Search

Objective: Lipids play key role in coronary atherosclerosis. The role of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) in atherosclerotic plaques using intravascular imaging remains unclear. This study aimed to assess its relationship with coronary plaque features using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: A total of 601 patients divided into two groups: normal non-HDL-C≤130 mg/dl (n = 410) and high non-HDL cholesterol >130 mg/dl (n = 191). IVUS performed before coronary intervention. Results: Mean age 53.18 ± 12.29 years. No significant differences in hypertension, diabetes, and smoking between groups. Plaque burden was significantly higher among normal versus high non-HDL-C groups (79.59 ± 9.98 % vs. 81.61 ± 5.39 %; p = 0.001). At minimal luminal site, fibrofatty percentage was higher in normal non-HDL-C group (p = 0.027), while necrotic core greater in high non-HDL-C group (p = 0.033). Segmental analysis, necrotic core was significantly higher in percentage (p = 0.006) and volumes (p = 0.011) in normal versus high non-HDL-C groups. Total cholesterol (r = 0.099, p = 0.015), LDL-C (r = 0.081, p = 0.046), triglycerides (r = 0.083, p = 0.041),and non-HDL-C (r = 0.099, p = 0.015) positively correlated with plaque burden. Total cholesterol (r = 0.115, p = 0.005), LDL-C (r = 0.107, p = 0.009), and non-HDL-C (r = 0.105, p = 0.010) positively correlated with necrotic core volume. Linear regression analysis showed age and non-HDL-C as predictors of higher plaque burden. Multiple linear regression analysis; age, body mass index, and non-HDL-C were predictors of larger necrotic core volume. Conclusion: Non-HDL-C levels were positively associated with plaque burden, measure of extent of atherosclerosis. It is closely associated with and is a predictor of necrotic core volume; a marker of plaque vulnerability. This IVUS study demonstrates potential role of non-HDL-C in causation of plaque in ACS.

Aim. To evaluate the associations of abdominal obesity (AO), adipokines and premature coronary artery disease (CAD) in young people for a deeper understanding of the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic diseases.Material and methods. A total of 1457 people were examined, including 653 (44,8%) men. Mean age was 36,7±6,0 years. Premature CAD was detected in 46 people, while 4 following subgroups were formed (138 people in total): with CAD and AO; with CAD, without AO; control groups by age and sex: without CAD, with AO; without CAD, without AO.Results. Premature CAD in young people is associated with an increase in non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C). Univariate analysis found that the probability of CAD increased by 1% with an increase in adiponectin level, and by 0,2% with an increase of 1 ng/ml in resistin level. Multivariate regression analysis, including sex, age, waist circumference, non-HD-C, adiponectin, and resistin, significant associations were obtained for non-HDL-C and adiponectin. With AO, the CAD probability increased by 0,6% with an increase in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 level (PAI-1). However, when non-HDL-C was included in the model, significance for this biomarker was not achieved.Conclusion. In young people, CAD is associated with increased levels of non-HDL cholesterol, adiponectin, resistin and PAI-1. Independent associations with premature CAD were obtained only for adiponectin, which makes this marker promising for study in young people.

IntroductionTriglyceride-rich remnant lipoproteins (TRLs) are considered atherogenic due to the presence of remnant cholesterol, which is transported by apolipoprotein B. In clinical practice, the concentration of TRLs can be estimated by calculating remnant cholesterol or non-HDL cholesterol levels.AimThis study aims to investigate the proportion of patients who have low LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) concentration but elevated remnant cholesterol concentration, stratified by the presence of hypertriglyceridaemia and ethnicity, using real-world hospital data. Our secondary aim is to investigate the proportion of patients with elevated non-HDL cholesterol levels using guideline-recommended goals.MethodsA 2-year retrospective study was conducted at a single centre, analyzing lipid blood tests of all patients, including directly measured LDL-C. Fasting for blood tests was not mandatory.ResultsThe study included a total of 21,605 consecutive patients with plasma lipid profiles analyzed in our hospital laboratory. The median age was 61 years. In patients with ASCVD (n = 14,704), 23.7% had an LDL-C level of 0.65 mmol/L was present in 11% of all patients. The current guideline-recommended non-HDL-C goal, which uses a 0.8 mmol/L estimate of remnant cholesterol concentration, was achieved in >92% of patients, suggesting that it is unlikely to be clinically useful for the majority of our patient population except where there is concomitant hypertriglyceridaemia. Further studies are needed to establish the appropriate non-HDL-C goal or calculated remnant cholesterol concentration, paired with the LDL-C goal or otherwise, in a Southeast Asian population.

Chuang Li,&ast; Kuizheng He,&ast; Yixing Yang, Kuibao Li, Mulei Chen, Lefeng Wang, Xiaorong Xu,&ast; Weiming Li&ast; Heart Center and Beijing Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Weiming Li; Xiaorong Xu, Heart Center and Beijing Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8&num; Gong-Ti South Road, Beijing, 10020, People’s Republic of China, Email liweiming@sina.com; medicinexxr@163.comIntroduction: Non-high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) is a secondary therapeutic target in cardiovascular diseases and is used for residual risk assessment in patients with coronary artery syndrome (ACS). This study was designed to determine the association between non-HDL-C in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) with ACS and clinical outcomes.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 468 patients with prior CABG with ACS and categorized them into two groups based on the median non-HDL-C level. The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including cardiovascular death and recurrent myocardial infarction. Kaplan–Meier curves, Cox proportional-hazard regressions, and restricted cubic splines were used to determine the association between non-HDL-C and MACEs. The discrimination and reclassification of the nomogram based on non-HDL-C were assessed using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and net reclassification improvement (NRI).Results: During the average follow-up time of 744.5 days, non-HDL-C was independently associated with the occurrence of MACEs (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.65– 15.24; p = 0.005) after adjusting for other lipid parameters. The spline curves indicated a linear relationship between non-HDL-C and MACEs (p-nonlinear: 0.863). The time-dependent areas under the ROC curves of prior-CABG-ACS nomograms containing non-HDL regarding MACEs in two consecutive years were 91.7 (95% CI: 85.5– 97.9) and 91.5 (95% CI: 87.3– 95.7), respectively. The NRI analysis indicated that the prior-CABG-ACS model improved the reclassification ability for 1- and 2-year MACEs (22.4% and 7%, p < 0.05, respectively).Discussion: Non-HDL is independently associated with the risk of MACEs in patients with prior CABG with ACS. The prior-CABG-ACS nomogram based on non-HDL-C and five convenient variables generates valid and stable predictions of MACE occurrence.Keywords: non-HDL cholesterol, major adverse cardiovascular events, prior coronary artery bypass grafting, GRACE score

Background & aims: Premature coronary artery disease (CAD) is endemic in India. We performed a study to identify risk factors, clinical presentation, angiographic findings and interventions in premature CAD. Methods: Successive patients who underwent percutaneous intervention (PCI) were enrolled from January 2018 to June 2021. Premature CAD was defined as women 45-59 y and men 40-54 y and very premature as women

Background Previous results provide supportive but not conclusive evidence for the use of omega‐3 fatty acids to reduce blood lipids and prevent events of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, but the strength and shape of dose–response relationships remain elusive. Methods and Results This study included 90 randomized controlled trials, reported an overall sample size of 72 598 participants, and examined the association between omega‐3 fatty acid (docosahexaenoic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid, or both) intake and blood lipid changes. Random‐effects 1‐stage cubic spline regression models were used to study the mean dose–response association between daily omega‐3 fatty acid intake and changes in blood lipids. Nonlinear associations were found in general and in most subgroups, depicted as J‐shaped dose–response curves for low‐/high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol. However, we found evidence of an approximately linear dose–response relationship for triglyceride and non‐high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol among the general population and more evidently in populations with hyperlipidemia and overweight/obesity who were given medium to high doses (>2 g/d). Conclusions This dose–response meta‐analysis demonstrates that combined intake of omega‐3 fatty acids near linearly lowers triglyceride and non‐high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol. Triglyceride‐lowering effects might provide supportive evidence for omega‐3 fatty acid intake to prevent cardiovascular events.

BackgroundThe relationship between cumulative non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) burden and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains unclearObjectiveTo prospectively examine the association between cumulative non-HDL-C burden and ASCVD risk in the Kailuan cohort of China.MethodsA total of 49,679 subjects who were free of ASCVD participated in three consecutive examinations in 2006, 2008 and 2010 were enrolled. Duration and concentration of cumulative exposure to non-HDL-C (cumNon-HDL-C) were respectively used to estimate the extent of cumulative non-HDL-C burden. The participants were divided into four groups according to durations of cumNon-HDL-C (0, 2, 4 and 6 years) and five groups according to the quintiles of cumNon-HDL-C concentration (

Deepa Joshi,1 Prashant GJ,1 Shohini Ghosh,1 Anookh Mohanan,1 Shashank Joshi,2 Viswanathan Mohan,3 Subhankar Chowdhury,4 Chaitanya Dutt,1 Nikhil Tandon5 1Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India; 2Lilavati Hospital, Mumbai, India; 3Dr. Mohan’s Diabetes Specialities Centre (Madras Diabetes Research Foundation), Tamil Nadu, India; 4Department of Endocrinology, Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research and Seth Sukhlal Karnani Memorial Hospital, Kolkata, India; 5Department of Endocrinology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, IndiaCorrespondence: Deepa Joshi, Research & Development, Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, Tel + 91 7971315571, Email deepajoshi@torrentpharma.comBackground: TRC150094, a novel mitochondrial modulator, reduces insulin resistance and is expected to improve the trinity of dysglycemia, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. In this multi-dose phase-2 study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of TRC150094 in diabetic subjects with dyslipidemia receiving standard of care.Methods: A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, Phase 2 study was conducted in 225 subjects from July 2013 to August 2015. The key inclusion criteria were body mass index of 23– 35 kg/m2, age between 30 and 65 years, fasting glucose of ≥ 126 or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of ≥ 6.4% stabilized on treatment with ≤ 2 oral hypoglycemic agents, apolipoprotein-B (apo-B) ≥ 100 mg/dL, serum triglyceride (TG) ≥ 150 mg/dL, systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 130 mmHg, and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 85 mmHg with/without antihypertensive treatment. The subjects were randomly assigned to one of three TRC150094 doses (25, 50, or 75 mg) or placebo for 24 weeks. The outcomes assessed included fasting plasma glucose (FPG), insulin, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), and apoB. In addition, safety and tolerability were assessed.Results: A reduction for dose up to 50 mg was noted for FPG in the range of 13.9 to 21.7 mg/dL (p < 0.05 for TRC150094 25 and 50 mg), fasting insulin reduction in the range 2.7 to 6.0 mU/L (all doses, p > 0.05), and improved HOMA-IR (− 2.0 to − 2.5) (all doses, p > 0.05) compared to placebo after 24 weeks of treatment. Furthermore, a significant reduction in MAP in the range 3.1 to 4.2 mmHg (p < 0.05 for TRC150094 25 and 75 mg) was noted. In addition, TRC150094 treatment was weight neutral, had a favorable effect on lowering atherogenic lipid fractions, including non-HDL cholesterol (− 6.8 mg/dL at 50 mg dose). Adverse events were mild to moderate in nature and not dose-related. One adverse event not related to treatment led to the discontinuation of the study. Overall, TRC150094 was safe and well tolerated for up to 24 weeks.Conclusion: In this study, TRC150094 treatment in the dose range of 25 to 50 mg showed improvement in various components of CMBCD, ie, dysglycemia, dyslipidemia, and hypertension.Trial Registration: This study was registered in the Clinical Trial Registry of India. Trial registration number: CTRI/2013/03/003444. Date of registration: 4th March 2013.Keywords: cardiometabolic-based chronic disease, mitochondrial modulator, type 2 diabetes, non-HDL cholesterol, hypertension, dyslipidemia

Background/Aims: Statin intolerance leads to poor adherence to statin therapy, resulting in a failure to achieve desired cholesterol reduction and adverse outcomes. The LILRB5 Asp247Gly genotype has been identified as being associated with statin intolerance and statin-induced myalgia. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to examine its role in immune response through T regulatory cell aggregation and in achieving cholesterol reduction targets.Methods: A double-blind, cross-over, recruit-by-genotype trial was undertaken. A total of 18 participants who had either the Asp247Asp (T/T) genotype or the Gly247Gly (C/C) genotype were recruited to the study. Participants were randomised to receive placebo or atorvastatin 80 mg daily for 28 days. Following a washout period of 3 weeks, they were then switched to the opposite treatment. Biochemical and immunological measurements as well as interviews were performed prior to and after both treatment periods. Within genotype group comparisons were performed using repeated measures Wilcoxon tests. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA with genotype and treatment as factors were used to compare changes in biochemical parameters between groups during placebo and atorvastatin periods.Results: Individuals with the Asp247Asp genotype had a greater increase in creatine kinase (CK) compared to those with Gly247Gly genotype in response to atorvastatin (p = 0.03). Those with Gly247Gly genotype had a mean non-HDL cholesterol reduction of 2.44 (95% CI:1.59 – 3.29) mmol/L while in Asp247Asp genotype group the mean reduction was 1.28 (95%CI: 0.48 – 2.07) mmol/L. The interaction between the genotype and atorvastatin treatment for total cholesterol (p = 0.007) and non-HDL cholesterol response was significant (p = 0.025). Immunological assessment showed no significant changes in aggregation of T regulatory cells by genotype.Conclusion: The Asp247Gly variant in LILRB5, previously associated with statin intolerance, was associated with differential increases in creatine kinase and total cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol-lowering response to atorvastatin. Taken together, these results suggest that this variant could have utility in precision cardiovascular therapy.

Abstract Suboptimal blood pressure (BP) control in patients with type 2 diabetes is associated with adverse micro‐ and macrovascular complications. This study aimed to investigate the predictors of uncontrolled hypertension in an Iranian population with type 2 diabetes. This is a cross‐sectional study of 2612 patients with type 2 diabetes, including 944 patients with hypertension. Controlled and uncontrolled hypertension were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to determined independent predictors of uncontrolled hypertension. Of 2612 patients with type 2 diabetes, 944 (36.1%) patients had hypertension. Of all patients with hypertension, 580 (61.4%) were still on monotherapy. Uncontrolled hypertension was detected in 536 participants (56.8%). Patients with uncontrolled hypertension had significantly higher body mass index (BMI) (29.8±4.8 vs. 28.6±4.6), waist circumference (99.11±10.95 vs. 96.68±10.92), pulse pressure (67.3±17.3 vs. 48.4±10.7), total cholesterol (177.1±45.5 vs. 164.3±40.5), non‐HDL cholesterol (133.0±43.5 vs. 120.1±38.7), triglycerides (175.7±80.3 vs. 157.4±76.7), and Atherogenic Index of Plasma (AIP) (0.57±0.23 vs. 0.52±0.24) (p 200 mg/dl non‐HDL cholesterol had a significant correlation with uncontrolled hypertension (OR = 4.635, CI95%:1.781–12.064, p = .002). In conclusion, BMI, pulse pressure, total cholesterol, and non‐HDL cholesterol are significant predictors of uncontrolled hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes. Also, ineffective monotherapy, medical inertia and patients’ non‐compliance were other contributors to the uncontrolled hypertension.

Abstract Background A distorted blood lipid profile is an important risk factor for ischemic heart disease (IHD) but the predictive ability of the different lipid measures has rarely been studied. Our aim was to examine and compare, in a large sample of women, the predictive ability of total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio (TC/HDL-C) and non-HDL-C in relation to IHD, adjusted for age, exercise, smoking, waist-hip ratio, blood pressure, and diabetes mellitus. Methods Between 1995 and 2000, a total of 6537 women aged 50–59 years from the Women’s Health in Lund area (WHILA) study in southern Sweden were included and underwent a baseline examination. The women were followed through national registers for incidence of IHD during a mean follow-up of 17 years. The prediction accuracy was estimated through Harrell’s C and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Results Increasing TC/HDL-C as well as non-HDL-C showed strong associations with IHD, with the highest risk in the 5th quintile, where the HR was 2.30 (95% CI: 1.70–3.11) for TC/HDL-C and 1.67 (95% CI: 1.25–2.24) for non-HDL-C, after adjustments. Comparisons using Harrell’s C and AIC indicated that TC/HDL-C has a slightly higher predictive ability than that of non-HDL-C (Harrell’s C 0.62 and 0.59 respectively, p = 0.003 for difference, age-adjusted model; AIC for TC/HDL-C

BackgroundNon-HDL-C is well established causal risk factor for the progression of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, there remains a controversial pattern of how non-HDL-C relates to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, and the concentration of non-HDL-C where the risk of mortality is lowest is not defined.MethodsA population-based cohort study using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2014. Male participants without statin therapy were divided into the six groups according to non-HDL-C levels (

To explore whether non-high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-c) is associated with depression, a total of 26 819 Canadians aged 45–85 from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) were included in analysis. Non-HDL-c, the difference between total-c and HDL-c, was categorized into five levels, i.e.,

Abstract Background Dyslipidemia contributes to the development of nephrolithiasis in adults; however its relationship to urolithiasis in children remains debatable, and will be clarified in the present work. Methods A case–control study was performed involving 58 pediatric patients diagnosed with upper urinary tract stones as well as 351 controls. Age, gender, body mass index (BMI), serum calcium, serum uric acid, blood glucose, blood lipids, and compositions of stones were compared. Results According to the univariate analysis, uric acid was higher (P

Abstract Background Lipid-lowering therapy is guided by Low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) levels, although the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk could be better reflected by other lipid parameters. This study aimed at comparing a comprehensive lipid profile between patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with LDL-c concentration within and above target. Methods A comprehensive lipid profile was characterized in 96 T2DM patients. The European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS) 2016 and 2019 Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemias were used to define LDL-c targets. Results In this population, only 28.1 and 16.7% of patients had mean LDL-c levels within target, as defined by the 2016 and 2019 guidelines, respectively. Applying the 2016 guidelines criteria, in patients with LDL-c within target, 22, 25 and 44% presented non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-c), Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) and oxidized LDL-c levels above the recommended range, respectively, whereas according to the 2019 guidelines criteria, 50, 39 and 44% of the patients with LDL-c within target had elevated high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), ApoB and oxidized LDL-c levels, respectively. LDL-c was strongly correlated with non-HDL-c (r = 0.850), ApoB (r = 0.656) and oxidized LDL-c (r = 0.508). Similarly, there was a strong correlation between non-HDL-c with both ApoB (r = 0.808) and oxidized LDL-c (r = 0.588). Conclusions These findings emphasize the limitations of only considering LDL-c concentration for cardiovascular (CV) risk assessment. Targeting only LDL-c could result in missed opportunities for CV risk reduction in T2DM patients. These data suggest that non-HDL-c, ApoB and oxidized LDL-c levels could be considered as an important part of these patients’ evaluation allowing for a more accurate estimation of CV risk and hopefully better management of these high-risk patients.

The article discusses a new approach to assessing cardiovascular risk in clinical practice, presented in the European guidelines 2021. Two novel risk charts (SCORE2 and SCORE2-OP) have been proposed that have undergone significant revision and require significant changes in primary care practice. It has been suggested that in modern conditions their practical introduction is premature, since the healthcare system is not ready for renewal. Therefore, time is needed to adapt it to the practical healthcare conditions and to revise the medical screening protocols, which will require financial costs. The implementation of these recommendations should be taken responsibly so as not to harm the existing system of preventive care.

Background: Not only low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol but also non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol (VLDL-C), and intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) cholesterol (IDL-C) are reported to be significant risk markers for coronary heart disease (CHD). We reported the relevance of IDL-C to Framingham risk score (F-score), but the present study addressed the relevance of IDL-C to Suita score (S-score), a risk score for coronary heart disease (CHD) developed for the Japanese individuals in addition to F-score.Methods: The cholesterol levels of lipoproteins, including triglyceride (TG)-rich lipoproteins (IDL and VLDL), were measured by an anion exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (AEX-HPLC). This study enrolled 476 men, aged mean 51 years and free of CHD and stroke.Results: Non-HDL-C, IDL-C, and VLDL-C significantly correlated with F-score and S-score. In the multiple stepwise regression analysis, IDL-C as well as body mass index (BMI) significantly correlated with both F-score and S-score in both the total subjects and the subjects without drug therapy. The multivariate logistic analysis with the model composed of BMI and IDL-C as the predictor variables demonstrated that 1 SD increase in IDL-C was an independent predictor for 10-year CHD risk >10% of F-score (OR 1.534, 95% CI 1.266–1.859, p < 0001) and that of S-score (OR 1.372, 95% CI 1.130–1.667, p = 0.0014) in the total subjects. Even in the subjects without the drug therapy, the increased IDL-C, as well as BMI, were significant predictors for 10-year CHD risk >10% of S-score as well as F-score.Conclusion: These results suggest the significant relevance of the increased IDL-C for CHD risk scores in middle-aged men free of CHD and stroke. Further investigations are needed in women and elderly subjects.

Background: The association between obesity, non-HDL cholesterol, and clinical outcomes in subjects with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is incompletely understood. The aim of this investigation was to explore the association between body mass index (BMI), non-high density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol, and long-term follow-up prognosis.Methods: This present study used data obtained by the Cardiovascular Center of Beijing Friendship Hospital Database Bank. We identified 3,780 consecutive AMI populations aged 25–93 years from 2013 to 2020. Participants were categorized as normal weight (18.5 ≤ BMI

Background: Hypertension and non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-c) measure is a useful evaluation tool to assess heart disease risk. Increasing physical activity (PA) is considered to reduce blood pressure (BP) and non-HDL-c in patients with hypertension. Objective: This study assesses the influence of moderate and regular PA on non-HDL cholesterol in essential hypertension. Subjects and methods: We studied 100 patients of either gender, aged 40–69 years of stage 2 essential hypertension in this interventional study. Patients were enrolled for 12 weeks of PA intervention (10,000 footsteps per day) and were followed at 15 days interval in the first month and after that 1-month duration. Lipid profile was estimated at baseline and at the final assessment visit (after 12 weeks). Results: The data included in this study confirm the beneficial effects of regular PA on non-HDL-c levels (P < 0.000001). It was found that after 12 weeks of intervention program, the cholesterol, triglycerides; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL), and non-HDL-c were lowered from 276.53 to 194.19, 191.17 to 110.58, 196.07 to 120.72, 38.23 to 22.12, and 234.32 to 142.84, respectively. It was also noted that high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) was increased from 42.21 to 51.35 following the interventional program. All the results were highly significant (P < 0.000001). Conclusions: A non-pharmacological activity like PA is beneficial for better management of hypertension to avoid cardiovascular co-morbidities. Twelve weeks of physical exercise program (walking of 10,000 footsteps/day) decreases the risk associated with BP elevation by improving non-HDL-c in hypertensive patients.

Abstract Background Probiotics incorporated into dairy products have been shown to reduce total (TC) and LDL cholesterolemia (LDL-C) in subjects with moderate hypercholesterolemia. More specifically, probiotics with high biliary salt hydrolase activity, e.g. Bifidobacterium longum BB536, may decrease TC and LDL-C by lowering intestinal cholesterol reabsorption and, combined with other nutraceuticals, may be useful to manage hypercholesterolemia in subjects with low cardiovascular (CV) risk. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a nutraceutical combination containing Bifidobacterium longum BB536, red yeast rice (RYR) extract (10 mg/day monacolin K), niacin, coenzyme Q10 (Lactoflorene Colesterolo®). The end-points were changes of lipid CV risk markers (LDL-C, TC, non-HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), HDL-C, apolipoprotein AI (ApoAI), lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9)), and of markers of cholesterol synthesis/absorption. Methods A 12-week randomized, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Thirty-three subjects (18–70 years) in primary CV prevention and low CV risk (SCORE: 0–1% in 24 and 2–4% in 9 subjects; LDL-C: 130–200 mg/dL) were randomly allocated to either nutraceutical (N = 16) or placebo (N = 17). Results Twelve-week treatment with the nutraceutical combination, compared to placebo, significantly reduced TC (− 16.7%), LDL-C (− 25.7%), non-HDL-C (− 24%) (all p

Abstract Background Excessive lipid depositing in liver cells could induce pathophysiological development of liver. Our study aimed to assess whether non-HDL cholesterol to HDL-cholesterol ratio (NonHDLc/HDLc) is an independent risk factor for liver function tests (LFTs) abnormalities in geriatric population. Methods We enrolled 1745 eligible subjects (714 males, 1031 females) with normal liver function tests at baseline who participated in annual health checkup for liver disease in 2015. Logistic regression models were used to examine the independent relationship between NonHDLc/HDLc ratio and LFTs abnormalities. Results After one year follow-up, there were 6.1% (n = 107) participants developed new-onset LFTs abnormalities in 2016. Equally dividing participants into tertiles according to their baseline NonHDLc/HDLc ratio levels, we found compared with tertile 1, the multivariable-adjusted ORs (95% CIs) for new-onset LFTs abnormalities of tertile 3 were 2.85 (1.18–6.93), P = 0.021. In stratified analysis, compared with controls, the correlation between NonHDLc/HDLc ratio and incidence of LFTs abnormalities was more remarkable in female individuals, BMI > 24 individuals and free of diabetes individuals. Conclusion Our study suggests that NonHDLc/HDLc ratio is an independent risk factor for LFTs abnormalities in geriatric population, and assessment of NonHDLc/HDLc ratio may help early identify high risk people of liver diseases. Trial registration Trial registration in the Ethics Committee of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (IORG No: IORG0003571). Registered 3 March 2015.

The paper reviews the relevance of various types of cholesterol as factors of cardiovascular risks. According to recent recommendations, apart from the routinely evaluated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-H), clinicians now look at non-HDL (high-density lipoprotein) cholesterol. The paper questions, whether there is enough clinical and scientific evidence to change priorities in the lipid assessment of cardiovascular risk: measurement and monitoring of non-HDL cholesterol vs. routine lipid markers - LDL cholesterol and plasma HDL cholesterol.

Objetivos: verificar el nivel de cumplimiento de las metas en colesterol LDL, colesterol no-HDL, triglicéridos y colesterol HDL, de acuerdo con lo indicado por la guía del NCEP-ATPIII y las recomendaciones actuales, en una población de pacientes hospitalizados por causa no cardiovascular pero con antecedente de enfermedad coronaria. Analizar, además, los hipolipemiantes que utiliza esta población, así como la prevalencia de síndrome metabólico, glucemia anormal en ayunas y diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Metodología: el porcentaje de cumplimiento de estas metas se evaluó mediante el programa de análisis estadístico STATA. Se compararon los hallazgos del perfil lipídico con la propuesta de la guía del NCEP-ATPIII y las recomendaciones actuales (punto final primario). Igualmente, se analizaron los hipolipemiantes utilizados, así como la prevalencia de glucemia anormal en ayunas, diabetes mellitus tipo 2 y síndrome metabólico (punto final secundario). Resultados: se identificaron 281 pacientes que cumplían con los criterios de inclusión. En la tabla 2 se resumen los resultados del punto final primario. De acuerdo con el NCEP-ATPIII, en el riesgo alto, el porcentaje de pacientes que cumplían con las metas en el cLDL (objetivo principal en el tratamiento de las dislipidemias), era de 57,2 y en el riesgo muy alto de 23,5%. En la actualidad, a los pacientes con enfermedad coronaria, independiente de la presencia de síndrome metabólico o diabetes mellitus, se les recomienda una meta para el cLDL menor de 70 mg/dL (Recomendación IIa), la cual se observó en 21,7% de los pacientes estudiados. La prevalencia de glucemia anormal en ayunas fue de 25,6%, la de diabetes mellitus tipo 2 de 20% y la de síndrome metabólico de 45,2%. Con respecto a los hipolipemiantes utilizados, se observó que 56% usaba lovastatina, 14% no utilizaba hipolipemiantes y ninguno tenía asociación de estos fármacos. Conclusiones: después de nueve años de la publicación de las guías del NCEP-ATPIII y de las recomendaciones posteriores sobre las metas del perfil lipídico en pacientes con enfermedad coronaria y a pesar de la divulgación de las mismas a través de conferencias, congresos y publicaciones, estas metas las cumple un porcentaje bajo de pacientes, tal como lo demuestra este estudio observacional en sujetos hospitalizados por causas diferentes a la enfermedad coronaria pero con este antecedente. Una de las explicaciones para este pobre resultado es el uso de lovastatina, estatina de baja efectividad para reducir el cLDL. Se analizan otras posibles causas y se hacen propuestas para lograr los objetivos.Objectives: to verify the level of compliance with the targets in LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, in accordance with the recommendations of the NCEP-ATPIII guide and current recommendations in a population of patients hospitalized for non-cardiovascular causes but with a history of coronary disease. Analyze also lipid-lowering drugs used by this population as well as the prevalence of metabolic syndrome, abnormal fasting glucose and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methodology: the percentage of fulfillment of these goals was assessed using the STATA statistical analysis program. Findings of the lipid profile were compared with the proposal from the NCEP-ATPIII guide and current recommendations (primary endpoint). Similarly, lipid-lowering drugs used were analyzed as well as the prevalence of abnormal fasting glucose, diabetes mellitus type 2 and metabolic syndrome (secondary endpoint). Results: we identified 281 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Table 2 summarizes the results of the primary endpoint. According to the NCEP-ATPIII, in high risk, the percentage of patients who met the LDL cholesterol goals (main goal in the treatment of dyslipidemias), was 57,2% and in the very high risk, 23,5%. Currently, patients with coronary heart disease independent of the presence of metabolic syndrome or diabetes mellitus, a goal for LDL cholesterol below 70 mg/dL is recommended (Recommendation IIa); this was observed in 21.7% of patients studied. The prevalence of abnormal fasting glucose was 25.6%, that of type 2 diabetes mellitus was 20% and that of metabolic syndrome 45.2%. With respect to lipid-lowering drugs used, we observed that 56% used lovastatin, 14% did not use lipid-lowering drugs and none had any association of these drugs. Conclusions: after nine years of the publication of NCEP-ATPIII guidelines and subsequent recommendations on the goals of the lipid profile in patients with coronary disease and despite the dissemination of these through lectures, conferences and publications, these goals are met by a low percentage of patients, as evidenced by this observational study in patients hospitalized for causes other than coronary heart disease but with this history. One explanation for this poor performance is the use of lovastatin, that is a low efficacy statin to reduce LDL cholesterol. Other possible causes are analyzed and proposals to achieve the objectives are made.

Abstract Background Serum total cholesterol (TC) and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) have been used as major laboratory measures in clinical practice to assess cardiovascular risk in the general population and disease management as well as prognosis in patients. However, some studies have also reported the use of non-HDL cholesterol (non-HDL-C). As non-HDL-C can be calculated by subtracting HDL-C from TC, both of which do not require fasting blood sample in contrast to LDL-C which requires fasting blood sample, we aimed to compare non-HDL-C with LDL-C as a predictor of myocardial infarction (MI). Methods This hospital based cross sectional study was undertaken among 51 cases of MI and equal number of controls. MI was diagnosed based on the clinical history, ECG changes and biochemical parameters. 5 mL of fasting blood sample was collected from each research participant for the analysis of lipid profile. Non-HDL-C was calculated by using the equation; Non-HDL-C = TC – HDL-C. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 14.0. Results 42 MI cases were dyslipidemic in contrast to 20 dyslipidemic subjects under control group. The differences in the median values of each lipid parameter were statistically significant between MI cases and controls. The lipid risk factors most strongly associated with MI were HDL-C (OR 5.85, 95% CI 2.41-14.23, P value = 0.000) followed by non-HDL-C (OR 3.77, 95% CI 1.64-8.66, P value = 0.002), LDL-C/HDL-C (OR 3.38, 95% CI 1.44-7.89, P value = 0.005), TC/HDL-C (OR 2.93, 95% CI 1.36-7.56, P value = 0.026), LDL-C (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.20-6.10, P value = 0.017), TC (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.04-6.97, P value = 0.042) and Tg (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.01-6.39, P value = 0.047). Area under the receiver operating curve was greater for non-HDL-C than for LDL-C. Non-HDL-C was also found to be more sensitive and specific than LDL-C for MI. Conclusions HDL-C and non-HDL-C are better discriminating parameters than LDL-C for MI. Thus, we can simply perform test for HDL-C and non-HDL-C both of which do not require fasting blood sample rather than waiting for fasting blood sample to measure LDL-C.

Objetivos: verificar el nivel de cumplimiento de las metas en colesterol LDL, colesterol no-HDL, triglicéridos y colesterol HDL, de acuerdo con lo indicado por la guía del NCEP-ATPIII y las recomendaciones actuales, en una población de pacientes hospitalizados por causa no cardiovascular pero con antecedente de enfermedad coronaria. Analizar, además, los hipolipemiantes que utiliza esta población, así como la prevalencia de síndrome metabólico, glucemia anormal en ayunas y diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Metodología: el porcentaje de cumplimiento de estas metas se evaluó mediante el programa de análisis estadístico STATA. Se compararon los hallazgos del perfil lipídico con la propuesta de la guía del NCEP-ATPIII y las recomendaciones actuales (punto final primario). Igualmente, se analizaron los hipolipemiantes utilizados, así como la prevalencia de glucemia anormal en ayunas, diabetes mellitus tipo 2 y síndrome metabólico (punto final secundario). Resultados: se identificaron 281 pacientes que cumplían con los criterios de inclusión. En la tabla 2 se resumen los resultados del punto final primario. De acuerdo con el NCEP-ATPIII, en el riesgo alto, el porcentaje de pacientes que cumplían con las metas en el cLDL (objetivo principal en el tratamiento de las dislipidemias), era de 57,2 y en el riesgo muy alto de 23,5%. En la actualidad, a los pacientes con enfermedad coronaria, independiente de la presencia de síndrome metabólico o diabetes mellitus, se les recomienda una meta para el cLDL menor de 70 mg/dL (Recomendación IIa), la cual se observó en 21,7% de los pacientes estudiados. La prevalencia de glucemia anormal en ayunas fue de 25,6%, la de diabetes mellitus tipo 2 de 20% y la de síndrome metabólico de 45,2%. Con respecto a los hipolipemiantes utilizados, se observó que 56% usaba lovastatina, 14% no utilizaba hipolipemiantes y ninguno tenía asociación de estos fármacos. Conclusiones: después de nueve años de la publicación de las guías del NCEP-ATPIII y de las recomendaciones posteriores sobre las metas del perfil lipídico en pacientes con enfermedad coronaria y a pesar de la divulgación de las mismas a través de conferencias, congresos y publicaciones, estas metas las cumple un porcentaje bajo de pacientes, tal como lo demuestra este estudio observacional en sujetos hospitalizados por causas diferentes a la enfermedad coronaria pero con este antecedente. Una de las explicaciones para este pobre resultado es el uso de lovastatina, estatina de baja efectividad para reducir el cLDL. Se analizan otras posibles causas y se hacen propuestas para lograr los objetivos.