Search

AbstractResin Transfer Molding (RTM) is a manufacturing process for fiber reinforced polymer composites where dry fibers are placed inside a mold and resin is injected under pressure. During mold design, filling simulations can study different manufacturing concepts (i.e. placement of injection gates and vents) to guarantee complete filling of the part and avoid air entrapment where flow fronts converge. In this work, a novel software tool LCMsim, which was implemented by the authors, is benchmarked against other tools and real-world flow experiments. Its development was driven by two ideas: Easy-of-use for the mold engineer and maximum flexibility for the researcher. Two experiments were used for validation. In the first, zones with different preform properties were present and in the second, race-tracking was enforced. Flow fronts from LCMsim and experiment agree with 7% error and simulated flow fronts from LCMsim and the commercially available software PAM-RTM agree with 3% error.

Experimental permeability measurements saw a considerable increase in accuracy when recommendations and guidelines were imposed upon the realization of two international benchmarks. Such requirements aid the design stage and experimental validation of a permeameter rig however, systematic errors in the measurements still compromise the comparability of measurements obtained by different radial permeameter rigs. Owing to hurdles and limitations in the data acquisition system, validation of the mold cavity and fluid injection system, optical errors in the visual tracking of a flow front, and uncertainties in the measurement of the fluid viscosity, the measurement’s accuracy is yet lower than the required for a standardized process. In this study, the detailed study and calibration of such parameters was able to identify and minimize error sources that would otherwise result in undetected systematic deviations from the expected results. In conclusion, the verification proposed by the radial benchmark does not guarantee the accuracy of the measurement, as the error in the instruments proposed for the verification is comparable to the requirements themselves. This creates a certain uncertainty in the verification that needs to be tackled with more detailed measurement protocols to ensure not only the compliance with the measurement requirements but also to set the limits of the attainable accuracy. The rig was validated by measuring the permeability of the fabric reinforcements used in the radial benchmark exercise. Due to the scattering in the results reported in the benchmark exercise, 13 out of the 19 reported values were excluded to obtain a good estimation of the expected permeability for each volume fraction. Although the rig complied with all recommendations currently in place, the obtained permeability showed a 20% deviation in the K1 direction, while the K2 was within the expected range for the average value. The observed deviation was later found to be caused by an optical distortion, which affected the measurement of the real-world flow front dimensions. A correction for this deviation needs further systematic investigation, also a possible revision of the future standard since a correction for optical distortions is yet not included in the measurement guidelines.

With the rapid development of high-performance fibers such as carbon, enhanced glass fibers in structural applications, the use of fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) materials has also increased in many areas. Liquid composite molding (LCM) is a widely used manufacturing process in composite manufacturing; however, the rapid impregnation of resin in the reinforcing fibers during processing poses a significant issue. The optimization of resin impregnation is related to tow deformations in the reinforcing fibers. The present study therefore focuses on this tow deformation. The permeability behaviors in double-scale porous media were observed under different flow rates and viscosity conditions to examine the overall tendencies of structural changes in the reinforcement. The permeability results showed hysteresis with increasing and decreasing flow rate conditions of 50–800 mm3/s, indicating structural changes in the reinforcement. The tow behaviors of the double-scale porous media with respect to the thickness and flow rate were investigated in terms of the representative indices of the minor axis (tow thickness) and major axis. The minor axis and major axis of the tow showed decreasing and increasing trends of 2–5% and 2%, respectively, with minimum and maximum values at different positions along the reinforcement, affected by the different hydrodynamic entry lengths. Finally, the deformed tow behavior was observed microscopically to examine the behavior of the tow at different flow rates.