Search

Background Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a rare disorder associated with increased mortality and morbidity. There are currently two drugs approved for IPF but their safety and efficacy profile in real-world settings in Spain is not well understood.Methods An observational, multicentre, prospective study was carried out among patients with IPF who started treatment with pirfenidone or nintedanib from 2015 to 2021. Data regarding clinical characteristics, drug adherence, safety profiles and clinical outcomes between these two drugs were collected.Results 232 patients were included in the analysis. There were no meaningful differences between both groups at baseline. Patients who started pirfenidone showed a decreased risk for treatment withdrawal compared with those starting nintedanib (HR 0.65 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.94; p=0.002)). Time to first adverse event and all-cause mortality was similar between study groups. Risk factors for withdrawal were female sex, diarrhoea and photosensitivity.Conclusions in this real-world study, both pirfenidone and nintedanib showed similar efficacy profiles. Pirfenidone was associated with less treatment discontinuations due to side effects.

Background: Intrathecal drug delivery (IDD) is part of the fourth analgesic step. Evidence on the quality of life of patients with refractory chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) using these devices and their long-term outcomes is scarce. This study aims to evaluate patients with IDD to assess their HRQoL. Additionally, the study seeks to understand the patients’ satisfaction with the treatment and changes in pain magnitude over time. Methods: Adult patients with CNCP and intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) were included. The study population was divided into two groups: less than and more than 15 years of treatment. HRQoL was analyzed using validated questionnaires. Pain reduction was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), and treatment satisfaction was evaluated using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale. Results: The results indicate a poor HRQoL in IDD patients, with better scores in the group with ≥15 years of treatment. Pain reduction was similar in both groups, and patients reported a positive satisfaction level with the treatment. Conclusions: HRQoL in CNCP patients is severely affected. Long-term IDD patients have a similar or even better HRQoL in some respects compared to those with shorter follow-ups. IDD patients experienced pain reduction, with most feeling better or much better.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in both men and women. It represents a public health problem that must be addressed through the early detection of specific biomarkers and effective treatment. To address this critical issue, it is imperative to implement effective methodologies for specific biomarker detection of lung cancer in real clinical samples. Electrochemical methods, including microfluidic devices and biosensors, can obtain robust results that reduce time, cost, and assay complexity. This comprehensive review will explore specific studies, methodologies, and detection limits and contribute to the depth of the discussion, making it a valuable resource for researchers and clinicians interested in lung cancer diagnosis.

Resumen: A pesar de la aparición de numerosas revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis sobre el uso de la doble terapia broncodilatadora para el tratamiento de la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica, la eficacia comparada de estas combinaciones entre sí no se ha explorado tan exhaustivamente. En la presente revisión narrativa se revisan los primeros estudios de doble terapia broncodilatadora y se evalúan los estudios que comparan dobles terapias broncodilatadoras en dispositivos por separado y en un único dispositivo. Los primeros ensayos de doble terapia en dispositivos separados se realizaron como una prueba de concepto sobre la función pulmonar con escaso tiempo de seguimiento o un número de pacientes reducido. Estos estudios mostraban mejorías no consistentes en función pulmonar, con escasa repercusión en síntomas u otros resultados clínicos. Los estudios que han comparado de forma directa la combinación de dos broncodilatadores de acción prolongada a dosis fijas en un único dispositivo han explorado principalmente las diferencias entre umeclidinio-vilanterol y diversas asociaciones. Estos trabajos muestran una mayor capacidad broncodilatadora de umeclidinio-vilanterol, con una reducción del uso de medicación de rescate. Por otro lado, no se observan diferencias aparentes en el control sintomático que ofrecen estas combinaciones entre sí y existen dudas sobre su impacto en la prevención de agudizaciones moderadas o graves. En el futuro sería interesante poder disponer de estudios que indiquen el efecto a largo plazo de estas combinaciones en el curso de la enfermedad, así como estudios encaminados a investigar los determinantes de las respuestas a estos fármacos tanto en función pulmonar como en síntomas, calidad de vida y exacerbaciones. Abstract: Despite the publication of numerous systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the use of dual bronchodilator therapy in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, the comparative efficacy of the different combinations has not been explored in depth. In this narrative review, we revisit the initial dual bronchodilator therapy studies and evaluate studies that compare dual bronchodilator therapies administered in separate devices and in a single device. The first trials on dual therapy delivered in separate devices were conducted as proof of concept studies, exploring lung function in limited patient numbers with short follow-up periods. These studies showed inconsistent improvements in lung function with little impact on symptoms or other clinical outcomes. Studies that directly compared fixed doses of long-acting bronchodilators in a single device investigated differences between umeclidinium/vilanterol and other combinations. These studies show increased bronchodilator capacity of umeclidinium/vilanterol with reduced use of rescue medication. However, no apparent differences were observed in the symptomatic control achieved by these different combinations, raising doubts about their impact on prevention in moderate or severe exacerbations. In the future, it would be interesting to see studies that analyze the long-term effect of these combinations on the disease course, as well as studies aimed at investigating the determinants of responses to these drugs in terms of lung function, symptoms, quality of life and exacerbations.

Resumen: La imposición del estado de alarma por el Gobierno Español como principal medida para evitar el contagio ha supuesto un cambio en la aproximación clínica al paciente crónico. Aunque las nuevas tecnologías de la comunicación nos ofrecen numerosas formas de establecer un contacto directo, pero en la distancia, las peculiaridades del paciente con EPOC hacen que con frecuencia esta atención sanitaria se vea reducida al teléfono. El reto de atender a los pacientes con EPOC por teléfono supone una complejidad añadida a la atención sanitaria. La entrevista se realizará sin la exploración del paciente, sin nuevas pruebas complementarias y sin poder verificar la técnica inhalatoria. Por tanto, los sanitarios que realicen estas entrevistas deben estar entrenados para conseguir realizarla adecuadamente para permitir la toma de decisiones. Este documento va dirigido a profesionales sanitarios que tengan que realizar algún tipo de atención telefónica a pacientes con EPOC durante la pandemia de SARS-CoV-2 y se basa en la experiencia de sus autores en entrevistas telefónicas mantenidas durante esta pandemia. En él se resumen aspectos esenciales sobre cómo debe afrontar esta entrevista, cómo llevarla a cabo, qué aspectos se deben tener presentes, cómo organizarla y cómo informar a los pacientes. Es muy probable que a partir de ahora este tipo de entrevista tenga que generalizarse para la atención de nuestros pacientes, por lo que necesitamos aprender a estructurar muchas de las visitas clínicas que hasta ahora se hacían presenciales en un nuevo modelo de atención sanitaria. Abstract: The state of alarm declared by the Spanish government as the main measure for preventing contagion has involved a change in the clinical management of chronic patients. Although new communication technologies offer us many ways to establish direct but remote contact, the peculiarities of the COPD patient often mean that their healthcare is reduced to telephone calls. The challenge of caring for COPD patients is made even more complex when it has to be delivered over the phone. The interview must be conducted without examining the patient, without performing additional tests, and without checking their inhalation technique. Therefore, healthcare providers who conduct these interviews must be trained to perform them properly in order to make the right decisions. This document is aimed at healthcare professionals who need to provide some form of telephone care to COPD patients during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and is based on the authors’ experience in telephone interviews conducted during this period. It summarizes essential aspects of how this interview should be approached, how to conduct it, what factors should be kept in mind, how to organize the interview, and how to keep patients informed. It is very likely that from now on this type of interview will be common practice in the care of our patients, so we need to learn how to structure a new model of healthcare for many of the clinical visits that have until now been conducted face-to-face.

Resumen: La oxigenoterapia crónica domiciliaria (OCD) consiste en el uso terapéutico del oxígeno a concentraciones mayores de las que se encuentran en el aire ambiente, con la intención de tratar o prevenir las manifestaciones a largo plazo de la hipoxia. Esta terapia ha demostrado aumentar la supervivencia en los enfermos con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC) e insuficiencia respiratoria crónica (IRC). Este concepto se ha extendido por analogía a la IRC originada por otras enfermedades respiratorias y no respiratorias, sin que su efectividad haya podido ser demostrada. La OCD no se ha demostrado efectiva en mejorar la supervivencia de pacientes con EPOC e hipoxemia moderada. Tampoco hay consenso sobre su empleo durante las desaturaciones nocturnas en EPOC y durante las desaturaciones al esfuerzo. La OCD actual debe valorar la situación clínica y social, adecuando las fuentes de administración de oxígeno al perfil de movilidad de los pacientes, conseguir la adecuada selección de paciente y fuente de oxígeno y es imprescindible titular la oxigenoterapia para asegurar la corrección de la hipoxemia. La búsqueda del equipo de oxígeno ideal, mejorar los sistemas de regulación e información de las terapias, avanzar en la educación de los pacientes y potenciar la investigación, son líneas de trabajo que nos marcan el futuro de la OCD. Abstract: Continuous home oxygen therapy (HOT) is the therapeutic use of oxygen at higher concentrations than those found in ambient air for treating or preventing long-term manifestations of hypoxia, and has been shown to increase survival in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic respiratory failure (CRF). This concept has been extended by analogy to CRF originating from other respiratory and non-respiratory diseases, but its effectiveness has not been demonstrated. HOT has not been shown to be effective in improving the survival of patients with COPD and moderate hypoxemia, nor is there any consensus on its use during nocturnal desaturations in COPD and desaturations caused by exertion. In the current use of HOT, the patient's clinical and social situation should be assessed, oxygen supply sources must be adapted to the patient's mobility profile, the appropriate oxygen source must be selected for each patient, and oxygen therapy must be titrated to ensure that hypoxemia is corrected. Lines of research that will shape the future of HOT include investigating the ideal equipment, improving regulation systems and information about treatments, educating patients, and promoting research.

