Search

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequent neoplasia in the male population. According to the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP), PCa can be divided into two major groups, based on their prognosis and treatment options. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) holds a central role in PCa assessment; however, it does not have a one-to-one correspondence with the histopathological grading of tumors. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithms and textural analysis, a subdivision of radiomics, have shown potential in bridging this gap. Objectives: We aimed to develop a machine-learning algorithm that predicts the ISUP grade of manually contoured prostate nodules on T2-weighted images and classifies them into clinically significant and indolent ones. Materials and Methods: We included 55 patients with 76 lesions. All patients were examined on the same 1.5 Tesla mpMRI scanner. Each nodule was manually segmented using the open-source 3D Slicer platform, and textural features were extracted using the PyRadiomics (version 3.0.1) library. The software was based on machine-learning classifiers. The accuracy was calculated based on precision, recall, and F1 scores. Results: The median age of the study group was 64 years (IQR 61–68), and the mean PSA value was 11.14 ng/mL. A total of 85.52% of the nodules were graded PI-RADS 4 or higher. Overall, the algorithm classified indolent and clinically significant PCas with an accuracy of 87.2%. Further, when trained to differentiate each ISUP group, the accuracy was 80.3%. Conclusions: We developed an AI-based decision-support system that accurately differentiates between the two PCa prognostic groups using only T2 MRI acquisitions by employing radiomics with a robust machine-learning architecture.

BackgroundMASLD is a prevalent chronic liver condition with substantial clinical implications. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of three new, elastography-based, scoring systems for advanced fibrosis ≥F3 (Agile 3+), cirrhosis F4 (Agile 4), and fibrotic NASH: NASH + NAS ≥4 + F≥2 (FAST score), in a cohort of biopsy-proven NAFLD meeting MASLD criteria. Our secondary aim was to compare their diagnostic performances with those of other fibrosis prediction tools: LSM-VCTE alone, and common, easily available scores (FIB-4 or APRI).MethodsSingle-center, retrospective study, on consecutive patients with baseline laboratory tests, liver biopsy, and reliable LSM-VCTE measurements. The discrimination between tests was evaluated by analyzing the AUROCs. Dual cut-off approaches were applied to rule-out and rule-in ≥F3, F4 and fibrotic NASH. We tested previously reported cut-off values and provided our best thresholds to achieve Se ≥85%, Se ≥90%, and Sp ≥90%, Sp ≥95%.ResultsAmong 246 patients, 113 (45.9%) were women, and 75 (30.5%) presented diabetes. Agile 3+ and Agile 4 demonstrated excellent performance in identifying ≥F3 and F4, achieving AUROCs of 0.909 and 0.968, while the FAST score yielded acceptable results in distinguishing fibrotic NASH. When compared to FIB-4 and LSM-VCTE, both Agile 3+ and Agile 4 performed better than FIB-4 and had a similar performance to LSM-VCTE, but with higher diagnostic accuracy, hence reducing the grey zone.ConclusionAgile 3+ and Agile 4 are reliable, non-invasive tests for identifying advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis in MASLD patients, while FAST score demonstrates moderate performance in identifying fibrotic NASH.

(1): Background: With the recent introduction of vesical imaging reporting and data system (VI-RADS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become the main imaging method used for the preoperative local staging of bladder cancer (BCa). However, the VI-RADS score is subject to interobserver variability and cannot provide information about tumor cellularity. These limitations may be overcome by using a quantitative approach, such as the new emerging domain of radiomics. (2) Aim: To systematically review published studies on the use of MRI-based radiomics in bladder cancer. (3) Materials and Methods: We performed literature research using the PubMed MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases using PRISMA principles. A total of 1092 papers that addressed the use of radiomics for BC staging, grading, and treatment response were retrieved using the keywords “bladder cancer”, “magnetic resonance imaging”, “radiomics”, and “textural analysis”. (4) Results: 26 papers met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final review. The principal applications of radiomics were preoperative tumor staging (n = 13), preoperative prediction of tumor grade or molecular correlates (n = 9), and prediction of prognosis/response to neoadjuvant therapy (n = 4). Most of the developed radiomics models included second-order features mainly derived from filtered images. These models were validated in 16 studies. The average radiomics quality score was 11.7, ranging between 8.33% and 52.77%. (5) Conclusions: MRI-based radiomics holds promise as a quantitative imaging biomarker of BCa characterization and prognosis. However, there is still need for improving the standardization of image preprocessing, feature extraction, and external validation before applying radiomics models in the clinical setting.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and its progressive form, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), represent, nowadays, real challenges for the healthcare system. Liver fibrosis is the most important prognostic factor for NAFLD, and advanced fibrosis is associated with higher liver-related mortality rates. Therefore, the key issues in NAFLD are the differentiation of NASH from simple steatosis and identification of advanced hepatic fibrosis. We critically reviewed the ultrasound (US) elastography techniques for the quantitative characterization of fibrosis, steatosis, and inflammation in NAFLD and NASH, with a specific focus on how to differentiate advanced fibrosis in adult patients. Vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) is still the most utilized and validated elastography method for liver fibrosis assessment. The recently developed point shear wave elastography (pSWE) and two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) techniques that use multiparametric approaches could bring essential improvements to diagnosis and risk stratification.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent malignant liver tumor and the third cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. For many years, the golden standard for HCC diagnosis has been the needle biopsy, which is invasive and carries risks. Computerized methods are due to achieve a noninvasive, accurate HCC detection process based on medical images. We developed image analysis and recognition methods to perform automatic and computer-aided diagnosis of HCC. Conventional approaches that combined advanced texture analysis, mainly based on Generalized Co-occurrence Matrices (GCM) with traditional classifiers, as well as deep learning approaches based on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Stacked Denoising Autoencoders (SAE), were involved in our research. The best accuracy of 91% was achieved for B-mode ultrasound images through CNN by our research group. In this work, we combined the classical approaches with CNN techniques, within B-mode ultrasound images. The combination was performed at the classifier level. The CNN features obtained at the output of various convolution layers were combined with powerful textural features, then supervised classifiers were employed. The experiments were conducted on two datasets, acquired with different ultrasound machines. The best performance, above 98%, overpassed our previous results, as well as representative state-of-the-art results.

The emergence of deep-learning methods in different computer vision tasks has proved to offer increased detection, recognition or segmentation accuracy when large annotated image datasets are available. In the case of medical image processing and computer-aided diagnosis within ultrasound images, where the amount of available annotated data is smaller, a natural question arises: are deep-learning methods better than conventional machine-learning methods? How do the conventional machine-learning methods behave in comparison with deep-learning methods on the same dataset? Based on the study of various deep-learning architectures, a lightweight multi-resolution Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architecture is proposed. It is suitable for differentiating, within ultrasound images, between the Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), respectively the cirrhotic parenchyma (PAR) on which HCC had evolved. The proposed deep-learning model is compared with other CNN architectures that have been adapted by transfer learning for the ultrasound binary classification task, but also with conventional machine-learning (ML) solutions trained on textural features. The achieved results show that the deep-learning approach overcomes classical machine-learning solutions, by providing a higher classification performance.