Search

Abstract Introduction Respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Less invasive methods of surfactant administration, along with the use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), have improved outcomes of preterm infants. Aerosolized surfactant can be given without the need for airway instrumentation and may be employed in areas where these skills are scarce. Recent trials from high-resourced countries utilising aerosolized surfactant have had a low quality of evidence and varying outcomes. Methods and analysis The Neo-INSPIRe trial is an unblinded, multicentre, randomised trial of a novel aerosolized surfactant drug/device combination. Inclusion criteria include preterm infants of 27–34+6 weeks’ gestational age who weigh 900-1999g and who require CPAP with a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of 0.25–0.35 in the first 2–24 h of age. Infants are randomised 1:1 to control (CPAP alone) or intervention (CPAP with aerosolized surfactant). The primary outcome is the need for intratracheal bolus surfactant instillation within 72 h of age. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of reaching failure criteria (persistent FiO2 of > 0.40, severe apnoea or severe work of breathing), the need for and duration of ventilation and respiratory support, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and selected co-morbidities of prematurity. Assuming a 40% relative risk reduction to reduce the proportion of infants requiring intratracheal bolus surfactant from 45 to 27%, the study will aim to enrol 232 infants for the study to have a power of 80% to detect a significant difference with a type 1 error of 0.05. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval has been granted by the relevant human research ethics committees at University of Cape Town (HREC 681/2022), University of the Witwatersrand HREC (221112) and Stellenbosch University (M23/02/004). Trial registration PACTR202307490670785

Inhaled tobramycin treatment has been associated with nephrotoxicity in some case reports, but limited data are available about serum levels and its possible systemic absorption in lung transplant recipients (LTR). We conducted a single-center, observational and retrospective study of all adult (>18 years old) LTR treated with inhaled tobramycin for at least 3 days between June 2019 and February 2022. Trough serum levels were collected and >2 μg/mL was considered a high drug level. The primary outcome assessed the presence of detectable trough levels, while the secondary outcome focused on the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in individuals with detectable trough levels. Thirty-four patients, with a median age of 60 years, were enrolled. The primary indications for treatment were donor bronchial aspirate bacterial isolation (18 patients) and tracheobronchitis (15 patients). In total, 28 patients (82%) exhibited detectable serum levels, with 9 (26%) presenting high levels (>2 μg/mL). Furthermore, 9 patients (26%) developed acute kidney injury during the treatment course. Median trough tobramycin levels were significantly elevated in invasively mechanically ventilated patients compared to non-ventilated individuals (2.5 μg/mL vs. 0.48 μg/mL) (p < 0.001). Inhaled tobramycin administration in LTRs, particularly in those requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, may result in substantial systemic absorption.

Background: Patients with post-acute sequelae of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (PASC, i.e., Long COVID) have a symptom complex highly analogous to many features of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), suggesting they may share some aspects of pathogenesis in these similar disorders. ME/CFS is a complex disease affecting numerous organ systems and biological processes and is often preceded by an infection-like episode. It is postulated that the chronic manifestations of illness may result from an altered host response to infection or inability to resolve inflammation, as is being reported in Long COVID. The immunopathogenesis of both disorders is still poorly understood. Here, we show data that suggest Long COVID and ME/CFS may be due to an aberrant response to an immunological trigger-like infection, resulting in a dysregulated immune system with CD8 T-cell dysfunction reminiscent of some aspects of T-cell clonal exhaustion, a phenomenon associated with oxidative stress. As there is an urgent need for diagnostic tools and treatment strategies for these two related disabling disorders, here, in a retrospective case series, we have also identified a potential nebulized antioxidant/anti-pathogen treatment that has evidence of a good safety profile. This nebulized agent is comprised of five ingredients previously reported individually to relieve oxidative stress, attenuate NF-κB signaling, and/or to act directly to inhibit pathogens, including viruses. Administration of this treatment by nebulizer results in rapid access of small doses of well-studied antioxidants and agents with anti-pathogen potential to the lungs; components of this nebulized agent are also likely to be distributed systemically, with potential to enter the central nervous system. Methods: and Findings: We conducted an analysis of CD8 T-cell function and severity of symptoms by self-report questionnaires in ME/CFS, Long COVID and healthy controls. We developed a CD8 T-cell functional assay, assessing CD8 T-cell dysfunction by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) in a group of ME/CFS (n = 12) and Long COVID patients (n = 8), comparing to healthy controls (HC) with similar age and sex (n = 10). Magnet-enriched fresh CD8 T-cells in both patient groups had a significantly diminished capacity to produce both cytokines, IFNγ or TNFα, after PMA stimulation when compared to HC. The symptom severity questionnaire showed similar symptom profiles for the two disorders. Fortuitously, through a retrospective case series, we were able to examine the ICS and questionnaire data of 4 ME/CFS and 4 Long COVID patients in conjunction with their treatment (3–15 months). In parallel with the treatment pursued electively by participants in this retrospective case series, there was an increase in CD8 T-cell IFNγ and TNFα production and a decrease in overall self-reported symptom severity score by 54%. No serious treatment-associated side effects or laboratory anomalies were noted in these patients. Conclusions: Here, in this small study, we present two observations that appear potentially fundamental to the pathogenesis and treatment of Long COVID and ME/CFS. The first is that both disorders appear to be characterized by dysfunctional CD8 T-cells with severe deficiencies in their abilities to produce IFNγ and TNFα. The second is that in a small retrospective Long COVID and ME/CFS case series, this immune dysfunction and patient health improved in parallel with treatment with an immunomodulatory, antioxidant pharmacological treatment with anticipated anti-pathogen activity. This work provides evidence of the potential utility of a biomarker, CD8 T-cell dysfunction, and suggests the potential for benefit from a new nebulized antioxidant/anti-pathogen treatment. These immune biomarker data may help build capacity for improved diagnosis and tracking of treatment outcomes during clinical trials for both Long COVID and ME/CFS while providing clues to new treatment avenues that suggest potential efficacy for both conditions.

Objective This study was carried out to compare different routes of midazolam administration (nebulized vs. oral) to achieve a satisfactory level of sedation, RAMSAY Sedation Score (RSS) of 4, within 30 minutes of midazolam administration in pediatric operative patients.Methods After approval of the ethical committee in Kasr Al-ainy university hospital and obtaining written consent from parents/legal guardians; Seventy-two pediatric patients scheduled for general and urological surgical operations under general anesthesia were included in this randomized double-blinded study. Patients were randomly assigned into one of the two equal groups. Group N: 36 children received nebulized midazolam 0.2 mg/kg in 3 ml normal saline plus 5 ml clear juice 30 min before undergoing general anesthesia (GA). Group O: 36 children received oral midazolam 0.5 mg/kg in 5 ml clear juice plus nebulizer of 3 ml normal saline 30 min before undergoing general anesthesia.Results We found no statistical difference between nebulized and oral midazolam regarding drug acceptance, peri-operative (sedation scores, hemodynamics, and side effects); P-value >0.05 for all values.Conclusion Nebulized midazolam is a good alternative to oral midazolam as a sedative premedication in pediatrics.

Background: Whether nebulized polymyxin B should be used as an adjunctive therapy or substitution strategy to intravenous polymyxin B for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains controversial. This study’s aim is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different administration ways of polymyxin B in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria(XDR-GNB).Methods: This retrospective cohort study enrolled ventilator-associated pneumonia patients caused by XDR-GNB treated with polymyxin B in the intensive care unit. Patients were categorized by the administration methods as intravenous (IV) group, inhaled (IH) group, and the intravenous combined with inhaled (IV + IH) group. Microbiological outcome and clinical outcome were compared in each group. The side effects were also explored.Results: A total of 111 patients were enrolled and there was no difference in demographic and clinical characteristics among the three groups. In terms of efficacy, clinical cure or improvement was achieved in 21 patients (55.3%) in the intravenous group, 19 patients (50%) in the IH group, and 20 patients (57.1%) in IV + IH group (p = 0.815). All three groups showed high success rates in microbiological eradication, as 29 patients with negative cultures after medication in inhaled group. Among all the patients who had negative bacterial cultures after polymyxin B, the inhaled group had significantly shorter clearance time than the intravenous group (p = 0.002), but with no significant difference in 28-day mortality. Compared with intravenous group, a trend towards a lower risk of acute kidney injury was observed in inhaled group (p = 0.025).Conclusion: From the perspective of minimal systemic renal toxicity, nebulized polymyxin B as a substitution strategy to intravenous polymyxin B for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by XDR-GNB is feasible.

IntroductionAdd-on magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) for refractory asthma exacerbation has been much debated. The aim of this review and meta-analysis is, therefore, to provide an update on the current evidence for the efficacy of MgSO4 in exacerbations of asthma in adults refractory to standard of care treatment.MethodsA systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The search was performed in the PubMed database (updated April 2023). For the meta-analysis, a random-effects model was applied using the metaphor package for RStudio (RStudio, Inc.).ResultsA total of 17 randomized controlled trials were included. Three of the nine studies addressing treatment with intravenous (IV) MgSO4 found a significant effect on lung function compared to placebo. Of the eight studies investigating hospital admission rate, only two found a significant effect of MgSO4. Six of the nine studies investigating treatment with nebulized MgSO4 compared to placebo found a favorable effect on forced expiratory volume in 1. second (FEV1) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEF). Only two of the five studies investigating the effect on hospital admission rate found an effect of MgSO4. Comparing effect sizes in a meta-analysis revealed a greater effect on PEF in asthma patients treated with nebulized MgSO4 (MD, 23.57; 95% CI, −2.48 to 49.62, p

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections pose a serious threat, with high morbidity and mortality rates. This retrospective cohort study, conducted at Nakornping Hospital between January 2015 and October 2022, aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a high loading dose (LD) of colistin combined with nebulized colistin in critically ill patients with CRAB pneumonia. Of the 261 patients included, 95 received LD colistin, and 166 received LD colistin with nebulized colistin. Multivariate Cox regression analysis, adjusted for baseline covariates using inverse probability weighting, showed no significant difference in 30-day survival between patients who received LD colistin and those who received LD colistin with nebulized colistin (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80–1.72, p = 0.418). Likewise, there were no significant differences in clinical response (aHR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.66–1.31, p = 0.688), microbiological response (aHR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.85–1.73, p = 0.279), or nephrotoxicity (aHR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.79–1.64, p = 0.492) between the two treatment groups. No significant adverse events related to nebulized colistin were reported. These findings suggest that the addition of nebulized colistin may not offer additional benefits in terms of 30-day survival, clinical or microbiological response, or nephrotoxicity in these patients.

Abstract Background Aerosolized antibiotic administration offers the theoretical advantages of achieving high drug concentrations at the infection site together with lower systemic absorption. This study aims to compare the effect of combining nebulized amikacin with intravenous amikacin to the effect of the usual intravenous route alone in the treatment of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia and its impact on the duration of mechanical ventilation, laboratory, and clinical picture of the patients. Results This study was carried out on 64 mechanically ventilated patients with Gram-negative VAP. The patients were divided into 2 groups. Group A included 32 patients treated with nebulized amikacin plus IV amikacin, and group B included 32 patients treated with IV amikacin alone. The duration of treatment for both groups was 8 days with a daily assessment of Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) and monitoring of clinical and laboratory parameters. Sputum cultures were obtained thereafter. In our study, the CPIS score and overall ICU mortality were less in the nebulized than in the IV group but the difference failed to be statistically significant. Increase of oxygenation level (Pao2/Fio2 ratio), organism clearance, decrease in serum creatinine level, duration of mechanical ventilation, and length of ICU stay were significantly different in favor of group A than group B. Conclusion Nebulized and IV amikacin offered better oxygenation, organism clearance, less nephrotoxicity, and less duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay than the IV group. Combined and IV routes were comparable regarding the decrease in CPIS score and ICU mortality with no significant difference between them. However, we prefer to use the combined regimen for the mentioned reasons. Further large-scale studies are required to confirm these findings and to establish a definite conclusion.

Background: Transient tachypnea of the newborn [TTN] is a common physiologic lung disorder. Stimulation of β-adrenergic receptors could alleviate the condition. Aim of the work: The study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of inhaled salbutamol in reduction of TTN, oxygen treatment and hospitalization. Patients and Methods:This clinical study included 150 [50 control group, 50 single dose of salbutamol and 50 double-doses of salbutamol] infants between 35th-39th week's gestation. Inhaled salbutamol was given and comparison between the three groups was carried out. Results: Treatable and control groups were comparable as regard neonatal and maternal characteristics. Heart rate was significantly increased in group B when compared to control group half and one hour after treatment. In addition, respiratory rate was significantly increase in group B when compared to group A at half hour after treatment and continued till 8 hours after treatment. The TTN score after treatment was significantly lower in group B when compared to group A at one hour after nebulized salbutamol and continued till 8 hours. Furthermore, time before initiation of feeding was significantly reduced in group B when compared to group A [26.72[±3.68] vs [39.66[±4.7] and also there was significant reduction of hospitalization days in group B when compared to group A [3.78 [±1.25] vs [7.36[±1.28]. Conclusion: Inhalational salbutamol reduced duration of supplemental oxygen therapy, the duration of hospitalization and time before initiation of feeding, and no adverse effects were reported. Thus, inhaled salbutamol seems to be effective and safe in TTN.

We present a patient with cystic fibrosis who used nebulized levofloxacin off-label to suppress chronic Burkholderia cenocepacia pulmonary infection. The patient was initially using tobramycin inhalation powder (TIP) off-label continuously for suppression of chronic B. cenocepacia; this was changed to alternating months of nebulized levofloxacin and TIP. Following initiation of nebulized levofloxacin, the patient had significant improvement in respiratory symptom burden and lung function (as measured by forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1]), and a decrease in the frequency of pulmonary exacerbations. Further research is necessary to determine whether the benefits observed with nebulized levofloxacin in our patient translate to a larger population of patients with chronic Burkholderia spp. pulmonary infection.

Background: This study was aimed to compare the effect of nebulized fentanyl versus intravenous fentanyl for postoperative analgesia after unilateral femur interlock surgery. Patients and Methods: A total of sixty patients scheduled for unilateral femur interlock surgery under subarachnoid block were enrolled in the study and were randomly divided into two groups. Group I included thirty patients who received 2 μg/kg of fentanyl intravenously, and Group N included thirty patients who received 4 μg/kg of fentanyl nebulization using a standard venturi mask. In the postoperative period, whenever the Visual Analog Scale ≥4, patients received the analgesic corresponding to their respective groups. The data obtained were statistically analyzed using IBM SPSS software. Results: There was no significant difference in the demographic characteristics, duration of surgery, the number of patients who required rescue analgesia, and the onset of analgesia in Group N in comparison with Group I. The duration of analgesia was significantly longer in Group N in comparison to Group I. In Group I, the rise in Ramsay sedation score was faster and peaked at 5 min. In Group N, however, it was lesser than that of Group I. Side effects in Group N were significantly lesser compared to Group I. Conclusion: Nebulization with fentanyl is a good alternative to intravenous fentanyl for adequate postoperative pain relief with fewer side effects.

Abstract Background Intravenous morphine titration (IVMT) is the French gold standard for opioid treatment in the emergency department (ED). Nebulized morphine titration (NMT) may represent an alternative without venous access, but it has not been adequately studied in adults. We test the hypothesis that NMT is at least as effective as IVMT to initially manage severe acute pain in the ED. Methods/design We designed a multicenter (10 French EDs), single-blind, randomized and controlled trial. Adults between 18 and 75 years with visual analog scale (VAS) ≥ 70/100 or numeric rating scale (NRS) ≥ 7/10 will be enrolled. We will randomize 850 patients into two groups to compare two routes of MT as long as VAS > 30 or NRS > 3. In group A (425), patients will receive an initial NMT for 5–25 min associated with titration of an intravenously (IV) administered placebo of physiologic serum (PS). In group B (425), patients will receive IVMT plus nebulized PS placebo. NMT is defined as a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 3 5-min nebulized boluses of 10 mg or 15 mg (weight ≥ 60 kg), at 10-min fixed intervals. IVMT is defined as a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 6 boluses of 2 mg or 3 mg (weight ≥ 60 kg), at 5-min fixed intervals. Nebulized placebo titration will be performed every 10 min. IV titration of PS will be performed every 5 min. In both groups, after 25 min, if VAS > 30/100 or NRS > 3/10, routine IVMT will be continued until pain relief. Pain severity, vital signs, bronchospasm, and Ramsay score will be recorded every 5 min. The primary outcome is the rate of relief obtained 1 h from the start of drug administration. Complete pain relief in both groups will be compared with a non-inferiority design. Secondary outcomes are pain relief at 30 min (the end of NMT) and at 2 h and median pain relief. We will compare final doses, and study the feasibility and tolerance of NMT (protocol deviations, respiratory or hemodynamic depression, sedation, and minor vegetative side effects). Co-analgesia will be recorded. Discharge criteria from the ED and hospital are defined. Discussion This trial is the first multicenter randomized and controlled NMT protocol for severe pain in the ED using the titration concept. We propose an original approach of combined titration with an endpoint at 1 h and a non-inferiority design. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03257319. Registered on 22 August 2017.

Background: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) is associated with a significant mortality in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of extended infusion of meropenem and nebulized amikacin on VAP caused by Gram-negative MDRO versus intravenous (IV) meropenem and amikacin alone. Methodology: A randomized nonblinded controlled trial was performed on ninety patients with VAP. Patients were randomized into three equal groups: Group I received IV amikacin 20 mg/kg/24 h and meropenem 2 g over 30 min/8 h. Group II received the same as Group I in addition to nebulized amikacin 25 mg/kg/day every 8 h. Group III received IV amikacin 20 mg/kg/24 h, nebulized amikacin 25 mg/kg/day every 8 h, and meropenem 2 g diluted in 240 ml normal saline over 3 h/8 h. The primary outcome was the clinical outcome of VAP. Secondary outcomes were microbiological outcome, VAP-related mortality, duration of MV, ICU stay, and nephrotoxicity. Results: Group II and Group III compared to Group I showed higher incidence of clinical cure (53.33% in Group II and 66.67% in Group III vs. 26.67% in Group I, P = 0.007). Group II compared to Group I showed significant reduction in ventilator days (5.32 ± 1.86 vs. 7.3 ± 2.1 days, respectively, P < 0.001) and reduction in ICU days (11.87 ± 2.6 vs. 15.3 ± 3.1 days, respectively, P < 0.001). Group III compared to Group II showed significant reduction in ventilator days (4.22 ± 1.32 vs. 5.32 ± 1.86, respectively, P = 0.011) and highly significant reduction in ICU days (9.21 ± 1.17 vs. 11.87 ± 2.6, respectively, P < 0.001). All groups were comparable as regards nephrotoxicity or mortality. Conclusions: Adding nebulized amikacin to systemic antibiotics in patients with VAP caused by Gram-negative MDRO may offer efficacy benefits, and the use of extended infusions of meropenem could improve the clinical outcomes in critically ill populations.

Objective: To determine by experimentation whether micafungin and anidulafungin possess physicochemical properties suitable for nebulization. Method: PH, osmolality, viscosity, density and chloride content were determined by pH monitoring, osmometry, viscometry, densitometry and potentiometry in two samples of different concentrations, 5 and 10 mg/mL each echinocandin. Results: The results obtained for micafungin solution were: pH 5.80 (0.14), osmolality 293.33 (1.53) mOsm/kg, chloride content 134.67 (0.58) mmol/L and density 1,009.4 (0,1) kg/m3; while for 10 mg/mL solution: osmolality 342.00 (1.00) mOsm/kg, chloride content 139.67 (0.58) mmol/L and density 1,014.5 (0.2) kg/m3. The results obtained for 5 mg/mL anidulafungin were: pH 4.22 (0.01), osmolality 464.67 (2.52) mOsm/kg, chloride content 137.00 (0.00) mmol/L and density 1,016.5 (0,2) kg/m3; while for 10 mg/mL solution: osmolality 656.33 (1.15) mOsm/kg, chloride content 132.00 (0.00) mmol/L and density 1,029.8 (0.4) kg/m3. Conclusions: PH, osmolality, chloride content and density values proved to be suitable for proper tolerability by nebulization.

Background and aim. In the last decade a significant increase of nebulized medication usage has been documented in Romania. Authors are aiming to describe parental and physician’s change of perspective regarding nebulized medication in the new era of online communication and education. Material and methods. Two different questionnaires were posted in a large and representative group (more than 60,000 followers) of Romanian parents and physicians, Virtual Children’s Hospital („Spitalul Virtual de Copii”). Results. More than 4,000 answers were submitted. 94.4% responders confirmed using at least once wetnebulized medication in children. A particular aspect documented was dexamethasone off-label usage via nebulizer in 67.8% children. Additional 7% of responders confirmed that they received an indication to nebulize a normal saline suspension with dexamethasone phosphate for parenteral usage, but they didn’t follow the indication and used an approved treatment. Conclusions. Upon our knowledge this is the first large study on nebulized dexamethasone in Romanian literature. 95% of Romanian children receive nebulized medication. Nebulizer is regarded by parents as a simple and friendly tool that can solve virtually all issues related to airway diseases in our country. 75% of children that received nebulized medication had a prescription for off-label use of dexamethasone.

Background: Asthma is characterized by airways narrowing and airflow limitation. The conventional therapy for asthma exacerbation is usually efficient but sometimes patients not respond to it, consequently; other additive drugs may be used as magnesium sulfate(MgSO4) either intravenously or by nebulization. Objective: To compare the bronchodilator effect of MgSO4 via intravenous injection and nebulization in controlling asthma exacerbation. Methods: 40 patients with asthma exacerbation were equally and randomly enrolled in two groups. One group received nebulized MgSO4 (A), and the other group received intravenous MgSO4 (B). Results: Improvement was higher in group B than in group A but without significant change in PEFR also there was no high significant difference in the two group parameters after MgSO4 treatment. Complications were few and manageable in both groups. Conclusion: Intravenous MgSO4 is effective affordable and cheap drug for asthma exacerbation management with good response while nebulized MgSO4 didn’t give the aimed response in these patients.

Introduction: Gastric overdistension by mask ventilation during induction of anesthesia in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) repair may worsen hypoxemia. Topical airway anesthesia may improve the intubating conditions during sevoflurane induction without muscle relaxation. The present study was designed to evaluate the effect of nebulized lidocaine and fentanyl on the intubating conditions without muscle relaxation during sevoflurane induction of anesthesia in infants undergoing CDH repair. The secondary aim was studying hemodynamic changes during induction. Patients and methods: Forty patients scheduled for (CDH) repair were randomly selected and blindly categorized to the following: Nebulizer group: Nebulized solution of 4 mg kg−1 lidocaine 1% plus 2 μg kg−1 fentanyl, Control group: Nebulized solution of comparable volume/weight normal saline 0.9%. Nebulizer of either solution was applied 15 min before sevoflurane induction. Results: Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial blood pressure (mABP) statistically significantly increased in the control group following intubation and for 2 min regarding HR and for 5 min regarding mABP in comparison with the base line and relative to the nebulizer group. There was a statistical significant improvement regarding the intubation conditions in the nebulizer group relative to the control group (p ⩽ 0.001). The same was noticed regarding the intubation time and the number of intubation attempts (p ⩽ 0.001). Conclusions: Premedication of infants undergoing CDH repair with nebulized solution containing 4 mg kg−1 lidocaine 1% plus 2 μg kg−1 fentanyl improves the intubating conditions under inhalational sevoflurane induction without muscle relaxation. The studied combination can suppress patients’ hemodynamic changes to intubation.

Objective: To estimate the efficacy and safety of nebulized tobramycin (NT) as an adjunct to systemic antibiotics in the treatment of severe nosocomial pneumonia (NP). Methods: 25 mechanically ventilated patients (out of 150 screened) were enrolled in the current observational single-center study. They were randomized to receive either NT (300 mg, BID; group 1, n=15) as an adjunct to systemic antibiotics or for a correction of the regimen of systemic antibiotics (group 2, n=10). The primary outcome measure was resolution of NP and acute respiratory insufficiency. The CPIS, signs of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and oxygenation index were used as objective indicators of the clinical progress. Results: The following signs of NT efficacy were detected in 87% of group 1 patients: a decrease of SIRS and CPIS scores within (2.3±1.2) d of NT therapy (P

Background: The efficacy of steroid administration in the prevention of postextubation complications in critical care remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine whether administration of nebulized budesonide in critically ill patients reduces the occurrence of postextubation airway complications. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.We prospectively followed up 70 adult patients in the intensive care unit who were intubated for more than 48 h. Patients received either nebulized budesonide (1 mg every 12 h; n = 35) or placebo (normal saline; n = 35) until 48 h after extubation. Then, the postextubation complications were assessed and recorded within 48 h of extubation. Results: The incidence of respiratory distress was lower in budesonide group (8.6% vs. 31.4%, P = 0.017). Reintubation with mechanical support was necessary in 8.6% (3.35) of patients in the budesonide group and 31.4% (11.35) of patients in the placebo group (P = 0.017). Conclusion: Nebulized budesonide after extubation is effective in reducing the incidence of reintubation and respiratory distress in adult patients.