Search

A unidirectional shake-table test was performed on the half-scale prototype of a natural stone masonry building aggregate, to investigate the seismic performance of this type of historical construction and to assess the effectiveness of two retrofit solutions. The specimen represented a building aggregate with two adjacent three-storey units, connected along one side as if they were built at different times. Double-leaf stone masonry with undressed blocks and river pebbles was used for the walls. Timber floors constituted flexible diaphragms in their planes. Roofs with different timber truss configurations and heights covered the two units. Improved wall-to-diaphragm connections and tie rods were pre-installed, although initially not fastened, on the prototype. Both retrofit systems were activated after significant damage was reached testing the unstrengthened specimen. This paper describes the seismic behaviour of the prototype, focusing on the effects of the retrofit interventions on damage mechanism evolution, lateral displacement demand, hysteretic response, and dynamic properties degradation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper presents an experimental and numerical study on different retrofit solutions for stone masonry buildings with timber diaphragms in earthquake-prone regions, aiming at enhancing wall-to-diaphragm connections, diaphragms' stiffness, and masonry properties. The experimental results of incremental dynamic shake-table tests on three full-scale two-story buildings, complemented by material and component characterization tests, are initially summarized. The first building specimen was unstrengthened. The second one was retrofitted at the floor and roof levels with improved wall-to-diaphragm connections and a moderate increase in diaphragm stiffness. Connections were also improved in the third specimen together with a significant enhancement of diaphragm stiffness. The calibration of two numerical models, versus the experimental response of the retrofitted building specimens, is then presented. The models were further modified and reanalyzed to assess the effects of masonry mechanical upgrades, which could be achieved in practice through deep joint repointing or various types of jacketing. These solutions were simulated by applying correction coefficients to the masonry mechanical properties, as suggested by the Italian building code. The effectiveness of the experimentally implemented and numerically simulated interventions are discussed in terms of strength enhancement and failure modes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]