1. Effects of human pregnancy on the ventilatory chemoreflex response to carbon dioxide
- Author
-
Jensen, Dennis, Wolfe, Larry A., Slatkovska, Lubomira, Webb, Katherine A., Davies, Gregory A.L., and O'Donnell, Denis E.
- Subjects
Respiration -- Research ,Pregnancy -- Health aspects ,Pregnancy -- Research ,Biological sciences - Abstract
This study examined the effects of human pregnancy on the central chemoreflex control of breathing. Subjects were two groups (n = 11) of pregnant subjects (PG, gestational age, 36.5 [+ or -] 0.4 wk) and nonpregnant control subjects (CG), equated for mean age, body height, prepregnant body mass, parity, and aerobic fitness. All subjects performed a hyperoxic C[O.sub.2] rebreathing procedure, which includes prior hyperventilation and maintenance of iso-oxia. Resting blood gases and plasma progesterone and estradiol concentrations were measured. During rebreathing trials, end-tidal PC[O.sub.2] increased, whereas end-tidal P[O.sub.2] was maintained at a constant hyperoxic level. The point at which ventilation ([??]E) began to rise as end-tidal PC[O.sub.2] increased was identified as the central chemoreflex ventilatory recruitment threshold for C[O.sub.2] (VRTC[O.sub.2]). [??]E levels below (basal [??]E) and above (central chemoreflex sensitivity) the VRTC[O.sub.2] were determined. The VRTC[O.sub.2], was significantly lower in the PG vs. CG (40.5 [+ or -] 0.8 vs. 45.8 [+ or -] 1.6 Tow), and both basal [??]E (14.8 [+ or -] 1.1 vs. 9.3 [+ or -] 1.6 l/min) and central chemoreflex sensitivity (5.07 [+ or -] 0.74 vs. 3.16 [+ or -] 0.29 l x [min.sup.-1] x [Torr.sup.-1]) were significantly higher in the PG vs. CG. Pooled data from the two groups showed significant correlations for resting arterial PC[O.sub.2] with basal [??]E, central chemoreflex sensitivity, and the VRTC[O.sub.2]. The VRTC[O.sub.2] was also correlated with progesterone and estradiol concentrations. These data support the hypothesis that pregnancy decreases the threshold and increases the sensitivity of the central chemoreflex response to C[O.sub.2]. These changes may be due to the effects of gestational hormones on chemoreflex and/or nonchemoreflex drives to breathe. human gestation; hyperoxia; chemoreflex sensitivity; ventilatory recruitment threshold
- Published
- 2005