Search

Abstract Background United States drug overdose deaths are being driven by the increasing prevalence of fentanyl, but whether patients are knowingly using fentanyl is unclear. We examined the analytical confirmation of fentanyl in emergency department (ED) patients with documented heroin overdose. Hypothesis We hypothesized that the proportion of fentanyl and fentanyl analogs would be higher than that of confirmed heroin. Methods This is a subgroup analysis from a prospective multicenter consecutive cohort of ED patients age 18+ with opioid overdose presenting to 10 US sites within the Toxicology Investigators Consortium from 2020 to 2021. Toxicology analysis was performed using liquid chromatography quadrupole time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry. De‐identified toxicology results were paired with the clinical database. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with fentanyl analytes detected in their serum. Results Of 1006 patients screened, 406 were eligible, and of 168 patients who reported that they had taken heroin or had a documented heroin overdose, 88% (n = 147) were in fact found to have fentanyl and/or a fentanyl analog present on serum analysis (p

Introduction: In 2019, there were over 16,000 deaths from psychostimulant overdose with 53.5% also involving an opioid. Given the substantial mortality stemming from opioid and psychostimulant co-exposure, evaluation of clinical management in this population is critical but remains understudied. This study aims to characterize and compare clinical management and outcomes in emergency department (ED) overdose patients with analytically confirmed exposure to both opioids and psychostimulants with those exposed to opioids alone. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective consecutive cohort of ED patients age 18+ with opioid overdose at 9 hospital sites from September 21, 2020 to August 17, 2021. Toxicologic analysis was performed using liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Patients were divided into opioid-only (OO) and opioid plus psychostimulants (OS) groups. The primary outcome was total naloxone bolus dose administered. Secondary outcomes included endotracheal intubation, cardiac arrest, troponin elevation, and abnormal presenting vital signs. We employed t-tests, chi-squared analyses and multivariable regression models to compare outcomes between OO and OS groups. Results: Of 378 enrollees with confirmed opioid overdose, 207 (54.8%) had psychostimulants present. OO patients were significantly older (mean 45.2 versus 40.6 years, p < 0.01). OS patients had significantly higher total naloxone requirements (mean total dose 2.79 mg versus 2.12 mg, p = 0.009). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes. Conclusion: Approximately half of ED patients with confirmed opioid exposures were also positive for psychostimulants. Patients in the OS group required significantly higher naloxone doses, suggesting potential greater overdose severity.

Abstract Since August 2019, the pulmonary disease termed e‐cigarette or vaping product‐use associated lung injury (EVALI), has resulted in 2758 hospitalizations and 64 deaths in the United States. EVALI is considered in patients who have vaped or dabbed within 90 days of symptom onset, and have abnormal lung imaging in the absence of any pulmonary infection. The majority of EVALI patients are otherwise healthy adolescents and young adults. The leading etiology of EVALI is contamination of delta‐9‐tetrahydrocannabinoid (THC) e‐liquids with vitamin E acetate. Although the exact pathophysiology of vitamin E acetate‐induced lung injury is unknown, vitamin E acetate may lead to pulmonary lipid accumulation and/or interfere with surfactant functioning. EVALI symptoms are vague but consist of a constellation of constitutional, pulmonary, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Patients often present multiple times to healthcare facilities as their clinical condition worsens with a considerable mortality risk. The diagnosis of EVALI hinges on obtaining history leading to the recognition of vaping/dabbing. Physicians need to be persistent, but nonjudgmental, in obtaining vaping histories, especially in THC‐prohibited states. Radiographical findings of nonspecific bilateral ground‐glass infiltrates are best detected on computed tomography. Management for EVALI requires a multidisciplinary approach focused on supportive respiratory care and ruling‐out infectious causes. Corticosteroids may be of benefit. Most patients who are hypoxic, have comorbidities, or lack appropriate follow‐up within 24–48 hours should be admitted for monitoring. Patients may benefit from substance abuse counseling and should be instructed to avoid vaping. As the outbreak continues, cases should be reported to local health departments and poison control centers.