1. The importance of choosing the right strategy to treat small cell carcinoma of the cervix: a comparative analysis of treatments
- Author
-
Mariko Kawamura, Yutaro Koide, Taro Murai, Shunichi Ishihara, Yuuki Takase, Takayuki Murao, Dai Okazaki, Takahiro Yamaguchi, Kaoru Uchiyama, Yoshiyuki Itoh, Takeshi Kodaira, Yuta Shibamoto, Mika Mizuno, Fumitaka Kikkawa, and Shinji Naganawa
- Subjects
Small cell carcinoma ,Cervical cancer ,Rare cancer ,Chemotherapy ,Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens ,RC254-282 - Abstract
Abstract Background Standard treatments for small cell carcinoma of the cervix (SCCC) have not been established. In this study, we aimed to estimate the optimal treatment strategy for SCCC. Methods This was a multicenter retrospective study. Medical records of patients with pathologically proven SCCC treated between 2003 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS) was plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank tests and Cox regression analysis were used to assess the differences in survival according to stage, treatment strategy, and chemotherapy regimen. Results Data of 78 patients were collected, and after excluding patients without immunohistopathological staining, 65 patients were evaluated. The median age of the included patients was 47 (range: 24–83) years. The numbers of patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stages I-IIA, IIB-IVA, IVB were 23 (35%), 34 (52%), and 8 (12%), respectively. Of 53 patients who had undergone chemotherapy, 35 and 18 received SCCC and non-SCCC regimens as their first-line chemotherapy regimen, respectively. The 5-year OS for all patients was 49%, while for patients with FIGO stages I-IIA, IIB-IVA, IVB, it was 60, 50, and 0%, respectively. The 5-year OS rates for patients who underwent treatment with SCCC versus non-SCCC regimens were 59 and 13% (p
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF