Search

Abstract Background Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture is one of the areas that most severely affected by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in China, and virological failure on antiretroviral therapy (ART) is serious in this area. Analyses of prevalence and determinants of ART failure, the genetic diversity and drug resistance among people living with HIV (PLWH) helps improve HIV treatment efficiency and prevent HIV transmission. Methods A total of 5157 PLWH were recruited from 2016 to 2017. The venous blood samples were subjected to RT-PCR, followed by sequencing of the HIV-1 pol gene, targeting the protease and reverse transcriptase fragments. HIV-1 diversity was analyzed using the DNAStar software and drug resistance mutations were analyzed using the Stanford University HIV Drug Resistance Database. Results A total of 2156 (41.81%) PLWH showed virological failure on ART. Males (ORm = 1.25), heterosexual behaviors and drug injection (ORm = 1.44) and mother to child transmission routes (ORm = 1.58), the clinical stage of AIDS (ORm = 1.35), having used illicit drugs and shared the needles (1–4 times: ORm = 1.34; more than 5 times: ORm = 1.52), having ever replaced ART regimen (ORm = 1.48) increased the risk of virological failure among PLWH, while higher education lever (ORm = 0.77) and ≥ 12 months on ART (12 ~ 36 months: ORm = 0.72; ≥36 months: ORm = 0.66) was associated with lower likelihood of virological failure. The data revealed that CRF07_BC (1508, 95.62%) were the most common strains, and the drug-resistant rate was 32.10% among PLWH with virological failure in this area. The high frequencies of drug resistance were found in EFV and NVP of NNRTIs, ABC, FTC and 3TC of NRTIs, and TPV/r in PIs. The most common mutations in NNRTIs, NRTIs and PIs were K103N/KN (64.69%), M184V/MV/I (36.29%) and Q58E/QE (4.93%), respectively. Conclusion We concluded that surveillance of virological failure, HIV-1 subtypes, and drug resistance to understand HIV-1 epidemiology and guide modification of ART guidelines, and target prevention and control strategies should be formatted to reduce the virological failure and drug resistance to promote viral suppression and prevent HIV-1 transmission.

Introduction: Transmitted drug resistance (TDR) can compromise antiretroviral therapy (ART) efficacy. We aimed to understand the molecular epidemiology of TDR and its genetic transmission networks among newly diagnosed people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWH).Methods: A total of 1,318 newly diagnosed PLWH, identified in all population-based HIV screening in an HIV-affected county of a minority area of China (i.e., Butuo county), were enrolled between January 1, 2018, and November 31, 2018. HIV-1 pol gene sequences were used for phylogenetic and genotypic drug resistance analyses. The genetic transmission networks were identified.Results: The prevalence of TDR among newly diagnosed PLWH was 8.12% (107/1,318). Patients in the stage of AIDS (adjusted odds ratio, OR: 2.32) and who had a history of sharing a needle ≥5 times (adjusted OR: 3.89) were more likely to have an increased risk of TDR. The prevalence of TDR for non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) is higher than that of other inhibitors, with a relatively high prevalence of three mutations [V179D/E/DE (4.93%), K103N/KN (3.11%), and E138A/G (1.52%)]. A total of 577 (43.78%) pol sequences were involved in the genetic transmission network, with 171 clusters ranging in size from 2 to 91 pol sequences; 37.38% (40/107) of individuals carrying TDR were involved in the network, and individuals with the same TDR-associated mutations were usually cross-linked.Conclusions: Our data suggest a relatively high level of TDR and many transmission clusters among the newly diagnosed PLWH. Targeted intervention, early identification, and monitoring of resistance are warranted to reduce the TDR and prevent HIV-1 transmission in areas with a high rate of HIV-1.

[Objective] Improving the output efficiency of arable land is the core focus of ensuring national food security. The reform of “three rights separation” of agricultural land has significantly increased the enthusiasm of farmers for land management through empowerment, which inevitably has a significant impact on the output efficiency of arable land. The degree of influence and mechanisms involved deserve further investigation. [Methods] Based on the panel data from 146 prefecture-level cities in China from 2013 to 2021, this study first calculated the output efficiency of arable land using the data envelopment analysis (DEA)-Malmquist index method. It then employed a multi-period difference-in-differences test to examine the impact of the “three rights separation” of agricultural land on the output efficiency of arable land. Finally, by constructing a panel fixed effects model with interaction terms, it explored the mechanisms through which the “three rights separation” of agricultural land affects the output efficiency of arable land. [Results] The reform of the “three rights separation” of agricultural, significantly promoted the improvement of the output efficiency of arable land in China. This effect is also reinforced by legal clarity, and the results remains robust after conducting robustness tests such as placebo tests. Heterogeneity analysis revealed that the positive impact of the “three rights separation” of agricultural land on the output efficiency of arable land is more significant in the western region, northeastern region, groups with high per unit sown area planting industry output value, and groups with fiscal support for agriculture below the median level. Mechanism analysis found that the “three rights separation” of agricultural land mainly affects the output efficiency of arable land by weakening the impact of large-scale land management on the output efficiency of arable land and enhancing the impact of rural labor transfer on the output efficiency of arable land. [Conclusion] In the future, China should continue to deepen rural land system reform along the current path, further unleash the policy dividends of the “three rights separation” of agricultural land, and improve the efficiency of arable land resource utilization.