Search

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of Xpert MTB/RIF assay in the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for differentiating tuberculosis intrathoracic lymphadenopathy from sarcoidosis intrathoracic lymphadenopathy. Methods: The patients who were suspected to having sarcoidosis or tuberculosis intrathoracic lymphadenopathy at the Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital between October 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021 were retrospectively evaluated in this study. All patients underwent endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and Xpert analysis. Differences in clinical and radiological features were recorded. The diagnostic performances of EBUS-TBNA Xpert, acid-fast bacilli, culture, and peripheral blood QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT) for differentiating sarcoidosis from tuberculosis intrathoracic lymphadenopathy were analyzed. Results: A total of 119 patients were included in this analysis. Of those, 83 patients were finally diagnosed with sarcoidosis (N = 50) and tuberculosis (N = 33) intrathoracic lymphadenopathy. Young individuals were more likely to have tuberculosis versus sarcoidosis intrathoracic lymphadenopathy (P = 0.006). Markers of inflammation, including fever, leukocytes, and serum ferritin levels, were significantly higher in tuberculosis versus sarcoidosis intrathoracic lymphadenopathy (P < 0.01). Bilateral lung involvement and symmetry intrathoracic lymphadenopathy were more common in sarcoidosis intrathoracic lymphadenopathy (P < 0.01). In addition, the longest diameter of intrathoracic lymphadenopathy (in cm) was significantly larger in sarcoidosis intrathoracic lymphadenopathy (P = 0.001). However, the largest diameter of lung lesions was significantly shorter (P = 0.005). The sensitivity and specificity values of Xpert and QFT for differentiating these two diseases were 69.70% and 100%, and 96.43% and 91.84%, respectively. Conclusion: Xpert MTB/RIF is recommended for the diagnosis of tuberculosis intrathoracic lymphadenopathy using EBUS-TBNA samples. A negative QFT suggests the exclusion of the diagnosis of tuberculosis intrathoracic lymphadenopathy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background and objective: Endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS‐TBNA) has emerged as a minimally invasive technique for diagnosing intrathoracic malignancies and some benignancies; however, there are no data available on the utility of EBUS‐TBNA for the diagnosis of non‐specific inflammatory intrathoracic lymphadenitis. Methods: A prospective analysis was performed from 104 patients with enlarged lymphadenopathy suspected of non‐specific lymphadenitis referred for EBUS‐TBNA between October 2009 and March 2012. Rapid on‐site cytological evaluation was not adopted. Microbiological tests were carried out in all patients. Patients were excluded from the study if there was other diagnosis being defined. Results: One hundred ninety‐one lesions were aspirated in 94 patients with enlarged mediastinal/hilar lymph nodes within reach of EBUS‐TBNA, which were diagnosed as non‐specific intrathorcacic lymphadenitis by pathology and clinical follow‐up. According to EBUS‐TBNA pathologies, 94 patients were categorized into four kinds: (i) inflammatory cell infiltrates and/or noncaseating necrosis in 38 cases; (ii) granuloma formed by epithelioid cells and/or fiber hyperplasia in 13 cases; (iii) lymph node tissue/lymphocyte without obvious abnormal lesions in 41 cases; (iv) inadequate sample in 2 cases. Bacterial and/or fungal smears and cultures were carried out in all 94 patients (100%), with pathogens being found in 4 (4.3%) cases. All patients (100%) underwent acid‐fast staining and culture for mycobacterium tuberculosis to exclude tuberculosis. No procedure‐related complication was observed. Conclusions: EBUS‐TBNA can provide pathological and microbiological evidences for diagnosing non‐specific inflammatory intrathoracic lymphadenopathy, and it is a safe and effective first‐line investigation for ruling out malignancies and other benign diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) now provides an important alternative diagnostic modality in patients with intrathoracic tuberculosis lymphadenopathy. The procedure is well tolerated in the outpatient setting, provides access to the mediastinal and hilar lymph node locations commonly in tuberculosis and also allows bronchial washing to be performed at the same procedure. However, there is no report of EBUS-TBNA applied to children to diagnose tuberculosis. We report a case of EBUS-TBNA applied to children who had intrathoracic tuberculosis lymphadenopathy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) provides material for the cytological diagnostic workup. To improve the evaluation of unexplained intrathoracic lymphadenopathy, the availability of material for histological evaluation would be desirable. For this purpose, the technique of endobronchial ultrasound-guided mediastinal forceps biopsy (EBUS-guided forceps biopsy) is a potentially good candidate. The aim of the present study was, using simple methodology, to establish the additional diagnostic yield provided by supplemental EBUS-guided forceps biopsy in comparison with EBUS-TBNA alone. Methods: The data of 50 consecutive patients with mediastinal, lobar, and hilar space-consuming lesions were analyzed. In all patients, immediately following EBUS-TBNA with a 22-gauge needle, a 21-gauge forceps was introduced through the opening created in the bronchial wall and an EBUS-guided forceps biopsy performed. The improvement in the diagnostic yield was determined. The diagnostic yield of the EBUS-guided forceps biopsy in relation to the size of the biopsy specimen and that of the EBUS-TBNA in relation to the cell-block technique were determined. Results: Combining the techniques increased the diagnostic sensitivity of the EBUS-TBNA from 50.0 to 82.0%. EBUS-guided forceps biopsies measuring ≥3 mm enabled a specific diagnosis to be established more often than did forceps biopsies <3 mm (90.9% vs. 57.1%). A cell block was prepared in 29 patients. In this case, EBUS-TBNA provided a higher diagnostic yield (65.5% vs. 28.6%) compared to cytology alone. Conclusion: EBUS-guided forceps biopsy should be employed for the bronchoscopic diagnosis of intrathoracic lymphadenopathy of unknown etiology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a study on endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS) guidance for transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) using a double-channel bronchoscope (EBUS-D). A randomized, comparative prospective study was conducted to 55 patients between January 2000 and August 2003. The study concluded that EBUS-D is useful for diagnosing intrathoracic lymphadenopathy, and the obtained specimen with real-time confirmation of the needle is directly proportional to an accurate diagnosis.