1. Establishing and reporting content validity evidence of periodic objective treatment review and nursing evaluation.
- Author
-
Varghese, Daniel and Timmons, David
- Subjects
NURSING ,PERFORMANCE evaluation ,MENTAL health services ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,TEST validity - Abstract
Objective: To design, create and validate an evaluation tool to measure progress of the patient within the national forensic mental health service. Methods: A methodological study with two sequential stages was used for this study. Stage 1 was the instrument development; stage 2 was expert judgment and each for these stages had 3 steps. Results: The 28-item questionnaire was submitted to 20 experts. Both descriptive and quantitative analysis were undertaken. The descriptive analysis included item ambiguity, median and percentage agreement. The quantitative method included a content validity index, content validity ratio and content validity coefficient. The acceptable values for item ambiguity, median and percentage agreement, content validity index, content validity ratio and content validity coefficient were a range of 3 or more between scores, median of 2.75 and above, 80 percent criterion, 0.79, 0.75 and 0.79 respectively. Conclusion: The 28-item tool met all the set criteria for content validity meeting the parameters established in the literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF