 (49.6%) had both preoperative DEXA and computed tomography scans. Mean DEXA-measured BMD was 0.91 ± 0.52 g/cm 2 , mean T-score was -1.61 ± 1.03, and mean HU was 153.5 ± 52.8. While no correlation was found between DEXA-measured BMD and HU (r = 0.17, P = 0.144), T-score and HU had a weakly positive correlation (r = 0.31, P = 0.007). Mechanical complications occurred in 48 (66.7%) patients, including 27 (37.5%) proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), 1 (1.4%) distal junctional kyphosis, 5 (6.9%) implant failure, 30 (41.7%) rod fracture/pseudarthrosis, 42 (58.3%) reoperations, and 16 (22.2%) reoperations due to PJK. No association was found between DEXA-measured BMD or T-scores with mechanical complications or reoperations. While univariate regression showed a significant association between lower HU and PJK (OR 0.98, 95%CI 0.97-0.99, P = 0.011), the significance was lost after multivariable analysis. When considering osteopenic patients (n = 37), only DEXA-measured BMD was an independent risk factor for PJK (OR 0.01, 95%CI 0.00-0.09, P = 0.017), with a threshold of 0.82 g/cm 2 (AUC 0.70, 95%CI 0.53-0.84, P = 0.019)., Conclusions: Poor correlation was found between the 3 BMD modalities. DEXA-measured BMD may be superior to T-scores and HU in predicting PJK among patients with osteopenia with a threshold of BMD <0.82 g/cm 2 ., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Prediction calculators can help set outcomes expectations following orthopaedic surgery, however effective implementation strategies for these tools are unknown. This study evaluated provider and patient perspectives on clinical implementation of web-based prediction calculators developed using national prospective spine surgery registry data from the Quality Outcomes Database., Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews in two health systems, Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) and Duke University Health System (DUHS) of orthopedic and neurosurgery health care providers (VUMC: n = 19; DUHS: n = 6), health care administrators (VUMC: n = 9; DUHS: n = 9), and patients undergoing elective spine surgery (VUMC: n = 16). Qualitative template analysis was used to analyze interview data, with a focus on end-user perspectives regarding clinical implementation of web-based prediction tools., Results: Health care providers, administrators and patients overwhelmingly supported the use of the calculators to help set realistic expectations for surgical outcomes. Some clinicians had questions about the validity and applicability of the calculators in their patient population. A consensus was that the calculators needed seamless integration into clinical workflows, but there was little agreement on best methods for selecting which patients to complete the calculators, timing, and mode of completion. Many interviewees expressed concerns that calculator results could influence payers, or expose risk of liability. Few patients expressed concerns over additional survey burden if they understood that the information would directly inform their care., Conclusions: Interviewees had a largely positive opinion of the calculators, believing they could aid in discussions about expectations for pain and functional recovery after spine surgery. No single implementation strategy is likely to be successful, and strategies vary, even within the same healthcare system. Patients should be well-informed of how responses will be used to deliver better care, and concerns over how the calculators could impact payment and liability should be addressed prior to use. Future research is necessary to determine whether use of calculators improves management and outcomes for people seeking a surgical consult for spine pain., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Background and Importance: To describe the first case of a thoracic perineural cyst successfully treated using a direct thoracic transforaminal endoscopic approach., Methods: Case report., Clinical Presentation: A 66-year-old male presented with right-sided radicular pain in a T4 distribution. MRI of the thoracic spine revealed a right T4 perineural cyst caudally displacing the root in the T4-5 foramen. He had failed attempts at nonoperative management. The patient underwent an all endoscopic transforaminal perineural cyst decompression and resection as a same-day surgical procedure. Postoperatively, the patient noted near complete resolution of the preoperative radicular pain. A thoracic MRI with and without contrast was performed 3 months after surgery and showed no evidence of the preoperative perineural cyst and no symptom recurrence was noted by the patient., Conclusion: This case report presents the first safe and successful report of an all endoscopic transforaminal decompression and resection of a perineural cyst in the thoracic spine., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study., Objective: To evaluate the association of Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) with surgical site infection (SSI) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and to identify optimal HbA1c thresholds to minimize the risk of SSI and maximize PROs., Summary of Background Data: Diabetes mellitus has been associated with worsened outcomes following spine surgery. HbA1c, a surrogate of glycemic control, is an important assessment tool in diabetic patients., Methods: A single-center, retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data was undertaken. Diabetic patients undergoing elective lumbar decompression surgery between October 2010 and May 2021 were included. HbA1c, demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative data were collected. Primary outcomes included: 1) SSI, and 2) PROs, including the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-back/leg pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary outcomes included: complications, readmissions, and reoperations within 90-days postoperatively. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was set at a 30% improvement from baseline PROs., Results: Of 1819 patients who underwent lumbar decompression surgery, 368 patients had diabetes mellitus, and 177 had a documented preoperative HbA1c value. Of patients with available HbA1c values, the mean age was 62.5±12.3, the mean HbA1c value was 7.2±1.5%, and SSI occurred in 3 (1.7%) patients only, which prevented further analysis of SSI and HbA1c. A significant association was seen with a higher HbA1c and failure to achieve NRS-Back pain MCID30 [Odds ratio(OR)=0.53, 95% confidence interval(CI) 0.42-0.78; P =0.001] and ODI MCID30 (OR=0.58, 95%CI 0.44-0.77; P =0.001), but not NRS-Leg pain MCID30 (OR=1.29, 95%CI 0.86-1.93; P =0.208). ROC-curve analysis and Youden's index revealed an HbA1c threshold of 7.8 for NRS-Back pain MCID30 (AUC=0.65, P <0.001) and 7.5 for ODI MCID30 (AUC=0.65, P =0.001)., Conclusions: In diabetic patients undergoing elective lumbar decompression surgery, HbA1c levels above 7.8 and 7.5 were associated with less improvement of NRS-Back and ODI scores at 12-months postoperatively, respectively. To optimize PROs, We recommend a preoperative HbA1c of 7.5 or below for diabetic patients undergoing elective lumbar decompression surgery., Competing Interests: B.F.S. II, MD has received consulting fees from Depuy-Synthes and Stryker Spine. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and posterolateral fusion (PLF) alone are two operations performed to treat degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. To date, it is unclear which operation leads to better outcomes., Objective: To compare TLIF vs PLF alone regarding long-term reoperation rates, complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with degenerative grade 1 spondylolisthesis., Methods: A retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data between October 2010 and May 2021 was undertaken. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 18 years or older with grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis undergoing elective, single-level, open posterior lumbar decompression and instrumented fusion with ≥1-year follow-up. The primary exposure was presence of TLIF vs PLF without interbody fusion. The primary outcome was reoperation. Secondary outcomes included complications, readmission, discharge disposition, return to work, and PROMs at 3 and 12 months postoperatively, including Numeric Rating Scale-Back/Leg and Oswestry Disability Index. Minimum clinically important difference of PROMs was set at 30% improvement from baseline., Results: Of 546 patients, 373 (68.3%) underwent TLIF and 173 underwent (31.7%) PLF. Median follow-up was 6.1 years (IQR = 3.6-9.0), with 339 (62.1%) >5-year follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression showed that patients undergoing TLIF had a lower odds of reoperation compared with PLF alone (odds ratio = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.54-0.99, P = .048). Among patients with >5-year follow-up, the same trend was seen (odds ratio = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.03-0.95, P = .045). No differences were observed in 90-day complications ( P = .487) and readmission rates ( P = .230) or minimum clinically important difference PROMs., Conclusion: In a retrospective cohort study from a prospectively maintained registry, patients with grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis undergoing TLIF had significantly lower long-term reoperation rates than those undergoing PLF., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2023. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To assess the impact of screw density on: (1) rod fracture/pseudarthrosis, (2) proximal/distal junctional kyphosis/failure (PJK/DJK/PJF), and (3) deformity correction judged by sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and T1-pelvic angle (T1PA)., Methods: A single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery from 2013 to 2017 was undertaken. Screw density was calculated by dividing the number of screws placed by the total instrumented levels. Screw density was then dichotomized at our calculated mean density to ≥ 1.65 and < 1.65. Outcomes consisted of mechanical complications and the amount of correction obtained., Results: 145 patients underwent ASD surgery with 2-year follow-up. Mean screw density (range) was 1.6 ± 0.3 (1.00-2.00). The most common levels with missing screws were L2 (n = 59, 40.7%), L3 (n = 57, 39.3%) and L1 (n = 51, 35.2%), located mainly along the concavity in 113(80.0%) patients and apices in 98 (67.6%) patients. Rod fracture/pseudarthrosis: 23/32 (71.8%) patients with rod fracture and 35/46 (76.0%) with pseudarthrosis had missing screws within two levels of the rod fracture/pseudarthrosis. Logistic regression showed no significant association between screw density and rod fracture/pseudarthrosis., Pjk/f: 15/47 (31.9%) patients with PJK and 9/30 (30.0%) with PJF had missing screws within three levels of the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV). Logistic regression showed no significant association between screws density and PJK/F. Correction obtained: linear regression failed to show any significant association between screw density and SVA or T1PA correction., Conclusion: These findings showed that no significant association was found between screw density and mechanical complications or the amount of correction obtained, though approximately 3 out of 4 patients with rod fracture/pseudarthrosis had missing screws at or within two levels of the pathology. The prevention of mechanical complications is likely multifactorial and subject to both patient's characteristics and surgical techniques., Level of Evidence: III., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.)

Background: Low bone mineral density (BMD) is a well-established risk factor for mechanical complications following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Hounsfield units (HU) measured on computed tomography (CT) scans are a proxy of BMD. In ASD surgery, we sought to: (I) evaluate the association of HU with mechanical complications and reoperation, and (II) identify optimal HU threshold to predict the occurrence of mechanical complications., Methods: A single-institution retrospective cohort study was undertaken for patients undergoing ASD surgery from 2013-2017. Inclusion criteria were: ≥5-level fusion, sagittal/coronal deformity, and 2-year follow-up. HU were measured on 3 axial slices of one vertebra, either at the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) itself or UIV ±4 from CT scans. Multivariable regression controlled for age, body mass index (BMI), postoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and postoperative pelvic-incidence lumbar-lordosis mismatch., Results: Of 145 patients undergoing ASD surgery, 121 (83.4%) had a preoperative CT from which HU were measured. Mean age was 64.4±10.7 years, mean total instrumented levels was 9.8±2.6, and mean HU was 153.5±52.8. Mean preoperative SVA and T1PA were 95.5±71.1 mm and 28.8°±12.8°, respectively. Postoperative SVA and T1PA significantly improved to 61.2±61.6 mm (P<0.001) and 23.0°±11.0° (P<0.001). Mechanical complications occurred in 74 (61.2%) patients, including 42 (34.7%) proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), 3 (2.5%) distal junctional kyphosis (DJK), 9 (7.4%) implant failure, 48 (39.7%) rod fracture/pseudarthrosis, and 61 (52.2%) reoperations within 2 years. Univariate logistic regression showed a significant association between low HU and PJK [odds ratio (OR) =0.99; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.98-0.99; P=0.023], but not on multivariable analysis. No association was found regarding other mechanical complications, overall reoperations, and reoperations due to PJK. HU below 163 were associated with increased PJK on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis [area under the curve (AUC) =0.63; 95% CI: 0.53-0.73; P<0.001]., Conclusions: Though several factors contribute to PJK, it appears that 163 HU may serve as a preliminary threshold when planning ASD surgery to mitigate the risk of PJK., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jss.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jss-22-102/coif). SLZ serves as an unpaid editorial board member of Journal of Spine Surgery. SLZ reports being an unaffiliated neurotrauma consultant for the National Football League. BFS is a consultant for Nuvasive and Carbofix and receives institutional research support from Nuvasive and Stryker Spine. AMA received an institutional research support from Stryker Spine. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2023 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: A retrospective cohort study., Objective: To evaluate the impact of the upper instrumented vertebral (UIV) screw angle in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery on: (1) proximal junctional kyphosis/failure (PJK/F), (2) mechanical complications and radiographic measurements, and (3) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)., Summary of Background Data: The effect of UIV screw angle in ASD surgery on patient outcomes remains understudied., Materials and Methods: A single-institution, retrospective study was undertaken from 2011 to 2017. UIV screw angle was trichotomized into positive: cranially directed screws relative to the superior endplate (2°≤θ), neutral: parallel to the superior endplate (-2°<θ<2°), and negative: caudally directed screws relative to the superior endplate (-2°≥θ). The primary outcome was PJK/F. Secondary outcomes included remaining mechanical complications, reoperation, and PROMs: Oswestry Disability Index, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) back/leg, and EuroQol. Regression controlled for age, body mass index, postoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and pelvic incidence lumbar-lordosis mismatch., Results: Among 145 patients undergoing ASD surgery, UIV screw angles were 35 (24.1%) cranially directed, 24 (16.6%) neutral, and 86 (59.3%) caudally directed. PJK occurred in 47(32.4%) patients. Positive screws were independently associated with increased PJK [odds ratio (OR)=4.88; 95% CI, 1.85-13.5, P =0.002] and PJF (OR=3.06; 95% CI, 1.32-12.30, P =0.015). Among 108 (74.5%) patients with lower thoracic UIV, PJK occurred in 38 (35.1%). Cranially directed screws were independently associated with an increased odds of PJK (OR=5.56; 95% CI, 1.86-17.90, P =0.003) with a threshold of 0.2° (area under the curve =0.65; 95% CI, 0.54-0.76, P <0.001), above which the risk of PJK significantly increased. No association was found between positive screw angle and PJF (OR=3.13; 95% CI, 0.91-11.40, P =0.073). Because of the low number of patients with an upper thoracic UIV (N=37, 25.5%), no meaningful conclusions could be drawn from this subgroup. There was no association between UIV screw angle and remaining mechanical complications, reoperations, postoperative SVA and T1-pelvic angle, or PROMs., Conclusions: Cranially directed UIV screw angles increased the odds of PJK in patients with lower thoracic UIV. Meticulous attention should be paid to the lower thoracic UIV screw angle to mitigate the risk of PJK in ASD., Competing Interests: B.F.S.: consulting: Depuy-Synthes; Research Support: Stryker Spine. A.M.A. received an institutional research support from Stryker Spine. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Retrospective case-control study., Objective: In a cohort of patients undergoing metastatic spine surgery, we sought to: (1) identify risk factors associated with unplanned readmission, and (2) determine the impact of an unplanned readmission on long-term outcomes., Summary of Background Data: Factors affecting readmission after metastatic spine surgery remain relatively unexplored., Materials and Methods: A single-center, retrospective, case-control study was undertaken of patients undergoing spine surgery for extradural metastatic disease between 02/2010 and 01/2021. The primary outcome was 3-month unplanned readmission. Preoperative, perioperative, and tumor-specific variables were collected. Multivariable Cox regression was performed, controlling for tumor size, other organ metastasis, and preoperative/postoperative radiotherapy/chemotherapy., Results: A total of 357 patients underwent surgery for spinal metastases with a mean follow-up of 538.7±648.6 days. Unplanned readmission within 3 months of surgery occurred in 64/357 (21.9%) patients, 37 (57.8%) were medical, 27 (42.2%) surgical, and 21 (77.7%) were related to their spine surgery. No significant differences were found regarding demographics and preoperative variables, except for insurance, where most readmitted patients had private insurance compared with nonreadmitted patients ( P =0.021). No significant difference was found in preoperative radiotherapy/chemotherapy. Regarding perioperative exposure variables, readmitted patients had a higher rate of postoperative complications (68.8% vs. 24.2%, P <0.001) and worse postoperative Karnofsky Performance Score ( P =0.021) and Modified McCormick Scale ( P =0.015) at the time of first follow-up. On multivariate logistic regression, postoperative complications were associated with increased readmissions (odds ratio=1.38, 95% CI=1.25-1.52, P <0.001). Regarding the impact of unplanned readmission on long-term tumor control, unplanned readmission was associated with shorter time to local recurrence (log-rank; P =0.029) and reduced overall survival (OS) (log-rank; P <0.001). On multivariate Cox regression, other organ metastasis [hazard ratio (HR)=1.48, 95% CI=1.13-1.93, P =0.004] and 3-month readmission (HR=1.75, 95% CI=1.28-2.39, P <0.001) were associated with worsened OS, with no impact on LR. Postoperative chemotherapy was significantly associated with longer OS (HR=0.59, 95% CI=0.45-0.77, P <0.001)., Conclusions: Postoperative complications were associated with unplanned readmission following metastatic spine surgery. Furthermore, 3-month unplanned readmission was associated with a shorter time to local recurrence and decreased OS. These results help surgeons understand the drivers of readmissions and the impact of readmissions on patient outcomes., Level of Evidence: 3., Competing Interests: S.L.Z. reports being an unaffiliated neurotrauma consultant for the National Football League. B.F.S. is a consultant for Nuvasive and Carbofix and receives institutional research support from Nuvasive and Stryker Spine. A.M.A. receives an institutional research support from Stryker Spine. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and posterolateral fusion (PLF) without an interbody device are two common approaches for single-level, open posterior fusion. Presently, it is unknown whether one of these operations leads to better outcomes. We sought to compare reoperation, complication, and readmission rates between TLIF and PLF for patients undergoing elective single-level, open, posterior lumbar fusion., Methods: A single-center, retrospective cohort study utilizing prospectively collected data was performed. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing elective single-level, open, posterior lumbar decompression and fusion between October 2010 and April 2021 with at least 1-year follow-up. The two comparison groups were TLIF vs PLF alone without interbody. The primary outcome was need for reoperation at most recent follow-up. Secondary outcomes included 90-day complication and readmission rates. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed., Results: A total of 850 patients were included, 591 (69.5%) of whom underwent TLIF and 259 (30.5%) of whom underwent PLF. Median follow-up was 6.1 years (interquartile range 3.7-8.9). No significant difference was found in overall reoperation rates (12.4% vs 13.9%, P = 0.534). When stratified by <5-year follow-up ( n = 231 TLIF, n = 85 PLF; 37.2%) and ≥5-year follow-up ( n = 360 TLIF, n = 174 PLF; 62.8%), no significant differences were seen in either cohort (<5 years: n = 24 TLIF vs n = 9 PLF, P = 0.959; 5+ years: n = 49 TLIF vs n = 27 PLF, P = 0.555). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, the presence of interbody fusion was not associated with reoperation (OR 2.26, 95% CI 0.66-7.74, P = 0.194)., Clinical Relevance: For patients undergoing elective single-level, open, posterior lumbar fusion without isthmic spondylolisthesis, no differences were seen in reoperation rates at long-term follow-up. Similar 90-day complication and readmission rates were seen. These results suggest that in degenerative lumbar spine disease without isthmic spondylolisthesis, TLIF and PLF achieved similar outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests : Amir M. Abtahi received institutional research support from Stryker Spine. Byron F. Stephens has received consulting fees from DePuy-Synthes and research support from Stryker Spine. Scott L. Zuckerman reports being an unaffiliated neurotrauma consultant for the National Football League. The remaining authors have nothing to report., (This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2023 ISASS. To see more or order reprints or permissions, see http://ijssurgery.com.)

Purpose: The modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) score consists of six sub-domains and is used to quantify the severity of cervical myelopathy. The current study aimed to assess for predictors of postoperative mJOA sub-domains scores following elective surgical management for patients with cervical myelopathy and develop the first clinical prediction model for 12-month mJOA sub-domain scores.Please confirm if the author names are presented accurately and in the correct sequence (given name, middle name/initial, family name). Author 1 Given name: [Byron F.] Last name [Stephens], Author 2 Given name: [Lydia J.] Last name [McKeithan], Author 3 Given name: [W. Hunter] Last name [Waddell], Author 4 Given name: [Anthony M.] Last name [Steinle], Author 5 Given name: [Wilson E.] Last name [Vaughan], Author 6 Given name: [Jacquelyn S.] Last name [Pennings], Author 7 Given name: [Jacquelyn S.] Last name [Pennings], Author 8 Given name: [Scott L.] Last name [Zuckerman], Author 9 Given name: [Kristin R.] Last name [Archer], Author 10 Given name: [Amir M.] Last name [Abtahi] Also, kindly confirm the details in the metadata are correct.Last Author listed should be Kristin R. Archer METHODS: A multivariable proportional odds ordinal regression model was developed for patients with cervical myelopathy. The model included patient demographic, clinical, and surgery covariates along with baseline sub-domain scores. The model was internally validated using bootstrap resampling to estimate the likely performance on a new sample of patients., Results: The model identified mJOA baseline sub-domains to be the strongest predictors of 12-month scores, with numbness in legs and ability to walk predicting five of the six mJOA items. Additional covariates predicting three or more items included age, preoperative anxiety/depression, gender, race, employment status, duration of symptoms, smoking status, and radiographic presence of listhesis. Surgical approach, presence of motor deficits, number of surgical levels involved, history of diabetes mellitus, workers' compensation claim, and patient insurance had no impact on 12-month mJOA scores., Conclusion: Our study developed and validated a clinical prediction model for improvement in mJOA scores at 12 months following surgery. The results highlight the importance of assessing preoperative numbness, walking ability, modifiable variables of anxiety/depression, and smoking status. This model has the potential to assist surgeons, patients, and families when considering surgery for cervical myelopathy., Level of Evidence: Level III., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Traumatic lumbosacral instability is a rare but potentially devastating injury. These injuries are frequently associated with neurologic injury and often result in long-term disability. Despite their severity, radiographic findings can be subtle, and multiple reports exist in which these injuries were not recognized on initial imaging. Transverse process fractures, high-energy mechanisms, and other injury features have been suggested as indications for advanced imaging, which has a high degree of sensitivity in detecting unstable injuries., Case Presentation: A 21-year-old man presented to our level I trauma center after being ejected in a rollover motor vehicle collision. He sustained multiple injuries, including multiple lumbar transverse process fractures and a unilateral superior articular facet fracture of S1., Primary Outcomes: Initial supine computed tomography (CT) images showed no displacement of the fracture and no listhesis or instability. Subsequent upright imaging in a brace, however, demonstrated significant displacement of the fracture with dislocation of the contralateral L5-S1 facet joint and significant anterolisthesis. The patient underwent open posterior reduction and stabilization of L4-S1 followed by L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion. The patient demonstrated excellent alignment on postoperative imaging. At 3 months postoperatively, he had returned to work, was ambulating without assistance, and reported minimal back discomfort and no lower extremity pain, numbness, or weakness., Conclusion: This case serves as a warning that supine CT imaging alone may not be sufficient to rule out unstable lumbar spine injuries, such as traumatic L5-S1 instability, and that upright radiographs in these potentially unstable injuries may represent a hazard to patients. Fractures involving the pedicle, pars, or facet joints as well as multiple transverse process fractures and/or a high-energy mechanism of injury should all raise suspicion of instability and warrant additional imaging., Clinical Relevance: This article provides guidance on approaching treatment for patients with potential traumatic lumbosacral instability., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests : The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2023 ISASS. To see more or order reprints or permissions, see http://ijssurgery.com.)

Background: Despite the known association between higher estimated blood loss (EBL) and suboptimal outcomes, the threshold of EBL that negatively impacts outcomes following elective spine surgery remains unknown. In an open 2- and 3-level posterolateral lumbar fusion, we sought to find a threshold of surgeon-reported EBL associated with length of stay (LOS), 30-day complications, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs)., Methods: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was performed for 2- and 3-level open posterolateral lumbar fusions between October 2010 and April 2021. Surgeon-reported EBL (milliliters) was the primary independent variable for predicting LOS (days). Secondary outcomes included 30-day complications and PROs as the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Multivariable regression and receiver operating characteristic curve with Youden's Index were calculated., Results: 2-Level Fusion: A total of 557 patients underwent 2-level fusions. Multivariable regression found EBL to be a significant risk factor for prolonged LOS. A threshold of 375 mL was associated with LOS beyond postoperative day 2 (POD2) (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.64, 95% CI 0.58-0.70, P < 0.001). 3-Level Fusion: A total of 287 patients underwent 3-level fusions. Similarly, EBL was a significant risk factor for prolonged LOS, with a threshold of 675 mL to predict LOS beyond POD2 (AUC = 0.63, 95% CI 0.54-0.73, P = 0.012). EBL was associated with increased odds of 30-day complications, with a threshold of 538 mL (AUC = 0.63, 95% CI 0.51-0.76, P < 0.001). For both 2- and 3-level fusions, EBL was not significantly associated with MCID for any of the PROs., Conclusions: In patients undergoing open, posterolateral lumbar fusions, surgeon-reported EBL thresholds at 375 mL for 2-level fusions and 675 mL for 3-level fusions were moderately associated with LOS beyond POD2. In 3-level lumbar fusions, EBL above 538 mL showed a potential association with an increased odds of 30-day complications., Clinical Relevance: Surgeons should improve their ability to manage blood loss and implement methods to keep EBL below the provided thresholds to decrease LOS and minimize the risk of complications., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests : Byron Stephens has received consulting fees from Depuy-Synthes and institutional research support from Stryker Spine. Amir Abtahi received institutional research support from Stryker Spine. For the remaining authors, no conflicts of interest were declared., (This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2023 ISASS. To see more or order reprints or permissions, see http://ijssurgery.com.)