Search

Background: In this study we integrated the CNV (copy number variation) and WssGWAS (weighted single-step approach for genome-wide association) analyses to increase the knowledge about number of piglets born alive, an economically important reproductive trait with significant impact on production efficiency of pigs., Results: A total of 3892 samples were genotyped with the Porcine SNP80 BeadChip. After quality control, a total of 57,962 high-quality SNPs from 3520 Duroc pigs were retained. The PennCNV algorithm identified 46,118 CNVs, which were aggregated by overlapping in 425 CNV regions (CNVRs) ranging from 2.5 Kb to 9718.4 Kb and covering 197 Mb (~ 7.01%) of the pig autosomal genome. The WssGWAS identified 16 genomic regions explaining more than 1% of the additive genetic variance for number of piglets born alive. The overlap between CNVR and WssGWAS analyses identified common regions on SSC2 (4.2-5.2 Mb), SSC3 (3.9-4.9 Mb), SSC12 (56.6-57.6 Mb), and SSC17 (17.3-18.3 Mb). Those regions are known for harboring important causative variants for pig reproductive traits based on their crucial functions in fertilization, development of gametes and embryos. Functional analysis by the Panther software identified 13 gene ontology biological processes significantly represented in this study such as reproduction, developmental process, cellular component organization or biogenesis, and immune system process, which plays relevant roles in swine reproductive traits., Conclusion: Our research helps to improve the understanding of the genetic architecture of number of piglets born alive, given that the combination of GWAS and CNV analyses allows for a more efficient identification of the genomic regions and biological processes associated with this trait in Duroc pigs. Pig breeding programs could potentially benefit from a more accurate discovery of important genomic regions.

Background: Integrating germplasm populations genotyped by different genotyping platforms via genotype imputation is a way to utilize accumulated genetic resources. In this study, we used 278 canola samples genotyped via whole-genome sequencing (WGS) at 10× coverage to evaluate the imputation accuracy of three imputation approaches. The optimal imputation methods were used to impute and integrate two Canola genotype datasets: a diverse canola collection genotyped by genotyping-by-sequencing via transcriptome (GBS-t) and a double haploid (DH) line collection genotyped with low-coverage WGS (skim-WGS). The genomic predictive ability (GP) and detection power of marker‒trait association (GWAS) of the combined population for blackleg resistance were evaluated., Results: The empirical imputation accuracy (r 2 ) measured as the squared correlation between observed and imputed genotypes was moderate for Minimac3 when imputing from the GBS-t density to the WGS. The accuracy dramatically improved from 0.64 to 0.82 by removing SNPs with poor Minimac3-reported Rsq (Rsq < 0.2) quality statistics. The r 2 for GLIMPSE was higher than that for Beagle when imputing from different low-coverage to full-coverage WGS. We imputed and integrated the diverse canola collection and the DH lines, and the combined population showed similar or slightly greater predictive ability (PA) for blackleg resistance traits than did each of the single populations with ~ 921 K SNPs. Higher marker-trait association (MTA) detection powers were indicated with the combined population; however, similar numbers of MTAs were discovered when each single population was combined in a meta-GWAS., Conclusion: It is feasible to impute and integrate germplasms from different sequencing platforms for downstream analyses. However, genetic heterogeneity across populations could add complexity to the analysis. Increasing the sample size by combining datasets showed slightly greater predictive ability and greater detection power in GWASs in the present study., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2025. The Author(s).)