1. Characterization of Treatment Resistance and Viral Kinetics in the Setting of Single-Active Versus Dual-Active Monoclonal Antibodies Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2.
- Author
-
Choudhary, Manish C, Deo, Rinki, Evering, Teresa H, Chew, Kara W, Giganti, Mark J, Moser, Carlee, Ritz, Justin, Regan, James, Flynn, James P, Crain, Charles R, Wohl, David Alain, Currier, Judith S, Eron, Joseph J, Margolis, David, Zhu, Qing, Zhon, Lijie, Ya, Li, Greninger, Alexander L, Hughes, Michael D, and Smith, Davey
- Subjects
SARS-CoV-2 ,VIRAL load ,NUCLEOTIDE sequencing ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,DISEASE progression - Abstract
Background Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) represent a crucial antiviral strategy for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, but it is unclear whether combination mAbs offer a benefit over single-active mAb treatment. Amubarvimab and romlusevimab significantly reduced the risk of hospitalizations or death in the ACTIV-2/A5401 trial. Certain SARS-CoV-2 variants are intrinsically resistant against romlusevimab, leading to only single-active mAb therapy with amubarvimab in these variants. We evaluated virologic outcomes in individuals treated with single- versus dual-active mAbs. Methods Participants were nonhospitalized adults at higher risk of clinical progression randomized to amubarvimab plus romlusevimab or placebo. Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels and targeted S-gene next-generation sequencing was performed on anterior nasal samples. We compared viral load kinetics and resistance emergence between individuals treated with effective single- versus dual-active mAbs depending on the infecting variant. Results Study participants receiving single- or dual-active mAbs had similar demographics, baseline nasal viral load, symptom score, and symptom duration. Compared with single-active mAb treatment, treatment with dual-active mAbs led to faster viral load decline at study days 3 (P <.001) and 7 (P <.01). Treatment-emergent resistance mutations were more likely to be detected after amubarvimab plus romlusevimab treatment than with placebo (2.6% vs 0%; P <.001) and were more frequently detected in the setting of single-active compared with dual-active mAb treatment (7.3% vs 1.1%; P <.01). Single-active and dual-active mAb treatment resulted in similar decrease in rates of hospitalizations or death. Conclusions Compared with single-active mAb therapy, dual-active mAbs led to similar clinical outcomes but significantly faster viral load decline and a lower risk of emergent resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF