Search

Background: Failure to rescue (FTR) is increasingly recognized as a quality metric but remains understudied in emergency general surgery (EGS). We sought to identify patient and operative factors associated with FTR to better inform standardized metrics to mitigate this potentially preventable event. Methods: All adult (≥18 years) non-elective hospitalizations for large bowel resection, small bowel resection, repair of perforated ulcer, laparotomy and lysis of adhesions were identified in the 2016–2020 National Readmissions Database. Patients undergoing trauma-related operations or procedures ≤2 days of admission were excluded. FTR was defined as in-hospital death following acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (AKI), myocardial infarction, pneumonia, respiratory failure, sepsis, stroke, or thromboembolism. Multilevel mixed-effect models were developed to assess factors linked with FTR. Results: Among 826,548 EGS operations satisfying inclusion criteria, 298,062 (36.1 %) developed at least one MAE. Of those experiencing MAE, 43,477 (14.6 %) ultimately did not survive to discharge (FTR). Following adjustment for fixed hospital level effects, only 3.5 % of the variance in FTR was attributable to center-level differences. Relative to private insurance and the highest income quartile, Medicaid insurance (AOR 1.33; 95%CI, 1.23–1.43) and the lowest income quartile (AOR 1.22; 95%CI, 1.17–1.29) were linked with increased odds of FTR.A subset analysis stratified complication-specific rates of FTR by insurance status. Relative to private insurance, Medicaid coverage and uninsured status were linked with greater odds of FTR following perioperative sepsis, pneumonia, and AKI. Conclusion: Our findings underscore the need for increased screening and vigilance following perioperative complications to mitigate disparities in patient outcomes following high-risk EGS.

Background: Surgical volume is known to influence failure to rescue (FTR), defined as death following a complication. Robotic lung surgery continues to expand and there is variability in outcomes among hospitals. We sought to estimate the contribution of hospital-based factors on outcomes and FTR following robotic right upper lobectomy (RRUL). Methods: Using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services inpatient claims database, we evaluated all patients age ≥65 years with a diagnosis of lung cancer who underwent RRUL between January 2018 and December 2020. We excluded patients who had undergone segmentectomy, sublobar, wedge, or bronchoplastic resection; had metastatic or nonmalignant disease; or had a history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Primary outcomes included FTR rate, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, conversion to open surgery, complications, and costs. We analyzed hospitals by tertiles of volume and Medicare Mortality Index (MMI). Defined as the institutional number of deaths per number of survivors, MMI is a marker of overall hospital performance and quality. Propensity score models were adjusted for confounding using goodness of fit. Results: Data for 4317 patients who underwent robotic right upper lobectomy were analyzed. Hospitals were categorized by volume of cases (low, 20) and MMI (low, 0.13). After propensity score balancing, patients from tertiles of lowest volume and highest MMI had higher costs ($34,222 vs $30,316; P = .006), as well as higher mortality (odds ratio, 7.46; 95% confidence interval, 2.67-28.2; P

Victor P Gazivoda, Timothy J Kennedy Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USACorrespondence: Timothy J Kennedy, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA, Email tk431@cinj.rutgers.eduAbstract: Historically, postoperative mortality rates were high after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), but in recent times those rates have improved, and Whipple procedures are safely performed. Multiple factors have contributed to the improvement of postoperative mortality rates after PD over time. Known risk factors leading to postoperative mortality after PD are based on patient factors, surgeon/hospital factors, and postoperative factors. These factors can be attributed to improvements in patient selection and optimization, operative techniques and regionalization to high volume centers, and better understanding and standardization of postoperative care and management of common complications. Further studies should investigate preoperative optimization using prehabilitation and explore early diagnosis of postoperative complications and interventions to prevent mortality after PD.Keywords: pancreaticoduodenectomy, mortality, risk assessment, operative volume, failure to rescue, PD, FTR

The Connection Between Caring, Knowing and Preventing Failure to Rescue in Nursing

Abstract Background and Aims Vital sign monitoring needs to be timely and correct to recognize deteriorating patients early and trigger the relevant clinical response. The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate compliance specifically toward the regional vital sign monitoring protocol the so called early warning score protocol (EWS‐protocol) 72 h before a medical emergency team response (MET‐response) and thereby illuminate whether poor compliance translates into a worse patient outcome. Methods It was investigated all eligible patients that underwent MET responses during the calendar year 2019. The inclusion criteria encompassed somatic patients above 18 years of age admitted to the hospital and detailed evaluations of the medical records of the included patients were conducted. Results Four hundred and twenty‐nine MET‐responses were included in the final analysis. EWS‐protocol failure was observed for more than half the patients within all the time frames assessed. Thirty‐day mortality was significantly higher for patients subject to EWS protocol failure in the timeframes 24−16, 16−8, 8−0 h before MET response. Adjusting for admission length, age, and gender, patients subject to EWS‐protocol failure had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.9, 2.0, 2.1, 2.3 for mortality in the time frames 72−48, 24−16, 16−8, and 8−0 h before the MET‐response, respectively. The adjusted OR for ICU‐admission was 1.7, and 1.6 for patients subject to EWS‐protocol failure in the time frames 16−8 and 8−0 h before MET‐response, respectively. Conclusion According to all the data analysis in this article, there is evidence that compliance toward the NEWS‐protocol is poor. EWS‐protocol failure is associated with a significant higher mortality and ICU‐admission rate.

Objective: Failure to rescue (FTR), defined as in-hospital death following a major complication, has been increasingly studied in patients who undergo cardiothoracic surgery. This study tested the hypothesis that elderly patients undergoing lung cancer resection have greater rates of FTR compared with younger patients. Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for primary lung cancer between 2011 and 2020 and had at least 1 major postoperative complication were identified using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients who died following complications (FTR) were compared with those who survived in an elderly (80+ years) and younger (

Objective: Postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery is associated with long-term cognitive decline and mortality. We investigated whether increased ICU Confusion Assessment Method scores were associated with greater 30-day mortality and failure to rescue after cardiac surgery. Methods: We studied 4030 patients who underwent a Society of Thoracic Surgeons index operation at the University of Virginia Health System from 2011 to 2021. We obtained all ICU Confusion Assessment Method scores recorded during patients' admission and summarized scores for the first 7 postoperative days. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyzed the association between ICU Confusion Assessment Method score/delirium presence and postoperative complications, operative mortality, and failure to rescue. Results: Any episode of ICU Confusion Assessment Method screen-positive delirium and nearly all components of the score were associated with increased 30-day mortality on univariate analysis. We found that a single episode of delirium was associated with increased mortality. Feature 2 (inattention) had the strongest association with poorer outcomes, including failure to rescue in our analysis, as were patients with higher peak Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale scores. Patients with higher mean Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale scores had an association with decreased failure to rescue. Conclusions: A single episode of delirium, as measured using ICU Confusion Assessment Method scores, is associated with increased mortality. Inattention and higher peak Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale scores were associated with failure to rescue. Screening may clarify diagnosing delirium and assessing its implications on mortality and failure to rescue. Our findings suggest the importance of identifying and managing risk factors for delirium to improve patient outcomes and reduce mortality and failure to rescue rates.

Objective: The study objective was to examine the association between hospital processes of care and failure to rescue in a diverse, multi-institutional cardiac surgery network. Methods: Failure to rescue was defined as an operative mortality after 1 or more of 4 complications: prolonged ventilation, stroke, renal failure, and unplanned reoperation. Society of Thoracic Surgeons data from 20,950 consecutive patients in the Columbia HeartSource network who underwent 1 of 7 cardiac operations—coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement ± coronary artery bypass grafting, mitral valve repair or replacement ± coronary artery bypass grafting—were analyzed to calculate failure to rescue rates. Hospital-specific characteristics were ascertained by survey method. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic models assessed the association of these hospital characteristics with failure to rescue while adjusting for patient-related factors known to be associated with mortality. Results: Failure to rescue rates at affiliate hospitals ranged from 5.45% to 21.74% (median, 12.5%; interquartile range, 6.9%). When controlling for Society of Thoracic Surgeons–predicted risk of mortality with hospital as a random effect, 4 hospital characteristics were found to be associated with lower failure to rescue rates; the presence of cardiac-trained anesthesiologists (odds ratio, 0.41; CI, 0.31-0.55, P

Abstract Background Failure to rescue (FTR), defined as a postoperative complication leading to death, is a recently described outcome metric used to evaluate treatment quality. However, the predictive factors for FTR, particularly following highly advanced hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery (HBPS), have not been adequately investigated. This study aimed to identify perioperative predictive factors for FTR following highly advanced HBPS. Methods This single-institution retrospective study involved 177 patients at Gifu University Hospital, Japan, who developed severe postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo classification grades ≥ III) between 2010 and 2022 following highly advanced HBPS. Univariate analysis was used to identify pre-, intra-, and postoperative risks of FTR. Results Nine postoperative mortalities occurred during the study period (overall mortality rate, 1.3% [9/686]; FTR rate, 5.1% [9/177]). Univariate analysis indicated that comorbid liver disease, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion, postoperative liver failure, postoperative respiratory failure, and postoperative bleeding significantly correlated with FTR. Conclusions FTR was found to be associated with perioperative factors. Well-coordinated surgical procedures to avoid intra- and postoperative bleeding and unnecessary blood transfusions, as well as postoperative team management with attention to the occurrence of organ failure, may decrease FTR rates.

A cancer diagnosis and its subsequent treatments are life-changing events, impacting the patient and their family. Treatment options available for cancer care are developing at pace, with more patients now able to achieve a cancer cure. This is achieved through the development of novel cancer treatments, surgery, and modern imaging, but also as a result of better understanding treatment/surgical trauma, rescue after complications, perioperative care, and innovative interventions like pre-habilitation, enhanced recovery, and enhanced post-operative care. With more patients living with and beyond cancer, the role of survivorship and quality of life after cancer treatment is gaining importance. The impact cancer treatments can have on patients vary, and the "scars" treatments leave are not always visible. To adequately support patients through their cancer journeys, we need to look past the short-term interactions they have with medical professionals and encourage them to consider their lives after cancer, which often is not a reflection of life before a cancer diagnosis.

Missed diagnosis of foreign bodies in esophagus occasionally results in adverse consequences for patients. This study aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics of esophageal foreign body missed diagnosis in 12 cases. Among the 12 patients, 7 didn't undergo esophagus-related examination due to mild pain; One case didn't report a clear history of swallowing foreign bodies. For one case, computed tomography (CT) examination had not reached the esophageal foreign body level. Two cases were missed diagnosis because the foreign bodies were too tiny to develop clearly on CT. One case showed foreign body in esophagus during initial CT examination, but after subsequent gastroscopy, no foreign body was found. Among the 12 patients, 7 had esophageal perforation, 1 of which developed a neck abscess, and 1 had peri-esophageal abscess. It seems that, if foreign bodies in the pharynx or esophagus are suspected and no foreign bodies are found in the laryngoscope, chest CT scan is necessary. It is best to perform examination of full-length esophagus and pharynx, because foreign bodies may exist in the post-cricoid region or the deep part of the pyriform sinus, especially in older cases with longer retention times.

Abstract Background Quality standards in postoperative outcomes have not yet been defined for gastric cancer surgery. Also, the effect of centralization of gastric cancer surgery on the improvement of postoperative outcomes continues to be debated. Short-term postoperative outcomes in gastric carcinoma patients in centers with low-volume of annual gastrectomies were assessed. The effect of age on major postoperative morbidity and mortality was also analyzed. Methods Patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction Siewert III type carcinomas who underwent surgical treatment with curative intent between January 2013 and December 2016 were included. Data were obtained from the population-based surgical registry Esophagogastric Carcinoma Registry of the Comunitat Valenciana (RECEG-CV). The RECEG-CV gathers information on demographic characteristics and comorbidity, preoperative study and neoadjuvant treatment, surgical procedure, pathological study, postoperative outcomes, and follow-up. Seventeen hospitals belonging to the public network participated in this registry. Results Data from 591 patients were analyzed. Postoperative major morbidity occurred in 154 (26.1%) patients. Overall 30-day or in-hospital mortality, and 90-day postoperative mortality rates were 8.6% and 10.1% respectively. Failure-to-rescue was 39% and it was significantly higher in patients aged 75 years or older in comparison with younger patients (55.3% vs 23.1% p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, age ≥ 75 years (p = 0.029), laparoscopic approach (p = 0.005), and total gastrectomy (p = 0.005) were associated with major postoperative morbidity. Age ≥ 75 years (p = 0.027), pulmonary complications (p = 0.001), cardiac complications (p = 0.001), leakage (p = 0.003), and hemorrhage (p = 0.013) were associated with postoperative mortality. Conclusions Centralization of gastric adenocarcinoma treatment in centers with higher annual caseload should be considered to improve the short-term postoperative outcomes in low-volume centers. Patients aged 75 or older had a significantly increased risk of major postoperative morbidity and mortality, and higher failure-to-rescue.

