1. Patient-Reported Outcomes of Postoperative NSCLC Patients with or without Staged Chinese Herb Medicine Therapy during Adjuvant Chemotherapy (NALLC 2): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
- Author
-
Zhang, Yi-lu, Jiao, Li-jing, Gong, Ya-bin, Xu, Jian-fang, Ni, Jian, Shen, Xiao-yong, Zhang, Jie, Zhou, Di, Qian, Cheng-xin, Wang, Qin, Yao, Jia-lin, Yang, Wen-xiao, Su, Ling-zi, Wang, Li-yu, Li, Jia-qi, Yao, Yi-qin, Zhang, Yuan-hui, Wang, Yi-chao, Chen, Zhi-wei, and Xu, Ling
- Subjects
CHINESE medicine ,POSTOPERATIVE care ,DOCETAXEL ,CISPLATIN ,PEMETREXED ,T-test (Statistics) ,HERBAL medicine ,BLIND experiment ,STATISTICAL sampling ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,PROBABILITY theory ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,CANCER patients ,FUNCTIONAL status ,CARBOPLATIN ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,ADJUVANT chemotherapy ,CANCER chemotherapy ,INTRAVENOUS therapy ,KAPLAN-Meier estimator ,QUALITY of life ,RESEARCH ,ANOREXIA nervosa ,CLINICAL deterioration ,GEMCITABINE ,HEALTH outcome assessment ,LUNG cancer ,CANCER fatigue ,PACLITAXEL ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,PROPORTIONAL hazards models ,DRUG dosage ,EVALUATION ,DRUG administration - Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether the combination of chemotherapy with staged Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) therapy could enhance health-related quality of life (QoL) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and prolong the time before deterioration of lung cancer symptoms, in comparison to chemotherapy alone. Methods: A prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was conducted from December 14, 2017 to August 28, 2020. A total of 180 patients with stage I B–IIIA NSCLC from 5 hospitals in Shanghai were randomly divided into chemotherapy combined with CHM (chemo+CHM) group (120 cases) or chemotherapy combined with placebo (chemo+placebo) group (60 cases) using stratified blocking randomization. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life-Core 30 Scale (QLQ-C30) was used to evaluate the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) during postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early-stage NSCLC. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed in the safety analysis. Results: Out of the total 180 patients, 173 patients (116 in the chemo+CHM group and 57 in the chemo+placebo group) were included in the PRO analyses. The initial mean QLQ-C30 Global Health Status (GHS)/QoL scores at baseline were 57.16 ± 1.64 and 57.67 ± 2.25 for the two respective groups (P>0.05). Compared with baseline, the chemo+CHM group had an improvement in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL score at week 18 [least squares mean (LSM) change 17.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 14.29 to 21.38]. Conversely, the chemo+placebo group had a decrease in the score (LSM change −13.67, 95% CI −22.70 to −4.63). A significant between-group difference in the LSM GHS/QoL score was observed, amounting to 31.63 points (95% CI 25.61 to 37.64, P<0.001). The similar trends were observed in physical functioning, fatigue and appetite loss. At week 18, patients in the chemo+CHM group had a higher proportion of improvement or stabilization in GHS/QoL functional and symptom scores compared to chemo+placebo group (P<0.001). The median time to deterioration was longer in the chemo+CHM group for GHS/QoL score [hazard ratio (HR)=0.33, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.48, P<0.0010], physical functioning (HR=0.43, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.75, P=0.0005), fatigue (HR=0.47, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.72, P<0.0001) and appetite loss (HR=0.65, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.00, P=0.0215). The incidence of AEs was lower in the chemo+CHM group than in the chemo+placebo group (9.83% vs. 15.79%, P=0.52). Conclusion: The staged CHM therapy could help improve the PROs of postoperative patients with early-stage NSCLC during adjuvant chemotherapy, which is worthy of further clinical research. (Registry No. NCT03372694) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF