1. A Dynamic Model of Guilt: Implications for Motivation and Self-Regulation in the Context of Prejudice
- Author
-
Amodio, David M., Devine, Patricia G., and Harmon-Jones, Eddie
- Subjects
Psychology and mental health - Abstract
To purchase or authenticate to the full-text of this article, please visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01933.x Byline: David M. Amodio (1), Patricia G. Devine (2), Eddie Harmon-Jones (3) Abstract: ABSTRACT Guilt is widely recognized as an important self-regulatory emotion, yet alternative theoretical accounts view guilt primarily as either a punishment cue or a prosocial motivator. Integrating these views, we propose that guilt functions dynamically to first provide a negative reinforcement cue associated with reduced approach motivation, which transforms into approach-motivated behavior when an opportunity for reparation presents itself. We tested this hypothesis in the context of racial prejudice. White subjects viewed a multiracial series of faces while cortical activity was recorded using electroencephalography. Following bogus feedback indicating anti-Black responses, subjects reported elevated guilt, which was associated with changes in frontal cortical asymmetry indicating reduced approach motivation. When subjects were presented with an opportunity to engage in prejudice-reducing behavior, guilt predicted greater interest in prejudice reduction, which in turn was associated with an approach-related shift in frontal asymmetry. The results support a dynamic model in which guilt is associated with adaptive changes in motivation and behavior. Author Affiliation: (1)New York University (2)University of Wisconsin-Madison (3)Texas A&M University Article History: (R eceived 5/23/06; R evision accepted 11/20/06; F inal materials received 12/4/06) Article note: Address correspondence to David M. Amodio, Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, e-mail: david.amodio@nyu.edu.
- Published
- 2007