Search

Purpose: Subdural hematoma (SDH) is quickly becoming the most common neurosurgical pathology due to the aging population. Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has recently emerged as an effective adjunct to surgical SDH evacuation by decreasing recurrence risk. MMAE has also shown promise as a standalone SDH intervention, but clinical and radiographic predictors of successful MMAE remain ill-defined., Methods: Retrospective chart review from 2020 to 2023 at a single center identified all MMAE cases performed as primary SDH treatment. Cases were classified by hematoma internal architecture as homogeneous, separated, laminar, or trabecular. SDH maximal thickness was assessed on all follow-up imaging and any recurrences or expansions requiring surgery were denoted as treatment failures., Results: 164 standalone MMAE cases were reviewed. Most cases were in male patients (75.0%) with a mean age of 73.2 years. The overall MMAE treatment failure rate was 6.7% with a 4.9% periprocedural complication rate. The cases with trabecular and laminar collections were slightly larger than those with homogeneous and separated collections (16.2 mm vs. 14.2 mm, p = 0.008*), but other baseline characteristics were similar. The MMAE failure rate was significantly lower in the laminar and trabecular subgroup (1.2%) compared to the homogeneous and separated subgroup (12.4%) (p = 0.005*). Homogeneous and separated internal hematoma architecture was the only predictor of MMAE failure in multivariate analysis (OR 10.5, p = 0.027*) and was also associated with delayed SDH resorption (ANOVA: F = 4.8, p = 0.0025*)., Conclusions: Standalone MMAE is an effective, safe, and durable treatment for non-acute SDHs, and is especially effective for SDHs with more membranous internal architecture., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethical approval: This study was approved by the Northwell Feinstein Institute Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board: #24–0246 and adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent: As documented in the study protocol approved by our institutional review board and referenced above, informed consent was waived due to the retrospective, non-interventional nature of this study. Competing interests: The authors declare that this research was conducted in the absence of any commercial, financial, or other non-financial relationships that could be construed as a competing interest or a conflict of interest. The authors therefore have no relevant conflicts of interest or competing interests to disclose., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background and Objectives: Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has emerged as a promising modality for chronic/subacute subdural hematoma treatment; however, consensus regarding embolization technique and embolisate has not been achieved. We thus sought to compare the efficacy of distinct MMAE techniques and embolisate., Methods: An institutional registry was reviewed to identify patients undergoing standalone MMAE for symptomatic chronic/subacute subdural hematoma. Surgical rescue rate and time preceding 50% hematoma resolution were evaluated across 3 technical groups: aggressive penetration (AP), nonaggressive penetration with proximal coil embolization (NP-PC), and nonaggressive penetration alone (NP). Effect sizes were adjusted for demographic, neurological and radiological features through multivariable logistic and Cox regression., Results: Among 117 procedures, 33.3% achieved AP, 36.8% had NP-PC, and 29.9% had NP. The rate of surgical rescue was 2.6% after AP, 9.3% for NP-PC, and 11.4% for NP. In patients not undergoing rescue surgery, 82.4% achieved hematoma resolution ≥50% at a median imaging follow-up of 56 days; AP or NP-PC were each statistically significantly associated with enhanced hematoma resolution as compared with NP ( P = .02). Similarly, sensitivity analysis within medium-size hematoma and antiplatelet/anticoagulation-at-admission subgroups revealed a superiority of resolution after AP or NP-PC. A unique, comparative secondary analysis of liquid embolisate (Onyx vs n-butyl cyanoacrylate) revealed no impact on rate of surgical rescue or hematoma resolution., Conclusion: AP was associated with the lowest rate of surgical rescue, while both AP and NP-PC were associated with improved rates of hematoma resolution., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chronic subdural hematoma (SDH) is a particularly challenging pathology due to high recurrence rates (2%-37%) and complex medical comorbidities that tend to afflict the patient population. Recently, there have been several case series published describing the use of middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization as an alternative to surgery for treatment of new or recurrent chronic SDH., Objective: To describe our first 60 cases of MMA embolization for chronic SDH., Methods: MMA embolization was performed using angiography, selective microcatheterization of the MMA, and infusion of polyvinyl alcohol particles. Outcomes were assessed clinically and with interval imaging studies at 1 d, 2 wk, and 6 wk postprocedure, and additional intervals as indicated., Results: MMA embolization was performed successfully on 60 total SDHs in 49 patients. This includes upfront treatment for new (not previously treated) SDH in 42, for recurrence in 8, and prophylaxis (soon after surgical evacuation) in 10. There were 3 mortalities (unrelated to the procedure), and no procedural complications. Of the 50 nonprophylactic cases, there were 4 (8.9%) cases of recurrence requiring surgical evacuation, and 31 (68.9%) that had resolution or reduction in size >50% of SDH at longest follow-up. Overall, 41 (91.1%) were stable or decreased in size and able to avoid surgery., Conclusion: MMA embolization may represent a minimally-invasive alternative to surgery for new or recurrent chronic SDH, or as prophylaxis to reduce the risk of recurrence after surgery. Given our encouraging results with a 91% long-term success rate, a large scale clinical trial is warranted., (Copyright © 2018 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.)

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the technical feasibility and safety of middle meningeal arterial (MMA) embolization combined with drilling drainage in the treatment of acute epidural hematoma (AEDH) by comparing it with traditional craniotomy in the treatment., Methods: One hundred seventeen patients with AEDH treated for MMA embolization combined with drilling and drainage or craniotomy hematoma removal from January 2017 to September 2020 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into a craniotomy group (n=85) and a minimally invasive group (n=32). Hematoma removal was performed in the craniotomy group, and MMA embolization combined with drilling and drainage was performed in the minimally invasive group. The general clinical data, imaging data, surgery, and follow-up of the 2 groups were compared and analyzed., Results: Compared with the craniotomy group, the residual hematoma volume in the minimally invasive group was higher than in the craniotomy group. The average postoperative drainage duration in the minimally invasive group was longer than in the craniotomy group. Compared with the craniotomy group, the minimally invasive group was associated with shorter operative time, less intraoperative bleeding, and lower rates of postoperative rebleeding. In addition, the incidence of postoperative complications and length of hospitalization in the minimally invasive group were significantly shortened., Conclusion: Middle meningeal arterial embolization combined with drilling and drainage in the treatment of AEDH caused by MMA active bleeding is safe, effective, and more minimally invasive, and can be promoted and applied., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.)

Background: Embolization of the middle meningeal artery (MMA) has recently been proposed as an alternative to surgery for treatment of chronic subdural hematoma (SDH). There is increasing evidence that fragile neovasculature arising from distal branches of the MMA found within the membrane that forms around a chronic SDH is responsible for high recurrence rates due to chronic, repeated rebleeding. Embolization of the MMA could thus potentially eliminate the blood supply to this membrane and prevent further rebleeding., Methods: The cases of 6 patients with 7 recurrent SDHs treated with MMA embolization with polyvinyl alcohol particles were retrospectively reviewed., Results: MMA embolization was performed successfully in all 6 patients with no complications. Of the 7 SDHs treated, 1 required surgical reevacuation due to recurrence. The other 6 were able to avoid surgery, with reduction in size from 12 mm to 11 mm over 3 weeks, 14 mm to 9 mm over 9 weeks, 21 mm to 5 mm over 31 weeks, 17 mm to 9 mm over 12 weeks, 18 mm to 3 mm over 8 weeks, and 25 mm to 6 mm over 24 weeks. All patients had resolution of symptoms at longest follow-up., Conclusions: In this case series of 6 patients harboring 7 recurrent, chronic SDHs, 6 of the 7 were successfully treated with MMA embolization and able to avoid surgery for reevacuation, suggesting that this minimally invasive technique may represent an effective alternative to surgery., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and purpose Embolization of the middle meningeal artery (MMA) has recently been proposed as an alternative to surgery for treatment of chronic subdural hematoma (SDH), and several case reports have been published supporting its efficacy. It has been suggested that the primary pathologic process in chronic SDH is repeated microhemorrhaging into the subdural collection from fragile neovasculature within the SDH membrane that arises from distal branches of the MMA. Embolization could thus provide a means of eliminating this chronic rebleeding. Materials and methods Images were selected from MMA embolization procedures performed at our institution in order to illustrate the technique and theory behind its efficacy for treatment of chronic SDH. Results Images from MMA angiograms demonstrate the variability of MMA anatomy and help illustrate the importance of avoiding potential ophthalmic collaterals and branches supplying cranial nerves. The findings of irregular wispiness of the distal MMA vasculature, contrast outlining of the SDH membrane on angiography, and homogenous increased density within the SDH on postembolization head computed tomography are described. Conclusion MMA embolization may provide a safe alternative for treatment of chronic SDH, but careful angiographic assessment of MMA anatomy should be performed to avoid potential complications. The findings illustrated here lend support to the theory that the pathologic process of chronic SDH is repeated leakage of blood products from an inflamed, abnormal arterial neovasculature within the SDH membrane that arises from the MMA, and thus selective embolization could provide an effective treatment.

Background: The primary aim of chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) treatment is to relieve pressure to improve neurological symptoms. The secondary aim is to avoid recurrence. The blood supply from the middle meningeal artery (MMA) to the haematoma membranes has recently become a research target, to enhance our understanding of the processes leading to growth and re-growth of a CSDH. Several studies indicate that endovascular embolization of the MMA (eMMA) reduces recurrence rates, but this effect must be confirmed in a randomized controlled setting. Endovascular embolization is an advanced and costly procedure carrying a significant risk of embolism in the elderly. The aim of this study was to assess anatomical and technical aspects of surgical occlusion of the MMA (soMMA) via a single same-procedure burr hole, as an alternative to eMMA., Method: Technical aspects of soMMA were assessed using cadaver head dissection. MMA anatomy was examined by mapping the branching pattern and distribution of MMA in dry skulls, and CSDH position was investigated by analysis of computed tomography (CT) of CSDHs. Finally, we evaluated the possibility of CT-guided navigation to mark the branching point of the anterior MMA division on the skin., Results: We established anatomical landmarks to locate the MMA and found that particularly the anterior MMA branch can be occluded through a single burr hole at the pterion during the same procedure as haematoma decompression. CT of 1454 CSDHs in 1162 patients showed that the CSDH was anteriorly located in 57.5% compared with posteriorly in only 3%. This correlated with the anterior branch of the MMA being dominant in 58% of dry skull samples examined. We further confirmed that the MMA can be localized by neuronavigation as an alternative to using anatomical landmarks and average measurements., Conclusion: A CSDH is mainly anteriorly located and supposedly primarily supplied by the anterior MMA branch. In a simulated setting, soMMA can be performed during the same procedure as haematoma decompression. A few reservations notwithstanding, we find that soMMA may be a viable alternative to eMMA in most CSDH cases and that soMMA should be further evaluated in a clinical setting.

Background: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) remains a neurosurgical condition with high recurrence rate after surgical treatment. The primary pathological mechanism is considered to be repeated microbleedings from fragile neo-vessels within the outer hematoma membrane. The neo-vessels are supplied from peripheral branches of the middle meningeal artery, and embolization of MMA (eMMA) has been performed to prevent re-bleeding episodes and thereby CSDH recurrence., Objective: To evaluate the published evidence for the effect of eMMA in patients with recurrent CSDH. Secondarily, to investigate the effect of eMMA as an alternative to surgery for primary treatment of CSDH., Method: A systematic review of the literature on eMMA in patients with recurrent CSDH was conducted. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were reviewed using the search terms: Embolization, Medial Meningeal Artery, Chronic Subdural Haematoma, and Recurrence. Furthermore, the following mesh terms were used: Chronic Subdural Haematoma AND embolization AND medial meningeal artery AND recurrence. Eighteen papers were found and included. No papers were excluded. The number of patients with primary CSDH and the number of patients with recurrent CSDH treated with eMMA were listed. Furthermore, the number of recurrences in both categories was registered., Results: Eighteen papers with a total of 191 included patients diagnosed with CSDH treated with eMMA for primary and recurrent CSDH were identified. Recurrence rate for patients treated with eMMA for recurrent CSDH was found to be 2.4%, 95% CI (0.5%; 11.0%), whereas the recurrence rate for patients treated with eMMA for primary CSDH was 4.1%, 95% CI (1.4%; 11.4%)., Conclusion: eMMA is a minimally invasive procedure for treatment of CSDH. Although this study is limited by publication bias, it seems that this procedure may reduce recurrence rates compared with burr hole craniostomy for both primary and recurrent hematomas. A controlled study is warranted.