Search

Abstract Background: Using a large, geographically diverse, hospital-based database in the United States (Premier PINC AI Healthcare Database), we aimed to describe the proportion and characteristics of patients receiving phenotype-desirable antimicrobial therapy (PDAT) among those hospitalized with Enterobacterales bloodstream infections. Methods: Adult patients with an admission between January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2022 with ≥1 blood culture positive for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella pneumoniae, or Proteus mirabilis and receiving an empiric antibiotic therapy on blood culture collection (BCC) Days 0 or 1 were included. Receiving PDAT (defined as receipt of any antimicrobial categorized as “desirable” for the respective phenotype) on BCC Days 0−2 was defined as receiving early PDAT. Results: Among 35,880 eligible patients, the proportion of patients receiving PDAT increased (from 6.8% to 22.8%) from BCC Day 0−4. Patients who received PDAT (8,193, 22.8%) were more likely to visit large (500 + beds, 36% vs 31%), teaching (45% vs 39%), and urban (85% vs 82%) hospitals in the Northeast (22% vs 13%) compared to patients not receiving PDAT (all P

Abstract Background: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) may be misdiagnosed if testing is performed in the absence of signs or symptoms of disease. This study sought to support appropriate testing by estimating the impact of signs, symptoms, and healthcare exposures on pre-test likelihood of CDI. Methods: A panel of fifteen experts in infectious diseases participated in a modified UCLA/RAND Delphi study to estimate likelihood of CDI. Consensus, defined as agreement by >70% of panelists, was assessed via a REDCap survey. Items without consensus were discussed in a virtual meeting followed by a second survey. Results: All fifteen panelists completed both surveys (100% response rate). In the initial survey, consensus was present on 6 of 15 (40%) items related to risk of CDI. After panel discussion and clarification of questions, consensus (>70% agreement) was reached on all remaining items in the second survey. Antibiotics were identified as the primary risk factor for CDI and grouped into three categories: high-risk (likelihood ratio [LR] 7, 93% agreement among panelists in first survey), low-risk (LR 3, 87% agreement in first survey), and minimal-risk (LR 1, 71% agreement in first survey). Other major factors included new or unexplained severe diarrhea (e.g., ≥ 10 liquid bowel movements per day; LR 5, 100% agreement in second survey) and severe immunosuppression (LR 5, 87% agreement in second survey). Conclusion: Infectious disease experts concurred on the importance of signs, symptoms, and healthcare exposures for diagnosing CDI. The resulting risk estimates can be used by clinicians to optimize CDI testing and treatment.

Diagnostic stewardship is increasingly recognized as a powerful tool to improve patient safety. Given the close relationship between diagnostic testing and antimicrobial misuse, antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) pharmacists should be key members of the diagnostic team. Pharmacists practicing in AMS already frequently engage with clinicians to improve the diagnostic process and have many skills needed for the implementation of diagnostic stewardship initiatives. As diagnostic stewardship becomes more broadly used, all infectious disease clinicians, including pharmacists, must collaborate to optimize patient care.

ABSTRACT Eravacycline is a synthetic fluorocycline approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2018. This study aimed to describe clinical and microbiological outcomes in addition to associated adverse effects of eravacycline used in U.S. hospitals. Real-world, observational study involving patients receiving ≥72 h of eravacycline at 19 medical centers located in all 5 regions of the United States between October 2018 and August 2022. The primary outcome was clinical success, defined as survival and absence of microbiological recurrence at 30 days from the end of eravacycline therapy and clinical improvement within 96 h of eravacycline initiation. In total, 416 patients met study criteria and were evaluated. Index culture specimens were most often isolated from the respiratory tract (24.8%, n = 103/416), wound(s) (20.9%, n = 87/416), or blood (19.5%, n = 81/416). As definitive therapy, eravacycline was most often used to treat infections caused by Enterobacterales spp. (42.3%, n = 176/416; 24.4%, n = 43/176 carbapenem-resistant), Enterococci spp. (24.0%, n = 100/416; 49.0%, 49/100 vancomycin-resistant), and Acinetobacter spp. (23.3%, n = 97/416; 47.4%, n = 46/97 carbapenem-resistant). Clinical success occurred in 75.7% of patients (n = 315/416). Thirty-nine (9.4%, n = 39/416) patients experienced a treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) potentially related to eravacycline with the majority (51.3%, n = 20/39) being gastrointestinal intolerance. Only 27 isolates (6.5%, n = 27/416) underwent eravacycline susceptibility testing. Eravacycline is being used to treat a broad range of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria in the United States including those demonstrating multidrug-resistance with consistently low reported drug-related TEAE; however, antimicrobial susceptibility testing and subsequent in vitro susceptibility data of clinical isolates was sparingly performed. IMPORTANCE The rise of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens, especially MDR Gram-negatives, poses a significant challenge to clinicians and public health. These resilient bacteria have rendered many traditional antibiotics ineffective, underscoring the urgency for innovative therapeutic solutions. Eravacycline, a broad-spectrum fluorocycline tetracycline antibiotic approved by the FDA in 2018, emerges as a promising candidate, exhibiting potential against a diverse array of MDR bacteria, including Gram-negative, Gram-positive, anaerobic strains, and Mycobacterium. However, comprehensive data on its real-world application remain scarce. This retrospective cohort study, one of the largest of its kind, delves into the utilization of eravacycline across various infectious conditions in the USA during its initial 4 years post-FDA approval. Through assessing clinical, microbiological, and tolerability outcomes, the research offers pivotal insights into eravacycline’s efficacy in addressing the pressing global challenge of MDR bacterial infections.

Abstract Introduction Numerous patients have cultures pending at discharge which, if not addressed, may delay diagnosis and initiation of appropriate antimicrobials. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the appropriateness of discharge antimicrobial therapy and result documentation in patients with positive cultures finalized post-discharge. Methods This was a cross-sectional cohort study of patients admitted from July 1 to December 31, 2019 with positive sterile-site microbiologic cultures finalized post-discharge. Pertinent inclusion and exclusion factors were admission ≥ 48 h and non-sterile sites, respectively. The primary objective was to determine the frequency of discharged patients warranting antimicrobial changes based on finalized cultures. Secondary objectives included prevalence and timeliness of result documentation and rates of 30-day readmission, among intervention warranted versus not warranted. Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests were used as appropriate. Binary multivariable logistic regression was completed for 30-day readmission stratified by infectious disease (ID) involvement due to the potential for effect modification. Results A total of 208 of 768 patients screened were included. Most patients were discharged from a surgical service (45.7%); deep tissue and blood were the most common culture sites (29.3%). Change in discharge antimicrobial was warranted in 36.5% of patients (n = 76). Result documentation was overall low (35.5%). Time to documentation was significantly shorter in patients warranting antimicrobial intervention (4 days vs. 9 days, P = 0.039), although rates of hospital readmission were higher in this group (32.9% vs. 22.7%, P = 0.109). Finally, in patients not being followed by ID, documentation of finalized results was associated with decreased odds of 30-day readmission (aOR 0.19; 95% CI 0.07–0.53). Conclusions A significant number of patients with cultures finalized post-discharge warranted antimicrobial intervention. Acknowledgment of finalized culture results may decrease the risk of 30-day hospital readmission, particularly in patients not followed by ID. Quality improvement efforts should focus on methods to improve documentation and action on pending cultures to positively impact patient outcomes.

