Search

Objective: The new 2019 guideline of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) recommends consideration for elective iliac artery aneurysm (eIAA) repair when the iliac diameter exceeds 3.5 cm, as opposed to 3.0 cm previously. The current study assessed diameters at time of eIAA repair and ruptured IAA (rIAA) repair and compared clinical outcomes after open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)., Methods: This retrospective observational study used the nationwide Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA) registry that includes all patients who undergo aorto-iliac aneurysm repair in the Netherlands. All patients who underwent primary IAA repair between 1 January 2014 and 1 January 2018 were included. Diameters at time of eIAA and rIAA repair were compared in a descriptive fashion. The anatomical location of the IAA was not registered in the registry. Patient characteristics and outcomes of OSR and EVAR were compared with appropriate statistical tests., Results: The DSAA registry comprised 974 patients who underwent IAA repair. A total of 851 patients were included after exclusion of patients undergoing revision surgery and patients with missing essential variables. eIAA repair was carried out in 713 patients, rIAA repair in 102, and symptomatic IAA repair in 36. OSR was performed in 205, EVAR in 618, and hybrid repairs and conversions in 28. The median maximum IAA diameter at the time of eIAA and rIAA repair was 43 (IQR 38-50) mm and 68 (IQR 58-85) mm, respectively. Mortality was 1.3% (95% CI 0.7-2.4) after eIAA repair and 25.5% (95% CI 18.0-34.7) after rIAA repair. Mortality was not significantly different between the OSR and EVAR subgroups. Elective OSR was associated with significantly more complications than EVAR (intra-operative: 9.8% vs. 3.6%, post-operative: 34.0% vs. 13.8%, respectively)., Conclusion: In the Netherlands, most eIAA repairs are performed at diameters larger than recommended by the ESVS guideline. These findings appear to support the recent increase in the threshold diameter for eIAA repair., (Copyright © 2020 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Hybrid revascularization combines open lower extremity surgery and endovascular procedures to simultaneously treat atherosclerotic lesions on multiple levels in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAD). Hybrid surgery appears to be a safe strategy for multilevel stenosis revascularization, though the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) has not been clearly investigated. This study evaluates the development of SSI following common femoral artery endarterectomy (CFE) and hybrid revascularization procedures., Methods: A retrospective study was performed including all patients undergoing CFE, as standalone or as part of a hybrid procedure, due to PAD between January 2013 and December 2016. Preoperative, intraoperative, clinical, and follow-up information was gathered prospectively and reviewed retrospectively. The presence of SSI was recorded based on criteria of the Centre for Disease Control., Results: A total of 229 CFEs were performed. One hundred thirty-two as a standalone procedure, 65 combined with iliofemoral angioplasty, and 32 combined with peripheral angioplasty. Nineteen patients (8.3%) developed an SSI, of which 4 were deep infections. Ten infections (7.6%) occurred in the CFE-only group, 5 (7.7%) in the iliofemoral hybrid group, and 4 (12.5%) in the peripheral hybrid group (P = 0.65). Five patients (2.1%) required surgery to control the infection. The mean duration of stay was 5 days for patients without SSI versus 20 days for patients who developed an SSI (P < 0.0001)., Conclusions: The hybrid procedure combining open femoral endarterectomy with endovascular revascularization is a safe procedure with no significant differences in infection rates between open surgery, central, or peripheral hybrid revascularization., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is a disease that is most prevalent in the elderly population. This group of patients includes patients suffering from comorbidities such as dementia. Mortality rates of both CLI and dementia are higher when compared with the nonaffected population. These demented vascular patients are often deemed unfit for surgery and at risk of respiratory and cardiovascular adverse events. Unfortunately, current literature is lacking in to determining the optimal treatment for demented patients suffering from CLI. The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of dementia in patients suffering from CLI, with special interest in the mortality rates of these patients., Methods: Between January 2012 and October 2015, all patients aged over 70 and suffering from CLI were retrospectively reviewed in the Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands. Patients with diagnosed dementia before admission by a geriatrician were included in this study. Baseline characteristics were retrieved from patients' medical charts. Primary end point of this study is mortality and the secondary end points include adverse events, reinterventions, and limb salvage., Results: A total of 369 patients suffering from CLI were diagnosed between January 2012 and October 2015. Thirty-one patients (8%) diagnosed with both dementia and CLI were included in this study with a mean age of 82 years old. Conservative therapy was selected as the therapy of choice in 61% of the patients. There was a mortality rate of 32% after 6 months, increasing to 52% after 1 year and 92% after 2 years. Limb salvage rates after 30 days were 84%, dropping to 77% after 6 months., Conclusions: Eight percent of CLI patients aged above 70 years old are suffering from dementia. Demented patients suffering from CLI are a frail group of elderly patients with a high mortality rate of 52% after 1-year follow-up. Therapy of choice should probably be selected following mutual agreement between vascular surgeons, individual patients, and their families, taking postoperative quality of life, life expectation, and anatomical arterial lesions into account., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Various treatment options exist for patients suffering from critical limb ischemia (CLI). These options consist of endovascular procedures, surgical revascularization, primary amputation, or conservative therapy. The effect of the treatment is traditionally focused on outcomes, such as primary patency and limb salvage, though quality of life (QoL) is considered an important additional primary end point in a more patient-oriented healthcare system. The aim of this systematic review is to explore the best clinical decision making possible, to increase QoL in CLI patients., Methods: This review is based on a systematic electronic literature search using the PubMed and EMBASE databases. Articles evaluating QoL in patients with CLI were selected for further analysis. Only prospective studies, written in English, describing QoL and health status (HS) after endovascular or surgical revascularization, amputation or conservative therapy were considered for inclusion. Treatment results were divided into short-term (≤3-month follow-up) and long-term results (≥1-year follow-up) to achieve a clear view of the QoL in patients suffering for CLI patients., Results: Twenty-five articles describing HS in patients suffering from CLI were included. It was found that while most of these articles reported HS of patients, rarely did they report on QoL. As a result, it is difficult to determine the best treatment to increase HS as studies that focus on the comparison of treatment modalities are lacking. All 4 treatment modalities can raise HS in the short and the long terms; however, endovascular and surgical revascularization seem to positively effect HS the most. QoL results are lacking in both the short and long terms., Conclusions: All treatment methods included in the study resulted in an increase in patients' HS in both short and long terms. More comparative studies with inclusion of all different treatments of CLI are needed to assist in clinical decision making and perform tailored interventions for the individual patient. QoL and HS are confusingly used in current international literature with abundant HS research. To take patients individual opinions more into account, focus on QoL research is needed to designate the superior treatment in patients suffering from CLI., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Lymphedema of the upper extremity is a common side effect of lymph node dissection or irradiation of the axilla. Several techniques are being applied in order to examine the presence and severity of lymphedema. Measurement of circumference of the upper extremity is most frequently performed. An alternative is the water-displacement method. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability and the reproducibility of the "Inverse Water Volumetry apparatus" (IWV-apparatus) for the measurement of arm volumes., Patients and Methods: The IWV-apparatus is based on the water-displacement method. Measurements were performed by three breast cancer nurse practitioners on ten healthy volunteers in three weekly sessions., Results: The intra-class correlation coefficient, defined as the ratio of the subject component to the total variance, equaled 0.99. The reliability index is calculated as 0.14 kg. This indicates that only changes in a patient's arm volume measurement of more than 0.14 kg would represent a true change in arm volume, which is about 6% of the mean arm volume of 2.3 kg., Conclusion: The IWV-apparatus proved to be a reliable and reproducible method to measure arm volume.

Objective: To assess the frailty and the incidence of delirium in elderly patients undergoing elective and acute colorectal surgery in correlation with morbidity and mortality., Methods: Patients aged 65 years and older having elective and acute colorectal surgery, between April 2013 and December 2013 were included in a prospective database. Patients diagnosed with a colorectal carcinoma or diverticulitis who were operated on were included. Factors that characterize frailty of patients were noted. The incidence rates of delirium after elective and acute surgery were recorded. Delirium was diagnosed using the Delirium Observation Screening Scale (DOSS). Preoperative evaluation, surgical outcome including morbidity, hospital stay and mortality were analyzed., Results: Patients ≥ 65 years were included, 83 (75%) received elective and 28 (25%) acute surgery. The overall incidence of delirium was 21%, 18% for elective and 29% for patients having urgent surgery (p = 0.24). Patients with delirium were older than the non-delirious patients (median 82 years vs. 74 years; p < 0.001). Delirious patients showed higher incidence of adverse events. Hospital stay, mortality and discharge to a nursing home were significant higher in the delirious compared to the non-delirious group (p = 0.01; 0.01; 0.02 respectively)., Conclusion: High incidence of delirium was found in both acute and elective colorectal surgery. Delirium was associated with adverse outcomes., (Copyright © 2015 IJS Publishing Group Limited. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Peripheral bypass surgery is an important treatment option for patients with peripheral arterial disease. Short-term results of quality of life (QoL) after peripheral bypass surgery showed an increase in QoL at 3 months. Little is known about QoL at more than 2 years of follow-up. This study was performed to analyze QoL at midterm follow-up, and overall survival after peripheral bypass surgery., Methods: This study was part of a randomized control trial in which intermittent pneumatic compression was compared with compression stockings in the treatment of edema after bypass surgery. Patients completed a QoL questionnaire before surgery, 14 days and 3 months postoperatively, and at least 2 years after the original operation. A survival analysis was performed to calculate survival for patients who received both autologous and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) bypass grafts., Results: The original study consisted of 93 patients, and QoL midterm follow-up was achieved for 42. QoL scores at midterm follow-up were comparable to the preoperative baseline scores for both the autologous and the PTFE groups. Three-year survival rates were 75% and 54%, respectively., Conclusion: Although peripheral bypass surgery significantly increased QoL 3 months after surgery, midterm follow-up showed a return to baseline scores. No significant difference was found in survival between patients in the autologous and PTFE groups., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Substantial lower-limb edema affects the majority of patients who undergo peripheral bypass surgery. Edema has impairing effects on the microvascular and the macrovascular circulation, causes discomfort and might delay the rehabilitation process of the patient. However, the pathophysiology of this edema is not well understood. The Cochrane Library and Medline were used to retrieve literature on edema following peripheral bypass surgery. Factors other than local wound healing alone are suggested in the literature to play a role, given the severity and duration of this edema. Hyperemia, microvascular permeability, reperfusion-associated inflammation and lymphatic disruptions are likely to facilitate the development of edema. Preventive methods could be lymphatic-sparing surgery, intraoperative antioxidative therapy and postoperative elevation. Successful treatment strategies to reduce postoperative edema are based on lymph massage and external compression. In conclusion, the pathophysiology of edema following peripheral surgery is not fully understood, although reperfusion-associated inflammation and lymphatic disruptions are likely to play a crucial role. When future less-invasive techniques prove to be successful, postoperative edema might be minimized. Until then, a careful lymphatic-sparing dissection should be executed when performing a peripheral bypass reconstruction. Postoperatively, the use of compression stockings and leg elevation are currently the golden standards.

Background: To examine the effects of peripheral bypass surgery on patients' quality of life (QoL) as well as to compare two treatment modalities to reduce postoperative edema with regard to patients' QoL., Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial set in the department of vascular surgery in a nonacademic teaching hospital. Ninety-three patients (mean age, 70 years; 33% Rutherford 5-6), enrolled between August 2006 and September 2009, who underwent peripheral bypass surgery (autologous 57, polytetrafluoroethylene 36). Patients were assigned to intermittent pneumatic compression (n = 46) or to compression stockings (n = 47). The main outcome measure was QoL, measured with the World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment instrument (short form: WHOQOL-BREF)., Results: QoL improved on the domain of Physical Health by 7.18 points (P < 0.001 [range, 0-100]) after 2 weeks and by 10.03 points (P < 0.001) after 3 months. Patients who received a polytetrafluoroethylene bypass scored 0.45 points (P = 0.0008 [range, 1-5]) lower at baseline on Global QoL than patients who received an autologous bypass. Type of bypass or edema treatment method did not affect the improvements. Edema did not correlate with QoL., Conclusion: Improvement in QoL on the domain Physical Health following femoropopliteal bypass surgery was found as soon as 2 weeks after surgery. Improvement in QoL domains was not influenced by the type of bypass reconstruction. No specific effects of edema on QoL were detected., (Copyright © 2012 Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The pathophysiological mechanisms that induce postrevascularization edema after femoropopliteal bypass surgery are not completely understood. Reperfusion-associated injury to revascularized tissue and damage to lymphatic structures are both likely to play a role. Aim of this study was to study edema formation after peripheral bypass surgery with magnetic resonance imaging., Materials and Methods: Nine patients suffering from severe peripheral arterial occlusive disease were subjected to magnetic resonance imaging scans before and 1 week after autologous femoropopliteal or femorocrural bypass surgery., Results: A 12% increase in volume of the upper legs and an 11% increase in volume of the lower legs were measured in patients postoperatively. The increase of volume was largely due to expansion of the subcutaneous compartments: a 35% increase in the upper legs and a 41% increase in the lower legs. Edema in the upper legs was predominantly located medially at the site of the surgical wound. In contrast, edema in the lower legs was homogenously distributed around the entire leg circumference. The muscle compartment showed no significant change of volume. However, in the majority of patients, edema-like changes were seen in selected muscles as well after a peripheral bypass reconstruction., Conclusion: Swelling of the subcutaneous compartments is mainly responsible for the volume increases in upper and lower legs similar to lymphatic edema. In addition, in a majority of patients, edema-like changes in selected muscles were seen especially in the upper legs. Reperfusion-associated injury as a cause of these changes cannot be ruled out., (Copyright © 2012 Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The graft of choice in lower limb bypass surgery is the autologous saphenous vein (ASV). However, a prosthetic graft is needed in the absence of an ASV. In such situations, we used an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) pre-cuffed Dynaflo graft as supragenicular bypass or Distaflo graft as infragenicular or femorocrural bypass. In respect to the expanding possibilities of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), the indication for bypass surgery moved toward patients with advanced stages of peripheral arterial occlusive disease. For this reason, this study analyzed the current performances of these ePTFE grafts and ASV grafts with special attention to limb salvage., Methods: In a retrospective study all patients who underwent peripheral bypass surgery between 2004 and 2008 were included. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to express primary patency, secondary patency, and limb salvage rates at 1 and 3 years. Log-rank tests were performed to compare graft types., Results: A total of 272 grafts (ePTFE/ASV: 110/162) were performed in lower limb bypass surgery. The mean follow-up was 20.3 months. The secondary 3-year patency rates were for (n=78) supragenicular grafts (ePTFE/ASV: 45%/94%)*, for (n=124) infragenicular grafts (24%/74%), and 70 for femorocrural grafts (26%/52%). Limb salvage after 3 years was 59% in the ePTFE group versus 78% in the ASV group (P < .05)., Conclusion: In the current population of vascular patients where no PTA is possible and a peripheral bypass is necessary, the ASV remains the graft of first choice. However, the pre-cuffed ePTFE graft is a good alternative, especially in cases of critical limb ischemia, in respect to an acceptable limb salvage rate.

Background: Patients who undergo autologous femoropopliteal bypass surgery develop postoperative edema in the revascularized leg. The effects of intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) to treat and to prevent postreconstructive edema were examined in this study., Methods: In a prospective randomized trial, patients were assigned to one of two groups. All patients suffered from peripheral arterial disease, and all were subjected to autologous femoropopliteal bypass reconstruction. Patients in group 1 used a compression stocking (CS) above the knee exerting 18 mmHg (class I) on the leg postoperatively for 1 week (day and night). Patients in group 2 used IPC on the foot postoperatively at night for 1 week. The lower leg circumference was measured preoperatively and at five postoperative time points. A multivariate analysis was done using a mixed model analysis of variance., Results: A total of 57 patients were analyzed (CS 28; IPC 29). Indications for operation were severe claudication (CS 13; IPC 13), rest pain (10/5), or tissue loss (7/11). Revascularization was performed with either a supragenicular (CS 13; IPC10) or an infragenicular (CS 15; IPC 19) autologous bypass. Leg circumference increased on day 1 (CS/IPC): 0.4%/2.7%, day 4 (2.1%/6.1%), day 7 (2.5%/7.9%), day 14 (4.7%/7.3%), and day 90 (1.0%/3.3%) from baseline (preoperative situation). On days 1, 4, and 7 there was a significant difference in leg circumference between the two treatment groups., Conclusions: Edema following femoropopliteal bypass surgery occurs in all patients. For the prevention and treatment of that edema the use of a class I CS proved superior to treatment with IPC. The use of CS remains the recommended practice following femoropopliteal bypass surgery.

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the reliability and reproducibility of repeated tape measurements to assess the leg circumference during a long period., Methods: A tape measure is a simple instrument that is applicable in the presence of oedema. Measurements were performed by four observers on 11 volunteers. Four measurements were done in the first week (short term), a fifth measurement at two weeks (medium term) and a sixth measurement was done at 12 weeks (long term)., Results: The short-, medium- and long-term intra-class correlation coefficients for repeated measurements were 0.90, 0.89 and 0.78, respectively. The short-term and long-term reproducibility indices equalled 4.4% and 6.5%. If only a single observer would be involved, the short-term intra-class correlation coefficients would improve to 0.94 (reproducibility index 3.3%)., Conclusion: Tape measurements have been proved to be a reliable and reproducible method to asses the lower limb circumference.

Objective: To establish whether measures taken to shorten the interval of time between a stroke and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) procedure at two Dutch hospitals had any effect., Design: Retrospective and descriptive., Method: Data were gathered on all patients with symptomatic narrowing of the carotid artery from a non-academic teaching hospital (Amphia Ziekenhuis in Breda) as well as from a university clinic dedicated to carotid abnormalities (University Medical Center Utrecht, UMCU). 'Pass-through' intervals were analysed from 2006 and 2007 and compared with those from 2010 when the sequence of hospital care had been improved in terms of time interval from stroke up to and including CEA. The time interval between the first symptoms of stroke and the first visit to the outpatient clinic specialist was determined, as well as the time interval between the stroke and CEA procedure., Results: After the hospitals had taken measures to shorten the time interval between a stroke and an operation, the percentage of patients who had undergone surgery within 2 weeks in 2010 was 34% at Amphia Ziekenhuis and 21% at the UMCU, as opposed to 5.5% (2006) and 10.5% (2007), respectively. The median time between first symptoms and surgery had decreased from 40 to 19 days at Amphia Ziekenhuis and from 57 to 36 days at the UMCU., Conclusion: At both the non-academic clinic and the university centre dedicated to carotid abnormalities, the majority of symptomatic patients had not undergone surgery within 2 weeks of a stroke in 2010. A CEA must therefore become a semi-acute operation instead of a semi-elective one in order to meet its associated performance criteria in the near future.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of A-V impulse technology (A-V) for oedema prevention and treatment following PTFE femoropopliteal surgery., Design: Prospective randomized clinical trial., Materials: 36 patients undergoing PTFE femoropopliteal bypass reconstructions, either being treated postoperatively with a compression stocking (CS) (Group-1, n = 19) or with A-V (Group-2, n = 17)., Methods: Patients in treatment group-1 used a CS postoperatively during 1 week day and night, patients in group-2 were treated with A-V postoperatively at night during one week. The lower leg circumference was measured preoperatively and at five postoperative time points., Results: Limb circumference has increased postoperatively on day 1 (CS 1.5%/A-V 1.4%), on day 4 (5.7%/6.3%), on day 7 (6.6%/6.1%), on day 14 (7.9%/7.7%) and on day 90 (5.8%/5.2%). Differences between treatment groups were not significant. A re-operation gives a significant 3.9% increase in circumference as compared to a first operation (95% CI: 1.5-6.4%; p = 0.002)., Conclusion: No significant differences were found in the extent of developed edema between the groups following PTFE femoropopliteal bypass surgery. A redo peripheral bypass operation results in significantly more postoperative oedema than a first-time performed bypass operation., (Copyright © 2010 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

A pseudoaneurysm following a shoulder dislocation is considered rare. We report here a case of an 82-yearold man who suffered from vascular and neurological injury due to an axillary pseudoaneurysm following anterior dislocation of the left shoulder. An emerging swelling in the shoulder region was caused by a hematoma and a slowly bleeding pseudoaneurysm in combination with reactive swelling of the soft tissues. Neurological damage occurred due to local compression. A minimally invasive technique was used to treat the pseudoaneurysm. Embolization was initially attempted, but this treatment failed. A stent was subsequently inserted to eliminate the axillary pseudoaneurysm from the circulation. Early imaging and an aggressive endovascular treatment should be considered in all patients suffering from an axillary artery (pseudo)aneurysm.

The purpose of this study is to report a new method of removing an infected endoprosthesis from the abdominal aorta using a wire cutter. A 65-year-old man with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm was admitted to our hospital. He was treated with an endovascular abdominal endoprosthesis and discharged one week later. Three months after placement, the patient returned with an infection of the aortic endoprosthesis. The endoprosthesis had been fixed with barbs and hooks above the renal arteries and was surgically explanted by using a wire cutter to cut the hooks. The bare suprarenal stent was left in place. The patient was discharged one month after stent removal, and was treated with oral antibiotics for another ten weeks. At one year follow-up the patient showed no clinical, biochemical, or radiological signs of infection. In conclusion, infected endoprostheses should be surgically removed according to the medical literature. We recognize that removing a Zenith endoprostheses requires a dangerous operation because the hooks of the bare stent are engaged into the supra-renal aorta. This case report documents a new technique to safely remove an infected endoprosthesis with the help of a wire cutter.