1. Prevention of Early Sudden Cardiac Death after Myocardial Infarction Using the Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator—Results from a Real-World Cohort.
- Author
-
Rohrer, Ursula, Manninger, Martin, Fiedler, Lukas, Steinwender, Clemens, Binder, Ronald K., Stühlinger, Markus, Zirngast, Birgit, Zweiker, David, Zirlik, Andreas, and Scherr, Daniel
- Subjects
CARDIAC arrest ,MYOCARDIAL infarction ,DEFIBRILLATORS - Abstract
Background: After acute myocardial infarction (AMI), patients are at risk of sudden cardiac death. The VEST trial failed to show a reduction in arrhythmic mortality in AMI patients with an LVEF ≤ 35% prescribed with a WCD, having a lower-than-expected WCD wearing compliance. Objectives: The aim was to investigate on outcomes of patients in a real-world Austrian cohort with good compliance. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all eligible Austrian WCD patients according to the VEST trial inclusion and exclusion criteria between 2010 and 2020 was performed. Results: In total, 105 Austrian patients (64 ± 11 years, 12% female; LVEF 28 ± 6%) received a WCD for a median of 69 (1; 277) days after AMI (wearing duration 23.5 (0; 24) hours/day). Within the first 90 days, 4/105 (3.8%) patients received 9 appropriate shocks (2 (1; 5) shocks). No inappropriate shocks were delivered, and 3/105 (2.9%) patients died during follow-up. Arrhythmic mortality (1.9% Austria vs. 1.6% VEST, p = 0.52), as well as all-cause mortality (2.9% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.42) was comparable in both cohorts. Conclusions: The WCD is a safe treatment option in a highly selected cohort of patients with LVEF ≤ 35% after AMI. However, despite excellent WCD wearing duration in our cohort, the arrhythmic mortality rate was not significantly different. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF