Search

Several cases of pigmented mammary Paget’s disease (PMPD) mimicking cutaneous malignant melanoma have been reported. In these cases, the tumor cells are colonized by melanocytes, particularly with the presence of a population of melanocytes staining for HMB-45 and S100. Here, we report a case of mammary Paget disease (MPD) which was misdiagnosed as melanoma in situ due to the interpretation of the staining of melanocytic markers S-100, Melan-A, and HMB-45. The tumor cells strongly expressed CK7 and GATA3, and a dual-labeling showed negative PHH3 labeling for the melanocytes. Pathologists need to be aware of the caveat of colonization of melanocytes in Paget disease.

Abstract Background We examined the vascularity of mammary Paget disease histologically to confirm the increased blood flow observed previously by clinical imaging. The relationships among blood vessel density (BVD), histopathological parameters of blood flow in the nipple, and the expression of angiogenic factors such as basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) were examined. Methods We calculated the average CD34-positive BVD and podoplanin (D2–40)-positive lymphatic vessel density (LVD) and the proportion of proliferating of endothelial cells in 14 Paget disease, 3 dermatitis biopsy, and 14 age-matched control cases. As a parameter related to blood flow in the nipple, the total CD34-positive blood vessel lumen area relative to the entire nipple area was measured in each Paget disease and control case using an automated image analysis system. Immunohistochemical expression of bFGF and VEGFA in Paget cells was also examined. Results The average BVD and LVD were significantly higher in the Paget disease cases than in the dermatitis (p = 0.003) and control (p

A very rare variant of MPD is the Pigmented Mammary Paget Disease (PMPD), first described by Culberson et al. in 1956. It is very difficult to distinguish this variant from melanoma both clinically and dermoscopically. The diagnosis is confirmed by histopathology and immunohistochemistry. Correct diagnosis is crucial for surgical treatment, which is different for these two diseases. We report the case of a 92-year-old woman, who presented an asymptomatic pigmented lesion of the right nipple and areola. The lesion was arisen for about 6 months and was suspected for melanoma because of clinical and dersmoscopic characteristics. Incisional biopsy revealed tumor cells, that proliferate in the major mammary ducts, and tumor cells in the overlying epidermis of the nipple, thus diagnosing pigmented mammary Paget disease (PMPD). The patient underwent radical mastectomy.

Abstract Background Most mammary Paget disease (MPD) is associated with underlying in situ or invasive breast cancer. The objective of this study was to compare the clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes between breast cancer with Paget disease (PD) and breast cancer alone. Methods From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, 2000‐2015, of the US National Cancer Institute, we identified 1569 women who had PD with invasive ductal carcinoma (PD‐IDC) and 1489 women who had PD with ductal carcinoma in situ (PD‐DCIS). Independent demographic and clinicopathological variables as well as survival outcomes of these patients were compared to patients with the corresponding breast cancer without concomitant PD. Results PD‐IDC and PD‐DCIS both had worse survival outcomes and poorer tumor characteristics than the corresponding disease without PD. Contrary to in the breast cancer alone groups, in the breast cancer with PD groups, the HR status (P = 0.182 in PD‐IDC and P = 0.371 in PD‐DCIS), HER2 status (P = 0.788 in PD‐IDC and P = 0.643 in PD‐DCIS), and combined molecular subtype (P = 0.196 in PD‐IDC and P = 0.853 in PD‐DCIS) were not found to affect disease prognosis. After matching tumor characteristics and treatment approaches, PD‐IDC as well as PD‐DCIS exhibited no significant difference in disease prognosis with corresponding IDC and DCIS. Finally, by comparative analysis, a kind of PD‐DCIS (ICD‐O‐3 code 8543/3) showed many invasive behaviors (31.8% of 8543/3 patients had stage I‐III cancer) and was associated with worse survival outcomes than the other type of PD‐DCIS. Conclusions Breast cancer with concomitant PD was associated with more aggressive tumor characteristics and worse survival outcomes. The HR status, HER2 status, and combined molecular subtype could not affect the prognosis of breast cancer with PD. Moreover, a portion of the PD‐DCIS cases were invasive breast cancer cases that required special treatment.