1. Retracted articles in scientific literature: A bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2022 using the Web of Science
- Author
-
Malcolm Koo and Shih-Chun Lin
- Subjects
Retractions ,Retraction of publication ,Scientific misconduct ,Publishing ,Bibliometric analysis ,Bibliometrix ,Science (General) ,Q1-390 ,Social sciences (General) ,H1-99 - Abstract
Retractions serve a crucial role in maintaining the integrity and accuracy of scientific literature. There has been growing interest in understanding the patterns behind retractions. This bibliometric study analyzed retracted articles published between 2003 and 2022, indexed by the Science Citation Index Expanded of the Web of Science Core Collection database. A total of 8466 retracted articles were identified, revealing an overall increase up to 2019, followed by a decline. A total of 109 countries contributed to the retracted articles, with China and the United States having the highest absolute numbers. In addition, the articles were published in 2347 different journals, with Tumor Biology recording the largest number of retracted articles. The top 10 most cited retracted articles indicated that data and image integrity issues were the main reasons for retraction. The primary reasons for retractions, identified by linking the retracted articles to the Retraction Watch Database, were data and results issues followed by plagiarism and duplication. In conclusion, the present bibliometric study offered an overview of the status of retracted articles indexed by the Web of Science Core Collection over the past two decades. These findings provide insight into areas where scientific integrity may be compromised and serve as a guide to foster a responsible research environment.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF