Search

Introduction and Objectives: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents one of the most common cancers worldwide. A considerable proportion of HCC is caused by cirrhosis related to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Due to the increasing prevalence of metabolic syndrome, it is estimated that MASH-related HCC will become the most prevalent etiology of HCC. Currently, HCC screening is based on liver ultrasonography; however, the sensitivity of ultrasonography for early HCC stages in obese patients only reaches 23 %. To date, no studied biomarker shows sufficient efficacy for screening purposes. Nevertheless, the usage of spectroscopic methods offers a new perspective, as its potential use would provide cheap, fast analysis of samples such as blood plasma. Material and Methods: We employed a combination of conventional and chiroptical spectroscopic methods to study differences between the blood plasma of obese cirrhotic patients with and without HCC. We included 20 subjects with HCC and 17 without evidence of liver cancer, all of them with body mass index ≥ 30. Results: Sensitivities and specificities reached values as follows: 0.780 and 0.905 for infrared spectroscopy, 0.700 and 0.767 for Raman spectroscopy, 0.840 and 0.743 for electronic circular dichroism, and 0.805 and 0.923 for Raman optical activity. The final combined classification model based on all spectroscopic methods reached a sensitivity of 0.810 and a specificity of 0.857, with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve among all models (0.961). Conclusions: We suggest that this approach can be used effectively as a diagnostic tool in patients who are not examinable by liver ultrasonography. Clinical trial registration: NCT04221347

Background and Objectives: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of primary liver cancer with a highly unfavorable prognosis. Aims: Retrospective statistical analysis of patients with HCC in the field of liver cirrhosis treated at our center from the perspective of demography, and the effects of key changes in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the last 10 years on overall survival (OS) and earlier diagnosis. Materials and Methods: This study included 170 cirrhotic patients with HCC (136 men, 80%). Demographic and etiological factors and OS were analyzed based on distribution into three groups according to the period and key changes in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches (BCLC classification staging; standardization of protocol for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and the introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) for the treatment of chronic viral hepatitis C (HCV); expansion of systemic oncological therapy). Results: The mean age at the time of diagnosis was 69.3 years (SD = 8.1), and etiology was as follows: non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) 39%, alcoholic liver disease (ALD) 36%, HCV 18%, cryptogenic liver cirrhosis 3%, chronic hepatitis B infection (HBV) 2%, and other etiology 2%. Distribution of stages according to the BCLC: 0 + A 36%, B 31%, C 22%, and D 11%. However, the distribution in the first studied period was as follows: 0 + A 15%, B 34%, C 36%, and D 15%; and in the last period: 0 + A 45%, B 27%, C 17%, and D 11%, and difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The median OS for stages 0 + A, B, C, and D was 58, 19, 6, and 2 months, respectively. During the monitored period, there was a visible increase in the etiology of ALD from 30% to 47% and a decrease in HCV from 22% to 11%. In patients treated with TACE (stage B), the median OS grew from 10 to 24 months (p < 0.0001) between the marginal monitored periods. Conclusions: We described a decreasing number of patients with HCV-related HCC during follow-up possibly linked with the introduction of DAA. In our cohort, an improvement in early-stage diagnosis was found, which we mainly concluded as a result of proper ultrasound surveillance, the institution of a HCV treatment center, and increased experience of our sonographers with an examination of cirrhotic patients. Lastly, we described significantly improved overall survival in patients with intermediate HCC treated by TACE, due to the increased experience of interventional radiologists with the method at our facility and an earlier switch to systemic therapy in case of non-response to TACE.