Aims There is increasing evidence to support the use of topical antibiotics to prevent surgical site infections. Although previous research suggests a minimal nephrotoxic risk with a single dose of vancomycin powder, fracture patients often require multiple procedures and receive additional doses of topical antibiotics. We aimed to determine if cumulative doses of intrawound vancomycin or tobramycin powder for infection prophylaxis increased the risk of drug-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) among fracture patients. Methods This cohort study was a secondary analysis of single-centre Program of Randomized Trials to Evaluate Pre-operative Antiseptic Skin Solutions in Orthopaedic Trauma (PREP-IT) trial data. We included patients with a surgically treated appendicular fracture. The primary outcome was drug-induced AKI. The odds of AKI per gram of vancomycin or tobramycin powder were calculated using Bayesian regression models, which adjusted for measured confounders and accounted for the interactive effects of vancomycin and tobramycin. Results Of the 782 included patients (mean age 48 years (SD 20); 59% male), 83% (n = 648) received at least one vancomycin dose (cumulative range 1 to 12 g). Overall, 45% of the sample received at least one tobramycin dose (cumulative range 1.2 to 9.6 g). Drug-induced AKI occurred in ten patients (1.2%). No association was found between the cumulative dose of vancomycin and drug-induced AKI (odds ratio (OR) 1.08 (95% credible interval (CrI) 0.52 to 2.14)). Additional doses of tobramycin were associated with a three-fold increase in the adjusted odds of drug-induced AKI (OR 3.66 (95% CrI 1.71 to 8.49)). Specifically, the risk of drug-induced AKI rose substantially after 4.8 g of tobramycin powder (7.5% (95% CrI 1.0 to 35.3)). Conclusion Cumulative doses of vancomycin were not associated with an increased risk of drug-induced AKI among fracture patients. While the risk of drug-induced AKI remains less than 4% with three or fewer 1.2 g tobramycin doses, the estimated risk increases substantially to 8% after four cumulative doses. Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(4):284–290.

Misdiagnosis of bacterial pneumonia increases risk of exposure to inappropriate antibiotics and adverse events. We developed a diagnosis calculator (https://calculator.testingwisely.com) to inform clinical diagnosis of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia using objective indicators, including incidence of disease, risk factors, and sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests, that were identified through literature review.

Abstract Objective: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) can be overdiagnosed on the basis of positive respiratory cultures in the absence of clinical findings of pneumonia. We determined the perceived diagnostic importance of 6 clinical attributes in ordering a respiratory culture to identify opportunities for diagnostic stewardship. Design: A discrete choice experiment presented participants with a vignette consisting of the same “stem” plus variations in 6 clinical attributes associated with VAP: chest imaging, oxygenation, sputum, temperature, white blood cell count, and blood pressure. Each attribute had 3–4 levels, resulting in 32 total scenarios. Participants indicated whether they would order a respiratory culture, and if yes, whether they preferred the bronchoalveolar lavage or endotracheal aspirate sample-collection method. We calculated diagnostic utility of attribute levels and relative importance of each attribute. Setting and participants: The survey was administered electronically to critical-care clinicians via a Qualtrics survey at a tertiary-care academic center in the United States. Results: In total, 59 respondents completed the survey. New radiograph opacity (utility, 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99–1.3), hypotension (utility, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74–1.03), fever (utility, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62–0.91) and copious sputum (utility, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60–0.90) had the greatest perceived diagnostic value that favored ordering a respiratory culture. Radiograph changes (23%) and temperature (20%) had the highest relative importance. New opacity (utility, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17–0.52) and persistent opacity on radiograph (utility, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.05–0.59) had the greatest value favoring bronchoalveolar lavage over endotracheal aspirate. Conclusion: Perceived high diagnostic value of fever and hypotension suggest that sepsis vigilance may drive respiratory culturing and play a role in VAP overdiagnosis.

Abstract Introduction Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) remain among the most common infectious processes seen in the clinical setting. For patients with complicated ABSSSIs deemed to require intravenous antibiotics, vancomycin remains the mainstay therapy. Ceftaroline has been shown to be non-inferior to vancomycin and may result in faster resolution of signs of infection. Methods Multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized trial of ceftaroline versus vancomycin for the treatment of adult patients admitted for management of ABSSSIs from April 2012 to May 2016; 166 patients in the clinically evaluable (CE) group were needed to determine a 20% difference in primary outcome of clinical response at day 2 or 3 of antibiotics. Clinical response was defined as cessation of spread of lesion and improvement in systemic signs/symptoms of infection. A secondary outcome was a ≥ 20% reduction in lesion size at day 2 or 3 of antibiotics. Results One hundred seventy-four patients were enrolled in the intention-to-treat (ITT) group and 108 were CE. Among CE patients, 54 were randomized to ceftaroline and 54 to vancomycin. Baseline characteristics were similar except patients in the ceftaroline arm were older and had a non-significantly higher degree of comorbidities (median Charlson score 2 vs. 4, respectively). Cellulitis was the most common type of ABSSSI (85.2% vs. 79.6%, respectively). Rapid diagnostic testing of available cultures (n = 55) demonstrated high agreement with clinical microbiology for identification of Staphylococcus aureus (100%) and MRSA (100%). There was no significant difference in primary outcome of day 2 or 3 clinical response (50.0% vs. 51.9%). Conclusion Early clinical response between vancomycin- and ceftaroline-treated ABSSSIs was similar. Patients with ABSSSIs rarely remained hospitalized for > 2–3 days, thus limiting our ability to critically assess clinical outcomes. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02582203. Funding Allergan plc.

Abstract Introduction Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) represent a large burden to the US healthcare system. There is little evidence-based guidance regarding the appropriate level of care for ABSSSIs. This study aimed to develop a prediction model and risk-scoring tool to determine appropriate levels of care. Methods This was a single-center observational cohort study of adult patients treated for ABSSSIs from 2012 to 2015 at the Detroit Medical Center. The predictive model used to create a novel risk-scoring tool was derived using multinomial regression analysis. The overall accuracy of this tool was compared to the Clinical Resource Efficacy Support Team (CREST) Classification and Standardized Early Warning Score (SEWS) using area-under-the- receiver-operator-curve (AUROC) analysis and Z-statistic. Results Final patient disposition was 230 (45.5%) home from the emergency department (ED), 65 (12.8%) observation unit (OU), and 211 (41.7%) initial inpatient. IV antibiotic therapy was used in 358 (70.8%) patients. CREST and SEWS were not accurate in the determination of ED versus OU disposition [AUROC CREST 0.0.682 (95% CI 0.640–0.724), AUROC SEWS 0.686 (95% CI 0.641–0.731)], but performed better in determining ED/OU versus inpatient [AUROC CREST = 0.678 (95% CI 0.630–0.725), AUROC SEWS 0.693 (95% CI 0.645–0.740)]. These scores were also not accurate in determining IV versus PO antibiotic therapy [AUROC CREST = 0.586 (95% CI 0.530–0.624), AUROC SEWS = 0.630 (95% CI 0.576–0.684)]. A risk-scoring tool ranging from 0 to 10 points was derived incorporating WBC, temperature, site of infection, and past medical history of diabetes, liver disease, PVD, AKI, and/or CKD. The AUROC of the new model was 0.675 (95% CI 0.611–0.739) ED versus OU, 0.789 (95% CI 0.748–0.829) ED/OU versus inpatient, and 0.742 (95% CI 0.694–0.789) IV versus oral antibiotics. The new score had a significantly higher AUROC compared to both the CREST and SEWS for determining ED/OU versus inpatient (p

Novel diagnostic stewardship in infectious disease consists of interventions that modify ordering, processing, and reporting of diagnostic tests to provide the right test for the right patient, prompting the right action. The interventions work upstream and synergistically with traditional antimicrobial stewardship efforts. As diagnostic stewardship continues to gain public attention, it is critical that antimicrobial stewardship programmes not only learn how to effectively leverage diagnostic testing to improve antimicrobial use but also ensure that they are stakeholders and leaders in developing new diagnostic stewardship interventions within their institutions. This review will discuss the need for diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship, the interplay of diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship, evidence of benefit to antimicrobial stewardship programmes, and considerations for successfully engaging in diagnostic stewardship interventions. This article is part of the Antibiotic stewardship Special Issue: https://www.drugsincontext.com/special_issues/antimicrobial-stewardship-a-focus-on-the-need-for-moderation