Search

Summary: Human genetic variants in SLC16A11 are associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). We previously identified two distinct mechanisms through which co-inherited T2D-risk coding and non-coding variants disrupt SLC16A11 expression and activity, thus implicating reduced SLC16A11 function as the disease-relevant direction of effect. In a recent publication, Zhao et al. (2019a) argue that human SLC16A11 coding variants confer gain of function, basing their conclusions on phenotypic changes observed following overexpression of mutant murine Slc16a11. However, data necessary to demonstrate gain-of-function activity are not reported. Furthermore, several fundamental flaws in their experimental system—including inaccurate modeling of the human variant haplotype and expression conditions that are not physiologically relevant—prevent conclusions about T2D-risk variant effects on human physiology. This Matters Arising paper is in response to Zhao et al. (2019a), published in Cell Reports. See also the response by Zhao et al. (2019b) in this issue of Cell Reports. : Hoch et al. discuss the analysis of coding variants of SLC16A11 in mice and humans in light of a recent Cell Reports publication. This Matters Arising paper is in response to Zhao et al. (2019a), published in Cell Reports. See also the response by Zhao et al. (2019b), published in this issue. Keywords: SLC16A11, type 2 diabetes, T2D