Search

Summary: Background: The efficacy of on-demand HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for men in sub-Saharan Africa has not been evaluated, and the on-demand PrEP dosing requirement for insertive sex remains unknown. Methods: HIV-negative males 13–24 years, requesting voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC), were enrolled into an open-label randomised controlled trial (NCT03986970), and randomised 1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1 to control arm or one of eight arms receiving emtricitabine-tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF) or emtricitabine-tenofovir alafenamide (F/TAF) over one or two days, and circumcised 5 or 21 h thereafter. The primary outcome was foreskin p24 concentrations following ex vivo HIV-1BaL challenge. Secondary outcomes included peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) p24 concentration, and drug concentrations in foreskin tissue, PBMCs, plasma and foreskin CD4+/CD4-cells. In the control arm, post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) activity of non-formulated tenofovir-emtricitabine (TFV-FTC) or TAF-FTC was assessed with ex vivo dosing 1, 24, 48 or 72 h post-HIV-1 challenge. Findings: 144 participants were analysed. PrEP with F/TDF or F/TAF prevented ex vivo infection of foreskins and PBMCs both 5 and 21 h after PrEP dosing. There was no difference between F/TDF and F/TAF (p24day15 geometric mean ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval: 0.65–1.74). Additional ex vivo dosing did not further increase inhibition. In the control arm, PEP ex vivo dosing was effective up to 48 post-exposure diminishing thereafter, with TAF-FTC showing prolonged protection compared to TFV-FTC. Participants receiving F/TAF had higher TFV-DP concentrations in foreskin tissue and PBMCs compared with F/TDF, irrespective of dose and sampling interval; but F/TAF did not confer preferential TFV-DP distribution into foreskin HIV target cells. FTC-TP concentrations with both drug regimens were equivalent and ∼1 log higher than TFV-DP in foreskin. Interpretation: A double dose of either F/TDF or F/TAF given once either 5 or 21 h before ex vivo HIV-challenge provided protection across foreskin tissue. Further clinical evaluation of pre-coital PrEP for insertive sex is warranted. Funding: EDCTP2, Gilead Sciences, Vetenskapsrådet.

Background: Different antiretroviral therapies (ARTs) may have differing effects on central nervous system (CNS) function. We assessed CNS pharmacodynamic effects of switching integrase inhibitors in people-with-HIV (PWH). Methods: PWH on tenofovir-DF/emtricitabine plus raltegravir 400 mg twice daily with suppressed plasma HIV RNA and without overt neuropsychiatric symptoms were randomly allocated on a 1:2 basis to remain on raltegravir or switch to dolutegravir 50 mg once daily for 120 days. Pharmacodynamic parameters assessed included cognitive function (z-score of 7 domains), patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs; PHQ-9 and Beck’s depression questionnaires), cerebral metabolite ratios measured by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (H1-MRS) and plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) HIV RNA. Pharmacokinetic parameters were also assessed in plasma and CSF. Changes and factors associated with changes in pharmacodynamics parameters were assessed. Results:In 20 subjects (19 male, 14 white ethnicity, median age 43 years (IQR: 11.5) and CD4 + count 717 (SD: 298) cells/µL), over 120 days there were no statistically significant changes in cognitive function [mean z-score difference (95%CI) −0.004 (−0.38/0.37); p = 0.98], PROMs [PHQ-9 median score change: 0 in control arm, −0.5 switch arm (p = 0.57); Beck’s depression questionnaire: −1.5 control arm, −1.0 switch arm (p = 0.38)], nor cerebral metabolite ratios between study arms. CSF HIV RNA was

Background and objectives: Access to safe and reliable contraception in the context of ARVs is essential. This study aimed to investigate the steady-state pharmacokinetics (PK) of ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel (EE/LNG) 30/150 μg (Microgynon®) and atazanavir/cobicistat (ATV/COBI) 300/150 mg (Evotaz®), co-administered in HIV negative female volunteers, and assess its safety and tolerability. Methods: This phase 1, open label, 57-day, cross over, PK study randomized participants to one of two groups: (i) group 1 received EE/LNG alone on days 1–21, EE/LNG (21 days) + ATV/COBI (14 days) in the co-administration phase (days 22–42) and ATV/COBI alone on days 43–56; (ii) group 2 followed the same sequence but started with ATV/COBI and concluding with EE/LNG. Each group underwent intensive PK sampling on days 14, 35, and 56. EE/LNG and ATV/COBI concentrations were measured using validated LC-MS/MS methods. Results: Of 14 healthy female volunteers screened, 11 attended baseline and six completed all PK phases (five withdrew secondary to side effects). Paired data were available for analysis in six subjects for EE/LNG and eight for ATV/COBI. Geometric mean ratios (GMR, with versus without ATV/COBI) and 90% confidence intervals (CI) for LNG Cmax, AUC0-24, C24 were 0.83 (0.68–1.02), 0.92 (0.71–1.18), 1.01 (0.73–1.38). GMR and 90% CI for EE Cmax, AUC0-24, C24 were 1.05 (0.92–1.19), 1.01 (0.83–1.22), 0.75 (0.60–0.93). No grade 3 or 4 adverse events or laboratory abnormalities were observed in the women who completed the study. Conclusions: Our findings showed no significant changes in LNG concentrations and a 25% decrease in EE C24 when EE/LNG was co-administered with ATV/COBI.