1. Social perception and influence of lies vs. bullshit: a test of the insidious bullshit hypothesis
- Author
-
Petrocelli, John V., Silverman, Haley E., and Shang, Samantha X.
- Subjects
Social perception -- Research ,Psychological research ,Deception -- Psychological aspects ,Psychology and mental health - Abstract
Although a ubiquitous social behavior, little is known about bullshitting (i.e., communicating with no regard for truth and/or evidence) and its effects on social perception and influence. Although bullshit and lies are viewed as undesirable, the distinction may have important implications for social influence. Frankfurt's (1986) insidious bullshit hypothesis (i.e., bullshitting is evaluated less negatively, but more insidious, than lying) is examined in light of social perception (i.e., evaluation and perceived motives; Experiment 1) and social influence (Experiment 2). Results suggest bullshitting is evaluated less negatively than lying and identifies ignorance, dishonesty, and opinion expression as mediators of a bullshit/lie-evaluation link. Furthermore, relative to lies, bullshit appears to have a more potent impact on that which is perceived to be true as well as attitudes formed for novel attitude objects., Author(s): John V. Petrocelli [sup.1] , Haley E. Silverman [sup.1] , Samantha X. Shang [sup.1] Author Affiliations: (1) grid.241167.7, 0000 0001 2185 3318, Department of Psychology, Wake Forest University, , [...]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF