Search

Abstract Background Prostate cancer (PCa) is a leading malignancy among men globally, with rising incidence rates emphasizing the critical need for better detection and therapeutic approaches. The roles of HSP90AB1 and PARP1 in prostate cancer cells suggest potential targets for enhancing treatment efficacy. Methods This study investigated the overexpression of HSP90AB1 and PARP1 in prostate cancer cells and the impact of HSP90AB1 knockdown on the sensitivity of these cells to the PARP inhibitor olaparib. We also explored the combined effect of olaparib and celastrol, an HSP90 inhibitor, on the clonogenic survival, migration, proliferation, and overall viability of prostate cancer cells, alongside the modulation of the PI3K/AKT pathway. An in vivo PC3 xenograft mouse model was used to assess the antitumor effects of the combined treatment. Results Our findings revealed significant overexpression of HSP90AB1 and PARP1 in prostate cancer cells. Knockdown of HSP90AB1 increased cell sensitivity to olaparib. The combination of olaparib and celastrol significantly reduced prostate cancer cell survival, migration, proliferation, and enhanced cumulative DNA damage. Celastrol also downregulated the PI3K/AKT pathway, increasing cell susceptibility to olaparib. In vivo experiments demonstrated that celastrol and olaparib together exerted strong antitumor effects. Conclusions The study indicates that targeting both HSP90AB1 and PARP1 presents a promising therapeutic strategy for prostate cancer. The synergistic combination of celastrol and olaparib enhances the efficacy of treatment against prostate cancer, offering a potent approach to combat this disease.

Abstract Although overall survival data are still premature, the PROpel study found radiological progression-free survival (PFS) benefits of abiraterone and olaparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, for patients who have not been genetically tested or lack BRCA1/2 mutations (BRCAm), this combination therapy has been questioned as a first-line conventional treatment for mCRPC, mainly due to significant health economics and side effects. In our retrospective study, we found that treatment with low-dose abiraterone plus olaparib as a late-line treatment for mCRPC could lead to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and symptom PFS in selective cases even without BRCAm. The median PSA–PFS was 8 months (IQR: 6.5–11.5), with a median follow-up duration of 39.0 months (IQR: 27.5–64.5). Gene tests were conducted in all patients, identifying non-BRCA mutations through ctDNA testing (24%), tumor tissue testing (12%), or both (64%). Adverse events occurred in 72% of patients, with 16% experiencing Grade ≥ 3 events. Common adverse events included anemia (64%), decreased appetite (48%), and fatigue (25%). Our findings support low-dose abiraterone plus olaparib as a potential option for mCRPC patients without BRCAm, offering manageable safety and efficacy profiles.

Introduction: Breast cancer is the second most common cause of central nervous system (CNS) metastases. It has been shown that the median time from breast cancer diagnosis to CNS metastasis is 30.9 months and that the overall median survival after metastasis is extremely poor at 6.8 months. Although treatment options for ErbB2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 2 (ERBB2)-positive breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) have been reported, effective treatment options for ERBB2-negative BCBM, which has one of the worst prognoses, are limited. Olaparib is one of the standard treatments for germline BRCA1/2 mutated (gBRCA1/2mt), ERBB2-negative, metastatic, or recurrent breast cancer. However, there is minimal existing evidence to evaluate the efficacy of olaparib in BCBM. Case Presentation: In our report, we assessed the case of a Japanese woman in her early 30s, ERBB2-negative, gBRAC2mt-positive BCBM, who achieved a complete response and prolonged progression-free survival of 9 months after the initiation of treatment with olaparib. Conclusions: Thus, our case report demonstrated the significant efficacy of olaparib in BCBM treatment. Furthermore, we highlighted the need for more studies to investigate the efficacy of olaparib and explore the efficacy of poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors in BCBM.

Olaparib, an oral poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, is a relatively new anticancer drug. It is essential to find TDM-guided dosage for better safety and tolerability of patients. However, first, it is important to develop a suitable analytical method to conduct reliable TDM. The aim of the study was the validation of UPLC-MS/MS method for TDM of olaparib in patients with ovarian cancer, with a particular attention to optimization of recovery. The validation of the method under analysis were accomplished by the ICH guidelines. The recovery of olaparib was optimized with the Central Composite Design (CCD). The TDM study was conducted on 10 patients with ovarian cancer treated with olaparib. The method validation was characterized by good precision (CV

A 74-year-old woman, who had been receiving olaparib for the treatment of ovarian cancer for more than a year, visited the emergency department complaining of a fever that had lasted for 1 month. She had been taking antipyretics and antibiotics for her fever, but without any effect. Although she had no symptoms other than fever, she had stopped taking olaparib for 1 week before her visit because she had developed anemia caused by myelosuppression from olaparib. After discontinuing olaparib, her maximum body temperature decreased. On admission, chest X-ray revealed no abnormalities, but chest CT showed diffuse ground-glass opacities. Chest CT taken 5 days later showed partial improvement; therefore, we diagnosed her with interstitial lung disease (ILD) associated with olaparib. After short-term steroid treatment, the ground-glass opacities disappeared, and the patient became afebrile. The CT scan taken for tumor evaluation 2 days before the onset of fever showed a few centrilobular nodular opacities and small patchy ground-glass opacities. These findings could indicate early lesions of ILD, but they seemed inconspicuous and nonspecific, and it might have been difficult to diagnose ILD then. To date, few cases of ILD associated with olaparib have been reported. However, based on previous reports, fever is often seen, and CT findings mainly comprise diffuse ground-glass opacities, and in some cases, centrilobular nodular shadows. Thus, in conjunction with the findings of the present case, these characteristics may be representative of olaparib-induced ILD.

The high metabolic requirements of cancer cells result in excess accumulation of H+ in the tumor microenvironment. Therefore, the extracellular pH of solid tumors is acidic, whereas the pH of normal tissues is more alkaline. The acidic tumor environment is correlated with tumor metastasis, immune escape, and chemoresistance, but the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Herein, we demonstrate that sodium bicarbonate, a weakly alkaline compound, induces cytotoxicity in ovarian cancer cells and hinders cancer migration and invasion in vitro. The anti-cancer efficacy of Olaparib can be significantly augmented when combined with sodium bicarbonate. In vivo experiments suggest that the combinatorial treatment of sodium bicarbonate and Olaparib is biocompatible and more effective at inhibiting ovarian cancer growth than either treatment alone. Additionally, RNA-sequencing results reveal that the differentially expressed genes are enriched in pathways related to reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, such as the cGMP/PKG pathway. The combined treatment increases M1 macrophage composition in tumors and reduces the accumulation of excessive ROS. These findings strongly suggest that sodium bicarbonate holds great potential as an adjuvant treatment by scavenging ROS accumulation and promoting M1 macrophage composition, thereby enhancing Olaparib’s anti-cancer activity.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of olaparib plus trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) and germinal BRCA mutations (gBRCAm). Methods: OPHELIA (NCT03931551) was a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial. Patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with HER2-positive ABC with germinal deleterious mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 who had received at least one prior systemic regimen for advanced disease were enrolled. Patients received olaparib plus trastuzumab until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed clinical benefit rate for at least 24 weeks as per RECIST v.1.1. Key secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and safety profile. Results: A total of 68 pre-treated HER2-positive ABC patients were screened. Due to slow accrual the trial was stopped after enrolling 5 patients instead of the planned sample size of 20. Four patients achieved clinical benefit (80.0 %, 95 % CI; 28.4–99.5, p

BackgroundThe landscape of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor treatment for ovarian cancer (OC) is continually evolving. This research aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors compared to placebo as a maintenance therapy for OC patients.MethodsWe conducted a search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving the use of PARP inhibitors as maintenance therapy in OC patients, up to 16 June 2024. Data regarding progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), chemotherapy-free interval (CFI), time to first subsequent therapy or death (TFST), time to second subsequent therapy or death (TSST), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were aggregated. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for PFS, OS, CFI, TFST, and TSST. Additionally, the relative risk (RR) and 95% CI for TEAEs were determined.ResultsThis meta-analysis encompassed 20 RCTs involving 7,832 participants. The overall analysis demonstrated that maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitors led to significant improvements in PFS (HR: 0.398, 95% CI = 0.339–0.467, 95% PI = 0.219–0.724), OS (HR: 0.677, 95% CI = 0.582–0.788, 95% PI = 0.546–0.839), CFI (HR: 0.417, 95% CI = 0.368–0.472, 95% PI = 0.265–0.627), TFST (HR: 0.441, 95% CI = 0.391–0.498, 95% PI = 0.308–0.632), and TSST (HR: 0.574, 95% CI = 0.507–0.649, 95% PI = 0.488–0.674) compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses further indicated that PARP inhibitor maintenance treatment significantly improved PFS, regardless of homologous recombination status (all p < 0.05). However, the risks of any grade (RR = 1.046, 95% CI = 1.032–1.059, 95% PI = 1.028–1.055) and grade ≥3 TEAEs (RR = 2.931, 95% CI = 2.641–3.253, 95% PI = 2.128–3.792) were increased by PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy compared to placebo.ConclusionOur research elucidated the benefits of maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitors in patients with OC, showing improvements in PFS, OS, CFI, TFST, and TSST. Vigilance regarding TEAEs is paramount for clinicians implementing PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy in clinical practice.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024560286.

Summary: Background: We aimed to assess real-world efficacy of the PARP inhibitor, olaparib, in US Veterans with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) by leveraging the national data repository and evaluate a novel approach to assess treatment efficacy in tumors considered rare or harboring rare mutations. Methods: Included Veterans had 1) mPC with somatic or germline alterations/mutations in genes involved in homologous recombination repair (HRR), 2) received olaparib monotherapy as well as a novel hormonal therapy/androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (NHT/ARPI), and/or chemotherapy, and 3) estimable rates of tumor growth (g-rate) using PSA values obtained while receiving treatment. Previous work has shown an excellent inverse correlation of g-rate with survival. Using g-rate, we determined tumor doubling time (DT) and DT ratios (DT on olaparib/DT on prior medication). We postulated that a DT ratio ≥ 1 was associated with benefit. Findings: We identified 139 Veterans, including 42 Black males with tumors harboring mutations/alterations in HRR genes who received olaparib: BRCA2 (50), ATM (32), BRCA1 (10), other mutations (47). 62/139 (45%) of all and 21/42 (50%) of Black Veterans had DT ratios ≥1, including 31, 10, 2, and 19 with BRCA2, ATM, BRCA1, and other mutations, respectively (p = 0.006). Median survival with DT ratios ≥1 was superior, being 24.5 vs. 11.4 months for DT ratio

Abstract Background The prospective phase III multi-centre L-MOCA trial (NCT03534453) has demonstrated the encouraging efficacy and manageable safety profile of olaparib maintenance therapy in the Asian (mainly Chinese) patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (PSROC). In this study, we report the preplanned exploratory biomarker analysis of the L-MOCA trial, which investigated the effects of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on olaparib efficacy. Methods HRD status was determined using the ACTHRD assay, an enrichment-based targeted next-generation sequencing assay. PD-L1 expression was assessed by SP263 immunohistochemistry assay. PD-L1 expression positivity was defined by the PD-L1 expression on ≥ 1% of immune cells. Kaplan–Meier method was utilised to analyse progression-free survival (PFS). Results This exploratory biomarker analysis included 225 patients and tested HRD status [N = 190; positive, N = 125 (65.8%)], PD-L1 expression [N = 196; positive, N = 56 (28.6%)], and BRCA1/2 mutation status (N = 219). The HRD-positive patients displayed greater median PFS than the HRD-negative patients [17.9 months (95% CI: 14.5–22.1) versus 9.2 months (95% CI: 7.5–13.8)]. PD-L1 was predominantly expressed on immune cells. Positive PD-L1 expression on immune cells was associated with shortened median PFS in the patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations [14.5 months (95% CI: 7.4–18.2) versus 22.2 months (95% CI: 18.3–NA)]. Conversely, positive PD-L1 expression on immune cells was associated with prolonged median PFS in the patients with wild-type BRCA1/2 [20.9 months (95% CI: 13.9–NA) versus 8.3 months (95% CI: 6.7–13.8)]. Conclusions HRD remained an effective biomarker for enhanced olaparib efficacy in the Asian patients with PSROC. Positive PD-L1 expression was associated with decreased olaparib efficacy in the patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations but associated with improved olaparib efficacy in the patients with wild-type BRCA1/2. Trial registration NCT03534453. Registered at May 23, 2018.

Prostate cancer (PC) has risen to become the second most common neoplasm in men, trailing only lung cancer. Individuals with advanced prostate cancer, particularly those who are resistant to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), also known as castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), have very few treatment options and a poor prognosis. Notably, advances in phase III clinical trials have highlighted the pronounced efficacy of poly adenosine diphosphate-ribose (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in CRPC patients harbouring homologous recombination repair (HRR)-related genetic aberrations. However, HRR-related mutations occur in only 20–25% of CRPC patients. It is crucial to reduce resistance to PARP inhibitors and make them available to other CRPC patients. Testicular nuclear receptor 4 (TR4), an important molecular player involved in tumorigenesis, metastasis and chemoresistance, has emerged as a focus of investigation. Our study indicated that in prostate cancer cell lines treated with olaparib treatment, TR4 expression increased as olaparib concentrations increased. Targeting TR4 expression can alter the in vitro sensitivity of prostate cancer cell lines to olaparib. Further investigation of the molecular mechanisms revealed that down-regulating TR4 gene expression can enhance the in vitro sensitivity of prostate cancer cell lines to olaparib, which is mediated by the inhibition of the Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM)/Ataxia Telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) pathway. This study provides a novel sensitization therapeutic strategy for CRPC patients who are resistant to PARP inhibitors.

Background: The results of the OlympiA study led to the approval of a PARP inhibitor (olaparib) as adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer (eBC) at high risk of relapse in patients with a germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm). However, the proportion of patients in routine practice who meet the “high-risk” criteria applied in the OlympiA study, and for whom gBRCAm testing would now be mandatory, remains unknown. Patients and methods: In this population-based study, we use unique data from the French specialized Côte d'Or Breast and Gynecological Cancer Registry, to assess the real-life proportion, and long-term prognosis of patients treated for eBC between 2005 and 2015 with standard treatment, and at “high risk” of relapse according to the OlympiA trial criteria. Results: We included 3483 patients treated for HER2-negative eBC (N = 380 with ER-, and N = 3103 with ER + tumor). We found N = 62 (1.8 %) patients with gBRCA1/2 mutations. A total of 494 patients (14.2 %) were classified as “high risk” according to the Olympia criteria; 55 % with ER-tumors, and 9.1 % with ER + tumors, respectively. Despite more intensive systemic treatments in “high risk” patients, 10-year overall survival was much worse in these “high risk” patients compared to the others: 60.1 % vs 83.8 % in ER-tumors, and 55.4 % vs 84.1 % in ER + tumors. Our estimates of net survival show an even greater difference. Conclusion: This study provides real-life insights into the prevalence and prognosis of patients with high-risk eBC, in a context where the approval of adjuvant olaparib requires careful reorganization of care, so as not to overlook a patient with gBRCAm who could benefit from adjuvant olaparib.

IntroductionThe objective of this systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) is to assess the effectiveness and safety of various neoadjuvant treatment protocols in individuals diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive, her2 negative(HR+/HER2-) breast cancer.Materials and methodsA systematic search was conducted in four databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL) from the inception of the databases to January 16, 2024, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to various neoadjuvant therapy options in patients diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. A network meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate pathological complete response (pCR).ResultsThere were 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in the analysis. These trials examined 16 different treatment regimens and involved a total of 5752 participants. The analysis revealed that the six most effective neoadjuvant treatment regimens for HR+/HER2- breast cancer were: CT(A)+olaparib (82.5%), CT(A)+nivolumab (76.5%), Com (74.9%), CT (72.1%), Mono+eribulin (72.0%), and CT(A)+pembrolizumab (70.4%).Paired meta-analysis for pathological complete response (pCR) found no statistically significant distinction between treatment regimens that included both anthracycline and immunosuppressants and regimens that relied solely on anthracycline chemotherapy(OR:1.14, 95%ci 0.79-1.64, I2 = 71%, P=0.50). Similarly, there was no significant difference between platinum-based chemotherapy and anthracycline-basedchemotherapy(OR:1.37, 95%ci 0.53- 3.56, I2 = 11%, P=0.52). With regards to safety, adverse effects of grade 3-5 were observed, which included haematological toxicity, gastrointestinal reactions, skin and mucous membrane reactions, neuropathy, hepatotoxicity, and cardiac disorders.ConclusionsThe CT(A)+Olaparib and CT(A)+nivolumab groups demonstrated superior efficacy in neoadjuvant therapy for HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Furthermore, it is crucial to focus on effectively managing the adverse effects of the treatment plan to enhance patient’s ability to tolerate it. Given the constraints of the current research, additional well-executed and suitable RCTs are necessary to validate the findings of this investigation. Although pCR is valuable in assessing the effect of neoadjuvant therapy in some cases, prognostic prediction and efficacy assessment in patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer should be based on a combination of broader clinical and biological characteristics.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024534539, CRD42024501740.

IntroductionThe incidence of brain metastases in ovarian cancer is quite rare, being approximately 1%–2%. According to retrospective studies, patients with BRCA 1/2 mutations present a higher risk. The trimodal approach based on surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy presents better outcomes, but the prognosis remains poor with overall survival since the brain progression is around 1 year. Poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have provided a new alternative for the management of advanced ovarian cancer. The SOLO2, NOVA, and ARIEL3 clinical trials do not refer data on patients with brain metastases, and the published evidence for PARPi in this setting comes only from case reports and retrospective studies.Case reportWe present the case of a 54-year-old woman with stage IV ovarian high-grade serous papillary carcinoma who, after 37 months of treatment with olaparib, presented a single brain lesion. After radical treatment with surgery and adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy, she resumed olaparib with no evidence of disease during 15 months. After a second single brain relapse treated with stereotactic radiosurgery, the patient continued olaparib beyond the brain progression with no evidence of extracranial disease. Despite that there were no changes in size or number of brain lesions, the neurological situation progressively worsened and the patient died 8 months after the second progression.DiscussionThe higher incidence of brain metastases of ovarian cancer points out a possible tropism for the CNS in BRCA-mutated patients. In preclinical studies, PARPi has shown to cross the blood–brain barrier, with possible antitumor activity in the central nervous system (CNS) while maintaining control of extracranial disease. The best survival data are obtained with a trimodal approach, and adding a PARPi could improve the survival outcomes in the context of platinum-sensitivity disease. Targeted therapies combined with local treatments are also used in other malignancies, suggesting potential effectiveness due to tumor heterogeneity. PARPi before brain metastasis may delay its diagnosis, and using iPARP after brain metastases could improve the outcome of this population.ConclusionThe role that PARPi may have in the treatment of brain metastases of ovarian cancer requires more studies. In the context of radical treatment of brain metastasis (surgery and/or RT), with no evidence of extracranial disease, maintaining treatment with PARPi beyond the brain progression should be considered.

Brain metastasis from ovarian cancer is a very rare condition with a poor prognosis. However, due to its rarity, there is no established treatment strategy. We present a case series of brain metastasis with ovarian cancer, focusing on two long-term survivors treated with multimodal therapy. Among the nine cases, the median survival time after brain metastases was six months (range: 0–58 months). Eight patients had high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). Three of the four patients who underwent genetic testing tested positive for germline BRCA2 (gBRCA2) mutation. Two patients survived longer than 4 years after the diagnosis of brain metastases. Both of these patients received chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and olaparib, a molecularly targeted drug, as maintenance therapy. This case series suggests that patients with gBRCA2 mutation-positive HGSC may be at a high risk of developing brain metastases. A multidisciplinary approach, including PARP inhibitors, may improve the prognosis of patients with brain metastases from ovarian cancer.

Considering the current and future therapeutic options that are or will be available in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer, this document reports on the insights from two multi-regional expert meetings aimed at investigating possible problems of access to the treatment pathway involving the BRCA (BReast CAncer) test. The experts stated that the update of the AIOM guidelines (diagnostic and therapeutic innovations) will require a correction of clinicians’ behaviors and a partial reorganization of the current Integrated Care Pathways (ICPs). From this point of view, the update of the AIOM GLs could supply to Regions and, above all, to all cancer networks a valid rationale for starting a process of harmonization of ICPs aimed at guaranteeing the rapid access to treatments by improving the quality of the service provided by the National Health Service (SSN). To ensure to breast cancer patients a rapid access to the latest approved treatments, experts believe that it will be necessary to update the access pathway to genetic tests. This could lead to an increase in the use of genetic tests, creating one of the main organizational and economic challenge that regions and cancer networks will have to face.

Abstract Background Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a highly aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. BRCA1/2 mutations are associated with impaired DNA double-strand break repair and are among the common mutations in penile cancer, potentially paving the way for poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor therapy. Case presentation We report a 65-year-old male with PSCC who progressed to thigh metastasis at 10 months after partial penectomy. Next-generation sequencing showed that the penis primary lesion and metastatic thigh lesion harboured a BRCA2 mutation. Chemotherapy plus immunotherapy was used for treatment, and the thigh metastasis was found to involve no tumour. Progression-free survival (PFS) lasted for 8 months until the appearance of lung metastasis. Afterwards, the patient benefited from second-line therapy of olaparib with pembrolizumab and anlotinib, and his disease was stable for 9 months. The same BRCA2 was identified in the lung biopsy. Given the tumour mutation burden (TMB, 13.97 mutation/Mb), the patient received third-line therapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, but PFS only lasted for 3 months, with the appearance of right frontal brain metastasis. Then, the patient was treated with radiation sequential fluzoparib therapy as fourth-line treatment, and the treatment efficacy was evaluated as PR. Currently, this patient is still alive. Conclusions This is the first report of penile cancer with BRCA2 mutation, receiving a combination treatment with olaparib and experiencing a benefit for 9 months. This case underscores the pivotal role of BRCA2 in influencing treatment response in PSCC, providing valuable insights into the application of targeted therapies in managing recurrent PSCC with BRCA2 alterations. This elucidation establishes a crucial foundation for further research and clinical considerations in similar cases.

Abstract Background Ovarian cancer is the eighth leading cause of cancer-related death among women, characterized by late diagnosis and a high relapse rate. In randomized controlled trials, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in treating advanced ovarian cancer. Methods This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021283150), included all phase II and phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of PARPi on ovarian cancer until the 13th of April, 2022. The main outcomes were progression- free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs), and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The random-effects model was applied in all analyses. Results In the meta-analysis, 16 eligible RCTs were included, with a total of 5,815 patients. In recurrent ovarian cancer, PARPi maintenance therapy showed a significant PFS benefit over placebo in the total population (HR 0.34, CI 0.29–0.40), BRCA mutant (HR 0.24, CI 0.18–0.31), germline BRCA mutant (HR 0.23, CI 0.18–0.30), and BRCA wild-type cases (HR 0.50, CI 0.39–0.65). PARPi monotherapy also improved PFS (HR 0.62, CI 0.51–0.76) compared with chemotherapy in BRCAm patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. The use of PARPi maintenance therapy resulted in an improvement in PFS over placebo in newly-diagnosed cancers in the overall population (HR 0.46, CI 0.30–0.71) and the BRCAm population (HR 0.36, CI 0.29–0.44). Although the risk of severe AEs was increased by PARPi therapy compared to placebo in most settings investigated, these side effects were controllable with dose modification, and treatment discontinuation was required in the minority of cases. Conclusions PARPis are an effective therapeutic option for newly-diagnosed and recurrent ovarian cancer. Despite a minor increase in the frequency of serious adverse effects, they are generally well tolerated.

We present the case of a 75-year-old female with simultaneous EGFR-mutated stage IV lung cancer and advanced BRCA2-mutated ovarian cancer, treated with a unique regimen. In this case report, the patient was treated with alternating months of osimertinib and olaparib to control her lung and ovarian cancers, respectively. When both diseases showed progression, the patient underwent a trial of concurrent therapy with both drugs, yet this was discontinued due to patient-reported adverse side effects. Combination targeted drug therapy may be required to treat complex diagnoses such as dual malignancies. However, combination drug therapy consisting of osimertinib and olaparib has not previously been explored. This case report represents the first to demonstrate osimertinib and olaparib combination therapy as a unique treatment regimen for concurrent lung and ovarian cancers. These two drugs can either be given in an alternating way or given together, short-term, with a higher but tolerable toxicity profile.

Background and purpose: In this manuscript we describe the academic French multicentric molecular analysis platforms including PROFILER, promoted by Centre Léon Berard, and the multicentric personalized medicine trials MOST, MOST Plus and MEGAMOST. Patients/material and methods: MOST, MOST Plus and MEGAMOST comprise 14 cohorts with different targeted agents and immunotherapies. Results and interpretation: PROFILER has recruited 5,991 patients in 10 years, MOST and MOST Plus 875 patients since 2014 and MEGAMOST 172 patients since 2020, and are still ongoing. We provide a description of the local, national and international implications of these initiatives, and we review the results of the sorafenib and olaparib cohorts.

BReast CAncer (BRCA)1 and BRCA2 gene pathogenic variants account for most hereditary breast cancers (BC). Identification of BRCA mutations can significantly influence both prognosis and treatment outcomes. Furthermore, it enables the identification of individuals who are at heightened risk of developing BC due to inherited genetic mutations. Many developing countries rely on western guidelines for BRCA testing and BC management; however, there exist wide disparities in the prevalence of risk factors, availability of medical resources, and practice patterns. Guidelines tailored to specific regions can help mitigate healthcare variations, promote consistency in treatment, and aid healthcare providers in identifying effective therapies for improving patient outcomes. Hence, oncologists from the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) congregated virtually in March 2023 and reviewed existing data on the epidemiology of BC, BRCA mutations, practices and challenges associated with BRCA testing and management of BRCA mutated early-stage BC in the GCC region. They also provided insights on the real-world diagnostic and treatment practices and challenges in the GCC region in the BRCA-mutated early-stage BC domain and suggested some variations to international guidelines to aid their uptake in this region.

Key Clinical Message In a patient with metastatic breast cancer, an acquired BRCA mutation in the BRCA gene was detected, resulting in benefits from olaparib treatment. This underscores the importance of ongoing genetic phenotype testing after paclitaxel chemotherapy. Abstract Triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with a poor prognosis and elevated mortality risk. BRCA mutations are commonly regarded as prevalent mutations in TNBC patients, strongly associated with congenital familial heredity. Dynamic changes in mutation sites, however, are rarely reported. In this case report, we report a 59‐year‐old TNBC patient who developed pulmonary metastases post‐chemoradiotherapy. No BRCA mutations were detected through NGS. After 7.6 months of nab‐paclitaxel treatment, the patient experienced progression of lung metastases, and BRCA mutations were detected through NGS testing. Subsequent administration of olaparib resulted in a reduction in lung metastasis, demonstrating significant therapeutic efficacy. This case underscores the infrequent occurrence of treatment‐induced BRCA mutations and emphasizes the significance of dynamic NGS genetic testing for real‐time assessment of a patient's mutational status.

Abstract Background Poly (ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have been increasingly used in the treatment of ovarian cancer, with BRCA positivity and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) being common biomarkers used for predicting their efficacy. However, given the limitations of these biomarkers, new ones need to be explored. Methods This retrospective study included 181 ovarian cancer patients who received olaparib or niraparib at two independent hospitals in Japan between May 2018 and December 2022. Clinical information and blood sampling data were collected. Patient characteristics, treatment history, and predictability of treatment duration based on blood data before treatment initiation were examined. Results High‐grade serous carcinoma, BRCA positivity, HRD, and maintenance therapy after recurrence treatment were observed more frequently in the olaparib group than in the niraparib group. The most common reasons for treatment interruption were anemia, fatigue, and nausea in the olaparib group and thrombocytopenia in the niraparib group. Regarding response to olaparib treatment, complete response to the most recent treatment, maintenance therapy after the first chemotherapy, high‐grade serous carcinoma, and germline BRCA positivity were observed significantly more frequently among responders than among non‐responders. Furthermore, neutrophil counts were significantly higher among responders than among non‐responders. Conclusions Inflammation‐related blood data, such as neutrophil count, obtained at the initial pre‐treatment visit might serve as potential predictors for prolonged olaparib treatment. While this study offers valuable insights into potential indicators for prolonged olaparib treatment, it underscores the need for more expansive research to strengthen our understanding of PARP inhibitors and optimize treatment strategies in ovarian cancer.

Abstract A 66‐year‐old woman was found to have abnormal shadows on a chest radiograph at a previous hospital 4 years ago, which led to a diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma, cT2aN1M1b stage IVA. First‐line treatment included carboplatin and paclitaxel plus thoracic radiotherapy and stereotactic radiation therapy for brain metastases. The patient later underwent second‐line pemetrexed treatment, followed by third‐line nivolumab, fourth‐line docetaxel and bevacizumab, fifth‐line tegafur‐gimeracil‐oteracil, and sixth‐line gemcitabine. Two years ago, after observing an increase in the primary lesion and carcinoembryonic antigen levels (104.0 ng/mL), a computed tomography‐guided biopsy was performed from the primary site of lung cancer. A cancer genomic profiling test (FoundationOne® CDx cancer genome profile) revealed a breast cancer susceptibility (BRCA) 2 gene mutation. Therefore, she started taking olaparib. The treatment led to stable disease for approximately 2 years.

Background: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor and antiangiogenic agent monotherapy have shown to be effective as maintenance treatment in patients with ovarian cancer (OC). However, there is currently a lack of evidence-based study to directly compare the effects of combination therapy with these two drugs. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with PARP inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents in women with OC using a meta-analysis.Methods: An exhaustive search of literature was undertaken using multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify pertinent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up until 17 December 2023. The data on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were pooled. We computed the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for PFS and OS, along with the relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs for AEs. Trial sequential analysis, heterogeneity test, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias assessment were performed. Stata 12.0 and Software R 4.3.1 were utilized for all analyses.Results: This meta-analysis included 7 RCTs with a total of 3,388 participants. The overall analysis revealed that combination therapy of PARP inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents significantly improved PFS (HR = 0.615, 95% CI = 0.517–0.731; 95% PI = 0.379–0.999), but also increased the risk of AEs, including urinary tract infection (RR = 1.500, 95% CI = 1.114–2.021; 95% PI = 0.218–10.346), fatigue (RR = 1.264, 95% CI = 1.141–1.400; 95% PI = 1.012–1.552), headache (RR = 1.868, 95% CI = 1.036–3.369; 95% PI = 0.154–22.642), anorexia (RR = 1.718, 95% CI = 1.320–2.235; 95% PI = 0.050–65.480), and hypertension (RR = 5.009, 95% CI = 1.103–22.744; 95% PI = 0.016–1580.021) compared with PARP inhibitor or antiangiogenic agent monotherapy. Our study has not yet confirmed the benefit of combination therapy on OS in OC patients (HR = 0.885, 95% CI = 0.737–1.063). Additionally, subgroup analyses further showed that combination therapy resulted in an increased risk of AEs, encompassing thrombocytopenia, vomiting, abdominal pain, proteinuria, fatigue, headache, anorexia, and hypertension (all p < 0.05).Conclusion: Our study demonstrated the PFS benefit of combination therapy with PARP inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents in patients with OC. The OS result need to be updated after the original trial data is mature. Clinicians should be vigilant of AEs when administering the combination therapy in clinical practice.Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42023494482.

Weimin Fang,1,2,&ast; Jinghao Wang,3,&ast; Xiaocong Ma,1,2 Ni Shao,1,2 Kunlin Ye,1,2 Dong Zhang,1,2 Changzheng Shi,1,2 Liangping Luo1,2 1Medical Imaging Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; 2The Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Molecular and Functional Imaging for Clinical Translation, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Pharmacy, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Changzheng Shi, Medical Imaging Center, The Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Molecular and Functional Imaging for Clinical Translation, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China, Email tsczcn@jnu.edu.cn Liangping Luo, Medical Imaging Center, The Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Molecular and Functional Imaging for Clinical Translation, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China. Department of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China, Email tluolp@jnu.edu.cnBackground: Olaparib, a poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor has demonstrated promising efficacy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) carrying breast cancer gene (BRCA) mutations. However, its impact on BRCA wild-type (BRCAwt) TNBC is limited. Hence, it is crucial to sensitize BRCAwt TNBC cells to olaparib for effective clinical practice. Novobiocin, a DNA polymerase theta (POLθ) inhibitor, exhibits sensitivity towards BRCA-mutated cancer cells that have acquired resistance to PARP inhibitors. Although both of these DNA repair inhibitors demonstrate therapeutic efficacy in BRCA-mutated cancers, their nanomedicine formulations’ antitumor effects on wild-type cancer remain unclear. Furthermore, ensuring effective drug accumulation and release at the cancer site is essential for the clinical application of olaparib.Materials and Methods: Herein, we designed a progressively disassembled nanosystem of DNA repair inhibitors as a novel strategy to enhance the effectiveness of olaparib in BRCAwt TNBC. The nanosystem enabled synergistic delivery of two DNA repair inhibitors olaparib and novobiocin, within an ultrathin silica framework interconnected by disulfide bonds.Results: The designed nanosystem demonstrated remarkable capabilities, including long-term molecular storage and specific drug release triggered by the tumor microenvironment. Furthermore, the nanosystem exhibited potent inhibitory effects on cell viability, enhanced accumulation of DNA damage, and promotion of apoptosis in BRCAwt TNBC cells. Additionally, the nanosystem effectively accumulated within BRCAwt TNBC, leading to significant growth inhibition and displaying vascular regulatory abilities as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Conclusion: Our results provided the inaugural evidence showcasing the potential of a progressively disassembled nanosystem of DNA repair inhibitors, as a promising strategy for the treatment of BRCA wild-type triple-negative breast cancer.Keywords: olaparib, novobiocin, tumor microenvironment, disulfide bonds, drug release, magnetic resonance

Based on the results of the NETTER-1 trial, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with Lutetium-177 (177Lu) – DOTATATE is authorized for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors (NET) grade 1 (G1) and grade 2 (G2) of the intestine. After the failure of 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy, targeted alpha-particle therapy (TAT) may be a possible treatment option. Here, we present a patient with cancer of unknown primary NET G2 later G3. The patient was referred to our hospital with urosepsis due to a second-degree urinary retention. After stent insertion, a contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a huge pelvic tumor without metastases. Initially, the patient had undergone surgical treatment. Later the patient developed liver metastasis and was treated by 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy and four lines of systemic therapy. A disease progression was observed and with the knowledge of a germline BRCA1 mutation, the patient was treated with TAT (Actinium-225 [225Ac]-DOTATATE) combined with olaparib. The patient achieved a significant treatment response for 12 months indicating that a combination therapy with an alpha emitter and olaparib demands further investigations in clinical trials.

Francisco Quiñonero,1,2,&ast; Belén Parra-Torrejón,3,&ast; Gloria B Ramírez-Rodríguez,3 Victor Garcés,3 José M Delgado-López,3 Cristina Jiménez-Luna,1,2,4 Gloria Perazzoli,1,2,4 Consolación Melguizo,1,2,4 Jose Prados,1,2,4 Raul Ortíz1,2,4 1Institute of Biopathology and Regenerative Medicine (IBIMER), Center of Biomedical Research (CIBM), University of Granada, Granada, 18100, Spain; 2Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ibs.GRANADA), Granada, 18014, Spain; 3Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Granada, Granada, 18071, Spain; 4Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, 18071, Spain&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: José M Delgado-López, Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Granada, Granada, 18071, Spain, Email jmdl@ugr.esIntroduction: Pancreatic cancer (PC) shows a very poor response to current treatments. Development of drug resistance is one of the causes of the therapy failure, being PARP1 (poly ADP-ribose polymerase 1) a relevant protein in the resistance mechanism. In this work, we have functionalized calcium phosphate-based nanoparticles (NPs) with Olaparib (OLA, a PARP-1 inhibitor) in combination with ascorbic acid (AA), a pro-oxidative agent, to enhance their individual effects.Methods: Amorphous Calcium Phosphate (ACP) NPs were synthesized through a biomimetic approach and then functionalized with OLA and AA (NP-ACP-OLA-AA). After evaluation of the loading capacity and release kinetic, cytotoxicity, cell migration, immunofluorescence, and gene expression assays were performed using pancreatic tumor cell lines. In vivo studies were carried out on tumors derived from the PANC-1 line in NOD SCID gamma (NSG) mice.Results: NP-ACP-OLA-AA was loaded with 13%wt of OLA (75% loading efficiency) and 1% of AA, respectively. The resulting dual nanosystem exhibited a gradual release of OLA and AA, being the latter protected from degradation in solution. This ensured the simultaneous availability of OLA and AA for a longer period, at least, during the entire time of in vitro cell experiments (72 hours). In vitro studies indicated that NP-ACP-OLA-AA showed the best cytotoxic effect outperforming that of the free OLA and a higher genotoxicity and apoptosis-mediated cytotoxic effect in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cell line. Interestingly, the in vivo assays using immunosuppressed mice with PANC-1-induced tumors revealed that NP-ACP-OLA-AA produced a higher tumor volume reduction (59.1%) compared to free OLA (28.3%) and increased the mice survival.Conclusion: Calcium phosphate NPs, a highly biocompatible and biodegradable system, were an ideal vector for the OLA and AA co-treatment in PC, inducing significant therapeutic benefits relative to free OLA, including cytotoxicity, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of cell migration, tumor growth, and survival.Graphical Abstract: Keywords: nanomedicine, calcium phosphate nanocarriers, Olaparib, ascorbic acid, synergistic effect, pancreatic cancer

Ovarian cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies in women. The treatment landscape underwent significant changes as new agents were introduced in ovarian cancer management over the last decade. We present two cases of long responses to Olaparib in BRCA (BReast CAncer gene) mutant ovarian cancer patients. The first case belongs to a 42-year-old female diagnosed with advanced ovarian carcinoma with a rare germinal mutation (BRCA1 c.68_69delAG, commonly found in descendants of Ashkenazi Jewish populations, but also Arabic and Asian ones) and a significant family history of ovarian and breast cancers. After poorly tolerated neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the patient underwent total hysterectomy, bilateral adnexectomy, and intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy. After eight months, the disease progressed, and first-line platinum chemotherapy was administered. Although not well-tolerated (grade 3 anemia, allergic reactions), chemotherapy resulted in a partial response, and given the patient’s characteristics, maintenance with Olaparib was recommended. Treatment is ongoing (total current duration 69 months) and tolerated well (grade 1 side effects). This case illustrates the long-term benefits that novel therapies like Olaparib may offer in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer harboring a rare BRCA mutation. The second case highlights a 55-year-old postmenopausal woman diagnosed with ovarian cancer, FIGO stage IVA. Initial treatment included six cycles of chemotherapy, which led to a partial response, followed by interval debulking surgery and another four cycles of chemotherapy. Subsequent Olaparib maintenance therapy post BRCA1 mutation identification contributed to a significant progression-free survival of 65 months until disease recurrence and secondary cytoreductive surgery, showcasing the effectiveness of PARP inhibitors in personalized oncology treatment of ovarian cancer.

In this study, we investigated the formulation of stable solid dispersions to enhance the bioavailability of olaparib (OLA), a therapeutic agent for ovarian cancer and breast cancer characterized as a BCS class IV drug with low solubility and low permeability. Various polymers were screened based on solubility tests, and OLA-loaded solid dispersions were prepared using spray drying. The physicochemical properties of these dispersions were investigated via scanning electron microscopy (SEM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR). Subsequent dissolution tests, along with assessments of morphological and crystallinity changes in aqueous solutions, led to the selection of a hypromellose (HPMC)-based OLA solid dispersion as the optimal formulation. HPMC was effective at maintaining the supersaturation of OLA in aqueous solutions and exhibited a stable amorphous state without recrystallization. In an in vivo study, this HPMC-based OLA solid dispersion significantly enhanced bioavailability, increasing AUC0–24 by 4.19-fold and Cmax by more than 10.68-fold compared to OLA drug powder (crystalline OLA). Our results highlight the effectiveness of HPMC-based solid dispersions in enhancing the oral bioavailability of OLA and suggest that they could be an effective tool for the development of oral drug formulations.

With the recent Health Canada approval of olaparib for high-risk, HER2-negative early breast cancer, physicians are now facing the practical challenges of integrating olaparib into current management of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and HR-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2−) early breast cancer. This review provides perspectives on some of the challenges related to identification of olaparib candidates, with a focus on the latest guidance for germline BRCA testing and considerations regarding high-risk disease definitions. Updated treatment pathways are explored for both disease states, including other adjuvant treatment options such as pembrolizumab, capecitabine, and abemaciclib. Gaps in the current literature regarding the sequential or combined use of these adjuvant therapies are noted and future, potentially informative, studies are briefly examined.

Abstract Background Olaparib, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, has demonstrated effectiveness in treating ovarian, breast, and other cancers, particularly those with specific molecular subtypes including, but not limited to, BRCA1/2 mutations. Consequently, its utilization is expected to increase in the future. For this reason, it is important to acknowledge the potential for adverse events associated with olaparib, including the relatively rare but significant risk of drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DIILD). Since DIILD can lead to fatal outcomes, its early detection is crucial. The dissemination of knowledge regarding DIILD can be facilitated through case reports; however, specific reports of DIILD caused by olaparib have only been published in Japanese. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report in English of our experience with three cases of DIILD caused by olaparib. Case presentation Cases 1, 2, and 3 involved Japanese women with ovarian cancer who had been receiving olaparib at a dose of 600 mg/day. Case 1, a 72-year-old woman who had been on olaparib for 4 months, and case 2, a 51-year-old woman who had been on olaparib for 8 months, reported fever and general malaise. Chest computed tomography (CT) revealed pale ground glass opacity (GGO) similar to hypersensitivity pneumonitis. The severity grade was 2 in both cases. Case 3, a 78-year-old woman who had been on olaparib for 3 weeks, presented with cough and reported dyspnea on exertion. Chest CT revealed non-specific interstitial pneumonia and organizing pneumonia-like shadows. The severity grade was 4. Olaparib was discontinued in all cases. Case 1 received 0.6 mg/kg of prednisolone due to mild hypoxia, while prednisolone was not administered in case 2 due to the absence of hypoxia. Case 3 received steroid pulse therapy due to severe hypoxia. Olaparib administration was not resumed in any patient. Conclusion DIILD caused by olaparib in Japan, including the present three cases, commonly presents with GGO, similar to hypersensitivity pneumonitis on chest CT. The prognosis for the majority of patients is favorable; however, there have been instances of severe cases. Early recognition of drug-induced lung injury and further accumulation of cases is important.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer associated with higher rates of relapse and mortality compared to other subtypes. Chemotherapy has been a mainstream treatment approach for TNBC due to the lack of therapeutic targets. Recent advances have led to the introduction of novel agents against specific patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive TNBC who harbor germline BRCA mutations. However, some patients who respond to PD-L1 or poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase PARP inhibitors often develop resistance. Additionally, treatment strategies are more complicated for patients with PD-L1-positive TNBC and germline BRCA mutations. Here, we report a patient with metastatic PD-L1-positive TNBC who harbored a germline BRCA1 mutation. The patient sequentially received combination treatment regimens, including PD-L1 inhibitors with chemotherapy and the PARP inhibitor olaparib, acquiring resistance to the treatments in a couple of months. Further investigations are warranted to elucidate the mechanisms underlying resistance to PD-L1 antibodies and PARP inhibitors to improve treatment outcomes while preventing emergence of treatment resistance in patients with TNBC.

Abstract Background Prostate cancer (PCa) is a prevalent malignant disease affecting a significant number of males globally. Elevated expression of the Bloom’s syndrome protein (BLM) helicase has emerged as a promising cancer biomarker, being associated with the onset and progression of PCa. Nevertheless, the precise molecular mechanisms governing BLM regulation in PCa remain elusive. Methods The expression of BLM in human specimens was analyzed using immnohistochemistry (IHC). A 5′-biotin-labeled DNA probe containing the promoter region of BLM was synthesized to pull down BLM promoter-binding proteins. Functional studies were conducted using a range of assays, including CCK-8, EdU incorporation, clone formation, wound scratch, transwell migration, alkaline comet assay, xenograft mouse model, and H&E staining. Mechanistic studies were carried out using various techniques, including streptavidin-agarose-mediated DNA pull-down, mass spectrometry (MS), immunofluorescence (IF), dual luciferase reporter assay system, RT-qPCR, ChIP-qPCR, co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP), and western blot. Results The results revealed significant upregulation of BLM in human PCa tissues, and its overexpression was associated with an unfavorable prognosis in PCa patients. Increased BLM expression showed significant correlations with advanced clinical stage (P = 0.022) and Gleason grade (P = 0.006). In vitro experiments demonstrated that BLM knockdown exerted inhibitory effects on cell proliferation, clone formation, invasion, and migration. Furthermore, PARP1 (poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1) was identified as a BLM promoter-binding protein. Further investigations revealed that the downregulation of PARP1 led to increased BLM promoter activity and expression, while the overexpression of PARP1 exerted opposite effects. Through mechanistic studies, we elucidated that the interaction between PARP1 and HSP90AB1 (heat shock protein alpha family class B) enhanced the transcriptional regulation of BLM by counteracting the inhibitory influence of PARP1 on BLM. Furthermore, the combination treatment of olaparib with ML216 demonstrated enhanced inhibitory effects on cell proliferation, clone formation, invasion, and migration. It also induced more severe DNA damage in vitro and exhibited superior inhibitory effects on the proliferation of PC3 xenograft tumors in vivo. Conclusions The results of this study underscore the significance of BLM overexpression as a prognostic biomarker for PCa, while also demonstrating the negative regulatory impact of PARP1 on BLM transcription. The concurrent targeting of BLM and PARP1 emerges as a promising therapeutic approach for PCa treatment, holding potential clinical significance.

Cisplatin (CDDP) is widely used as one kind of chemotherapy drugs in cancer treatment. It functions by interacting with DNA, leading to the DNA damage and subsequent cellular apoptosis. However, the presence of intracellular PARP1 diminishes the anticancer efficacy of CDDP by repairing DNA strands. Olaparib (OLA), a PARP inhibitor, enhances the accumulation of DNA damage by inhibiting its repair. Therefore, the combination of these two drugs enhances the sensitivity of CDDP chemotherapy, leading to improved therapeutic outcomes. Nevertheless, both drugs suffer from poor water solubility and limited tumor targeting capabilities. To address this challenge, we proposed the self-assembly of two drugs, CDDP and OLA, through hydrogen bonding to form stable and uniform nanoparticles. Self-assembled nanoparticles efficiently target tumor cells and selectively release CDDP and OLA within the acidic tumor microenvironment, capitalizing on their respective mechanisms of action for improved anticancer therapy. In vitro studies demonstrated that the CDDP-OLA NPs are significantly more effective than CDDP/OLA mixture and CDDP at penetrating cancer cells and suppressing their growth. In vivo studies revealed that the nanoparticles specifically accumulated at the tumor site and enhanced the therapeutic efficacy without obvious adverse effects. This approach holds great potential for enhancing the drugs’ water solubility, tumor targeting, bioavailability, and synergistic anticancer effects while minimizing its toxic side effects.

PARP inhibitors have changed the management of advanced high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), especially homologous recombinant (HR)-deficient advanced high-grade EOC. However, the effect of PARP inhibitors on HR-proficient (HRP) EOC is limited. Thus, new therapeutic strategy for HRP EOC is desired. In recent clinical study, the combination of PARP inhibitors with anti-angiogenic agents improved therapeutic efficacy, even in HRP cases. These data suggested that anti-angiogenic agents might potentiate the response to PARP inhibitors in EOC cells. Here, we demonstrated that anti-angiogenic agents, bevacizumab and cediranib, increased the sensitivity of olaparib in HRP EOC cells by suppressing HR activity. Most of the γ-H2AX foci were co-localized with RAD51 foci in control cells. However, most of the RAD51 were decreased in the bevacizumab-treated cells. RNA sequencing showed that bevacizumab decreased the expression of CRY1 under DNA damage stress. CRY1 is one of the transcriptional coregulators associated with circadian rhythm and has recently been reported to regulate the expression of genes required for HR in cancer cells. We found that the anti-angiogenic agents suppressed the increase of CRY1 expression by inhibiting VEGF/VEGFR/PI3K pathway. The suppression of CRY1 expression resulted in decrease of HR activity. In addition, CRY1 inhibition also sensitized EOC cells to olaparib. These data suggested that anti-angiogenic agents and CRY1 inhibitors will be the promising candidate in the combination therapy with PARP inhibitors in HR-proficient EOC.

Sepsis is a dysregulated response to infection that can result in life-threatening organ failure, and septic cardiomyopathy is a serious complication involving ferroptosis. Olaparib, a classic targeted drug used in oncology, has demonstrated potential protective effects against sepsis. However, the exact mechanisms underlying its action remain to be elucidated. In our study, we meticulously screened ferroptosis genes associated with sepsis, and conducted comprehensive functional enrichment analyses to delineate the relationship between ferroptosis and mitochondrial damage. Eight sepsis-characterized ferroptosis genes were identified in sepsis patients, including DPP4, LPIN1, PGD, HP, MAPK14, POR, GCLM, and SLC38A1, which were significantly correlated with mitochondrial quality imbalance. Utilizing DrugBank and molecular docking, we demonstrated a robust interaction of Olaparib with these genes. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated HL-1 cells and monocytes were used to establish an in vitro sepsis model. Additionally, an in vivo model was developed using mice subjected to cecal ligation and perforation (CLP). Intriguingly, low-dose Olaparib (5 mg/kg) effectively targeted and mitigated markers associated with ferroptosis, concurrently improving mitochondrial quality. This led to a marked enhancement in cardiac function and a significant increase in survival rates in septic mice (p

Olaparib is (ADP‐ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi), which stops the repair of single-stranded DNA breaks. This leads to the death of cancer cells with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations or homologous recombination deficiency. Since being approved by the FDA in 2023 for treating castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), there have been some reports of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute leukemia linked to PARP inhibitor use for ovarian, breast, pancreatic and breast cancers, there have been no reports of aplastic anemia after receiving PARPi therapy. This case report describes a 75-year-old man with BRCA2-positive metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer who developed aplastic anemia after taking olaparib.

Olaparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, in combination with the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab, is approved as maintenance therapy for patients with newly diagnosed stage III or IV epithelial ovarian cancer who have homologous recombination deficient tumors with a deleterious or suspected deleterious BRCA mutation and/or genomic instability based on the long-lasting survival benefit observed in the PAOLA-1 trial. Despite treatment with olaparib and bevacizumab showing an acceptable safety profile, the rate of discontinuations due to adverse events was relatively high, and toxicity related to this regimen may restrict its clinical use. Proper management of olaparib/bevacizumab-related adverse events is important for the improvement of quality of life and maximization of the efficacy of maintenance therapy. Here, we summarize the safety results of the PAOLA-1 study, focusing on treatment discontinuation reasons and adverse event profiles. We sought to shed light on toxicity monitoring and prevention, providing concise recommendations for the clinical management of the most relevant side effects.

Purpose: PARP-inhibitors have potent radiosensitizing properties in pre-clinical models. To identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the PARP-inhibitor Olaparib in combination with radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer, a single institutional phase-I dose escalation trial was initiated. Patients and methods: The starting dose of Olaparib was 25 mg BID, combined with radiotherapy (70 Gy in 35 fractions). The MTD was defined as the highest dose-level at which not more than 20 % of patients experience dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) or as the highest reached dose in the absence of DLT’s. Results: One week Olaparib‐only treatment (25 mg QD) was administered to all patients prior to the start of radiotherapy. In dose-level I, Olaparib (25 mg BID) was combined with accelerated radiotherapy (70 Gy in 6 weeks). Because of DLT’s in 3 of the 4 treated patients (acute tracheotomy 5 and 7 months and osteoradionecrosis 7 months after treatment), the Olaparib dose was de-escalated to 25 mg QD, and combined with conventional radiotherapy (70 Gy in 7 weeks) (dose-level II). There were no DLT’s observed in 5 patients treated within dose-level II. After a median follow-up of 60 months, the 4-year LRC and OS rates were 77.8 % and 88.9 %, respectively. Conclusion: Olaparib 25 mg QD combined with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy was well tolerated and identified as the MTD while severe DLT’s were observed when Olaparib 25 mg BID was combined with accelerated radiation. This combination might be further explored in future Olaparib dose escalation studies in patients with locally-advanced HNSCC unfit for cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy.

Background: Malignancies with BRCA1/2 deficiencies are particularly sensitive to PARP inhibitors. Thus, combining PARP inhibitors with agents that impair DNA damage repair to treat BRCA1/2 wild-type PDAC could broaden the clinical use of these promising PARP inhibitors. Here we examined the synergism and mechanism of oncolytic measles virus (rMV-Hu191) with a PARP inhibitor (Olaparib) in vitro and in vivo. Methods: The cell viability assay, cell cycle analysis, colony formation assay, TCID 50 method, western blotting, flow cytometry, DNA comet assay, Mice bearing PDAC xenografts, IF, IHC and TUNEL assay were performed to explore the antitumor efficacy and underlying mechanisms. Results: In this study, we explored the antitumor activities of rMV-Hu191 and Olaparib in two PDAC cell lines harboring wild-type BRCA1/2 genes. Compared to monotherapy, the combination of rMV-Hu191 and Olaparib was able to synergistically cause growth arrest, apoptotic cell death and DNA damage, accompanying with excessive oxidative stress. Mechanistically, the data indicated that the observed synergy depended on the oxidative DNA damage and ROS-dependent apoptosis generating by rMV-Hu191 combined with Olaparib in human PDAC cells. Tumor inhibition and prolonged survival of PDAC mice xenografts in vivo confirmed the synergism of combinational treatment with trivial side-effects. Conclusions: Our findings firstly suggested that combination treatment with rMV-Hu191 and Olaparib had a profound and synergistic therapeutic effect against human PDAC through synthetic lethality. In conclusion, we recommend combining oncolytic rMV-Hu191 with a PARP inhibitor (Olaparib) as a novel therapeutic strategy and provided a potential mechanism for advanced PDAC regardless of BRCA mutation status.

Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are effective therapies for cancer patients with homologous recombination (HR) deficient tumors. The imipridone ONC206 is an orally bioavailable dopamine receptor D2 antagonist and mitochondrial protease ClpP agonist that has anti-tumorigenic effects in endometrial cancer via induction of apoptosis, activation of the integrated stress response and modulation of PI3K/AKT signaling. Both PARP inhibitors and imipridones are being evaluated in endometrial cancer clinical trials but have yet to be explored in combination. In this manuscript, we evaluated the effects of the PARP inhibitor olaparib in combination with ONC206 in human endometrioid endometrial cancer cell lines and in a genetically engineered mouse model of endometrial cancer. Our results showed that simultaneous exposure of endometrial cancer cells to olaparib and ONC206 resulted in synergistic anti-proliferative effects and increased cellular stress and apoptosis in both cell lines, compared to either drug alone. The combination treatment also decreased expression of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 and reduced phosphorylation of AKT and S6, with greater effects compared to either drug alone. In the transgenic model of endometrial cancer, the combination of olaparib and ONC206 resulted in a more significant reduction in tumor weight in obese and lean mice compared to ONC206 alone or olaparib alone, together with a considerably decreased Ki-67 and enhanced H2AX expression in obese and lean mice. These results suggest that this novel dual therapy may be worthy of further exploration in clinical trials.

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of olaparib for the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. All studies that assessed the efficacy and safety of olaparib in advanced ovarian cancer were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from their inception to 20 September 2022. The analysis included six studies and 2016 patients. Olaparib could significantly prolong the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients compared to that of the control group (HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.36 − 0.68). However, no statistically significant differences were detected in overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) between the olaparib and control groups. Olaparib treatment increased the number of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer compared with that in the control group. Olaparib significantly prolonged PFS in patients with advanced ovarian cancer; however, no statistically significant differences were detected in OS and ORR. In terms of safety, olaparib has manageable adverse effects.

Pancreatic cancer has an annual incidence of 2/10,000 in Canada, with a one-year mortality rate greater than 80%. In the absence of a cost-effectiveness analysis in Canada, this study’s objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of olaparib versus a placebo in adult patients with deleterious or suspected deleterious BRCA metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, who did not show any progression for at least 16 weeks with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. A partitioned survival model with a 5-year time horizon was adopted to estimate the costs and effectiveness. All of the costs were extracted from the public payer’s available resources, effectiveness data were obtained from the POLO trial, and Canadian studies were used for utility inputs. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were performed. The total costs of olaparib and the placebo over five years were CAD 179,477 and CAD 68,569, with overall quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of 1.70 and 1.36, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the olaparib group compared with the placebo was CAD 329,517 per QALY. With a commonly cited willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of CAD 50,000 per QALY, the drug does not achieve acceptable cost-effectiveness mainly due to the high price of the medication and insufficient impact on the overall survival of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Abstract Background Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) affects young women and is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer (BC). TNBCs disproportionally affect women of African-American (AA) descent compared to other ethnicities. We have identified DNA repair gene RAD51 as a poor prognosis marker in TNBC and its posttranscriptional regulation through microRNAs (miRNAs). This study aims to delineate the mechanisms leading to RAD51 upregulation and develop novel therapeutic combinations to effectively treat TNBCs and reduce disparity in clinical outcomes. Methods Analysis of TCGA data for BC cohorts using the UALCAN portal and PrognoScan identified the overexpression of RAD51 in TNBCs. miRNA sequencing identified significant downregulation of RAD51-targeting miRNAs miR-214-5P and miR-142-3P. RT-PCR assays were used to validate the levels of miRNAs and RAD51, and immunohistochemical and immunoblotting techniques were used similarly for RAD51 protein levels in TNBC tissues and cell lines. Luciferase assays were performed under the control of RAD51 3’-UTR to confirm that miR-214-5P regulates RAD51 expression. To examine the effect of miR-214-5P-mediated downregulation of RAD51 on homologous recombination (HR) in TNBC cells, Dr-GFP reporter assays were performed. To assess the levels of olaparib-induced DNA damage responses in miR-214-5P, transfected cells, immunoblots, and immunofluorescence assays were used. Furthermore, COMET assays were used to measure DNA lesions and colony assays were performed to assess the sensitivity of BRCA-proficient TNBC cells to olaparib. Results In-silico analysis identified upregulation of RAD51 as a poor prognostic marker in TNBCs. miRNA-seq data showed significant downregulation of miR-214-5P and miR-142-3P in TNBC cell lines derived from AA women compared to Caucasian-American (CA) women. miR-214-5P mimics downregulated RAD51 expression and induces HR deficiency as measured by Dr-GFP assays in these cell lines. Based on these results, we designed a combination treatment of miR-214-5P and olaparib in HR-proficient AA TNBC cell lines using clonogenic survival assays. The combination of miR-214-5P and olaparib showed synergistic lethality compared to individual treatments in these cell lines. Conclusions Our studies identified a novel epigenetic regulation of RAD51 in TNBCs by miR-214-5P suggesting a novel combination therapies involving miR-214-5P and olaparib to treat HR-proficient TNBCs and to reduce racial disparity in therapeutic outcomes.

BUB1 is overexpressed in most human solid cancers, including breast cancer. Higher BUB1 levels are associated with a poor prognosis, especially in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Women with TNBC often develop resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, which are still the mainstay of treatment for TNBC. Our previous studies demonstrated that a BUB1 kinase inhibitor (BAY1816032) reduced tumor cell proliferation and significantly enhanced radiotherapy efficacy in TNBC. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of BAY1816032 with a PARP inhibitor (olaparib), platinum agent (cisplatin), and microtubule poison (paclitaxel) alone or in combination with radiotherapy using cytotoxicity and clonogenic survival assays. BUB1 inhibitors sensitized BRCA1/2 wild-type SUM159 and MDA-MB-231 cells to olaparib, cisplatin, and paclitaxel synergistically (combination index; CI < 1). BAY1816032 significantly increased the radiation sensitization of SUM159 and MDA-MB-231 by olaparib, cisplatin, or paclitaxel at non-toxic concentrations (doses well below the IC50 concentrations). Importantly, the small molecular inhibitor of BUB1 synergistically (CI < 1) sensitized the BRCA mutant TNBC cell line HCC1937 to olaparib. Furthermore, the BUB1 inhibitor significantly increased the radiation enhancement ratio (rER) in HCC1937 cells (rER 1.34) compared to either agent alone (BUB1i rER 1.19; PARPi rER 1.04). The data presented here are significant as they provide proof that inhibition of BUB1 kinase activity sensitizes TNBC cell lines to a PARP inhibitor and radiation, irrespective of BRCA1/2 mutation status. Due to the ability of the BUB1 inhibitor to sensitize TNBC to different classes of drugs (platinum, PARPi, microtubule depolarization inhibitors), this work strongly supports the role of BUB1 as a novel molecular target to improve chemoradiation efficacy in TNBC and provides a rationale for the clinical evaluation of BAY1816032 as a chemosensitizer and chemoradiosensitizer in TNBC.

Resistance to olaparib is the major obstacle in targeted therapy for ovarian cancer (OC) with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis), prompting studies on novel combination therapies to enhance olaparib efficacy. Despite identifying various mechanisms, understanding how OC cells acquire PARPi resistance remains incomplete. This study investigated microRNA (miRNA) expression in olaparib-sensitive (PEO1, PEO4) and previously established olaparib-resistant OC cell lines (PEO1-OR) using high-throughput RT-qPCR and bioinformatic analyses. The role of miRNAs was explored regarding acquired resistance and resensitization with the ATR/CHK1 pathway inhibitors. Differentially expressed miRNAs were used to construct miRNA–mRNA regulatory networks and perform functional enrichment analyses for target genes with miRNet 2.0. TCGA-OV dataset was analyzed to explore the prognostic value of selected miRNAs and target genes in clinical samples. We identified potential processes associated with olaparib resistance, including cell proliferation, migration, cell cycle, and growth factor signaling. Resensitized PEO1-OR cells were enriched in growth factor signaling via PDGF, EGFR, FGFR1, VEGFR2, and TGFβR, regulation of the cell cycle via the G2/M checkpoint, and caspase-mediated apoptosis. Antibody microarray analysis confirmed dysregulated growth factor expression. The addition of the ATR/CHK1 pathway inhibitors to olaparib downregulated FGF4, FGF6, NT-4, PLGF, and TGFβ1 exclusively in PEO1-OR cells. Survival and differential expression analyses for serous OC patients revealed prognostic miRNAs likely associated with olaparib resistance (miR-99b-5p, miR-424-3p, and miR-505-5p) and resensitization to olaparib (miR-324-5p and miR-424-3p). Essential miRNA–mRNA interactions were reconstructed based on prognostic miRNAs and target genes. In conclusion, our data highlight distinct miRNA profiles in olaparib-sensitive and olaparib-resistant cells, offering molecular insights into overcoming resistance with the ATR/CHK1 inhibitors in OC. Moreover, some miRNAs might serve as potential predictive signature molecules of resistance and therapeutic response.

Olaparib is recently approved as an anti-tumor agent for several cancers, including castration-resistant prostate cancer, which inhibits poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase, a DNA repair factor. Since olaparib is a newly approved drug, there are few reports of skin disorders that may be triggered by olaparib administration. In this report, we present a case with an olaparib-induced drug eruption presenting multiple purpuras on the patient’s fingers and fingertips. The present case suggests that olaparib might induce purpura as nonallergic drug eruption.