Search

Cervical spinal cord injuries (cSCI) severely affect upper limb function, yet research on post-injury neuromotor abilities is limited. In response, we developed an assessment integrating clinical, kinematic and muscle activity measures. Twelve cSCI (C5-C7) and six unimpaired participants underwent a clinical (Range Of Motion and Manual Muscle tests) and an instrumented assessment. During the latter, bilateral upper body kinematics and muscle activity were recorded as participants performed a set of unilateral movements, i.e. reaching movements toward different heights-directions and an object transfer along an arch-shaped structure (arc task). Kinematics and neuromuscular indicators were analyzed following a two-tiered approach: comparing unimpaired and cSCI and differentiating more and less impaired arms within the cSCI cohort based on their ability to complete the arc task. Clinical tests revealed shoulder mobility and strength limitations in cSCI participants, with a significant weakness in elbow extension noted in more impaired arms. The instrumented assessment revealed reduced movement speed, smoothness and accuracy in the cSCI cohort, primarily due to weaknesses in the pectoralis muscle affecting contralateral movements and deltoids affecting ipsilateral movements. Muscle activations were detected in the non-moving arm of cSCI participants, particularly noticeable during movements toward greater heights or in a contralateral direction. The pronounced weakness in the pectoralis muscle of the more impaired cSCI arms explained the related ability to complete only 28% of the arc task. Our findings provide a thorough insight into changes in upper limb neuromotor function following cSCI, underscoring motor deficits and related alterations in bilateral muscle activity.

Cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI) often results in bilateral impairment of the arms, leading to difficulties in performing daily activities. However, little is known about the neuromotor alterations that affect the ability of individuals with cSCI to perform coordinated movements with both arms. To address this issue, we developed and tested a functional assessment that integrates clinical, kinematic, and muscle activity measures, including the evaluation of bilateral arm movements. Twelve subjects with a C5-C7 spinal lesion and six unimpaired subjects underwent an evaluation that included three tests: the Manual Muscle Test, Range Of Motion test and Arm stabilisation test, a subsection of the “Van Lieshout arm/hand function test”. During the latter, we recorded kinematic and muscle activity data from the upper-body during the execution of a set of movements that required participants to stabilize both arms against gravity at different configurations. Analytical methods, including muscle synergies, spinal maps, and Principal Component Analysis, were used to analyse the data. Clinical tests detected limitations in shoulder abduction-flexion of cSCI participants and alterations in elbows-wrists motor function. The instrumented assessment provided insight into how these limitations impacted the ability of cSCI participants to perform bilateral movements. They exhibited severe difficulty in performing movements involving over-the-shoulder motion and shoulder internal rotation due to altered patterns of activity of the scapular stabilizer muscles, latissimus dorsi, pectoralis, and triceps. Our findings shed light on the bilateral neuromotor changes that occur post-cSCI addressing not only motor deficits, but also the underlying abnormal, weak, or silent muscle activations.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune and neurodegenerative disease resulting in motor impairments associated with muscle weakness and lack of movement coordination. The goal of this work was to quantify upper limb motor deficits in asymptomatic MS subjects with a robot-based assessment including performance and muscle synergies analysis. A total of 7 subjects (MS: 3 M−4 F; 42 ± 10 years) with clinically definite MS according to McDonald criteria, but with no clinical disability, and 7 age- and sex-matched subjects without a history of neurological disorders participated in the study. All subjects controlled a cursor on the computer screen by moving their hand or applying forces in 8 coplanar directions at their self-selected speed. They grasped the handle of a robotic planar manipulandum that generated four different environments: null, assistive or resistive forces, and rigid constraint. Simultaneously, the activity of 15 upper body muscles was recorded. Asymptomatic MS subjects generated less smooth and less accurate cursor trajectories than control subjects in controlling a force profile, while the end-point error was significantly different also in the other environments. The EMG analysis revealed different muscle activation patterns in MS subjects when exerting isometric forces or when moving in presence of external forces generated by a robot. While the two populations had the same number and similar structure of muscle synergies, they had different activation profiles. These results suggested that a task requiring to control forces against a rigid environment allows better than movement tasks to detect early sensory-motor signs related to the onset of symptoms of multiple sclerosis and to differentiate between stages of the disease.

This study investigated how stroke’s hemispheric localization affects motor performance, spinal maps and muscle synergies while performing planar reaching with and without assistive or resistive forces. A lesion of the right hemisphere affected performance, reducing average speed and smoothness and augmenting lateral deviation in both arms. Instead, a lesion of the left hemisphere affected the aiming error, impairing the feedforward control of the ipsilesional arm. The structure of the muscle synergies had alterations dependent on the lesion side in both arms. The applied force fields reduced the differences in performance and in muscle activations between arms and among populations. These results support the hypotheses of hemispheric specialization in movement control and identify potential significant biomarkers for the design of more effective and personalized rehabilitation protocols.