Search

The differential diagnosis of ST-segment elevation on electrocardiogram is multifaceted. Particularly, in cases of precordial ST-segment elevation, considering anterior myocardial infarction is crucial. Herein, we present a case of precordial ST-segment elevation with normal left coronary arteries.

Abstract Background Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation is an effective treatment; however, periesophageal vagal nerve injury is not rare and sometimes results in acute gastroparesis (AGP) after atrial fibrillation ablation (AFA). We sought to investigate the incidence and risk factors of AGP via preprocedural computed tomography (CT) analysis. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 422 patients who underwent index AFA at our center. Using contrast‐enhanced CT performed before ablation, the anatomical characteristics of the esophagus were compared between patients with and without post‐ablation AGP. AGP was diagnosed by the presence of symptoms, fasting abdominal X‐ray radiography as a screening test, and additional abdominal imaging. Results Of the 422 patients (age, 67 ± 11 years; male, 68.5%; cryoballoon, 63.7%), AGP developed in 14 (3.3%) patients, and six of 14 patients were asymptomatic. AGP resolved in all patients within 4 weeks without invasive treatment. In the AGP group, the esophagus was frequently located on the vertebra (middle‐positioned esophagus) (AGP vs non‐AGP, 42.9% vs 11.5%; P = .01), and additional posterior wall ablation was frequently performed (50.0% vs 14.5%; P = .02). In the multivariate analysis, middle‐positioned esophagus (P = .02; odds ratio, 9.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5‐53.3) and additional posterior wall ablation (P = .01; odds ratio, 7.6; 95% CI, 1.5‐42.1) were independent predictors of AGP. Conclusions Anatomical evaluation of the esophagus using CT may be simple and useful for predicting AGP after AFA. High‐risk patients who have middle‐positioned esophagus or who underwent excessive posterior wall ablation should be followed up closely.

Abstract Background The low voltage zone (LVZ) detected with three‐dimensional electroanatomical mapping is a surrogate marker of atrial scar in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) and is associated with poor clinical outcomes after catheter ablation. However, fewer studies have reported the relationship between responsiveness to antiarrhythmic drugs and the LVZ. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 76 patients who underwent catheter ablation for PeAF at our center. Rhythm control with bepridil was initiated before ablation in all patients, and electrical cardioversion was performed in cases of failure to restore sinus rhythm with bepridil alone. Patients with successful sinus restoration with bepridil alone (≤200 mg/d) were defined as “responders”, while those who required electrical cardioversion as well were defined as “non‐responders”. We compared the LVZ ratio (ratio of the LVZ surface area to the left atrium surface area on three‐dimensional electroanatomical mapping) and the recurrence‐free rate after ablation between the two groups. Results Of the 76 patients, 48 (63.2%) were responders to bepridil. The median LVZ ratio was significantly lower in the responder group than in the nonresponder group (7.5% vs 14.0%, P = .009). Multivariate analysis revealed that response to bepridil was an independent predictor of normal voltage (P = .02, odds ratio = 0.20, 95% confidence interval = 0.04‐0.76). The recurrence‐free rate at 1 year after catheter ablation was significantly higher in the responder group than in the nonresponder group (87.1% vs 62.3%, P = .03). Conclusions Response to bepridil is a marker of normal voltage in electroanatomical mapping and is significantly associated with better clinical outcomes after catheter ablation.

Background Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an established ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation (AF), however, PVI alone is insufficient to suppress AF recurrence. Non-pulmonary vein (non-PV) trigger ablation is one of the promising strategies beyond PVI and has been shown to be effective in refractory/persistent AF cases. To make non-PV trigger ablation more standardized, it is essential to develop a simple method to localize the origin of non-PV triggers. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 37 non-PV triggers in 751 ablation sessions for symptomatic AF from January 2017 to December 2020. Regarding non-PV triggers, intra-atrial activation interval from the earliest in right atrium (RA) to proximal coronary sinus (CS) (RA-CSp) and that from the earliest in RA to distal CS (RA-CSd) obtained by a basically-positioned duodecapolar RA-CS catheter were compared among 3 originating non-PV areas [RA, atrial septum (SEP) and left atrium (LA)]. Results RA-CSp of RA non-PV trigger (56.4 ± 23.4 ms) was significantly longer than that of SEP non-PV (14.8 ± 25.6 ms, p = 0.019) and LA non-PV (-24.9 ± 27.9 ms, p = 0.0004). RA-CSd of RA non-PV (75.9 ± 32.1 ms) was significantly longer than that of SEP non-PV (34.2 ± 32.6 ms, p = 0.040) and LA non-PV (-13.3 ± 41.2 ms, p = 0.0008). RA-CSp and RA-CSd of SEP non-PV were significantly longer than those of LA non-PV (p = 0.022 and p = 0.016, respectively). Sensitivity and specificity of an algorithm to differentiate the area of non-PV trigger using RA-CSp (cut-off value: 50 ms) and RA-CSd (cut-off value: 0 ms) were 88% and 97% for RA non-PV, 81% and 73% for SEP non-PV, 65% and 95% for LA non-PV, respectively. Conclusions The analysis of intra-atrial activation sequences was useful to differentiate non-PV trigger areas. A simple algorithm to localize the area of non-PV trigger would be helpful to identify non-PV trigger sites in AF ablation.

BackgroundPulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an established ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation (AF), however, PVI alone is insufficient to suppress AF recurrence. Non-pulmonary vein (non-PV) trigger ablation is one of the promising strategies beyond PVI and has been shown to be effective in refractory/persistent AF cases. To make non-PV trigger ablation more standardized, it is essential to develop a simple method to localize the origin of non-PV triggers.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 37 non-PV triggers in 751 ablation sessions for symptomatic AF from January 2017 to December 2020. Regarding non-PV triggers, intra-atrial activation interval from the earliest in right atrium (RA) to proximal coronary sinus (CS) (RA-CSp) and that from the earliest in RA to distal CS (RA-CSd) obtained by a basically-positioned duodecapolar RA-CS catheter were compared among 3 originating non-PV areas [RA, atrial septum (SEP) and left atrium (LA)].ResultsRA-CSp of RA non-PV trigger (56.4 ± 23.4 ms) was significantly longer than that of SEP non-PV (14.8 ± 25.6 ms, p = 0.019) and LA non-PV (-24.9 ± 27.9 ms, p = 0.0004). RA-CSd of RA non-PV (75.9 ± 32.1 ms) was significantly longer than that of SEP non-PV (34.2 ± 32.6 ms, p = 0.040) and LA non-PV (-13.3 ± 41.2 ms, p = 0.0008). RA-CSp and RA-CSd of SEP non-PV were significantly longer than those of LA non-PV (p = 0.022 and p = 0.016, respectively). Sensitivity and specificity of an algorithm to differentiate the area of non-PV trigger using RA-CSp (cut-off value: 50 ms) and RA-CSd (cut-off value: 0 ms) were 88% and 97% for RA non-PV, 81% and 73% for SEP non-PV, 65% and 95% for LA non-PV, respectively.ConclusionsThe analysis of intra-atrial activation sequences was useful to differentiate non-PV trigger areas. A simple algorithm to localize the area of non-PV trigger would be helpful to identify non-PV trigger sites in AF ablation.

Abstract In the majority of cases presenting with the Mahaim fiber (MF), the MF connects the lateral right atrium (RA) to the right bundle branch or the right ventricle. We present the case of a 33‐year‐old man with antidromic atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia using MF connected to the septal RA and left ventricle (LV). Although the Mahaim potential was recorded at the septal RA, ablation at this site could not eliminate the MF and had a potential risk of injury to the atrioventricular node. Additional application at the posterior septal LV achieved successful MF ablation.

Abstract Background Induction test of atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of endpoint measures in catheter ablation (CA). However, its predictive value in long‐term outcome remains controversial. Methods Ninety‐eight patients (61 years, 77 males) with persistent AF who underwent pulmonary vein antrum isolation‐based CA were retrospectively analyzed. We determined whether inducibility of AF/atrial tachyarrhythmias (AT) by atrial burst pacing at the end of CA and other characteristics were associated with the recurrence of AF/AT. Atrial burst pacing was performed with 30‐beat from the coronary sinus; increasing from 240 to 320 ppm. Inducibility was defined as AF/AT lasting ≥5 minutes following atrial burst pacing. Results AF/AT was induced in 50 patients (51%). During 1 year of follow‐up, 71 patients (72.4%) had no recurrence of AF/AT. A logistic regression analysis showed that female gender (OR 3.8; P = 0.02), multiple sessions (OR 3.5; P = 0.02), and early recurrence of AF/AT (OR 5.3; P = 0.004) were associated with clinical recurrence. AF/AT Inducibility was not associated with clinical recurrence (P = 0.65). A subanalysis in patients with enlarged LA (LA diameter ≥45 mm, n = 40) showed that AF/AT inducibility was associated with recurrence (OR 8.1; P = 0.04). The positive and negative predictive values of AF/AT inducibility for AF/AT recurrence were 41 and 89%, respectively. Negative predictive value was increased to 92.3% when the inducibility was defined as AF/AT of ≥30 seconds following atrial burst pacing. Conclusions AF/AT inducibility cannot predict long‐term clinical recurrence in patients with persistent AF. However, it may have a prognostic value especially in patients with enlarged LA.