Search

Salvatore Sardo,1 Giustino Varrassi,2 Mario Scartozzi,3 Maria Caterina Pace,4 Vittorio Schweiger,5 Stefano Tamburin,6 Mario Musu,1 Gabriele Finco1 1Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy; 2Paolo Procacci Foundation, Rome, Italy; 3Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy; 4Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, University of Napoli, Napoli, Italy; 5Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; 6Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, ItalyCorrespondence: Salvatore Sardo, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy, Email salvatore.sardo@unica.itIntroduction: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) affects nearly 70% of cancer patients after chemotherapy, causing sensory, motor, autonomic dysfunction, and neuropathic pain. The Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) framework is proposed as a better way to assess preventive or therapeutic interventions for CIPN.Methods: A survey was conducted among Italian healthcare professionals and researchers affiliated to the Italian Chapter of the International Association for the Study of Pain (AISD) to identify the most important outcomes in clinical management and research.Results: Among the 73 respondents, 61 qualified for the survey, with an overall response rate of 1.2%. The vast majority were physicians (77%), most of whom were anesthesiologists (47.5%). The results showed that pain, survival, sensory impairment, motor impairment, and quality of life were consistently ranked as the most important outcomes, but there was significant disagreement in the outcomes relative ranking, making it difficult to develop a DOOR algorithm. The study also revealed that clinicians commonly use structured interviews to evaluate patients with CIPN, and the most prescribed drugs or supplements were palmitoylethanolamide, pregabalin, gabapentin and alpha lipoic acid as preventive agents and pregabalin, palmitoylethanolamide, duloxetine, gabapentin, and amitriptyline as therapeutic agents. However, many of these drugs have not been clinically proven to be effective for CIPN.Discussion: This study suggests that the implementation of a DOOR framework for CIPN using healthcare professionals is more difficult than expected, given the significant disagreement in our respondents’ ranking of outcomes. Our work provides interesting topics for future research in CIPN, but its limitations include a small sample size, a low response rate, and a possible selection bias.Keywords: neuropathic pain, peripheral neuropathy, cancer, taxane, Desirability of Outcome Ranking, survey, chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy

Salvatore Sardo,1,2 Maura Galletta,2 Erica Coni,3 Cesar Ivan Aviles Gonzalez,1 Ilenia Piras,4 Giorgio Pia,4 Maurizio Evangelista,5 Mario Musu,1,2 Gabriele Finco1,2 1Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; 2Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; 3RN-BC, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; 4ATS Sardegna, ASSL Cagliari SS, Cagliari, Italy; 5Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Cattolica University, Rome, ItalyCorrespondence: Maura GallettaDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Highway 554 (exit for Sestu), Monserrato 09042, Cagliari, ItalyTel +39 070-675-3108Email maura.galletta@gmail.comPurpose: The aim of this prospective study was to assess the behavior of emergency department (ED) nurses with regard to pain and their role in pain management in a real-life clinical setting.Methods: A total of 509 consecutive patients were enrolled during a 6-week period. A case-report form was used to collect data on nurses’ approaches to pain, time to analgesia provision, and patient-perceived quality of analgesia.Results: Triage nurses actively inquired about pain in almost every case, but they did not estimate pain intensity in a third of patients. In the majority of cases, triage nurses did not report pain-related findings to the physician, who was the only professional that could prescribe analgesia to patients. The assignment of the color-coding of triage by nurses appears to be related to the perceived severity of the clinical case and a more comprehensive evaluation of pain. More than half of patients were at least fairly satisfied with analgesia.Conclusion: Pain is increasingly screened during triage, but its comprehensive assessment and management still lack systematic application. We believe that further education and implementation of analgesia protocols may empower nurses to manage ED patients’ pain more effectively and in a more timely manner.Keywords: emergency, ED, nurse, oligoanalgesia, pain, triage

Abstract Background Individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD) have particularly high rates of chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) and are also more likely to receive prescription opioids for their pain. However, there have been no known studies published to date that have examined opioid treatment patterns among individuals with schizophrenia. Methods Using electronic medical record data across 13 Mental Health Research Network sites, individuals with diagnoses of MDD (N = 65,750), BD (N = 38,117) or schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (N = 12,916) were identified and matched on age, sex and Medicare status to controls with no documented mental illness. CNCP diagnoses and prescription opioid medication dispensings were extracted for the matched samples. Multivariate analyses were conducted to evaluate (1) the odds of receiving a pain-related diagnosis and (2) the odds of receiving opioids, by separate mental illness diagnosis category compared with matched controls, controlling for age, sex, Medicare status, race/ethnicity, income, medical comorbidities, healthcare utilization and chronic pain diagnoses. Results Multivariable models indicated that having a MDD (OR = 1.90; 95% CI = 1.85–1.95) or BD (OR = 1.71; 95% CI = 1.66–1.77) diagnosis was associated with increased odds of a CNCP diagnosis after controlling for age, sex, race, income, medical comorbidities and healthcare utilization. By contrast, having a schizophrenia diagnosis was associated with decreased odds of receiving a chronic pain diagnosis (OR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.82–0.90). Having a MDD (OR = 2.59; 95% CI = 2.44–2.75) or BD (OR = 2.12; 95% CI = 1.97–2.28) diagnosis was associated with increased odds of receiving chronic opioid medications, even after controlling for age, sex, race, income, medical comorbidities, healthcare utilization and chronic pain diagnosis; having a schizophrenia diagnosis was not associated with receiving chronic opioid medications. Conclusions Individuals with serious mental illness, who are most at risk for developing opioid-related problems, continue to be prescribed opioids more often than their peers without mental illness. Mental health clinicians may be particularly well-suited to lead pain assessment and management efforts for these patients. Future research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of involving mental health clinicians in these efforts.

Paolo Mura,1 Elisabetta Serra,1 Franco Marinangeli,2 Sebastiano Patti,3 Mario Musu,1 Ilenia Piras,3 Maria Valeria Massidda,1 Giorgio Pia,3 Maurizio Evangelista,4 Gabriele Finco1 1Department of Medical Sciences “M. Aresu”, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; 2Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy; 3Department of Emergency Medicine, Santissima Trinità Hospital, Cagliari, Italy; 4Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Cattolica University, Rome, Italy Aim: Pain represents the most frequent cause for patient admission to emergency departments (EDs). Oligoanalgesia is a common problem in this field. The aims of this study were to assess prevalence and intensity of pain in patients who visited a second-level urban ED and to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacological treatment administered subsequent to variations in pain intensity. Methods: A 4-week prospective observational study was carried out on 2,838 patients who visited a second-level urban ED. Pain intensity was evaluated using the Numeric Rating Scale at the moment of triage. The efficacy of prescribed analgesic therapy was evaluated at 30 and 60 minutes, and at discharge. Data concerning pain intensity were classified as absent, slight, mild, or severe. Pain was evaluated in relation to the prescribed therapy. Results: Pain prevalence was 70.7%. Traumatic events were the primary cause in most cases (40.44%), followed by pain linked to urologic problems (13.52%), abdominal pain (13.39%), and nontraumatic musculoskeletal pain (7.10%). Only 32.46% of patients were given pharmacological therapy. Of these, 76% reported severe pain, 19% moderate, and 5% slight, and 66% received nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or paracetamol, 4% opioids, and 30% other therapies. A difference of at least 2 points on the Numerical Rating Scale was observed in 84% of patients on reevaluation following initial analgesic therapy. Conclusion: Pain represents one of the primary reasons for visits to EDs. Although a notable reduction in pain intensity has been highlighted in patients who received painkillers, results show that inadequate treatment of pain in ED continues to be a problem. Keywords: pain, emergency department, oligoanalgesia, pain treatment, pain assessment, NSAIDs, opioids, methoxyflurane, traumatic pain, abdominal pain