Background: Although the effects of hospital volume on mortality have been studied in other procedures, data on total joint arthroplasty (TJA) are limited. Furthermore, mortality rate among surgical patients with early major complications has become an important patient safety indicator and has been shown to be an important driver of mortality in certain operations. Our objective was to examine the effect of hospital volume on early complications and in-hospital mortality rate after TJA. Material and methods: A total of 5,396,644 patients undergoing elective, unilateral TJA between 2002 and 2011 were identified using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Hospitals were divided by annual volume into tertiles. Major complications associated with postoperative mortality were identified. Risk-adjusted mortality (RAM) was calculated to adjust for hospital case mix. Results: For THAs performed at high-volume centers, RAM was significantly lower (0.03% vs 0.41%, P < .05, high vs low volume) with lower prevalence of major complications (2.2% vs 3.3%, P < .05, high vs low volume). We observed similar results for TKA where RAM was lower (

Study Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of alarm configuration tactics in general care settings. Methods: Retrospective analysis of over 150,000 hours of medical/surgical unit continuous SpO2 and pulse rate data were used to estimate alarm rates and impact on individual nurses. Results: Application of an SpO2 threshold of 80% vs 88% produced an 88% reduction in alarms. Addition of a 15 second annunciation delay reduced alarms by an additional 71% with an SpO2 threshold of 80%. Pulse rate alarms were reduced by 93% moving from a pulse rate high threshold of 120–140 bpm, and 95% by lowering the pulse rate low threshold from 60 to 50 bpm. A 15 second annunciation delay at thresholds of 140 bpm and 50 bpm resulted in additional reductions of 80% and 81%, respectively. Combined alarm frequency across all parameters for every 24 hours of actual monitored time yielded a rate of 4.2 alarms for the surveillance configuration, 83.0 alarms for critical care monitoring, and 320.6 alarms for condition monitoring. Total exposure time for an individual nurse during a single shift ranged from 3.6 min with surveillance monitoring, to 1.2 hours for critical care monitoring, and 5.3 hours for condition monitoring. Conclusions: Continuous monitoring can eliminate unwitnessed/unmonitored arrests associated with significant increased mortality in the general care setting. The “alarm problem” associated with these systems is manageable using alarm settings that signify severely abnormal physiology to alert responsible clinicians of urgent situations.

Summary: Surveys suggest that anaesthesiologists believe that continuous monitoring with wearables will lead to improved patient outcomes. However, evidence suggests that several critical factors, including timely recognition of physiological problems, the presence of a trained team to respond to the alerts, and that the alerts occur far in advance of the deterioration, are required before overall improvement can occur. Wearables alone will not change patients' outcomes, they must be implemented as part of a system change that takes advantage of the higher frequency observations that continuous monitoring provides.

Abstract Background Most trauma patients admitted to the hospital alive and die later on, decease during the initial care in the emergency department or the intensive care unit (ICU). However, a number of patients pass away after having been discharged from the ICU during the initial hospital stay. On first sight these cases could be seen as “failure to rescue” of potentially salvageable patients. A low rate of such patients might be a potential indicator of quality for trauma care on ICUs and surgical wards. Methods Retrospective analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU® with data from 2015 to 2017. Patients that died during the initial ICU stay were compared to those who were discharged from the initial ICU stay for at least 24 h but died later on. Results A total of 82,313 trauma patients were included in the TraumaRegister DGU®. In total, 6576 patients (8.0%) died during their hospital stay. Out of those, 5481 were admitted to the ICU alive and 972 patients (17.7%) were discharged from ICU and died later on. Those were older (mean age: 77 vs. 68 years), less severely injured (mean ISS: 23.1 vs. 30.0 points) and had a longer mean ICU length of stay (10 vs. 6 days). A limitation of life-sustaining therapy due to a documented living will was present in 46.1% of all patients who died during their initial ICU stay and in 59.9% of patients who died after discharge from their initial ICU stay. Conclusions 17.7% of all non-surviving severely injured trauma patients died within the hospital after discharge from their initial ICU treatment. Their death can partially be explained by a limitation of therapy due to a living will. In conclusion, the rate of such late deaths may partially represent patients that died of potentially avoidable or treatable complications.

Background: Several continuous monitoring solutions, including wireless wearable sensors, are available or being developed to improve patient surveillance on surgical wards. We designed a survey to understand the current perception and expectations of anaesthesiologists who, as perioperative physicians, are increasingly involved in postoperative care. Methods: The survey was shared in 40 university hospitals from Western Europe and the USA. Results: From 5744 anaesthesiologists who received the survey link, there were 1158 valid questionnaires available for analysis. Current postoperative surveillance was mainly based on intermittent spot-checks of vital signs every 4–6 h in the USA (72%) and every 8–12 h in Europe (53%). A majority of respondents (91%) considered that continuous monitoring of vital signs should be available on surgical wards and that wireless sensors are preferable to tethered systems (86%). Most respondents indicated that oxygen saturation (93%), heart rate (80%), and blood pressure (71%) should be continuously monitored with wrist devices (71%) or skin adhesive patches (54%). They believed it may help detect clinical deterioration earlier (90%), decrease rescue interventions (59%), and decrease hospital mortality (54%). Opinions diverged regarding the impact on nurse workload (increase 46%, decrease 39%), and most respondents considered that the biggest implementation challenges are economic (79%) and connectivity issues (64%). Conclusion: Continuous monitoring of vital signs with wireless sensors is wanted by most anaesthesiologists from university hospitals in Western Europe and in the USA. They believe it may improve patient safety and outcome, but may also be challenging to implement because of cost and connectivity issues.

Introduction: Failure-to-rescue (FTR), defined as death after a surgical complication, is a quality metric that is an important variable affecting mortality rates in hospitals. This study aims to analyze complications, FTR rates, and its predictors at the index hospital setting. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study performed at an academic hospital from 2015 to 2020 in the Department of Surgical Gastroenterology. We included all patients who had major complications following elective major benign or malignant abdominal surgeries. The primary and secondary endpoint was FTR rates and the overall major complications and deaths, re-operation rate, and its predictors respectively. Results: Among 762 patients, the rate of any major complication was 14.9% . The overall mortality rate was 2.8%. However, the mortality rate among patients with complications was 27.4% (FTR). Twenty-seven (52.9%) patients underwent re-operation for complications, out of which 70% survived. Three (21.4%) patients had a delay in prompt diagnosis and interventions of complications and had FTR due to the anastomotic leak and bleeding. The ASA grade, co-morbidities,, re-operation, and nature of the disease (benign vs. malignant) did not predict the FTR. Conclusion: This study conducted at an academic, low-volume center had higher rates of FTR. It can be further reduced by both prompt and appropriate interventions of postoperative complications in a multidisciplinary setup.

Introduction: Failure-to-rescue (FTR), defined as death after a surgical complication, is a quality metric that is an important variable affecting mortality rates in hospitals. This study aims to analyze complications, FTR rates, and its predictors at the index hospital setting. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study performed at an academic hospital from 2015 to 2020 in the Department of Surgical Gastroenterology. We included all patients who had major complications following elective major benign or malignant abdominal surgeries. The primary and secondary endpoint was FTR rates and the overall major complications and deaths, re-operation rate, and its predictors respectively. Results: Among 762 patients, the rate of any major complication was 14.9% . The overall mortality rate was 2.8%. However, the mortality rate among patients with complications was 27.4% (FTR). Twenty-seven (52.9%) patients underwent re-operation for complications, out of which 70% survived. Three (21.4%) patients had a delay in prompt diagnosis and interventions of complications and had FTR due to the anastomotic leak and bleeding. The ASA grade, co-morbidities,, re-operation, and nature of the disease (benign vs. malignant) did not predict the FTR. Conclusion: This study conducted at an academic, low-volume center had higher rates of FTR. It can be further reduced by both prompt and appropriate interventions of postoperative complications in a multidisciplinary setup.

Introduction: Increased life expectancy leads to older and frailer surgical patients. Co-management between medical and surgical specialities has proven favourable in complex situations. Selection of patients for co-management is full of difficulties. The aim of this study was to develop a clinical decision support tool to select surgical patients for co-management. Material and Methods: Clinical data was collected from patient electronic health records with an ICD-9 code for colorectal surgery from January 2012 to December 2015 at a hospital in Lisbon. The outcome variable consists in co-management signalling. A dataset from 344 patients was used to develop the prediction model and a second data set from 168 patients was used for external validation. Results: Using logistic regression modelling the authors built a five variable (age, burden of comorbidities, ASA-PS status, surgical risk and recovery time) predictive referral model for co-management. This model has an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.81 - 0.90), a predictive Brier score of 0.11, a sensitivity of 0.80, a specificity of 0.82 and an accuracy of 81.3%. Discussion: Early referral of high-risk patients may be valuable to guide the decision on the best level of post-operative clinical care. We developed a simple bedside decision tool with a good discriminatory and predictive performance in order to select patients for comanagement. Conclusion: A simple bed-side clinical decision support tool of patients for co-management is viable, leading to potential improvement in early recognition and management of postoperative complications and reducing the ‘failure to rescue’. Generalizability to other clinical settings requires adequate customization and validation.