Search

Abstract The purpose of this study was to compare the academic motivation, self-regulation and self-worth of the gifted and normal students. It was a causal-comparative study. The research population consisted of all 11-year-old female students studying in the gifted and normal schools of Karaj educational district 1 in the academic year 1397-98 (totally 2107 people). Using random cluster sampling method, a female school was selected from the schools of Karaj educational district 1. Two classes of 11th grade of that school including 50 students were selected randomly from among the 11th grade classes and a sample of 50 gifted high school students was also selected purposefully. The subjects responded to Valerand and colleagues (1992) questionnaire, Self-Regulatory Learning Questionnaire (Pintrich & De Groot, 1990) and Rosenberg Self- worth Inventory (1965). The purpose of this research was to investigate the following hypothesis: there is a significant difference between the academic motivation, academic self-regulation and self- worth of the gifted and normal students. Data were analyzed by independent samples t-test using SPSS software. Findings confirmed the above hypothesis and showed that the level of the academic motivation, self-regulation and self-worth of the gifted students is higher than the normal students. Therefore, the above results emphasized the need to pay attention to the components of the self-regulation learning, and reinforcing the motivational beliefs and internal values of the normal students, because the correct policy of the educational development is of paramount importance to both the gifted and normal people.

Objective: At present, the media for health education on Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)/Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) are not appropriate for the hearing-impaired. The objectives of this research were to determine the effectiveness of Health Education by comparing the knowledge on HIV/AIDS before and after watching a dual spoken/sign language video, and at a 3 months follow-up. Material and Methods: The video was translated into sign language which was added at corner of screen. Subjects in the study were 160 students who were the students in school for the deaf and normal students in Polytechnic school. All students were in the upper secondary school level. Data were collected from August 2010 to April 2011. Results: The study revealed that 38% of the students had had sexual intercourse. Among the normal student, A comparable of normal hearing student was associated for comparison, 41% of this group had had sexual intercourse. Nine percent of deaf student were no condom use, 18% of the comparison group used no condom. Mean knowledge score on HIV/AIDS among the deaf student was higher in the comparison group. Mean knowledge score before watching the video was significant. After watching the video levels of knowledge increased in both groups (p

Objective: Handedness is the most prominent behavioral asymmetry in human. The term of hand preference points to prefer hand or functional asymmetry in manual tasks. The items were considered in this study were: the comparison of handedness between normal and congenitally deaf students the effects of age, sex, and pressure on using right hand for unimanual tasks on handedness the frequency of left-handers among student’s families, the influence of hand preference on English language capabilities, and the point of view of people rather to left-handers have been investigated. Materials & Methods: This cross-sectional comparative study was conducted on 760 students including 380 normal students and 380 deaf students with congenital severe or profound sensory-neural hearing loss from 12 to 18 years of age by that were selected purposefully, completing Edinburg handedness inventory in Tehran. The students didn’t have any confirmed diseases or neurological disorders, except hearing loss in deaf student. Data were gathered through the completion of the Edinburg Handedness Inventory by the students. The student’s aural records and also the confirmation of the audiologist in the deaf schools were considered in order to determine the kind and degree of hearing loss. Results: The prevalence of left-handedness among normal (9.7%) and deaf (10.3%) students were near to each other, and there was no significant difference between them (P=0.901, z=-1.24). The prevalence of left-handedness was higher in boys rather than girls, but there was no significant influence of sex and age on results (P>0.05). The family and/or teacher pressure for using right hand was 16.0% in normal students and 5.0% in deaf students, and they didn’t report any strict pressure or severity regard this mater. The frequency of left-handers was higher among family of normal students (22.6%) than deaf students (13.2%), and the difference between them was significant statistically (P=0.003, Z=-2.976). In both normal and deaf students, there was no significant difference between left and right-handers relate to English language ability (P>0.05). Regarding point of view people relate to left-handers, there was no significant difference between normal and deaf students (P=0.541, Z=-0.611). Conclusion: In present study, the prevalence of left-handedness was near to it’s prevalence in North-America and Western Europe, and revealed considerable difference with statistics of some Asian countries. The sameness of left-handedness prevalence in normal and deaf students, didn’t confirm the Previc’s hypothesis regard no differential ear sensitivity or advantage in congenitally deaf persons.