Search

BackgroundThe potential link between Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and prognosis in patients with glioma remains uncertain. This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the clinical value of PNI in glioma patients by integrating all available evidence to enhance statistical power.MethodA systematic search of databases including Medline, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to January 8, 2023 to retrieve all pertinent peer-reviewed articles. The primary outcome of the study was to examine the association between a high PNI value and overall survival, while secondary outcome included the relationship between a high PNI and progression-free survival.ResultsIn this meta-analysis, we included 13 retrospective studies published from 2016 to 2022, which analyzed a total of 2,712 patients. Across all studies, surgery was the primary treatment modality, with or without chemotherapy and radiotherapy as adjunct therapies. A high PNI was linked to improved overall survival (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.52 to 0.72, p < 0.00001, I2 = 25%), and this finding remained consistent even after conducting sensitivity analysis. Subgroup analyses based on ethnicity (Asian vs. non-Asian), sample size (200), and source of hazard ratio (univariate vs. multivariate) yielded consistent outcomes. Furthermore, patients with a high PNI had better progression-free survival than those with a low PNI (HR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.58 to 0.88, p=0.001, I2 = 0%).ConclusionOur meta-analysis suggested that a high PNI was associated with better overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with glioma. These findings may have important implications in the treatment of patients with glioma. Additional studies on a larger scale are necessary to investigate if integrating the index into the treatment protocol leads to improved clinical outcomes in individuals with glioma.Systematic review registration[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42023389951].