Search

BackgroundThe head and neck cancers (HNCs) incidence differs between Europe and East Asia. Our objective was to determine whether survival of HNC also differs between European and Asian countries.MethodsWe used population-based cancer registry data to calculate 5-year relative survival (RS) for the oral cavity, hypopharynx, larynx, nasal cavity, and major salivary gland in Europe, Taiwan, and Japan. We modeled RS with a generalized linear model adjusting for time since diagnosis, sex, age, subsite, and histological grouping. Analyses were performed using federated learning, which enables analyses without sharing sensitive data.FindingsFive-year RS for HNC varied between geographical areas. For each HNC site, Europe had a lower RS than both Japan and Taiwan. HNC subsites and histologies distribution and survival differed between the three areas. Differences between Europe and both Asian countries persisted even after adjustments for all HNC sites but nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, when comparing Europe and Taiwan.InterpretationSurvival differences can be attributed to different factors including different period of diagnosis, more advanced stage at diagnosis, or different availability/access of treatment. Cancer registries did not have stage and treatment information to further explore the reasons of the observed survival differences. Our analyses have confirmed federated learning as a feasible approach for data analyses that addresses the challenges of data sharing and urge for further collaborative studies including relevant prognostic factors.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common malignant neoplasm of mesenchymal origin. GIST spans a wide clinical spectrum that ranges from tumors with essentially no metastatic potential to malignant and life-threatening spread diseases. Gain-of-function mutations in KIT or PDGFRA receptor tyrosine kinases are the crucial drivers of most GISTs, responsible for tumor initiation and evolution throughout the entire course of the disease. The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting these receptors has substantially improved the outcomes in this formerly chemoresistant cancer. As of today, five agents hold regulatory approval for the treatment of GIST: imatinib, sunitinib, regorafenib, ripretinib, and avapritinib. This, in turn, represents a success for a rare neoplasm. During the past two decades, GIST has become a paradigmatic model in cancer for multidisciplinary work, given the disease-specific particularities regarding tumor biology and tumor evolution. Herein, we review currently available evidence for the management of GIST. This clinical practice guideline has been developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel (oncologist, pathologist, surgeon, molecular biologist, radiologist, and representative of patients’ advocacy groups) from the Spanish Group for Sarcoma Research, and it is conceived to provide, from a critical perspective, the standard approach for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up.

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to confirm the efficacy of the ERBITAX scheme (paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly and cetuximab 400 mg/m2 loading dose, and then 250 mg/m2 weekly) as first-line treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) who are medically unfit for cisplatin-based (PT) chemotherapy.Materials and methodsThis retrospective, non-interventional study involved 16 centers in Spain. Inclusion criteria were to have started receiving ERBITAX regimen from January 2012 to December 2018; histologically confirmed SCCHN including oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx; age ≥18 years; and platinum (PT) chemotherapy ineligibility due to performance status, comorbidities, high accumulated dose of PT, or PT refractoriness.ResultsA total of 531 patients from 16 hospitals in Spain were enrolled. The median age was 66 years, 82.7% were male, and 83.5% were current/former smokers. Patients were ineligible to receive PT due to ECOG 2 (50.3%), comorbidities (32%), PT cumulative dose ≥ 225 mg/m2 (10.5%), or PT refractoriness (7.2%). Response rate was 37.7%. Median duration of response was 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.4–6.6). With a median follow-up of 8.7 months (95% CI: 7.7–10.2), median PFS and OS were 4.5 months (95% CI: 3.9–5.0) and 8.9 months (95% CI: 7.8–10.3), respectively. Patients treated with immunotherapy after ERBITAX had better OS with a median of 29.8 months compared to 13.8 months for those who received other treatments. The most common grade ≥ 3 toxicities were acne-like rash in 36 patients (6.8%) and oral mucositis in 8 patients (1.5%). Five (0.9%) patients experienced grade ≥ 3 febrile neutropenia.ConclusionThis study confirms the real-world efficacy and tolerability of ERBITAX as first-line treatment in recurrent/metastatic SCCHN when PT is not feasible. Immunotherapy after treatment with ERBITAX showed remarkable promising survival, despite potential selection bias.

Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA) is a rare immune-related adverse event and appears to be more common with anti-PD1/PDL1 than anti-CTLA4. Little is known about the safety of re-treating with anti-PD1/PDL1 or changing to anti-CTLA4. We present a case of grade 4 AIHA due to nivolumab (PD1-inhibitor) treatment in a patient with melanoma for adjuvant setting after surgery and the safeness of subsequent treatment with ipilimumab (anti-CTLA4). After the remission of AIHA with steroids, ipilimumab was started with the rationale of its different mechanism of action. Fortunately, AIHA did not recur. The mechanism by which checkpoint inhibitors cause AIHA is likely by augmenting or redirecting immune surveillance, especially by activating pre-existing red blood cell autoantibodies, but further studies must be done. To our knowledge, this is the first case published in the literature with the change of immunotherapy treatment to anti-CTLA4.

Abstract Doege‐Potter syndrome is a rare hypoglycemic paraneoplastic disorder. This case describes that severe and symptomatic hypoglycemia can occasionally be due to a rare malignant neoplasm, and the differential diagnosis of malignancy should not be overlooked in this setting.

Born in 1962 with the Canadian Geographical Information System (CGIS), the GIS knew a spectacular development and broaden its applications, touching various disciplines that made its potential come out. Nonetheless, many functions have not been exploited yet. And it is precisely in domains other than the most usual, such as the quantitative geography, that we can appreciate the value of this tool, as this historical research El éxodo catalán de 1936 a través de los Pirineos. De la derrota a la victoria demonstrates.

Predictive biomarkers of trabectedin represent an unmet need in advanced soft‐tissue sarcomas (STS). DNA damage repair (DDR) genes, involved in homologous recombination or nucleotide excision repair, had been previously described as biomarkers of trabectedin resistance or sensitivity, respectively. The majority of these studies only focused on specific factors (ERCC1, ERCC5, and BRCA1) and did not evaluate several other DDR‐related genes that could have a relevant role for trabectedin efficacy. In this retrospective translational study, 118 genes involved in DDR were evaluated to determine, by transcriptomics, a predictive gene signature of trabectedin efficacy. A six‐gene predictive signature of trabectedin efficacy was built in a series of 139 tumor samples from patients with advanced STS. Patients in the high‐risk gene signature group showed a significantly worse progression‐free survival compared with patients in the low‐risk group (2.1 vs 6.0 months, respectively). Differential gene expression analysis defined new potential predictive biomarkers of trabectedin sensitivity (PARP3 and CCNH) or resistance (DNAJB11 and PARP1). Our study identified a new gene signature that significantly predicts patients with higher probability to respond to treatment with trabectedin. Targeting some genes of this signature emerges as a potential strategy to enhance trabectedin efficacy.

En este trabajo realizamos una aproximación a los datos publicados hasta la fecha sobre la alimentación de las especies más importantes de homínidos del Plio-Pleistoceno. Para ello, nos centraremos principalmente en los análisis isotópicos, utilizados en la reconstrucción paleodietaria desde la década de los 70. El estudio de las paleodietas homínidas a partir de técnicas de análisis como los análisis de isótopos estables destruye viejos paradigmas. No obstante, los resultados que nos ofrecen estos estudios son a menudo difíciles de interpretar, además, la información que nos aportan es en ocasiones contradictoria con los datos obtenidos tanto a través de otras técnicas analíticas, como de las evidencias de carácter secundario que nos ofrece el registro fósil. En este trabajo sometemos a debate todas estas informaciones en las especies seleccionadas, ofreciendo un discurso crítico acerca de nuestro conocimiento de la alimentación de nuestros ancestros.