Background: Changes in lung cancer has been characterized by the increase of cases among women and the increase in adenocarcinomas among other histological subtypes. Methods: Descriptive analysis of cases diagnosed with lung cancer in Hospital Virgen de las Nieves (Spain) from 1990 to 2010, based on five variables (age, sex, smoking, histology and pathological anatomy). The study establishes associations between these variables and compares the results with the literature. Results: 2,026 patients were diagnosed with lung cancer in this period; 1,838 were males (90.7%) and 188 women (9.3%); 1,892 patients (93.4%) were smokers or ex-smokers and 134 (6.6%) had never smoked; the most frequent non-small cell histology types were squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma and it was the most frequent neoplasia in women and were associated with a lower tobacco consumption. Conclusion: The large majority of lung cancer cases is associated with a history of smoking tobacco and there are histopathological differences according to gender and cumulative tobacco smoke load.

Abstract Background Clinical audits have reported considerable variability in COPD medical care and frequent inconsistencies with recommendations. The objectives of this study were to identify factors associated with a better adherence to clinical practice guidelines and to explore determinants of this variability at the the hospital level. Methods EPOCONSUL is a Spanish nationwide clinical audit that evaluates the outpatient management of COPD. Multilevel logistic regression with two levels was performed to assess the relationships between individual and disease-related factors, as well as hospital characteristics. Results A total of 4508 clinical records of COPD patients from 59 Spanish hospitals were evaluated. High variability was observed among hospitals in terms of medical care. Some of the patient’s characteristics (airflow obstruction, degree of dyspnea, exacerbation risk, presence of comorbidities), the hospital factors (size and respiratory nurses available) and treatment at a specialized COPD outpatient clinic were identified as factors associated with a better adherence to recommendations, although this only explains a small proportion of the total variance. Conclusion To be treated at a specialized COPD outpatient clinic and some intrinsic patient characteristics were factors associated with a better adherence to guideline recommendations, although these variables were only explaining part of the high variability observed among hospitals in terms of COPD medical care.

Abstract According to the current clinical practice guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the addition of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) to long-acting β2 agonist therapy is recommended in patients with moderate-to-severe disease and an increased risk of exacerbations. However, ICS are largely overprescribed in clinical practice, and most patients are unlikely to benefit from long-term ICS therapy. Evidence from recent randomized-controlled trials supports the hypothesis that ICS can be safely and effectively discontinued in patients with stable COPD and in whom ICS therapy may not be indicated, without detrimental effects on lung function, health status, or risk of exacerbations. This article summarizes the evidence supporting the discontinuation of ICS therapy, and proposes an algorithm for the implementation of ICS withdrawal in patients with COPD in clinical practice. Given the increased risk of potentially serious adverse effects and complications with ICS therapy (including pneumonia), the use of ICS should be limited to the minority of patients in whom the treatment effects outweigh the risks.

BACKGROUND:Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the main reasons for healthcare appointments and use of healthcare resources. In recent years, clinics specializing in COPD have been developed to offer improved care and optimization of recourses for patients with high complexity and frequent decompensations. However, little is known about the clinical practice in this clinical model specializing in COPD. The objectives of this study were to assess the prevalence, characteristics of specialized COPD outpatient respiratory clinics and to evaluate clinical practice in this healthcare model. METHODS:EPOCONSUL is a Spanish nationwide, observational, cross-sectional, clinical audit with prospective case recruitment including the clinical records for 4508 COPD cases from outpatient respiratory clinics over a 12-month period (May 2014-May 2015). The study evaluated clinical practice in 2378 cases from 28 hospitals with both general and specialized COPD outpatient respiratory clinics. RESULTS:Only 28 (47.5%) centers had an outpatient clinic specializing in COPD, which was characterized by longer patient visits and a higher prevalence of written protocols compared to a general clinic. Patients treated in a specialized clinic had greater obstruction severity, a higher degree of dyspnea and also suffered from more comorbidities. The majority of patients at both types of clinic were classified as high risk (81.1% versus 83%, p = 0.384) according to GesEPOC criteria. Clinical control of COPD was more frequent at specialized clinics, with significant differences in non-severe patients (70.5% versus 56.1%, p < 0.001). Testing was done more frequently in specialized clinics, with better adherence to good clinical practice recommendations. CONCLUSION:A specialized COPD outpatient clinic is a healthcare model found in few pulmonology departments that treats more severe patients and those with increased comorbidities. The COPD patients treated in a specialized clinic had a better clinical control, as defined by impact and clinical stability. It is a healthcare model to offer improved care with a higher degree of adherence to guidelines.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198777.].

BACKGROUND:Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is the most common hereditary disorder in adults, but is under-recognized. In Spain, the number of patients diagnosed with AATD is much lower than expected according to epidemiologic studies. The objectives of this study were to assess the frequency and determinants of testing serum α1-antitrypsin (AAT) levels in COPD patients, and to describe factors associated with testing. METHODS:EPOCONSUL is a cross-sectional clinical audit, recruiting consecutive COPD cases over one year. The study evaluated serum AAT level determination in COPD patients and associations between individual, disease-related, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS:A total of 4,405 clinical records for COPD patients from 57 Spanish hospitals were evaluated. Only 995 (22.5%) patients had serum AAT tested on some occasion. A number of patient characteristics (being male [OR 0.5, p < 0.001], ≤55 years old [OR 2.38, p